In vitro activities of tedizolid compared with other antibiotics against Gram-positive pathogens associated with hospital-acquired pneumonia, skin and soft tissue infection and bloodstream infection collected from 26 hospitals in China

Multi-year comparison of VITEK MS performance for identification of rarely encountered pathogenic gram-positive organisms (GPOs) in a large integrated Canadian healthcare region

This multi-year study (2014-2019) compared identification of rare and unusual gram-positive organisms (GPOs) by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) (VITEK MS; bioMérieux, Laval, Quebec) to 16S rRNA gene sequencing (16S) according to our laboratory routine workflow. 16S is done if initial MALDI-TOF MS results are discordant or wrong, or there are no results. GPO isolates were first analyzed by standard phenotypic methods and MALDI-TOF MS using direct deposit with full formic acid extraction; MALDI-TOF was repeated if no result occurred. Medically approved 16S analyses were done using fast protocols. Isolate sequences were analyzed using the Integrated Database Network System bacterial database (SmartGene, Lausanne, Switzerland). 655 GPO isolates were recovered from 648 specimens; >1 isolate was recovered from 7 (1%). A total of 451 (68.9%) aerobic gram-positive bacilli (GPBs) and 204 (31.1%) aerobic gram-positive cocci (GPCs) were mainly recovered from bloodstream infections (35%), sterile fluids and deep tissues (35%), and abscesses/deep wounds (17%). Accurate genus vs species identities were obtained for 59% and 49.4% GPB, and 81% and 53.9% GPC, respectively. Wrong or no results were obtained for 9% and 31% of GPB and 7% and 12% of GPC; 15% of GPBs and 5.3% of GPC identification errors occurred due to absence from the instrument's database. VITEK MS performance remained stable for GPB and GPC isolates due to few species additions to the database. VITEK MS databases need to be continually updated to include an increasing number of rare and unusual GPOs causing invasive human infections. 16S remains important for identification of GPOs where MALDI-TOF fails.IMPORTANCEMALDI-TOF MS has transformed the identification of commonly encountered GPOs in the clinical laboratory, but rare and unusual bacteria continue to challenge the technology. This study verified the performance of VITEK MS for identification of a broad range of rare and unusual clinical GPO isolates by our large reference laboratory workflow over a multi-year period. Although most GPOs were accurately identified by MALDI-TOF MS, a small number of common GPC isolates (6.3%) (i.e., Enterococcus/Staphylococcus/Streptococcus) requiring sequencing for identification were studied. Approximately 13% of aerobic GPBs and 5.3% of GPCs could not be accurately identified by MALDI-TOF due to lack of an organism in the instrument's database. MALDI-TOF MS databases should be continuously updated and validated, and laboratories should have a workflow for the identification of unusual or rarely encountered GPOs that includes 16S rRNA gene sequencing whenever MALDI-TOF cannot give a definitive identification.

Global prevalence of macrolide-resistant Staphylococcus spp.: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Staphylococcus is a genus of bacteria responsible for various infections ranging from mild skin to severe systemic diseases. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) are significant challenges owing to their resistance to multiple antibiotics, including macrolides, such as erythromycin, clarithromycin, and azithromycin.

Objective

This study aimed to systematically review and synthesize data on the prevalence of macrolide resistance in Staphylococcus spp., identify trends and changes in resistance patterns over time, and assess how testing methods and guidelines affect reported resistance rates.

Methods

The study conducted a systematic search of the Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases. Studies have reported the proportion of macrolide-resistant Staphylococcus spp. Two authors independently extracted and analyzed the data using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed, and subgroup analyses were performed based on country, continent, species, AST guidelines, methods, and period.

Results

In total, 223 studies from 76 countries were included. The pooled prevalence of resistance to erythromycin, clarithromycin, and azithromycin were 57.3, 52.6, and 57.9%, respectively. Significant heterogeneity was observed across studies (I2 > 95%, p < 0.001). Oceania (72%) had the highest erythromycin resistance, whereas Europe had the lowest (40.7%). Subgroup analyses revealed variations in resistance based on the species, with higher resistance in MRSA than in MSSA and CoNS than in other species. Over time, a slight decrease in erythromycin resistance has been observed (59.6% from 2015-2019 to 55% from 2020-2023).

Conclusion

This study emphasizes the high prevalence of macrolide resistance in Staphylococcus spp. and its notable regional variation. These findings highlight the necessity for standardized methodologies and global surveillance to manage macrolide resistance effectively. Controlling antibiotic resistance should prioritize enhancing public health measures and updating treatment guidelines.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=557756, CRD42024557756.

