Segment 2 from influenza A(H1N1) 2009 pandemic viruses confers temperature-sensitive haemagglutinin yield on candidate vaccine virus growth in eggs that can be epistatically complemented by PB2 701D

DEVELOPMENT OF REASSORTANT INFLUENZA VACCINES: CLASSICAL REASSORTMENT OR REVERSE GENETICS?

An important feature of influenza vaccines, which distinguishes them from other immunobiological preparations, is that they have no fixed composition. Due to the constant influenza virus antigenic variability, production facilities require timely supply with relevant vaccine strains undoable due to the lack of proper method for the convenient, rapid and uninterrupted development of vaccine strains. Among the licensed influenza vaccines, classical inactivated and live influenza vaccines hold a special place. They are based on reassortant vaccine strains obtained by crossing currently circulating influenza virus with the so-called donor strain (cold-adapted attenuation donor for live influenza vaccines or high yield donor for inactivated vaccines). Vaccine strains for licensed live attenuated influenza vaccines are reassortants with the so-called 6:2 genome formula two genes encoding hemagglutinin and neuraminidase (HA and NA) belong to the current epidemic virus, and six genes encoding internal proteins (PB2, PB1, PA, NP, M and NS) to cold-adapted master donor virus. There is a very limited number of donors of attenuation. In Russia, there are cold-adapted viruses A/Leningrad/134/17/57 (H2N2) and B/USSR/60/69; in the USA (MedImmune) there are viruses A/Ann Arbor/6/60ca (H2N2) and B/Ann Arbor/1/66ca. MedImmune produces vaccine strains using reverse genetics technique. For other countries, this approach for obtaining vaccines is limited due to the need to purchase a license from the patent holders. In Russia, genetic manipulations with strains for the seasonal live influenza vaccine are not yet allowed; reassortants for the Russian live influenza vaccine are created only by classical reassortment in embryonated chicken eggs. Vaccine candidates for the inactivated influenza vaccine are prepared by the classical reassortment method, the requirements for them are more flexible and allow to use diverse genes combinations from wild type virus and master donor virus. High-yielding viruses such as A/PR/8/34 (H1N1), A/Texas/1/77 (H3N2), B/Lee/40 and some others are used as donors of internal genes. Unfortunately, the classical reassortment method does not always allow to promptly obtain a reassortant virus with a 6:2 genome formula. This is hindered by a number of reasons, ranging from the unique properties of a certain epidemic virus ending up with the constellation of genes. The reverse genetics method based on plasmids is an alternative approach to create reassortant vaccine strains allowing to reliably and quickly obtain reassortant viruses of a set 6:2 genome formula. However, this method also has certain weaknesses. This review discusses the advantages and disadvantages of development of conventional influenza vaccine candidates by reverse genetics and classical reassortment in developing chick embryos.

Current Opinion in LAIV: A Matter of Parent Virus Choice

Influenza is still a frequent seasonal infection of the upper respiratory tract, which may have deadly consequences, especially for the elderly. This is in spite of the availability of vaccines suggested for persons above 65 years of age. Two types of conventional influenza vaccines are currently licensed for use-live attenuated and inactivated vaccines. Depending on local regulatory requirements, live attenuated vaccines are produced by the reverse genetics technique or by classical reassortment in embryonated chicken eggs. Sometimes, the efficiency of classical reassortment is complicated by certain properties of the wild-type parent virus. Cases of low efficacy of vaccines have been noted, which, among other reasons, may be associated with suboptimal properties of the wild-type parent virus that are not considered when recommendations for influenza vaccine composition are made. Unfortunately, knowledge surrounding the roles of properties of the circulating influenza virus and its impact on the efficacy of the reassortment process, vaccination efficiency, the infectivity of the vaccine candidates, etc., is now scattered in different publications. This review summarizes the main features of the influenza virus that may dramatically affect different aspects of the preparation of egg-derived live attenuated vaccine candidates and their effectiveness. The author expresses her personal view, which may not coincide with the opinion of other experts in the field of influenza vaccines.

The inactivated vaccine of reassortant H3N2 canine influenza virus based on internal gene cassette from PR8 is safe and effective

Canine influenza (CI) is a contagious respiratory disease in dogs, which poses a threat to canine health. A safe, high-yield vaccine seed virus is critical for CI vaccine development. We developed a PR8-based reassortant H3N2 canine influenza virus (RT CIV) using the reverse genetic method and evaluated its yield in canine kidney epithelial (MDCK) cells, Vero cells, and specific pathogen-free (SPF) chicken embryos. Mice and dogs were infected with RT CIV, and the pathogenicity was evaluated. The viral titers of RT CIV increased in MDCK cells, Vero cells, and SPF chicken embryos; the HA yield in SPF chicken embryos increased 4-fold. However, RT CIV was not lethal to mice, and it showed similar virulence as wild-type CIV. RT CIV also showed minimal pathogenicity in dogs, which manifested as mild fever and rhinorrhea for the first two days post-infection. Thus, RT CIV carrying the internal gene cassette from PR8 showed almost no pathogenicity in dogs. And the reassortant virus inactivated vaccine could provide complete protection against H3N2 CIV. To our knowledge, this is the first report on the pathogenicity of PR8-based reassortant H3N2 CIV in dogs. These studies are relevant for developing a high-yield and safe CI vaccine.