Tolerant pattern recognition: evidence from phonotactic responses in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus (de Geer)

Sound processing in the cricket brain: evidence for a pulse duration filter

The auditory system of female crickets allows them to specifically recognize and approach the species-specific male calling song, defined by sound pulses and silent intervals. Auditory brain neurons form a delay-line and coincidence detector network tuned to the pulse period of the male song. We analyzed the impact of changes in pulse duration on the behavior and the responses of the auditory neurons and the network. We confirm that the ascending neuron AN1 and the local neuron LN2 copy the temporal structure of the song. During ongoing long sound pulses, the delay-line neuron LN5 shows additional rebound responses and the coincidence detector neuron LN3 can generate additional bursts of activity, indicating that these may be driven by intrinsic oscillations of the network. Moreover, the response of the feature detector neuron LN4 is shaped by a combination of inhibitory and excitatory synaptic inputs, and LN4 responds even to long sound pulses with a short depolarization and burst of spikes, like to a sound pulse of natural duration. This response property of LN4 indicates a selective auditory pulse duration filter mechanism of the pattern recognition network, which is tuned to the duration of natural pulses. Comparing the tuning of the phonotactic behavior with the tuning of the local auditory brain neurons to the same test patterns, we find no evidence that a modulation of the phonotactic behavior is reflected at the level of the feature detector neurons. This rather suggests that steering to nonattractive pulse patterns is organized at the thoracic level.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Pulse period selectivity has been reported for the cricket delay-line and coincidence detector network, whereas pulse duration selectivity is evident from behavioral tests. Pulses of increasing duration elicit responses in the pattern recognition neurons, which do not parallel the behavioral responses and indicate additional processing mechanisms. Long sound pulses elicit rhythmic rebound activity and additional bursts, whereas the feature detector neuron reveals a pulse duration filter, expanding our understanding of the pattern recognition process.

Response properties of spiking and non-spiking brain neurons mirror pulse interval selectivity

In the bispotted field cricket auditory pulse pattern recognition of the species-specific calling song is based on a delay-line and coincidence detection network, established by the activity and synaptic connections of only 5 auditory neurons in the brain. To obtain a more detailed understanding of the network and the dynamic of the neural activity over time we analyzed the response properties of these neurons to test patterns, in which the pulse duration was kept constant while the duration of specific pulse intervals was systematically altered. We confirm that the ascending interneuron AN1 and the local interneuron LN2 copy the structure of the pulse pattern, however with limited resolution at short pulse intervals, further evident in downstream neural responses. In the non-spiking delay-line interneuron LN5 during long pulse intervals full-blown rebound potentials develop over a time course of 35–70 ms. LN5 also reveals an overall increase in its membrane potential tuned to chirps of the calling song pulse pattern. This may contribute to the pattern recognition process by driving the activity of the coincidence-detector LN3 and may indicate a further function of the delay-line neuron LN5. The activity of LN3 and of the feature detector LN4 match the tuning of the phonotactic behavior and demonstrate an increasingly sparse coding of the calling song pulse patterns as evident in the response of the feature detector LN4. The circuitry reveals a fundamental mechanism of auditory pattern recognition and demonstrates a principle of neuronal coding.