Phenotypic and Genotypic Assays to Evaluate Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci Biofilm Production in Bloodstream Infections

Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) are commensal on human body surfaces and, for years, they were not considered a cause of bloodstream infection and were often regarded as contamination. However, the involvement of CoNS in nosocomial infection is increasingly being recognized. The insertion of cannulas and intravascular catheters represents the primary source of CoNS entry into the bloodstream, causing bacteremia and sepsis. They owe their pathogenic role to their ability to produce biofilms on surfaces, such as medical devices. In this study, we evaluate the adhesive capacity of CoNS isolated from blood cultures by comparing a spectrophotometric phenotypic assay with genotypic analysis based on the evidence of the ica operon. We retrospectively reviewed the database of CoNS isolated from blood cultures from January to December 2021 that were considered responsible for 361 bloodstream infections. Eighty-nine CoNS were selected among these. Our data show that Staphylococcus epidermidis was the predominant species isolated, expressing greater adhesive capacities, especially those with the complete operon. Knowledge of the adhesive capabilities of a microorganism responsible for sepsis can be useful in implementing appropriate corrective and preventive measures, since conventional antibiotic therapy cannot effectively eradicate biofilms.

Antibacterial activity of recently approved antibiotics against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections are considered an important public health problem, and treatment options are limited. Accordingly, in this meta-analysis, we analyzed published studies to survey in vitro activity of recently approved antibiotics against MRSA isolates.

Methods

We searched electronic databases; PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to identify relevant studies (until November 30, 2020) that have focused on the in vitro activity of telavancin, dalbavancin, oritavancin, and tedizolid against MRSA isolates. Statistical analyses were conducted using STATA software (version 14.0).

Results

Thirty-eight studies were included in this meta-analysis. Overall in vitro activity of tedizolid on 12,204 MRSA isolates was 0.250 and 0.5 µg/mL for MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀, (minimum inhibitory concentration at which 50% and 90% of isolates were inhibited, respectively), respectively. The overall antibacterial activity of dalbavancin on 28539 MRSA isolates was 0.060 and 0.120 µg/mL for MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀, respectively. The overall antibacterial activity of oritavancin on 420 MRSA isolates was 0.045 and 0.120 µg/mL for MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀, respectively. The overall antibacterial activity of telavancin on 7353 MRSA isolates was 0.032 and 0.060 µg/mL for MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀, respectively. The pooled prevalence of tedizolid, telavancin, and dalbavancin susceptibility was 100% (95% CI: 100–100).

Conclusion

Telavancin, dalbavancin, oritavancin, and tedizolid had potent in vitro activity against MRSA isolates. The low MICs and high susceptibility rates of these antibiotics recommend a hopeful direction to introduce useful antibiotics in treating MRSA infections in the future.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12941-022-00529-z.

Epidemiology and Pathogenesis of Staphylococcus Bloodstream Infections in Humans: a Review

Staphylococci are among the most frequent human microbiota components associated with the high level of bloodstream infection (BSI) episodes. In predisposed patients, there is a high risk of transformation of BSI episodes to sepsis. Both bacterial and host factors are crucial for the outcomes of BSI and sepsis. The highest rates of BSI episodes were reported in Africa, where these infections were up to twice as high as the European rates. However, there remains a great need to analyze African data for comprehensive quantification of staphylococcal BSI prevalence. The lowest rates of BSI exist in Australia. Asian, European, and North American data showed similar frequency values. Worldwide analysis indicated that both Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) are the most frequent BSI agents. In the second group, the most prevalent species was Staphylococcus epidermidis, although CoNS were not identified at the species level in many studies. The lack of a significant worldwide decrease in BSI episodes indicates a great need to implement standardized diagnostic methods and research etiological factors using advanced genetic methods.

Investigating the efficacy and safety of mineral smectite granules on wound healing

Mineral smectite granules have traditionally been used for diarrhea and gastrointestinal bleeding; however, the wound healing ability of mineral smectite granules has not been investigated in detail. Therefore, the present study explored the efficacy and safety of mineral smectite granules on wound healing. An excision wound rat model was established. The experimental group was treated with smectite granules, the positive control group was treated with starch and the blank control group was left untreated. Wound closure rates, wound healing times and histopathological analysis were compared among the three groups. The mechanism underlying the effects of mineral smectite granules on wound healing was assessed by performing picrosirius red staining and immunohistochemical staining and measuring hydroxyproline content. Based on wound closure rates, wound healing times and histopathological analysis, the results indicated that rats treated with smectite granules displayed increased wound healing efficacy compared with the other two groups. Investigation of the underlying mechanism suggested that mineral smectite granules could promote wound healing by inducing collagen fiber synthesis and increasing the number of neovessels. The present study indicated the efficacy and safety of mineral smectite granules on wound healing and provided a theoretical basis for its application in a clinical setting.

Microbial Predominance and Antimicrobial Resistance in a Tertiary Hospital in Northwest China: A Six-Year Retrospective Study of Outpatients and Patients Visiting the Emergency Department

Background

With the wide use of antibiotics, antimicrobial resistance becomes a serious issue. Timely understanding of microbial pathogen profiles and the change of antimicrobial resistance provide an important guidance for effective and optimized use of antibiotics in local healthcare systems. The aim was to investigate the characteristics of microbial species and their antimicrobial resistances in a tertiary hospital with an Emergency Department and outpatient clinics for a period of six years. Methodology. A retrospective study was conducted using the HIS database of a tertiary hospital between 2013 and 2018. Antimicrobial susceptibility was tested by automated systems and/or the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method. The data were analyzed using the WHONET 5.6 software. The Cochran-Armitage test was used to study the trends over the period of research.

