Evidence of attack deflection suggests adaptive evolution of wing tails in butterflies

When a glimpse is enough: Partial mimicry of jumping spiders by insects

Many flies and moths mimic the frontal appearance of jumping spiders. This type of mimicry, which we term as partial mimicry, can be distinguished from Batesian mimicry since the mimic has spider resembling patterns only in certain parts of the body, and not the entire body. The presence of spider-like patterns is obvious only at certain angles suggesting that the mimic is frequently targeted by its predators from particular angles. We tested this hypothesis using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks (DCNNs). First, we trained the network on images of forward facing jumping spiders, where features such as the large principal eyes, small lateral eyes and outstretched legs were evident. Then we tested the classifier on images of jumping spider mimicking flies and moths. A probability value according to the likelihood of the image being a jumping spider or not was assigned by the classifier. We show that the classifier was more likely to misidentify mimicking flies and moths as jumping spiders, but that this probability varied according to the species tested. We further tested it on images of flies from different angles and by taking into consideration the visual acuity of potential predators. Our results suggest that neural networks can be efficient tools for testing evolutionary hypotheses, and that partial mimicry may be a result of the effect of the signaling angle and orientation of the mimics in combination with the likelihood that predators may depend on cognitive shortcuts to identify insects as prey. Further experiments incorporating the properties of the visual system of predators (such as vision in ultraviolet) would result in a better understanding of the evolution of partial mimicry.

Testing bird-driven diurnal trade-offs of the moon moth's anti-bat tail

Traits are often caught in a dynamic tension of countervailing evolutionary pressures. Trade-offs can be imposed by predators evolutionarily curtailing the conspicuousness of a sexually selected trait, or acting in opposition to another natural selection pressure, for instance, a different predator with a divergent hunting strategy. Some moon moths (Saturniidae) have long hindwing tails that thwart echolocating bat attacks at night, allowing the moth to escape. These long tails may come at a cost, however, if they make the moth's roosting form more conspicuous to visually foraging predators during the day. To test this potential trade-off, we offered wild-caught Carolina wrens (Thryothorus ludovicianus) pastry dough models with real Actias luna wings that were either intact or had tails experimentally removed. We video recorded wrens foraging on models and found that moth models with tails did not experience increased detection and attack by birds. Thus, this elaborate trait, while obvious to human observers, does not seem to come at a cost of increased avian predator attention. The evolution of long hindwing tails, likely driven by echolocating predators at night, does not seem to be limited by opposing diurnal constraints. This study demonstrates the importance of testing presumed trade-offs and provides hypotheses for future testing.

Shape of Evasive Prey Can Be an Important Cue That Triggers Learning in Avian Predators

Advertising escape ability could reduce predatory attacks. However, the effectiveness of certain phenotypic cues (e.g., color, shape, and size) in signaling evasiveness is still unknown. Understanding the role of such signals in driving predator learning is important to infer the evolutionary mechanisms leading to convergent evasiveness signals among prey species (i.e., evasive mimicry). We aim to understand the role of the color pattern (white patches on dark background) and morphology (extended butterfly hindwings) in driving learning and avoidance of escaping prey by surrogate avian predators, the European blue tit. These cues are common in butterflies and have been suspected to advertise escape ability in nature. We use dummy butterflies harboring shape and color patterns commonly found in skippers (family Hesperiidae). The prey models displayed the studied phenotypical cues (hindwing tails and white bands) in factorial combinations, and we tested whether those cues were learned as evasive signals and were generalised to different phenotypes. Our results suggest that hindwing tails and white bands can be associated with prey evasiveness. In addition, wild blue tits might learn and avoid attacking prey models bearing the studied phenotypic cues. Although blue tits seem to have an initial preference for the phenotype consisting of white patches and hindwing tails, the probability of attacking it was substantially reduced once the cues were associated with escaping ability. This suggests that the same morphological cues might be interchangeable as preference/avoidance signals. Further investigation of the salience of hindwing tails vs. white bands as cues for escaping ability, revealed that predators can associate both color pattern and shape to the difficulty of capture, and possibly generalize their aversion to other prey harboring those cues. More studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm this trend. Altogether, our results highlight the hitherto overlooked role of shape (butterfly hindwing tails) for signaling prey unprofitability.