Results

In a total of 19,028 specimens submitted for microbial tests during the period from 49 units of the hospital, only the samples from the Emergency Department and Kidney Transplantation Clinic showed an annually significant increase (P < 0.001). More than 200 species with 46.4% gram-positive cocci and 45.3% gram-negative bacilli were identified in the 3,849 nonrepetitive isolates. The methicillin-resistant S. aureus and S. epidermidis rates were 25.1% and 74.6%, respectively. 60.9% E. coli and 33.5% K. pneumonia samples carried extended-spectrum-β-lactamase. All Staphylococci and Enterococci samples were not resistant to linezolid, vancomycin, and tigecycline. In addition, only 0.01% E. coli, 1.1% K. pneumonia, and 18.7% P. aeruginosa isolates showed resistance to carbapenems.

Conclusions

Vancomycin, linezolid and tigecycline were the most effective antibiotics for outpatients with gram-positive infection. Carbapenems were the most effective antibiotics for gram-negative infection. There was no significant annual increase of common multidrug resistances.

Emerging drugs for treating methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Introduction: In clinical practice, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) represents a major threat and has been associated with high rates of inadequate antibiotic treatment and significant increases in morbidity, mortality, and overall healthcare costs. The association between the prescription of an inappropriate or delayed antibiotic and impaired clinical outcomes has been widely described. Areas covered: To address the threat of MRSA, many new therapeutic options with a peculiar activity against MRSA have been recently developed and approved. New agents are characterized by specific issues in terms of spectrum of activity, pharmacokinetics, risk of drug-drug interactions, and toxicity, with potential advantages that should be considered in everyday clinical practice. Expert opinion: The most attractive characteristic of new drugs is represented by the broad spectrum of activity against multidrug-resistant pathogens; moreover, new compounds in most cases are characterized by favorable toxicity profiles compared with old drugs currently used in clinical practice. Some of the new antimicrobials will be also available as oral formulations, with the potential for oral switch, even in infections due to resistant pathogens. In particular conditions/populations (e.g. liver failure, renal disease, pregnancy, diabetic, children, and elderly), novel antibiotics with reduced toxicity could be an important option, including after hospital discharge.

When to switch to an oral treatment and/or to discharge a patient with skin and soft tissue infections

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Skin and soft tissue infections prevalence is increasing and represent a frequent cause of hospital admission. New guidelines have become available in order to better define these infections and their response to antimicrobial treatment. Gram-positive bacteria, in particular Staphylococcus aureus, remain the most frequently isolated pathogens in skin and soft tissue infections. To treat complicated forms and infections caused by drug-resistant bacteria, hospital admission and administration of intravenous antibiotics are often required, impacting on healthcare costs and patients' morbidity.

RECENT FINDINGS

New therapeutic options offer efficacy against drug-resistant Gram-positive bacteria as well as potential to favor early patients' discharge, including the possibility for intravenous to oral switch and infrequent drug administration because of prolonged drug half-life. Although data from real-world studies on new antimicrobials is awaited, clinicians need clear direction on how to optimize the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections in order to avoid prolonged hospitalizations and extra costs. Early assessment of patient's clinical conditions and response to treatment appear useful in order to facilitate patients' discharge.

SUMMARY

We have reported the evidence for early intravenous to oral switch and early hospital discharge for patients with skin and soft tissue infections. New therapeutic options that represent promising tools in promoting an optimized management of these infections have also been reviewed.

The role of tedizolid in skin and soft tissue infections

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Tedizolid is a second-generation oxazolidinone with activity against Gram-positive bacteria, including MRSA isolates resistant to linezolid. Pivotal clinical trials showed that tedizolid at 200 mg once-daily for 6 days is not inferior to linezolid 600 mg twice daily for 10 days in patients with SSTI. The comparison of adverse events is favorable to tedizolid under the circumstances of the clinical trials. This is a review of recent literature on tedizolid, its use in special populations and potential adverse effects.

RECENT FINDINGS

Findings suggest that tedizolid can be used in SSTI in adolescents, those older than 65 years, obese individuals and patients with diabetic foot infections. Forthcoming research to determine the future uses of this drug in other clinical syndromes requires demonstration of tolerance whenever tedizolid is administered for longer than 6 days.We also speculate on missing data and potential future indications of tedizolid in the highly competitive field of the treatment of severe Gram-positive infections other than SSTI.

SUMMARY

Tedizolid is a second-generation oxazolidinone, very convenient for treatment of SSTI, in search for other indications including nosocomial pneumonia and bone and joint infections. VIDEO ABSTRACT.

Efficacy and Safety of Tedizolid Phosphate versus Linezolid in a Randomized Phase 3 Trial in Patients with Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infection

Tedizolid phosphate is approved for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection (ABSSSI) caused by Gram-positive bacteria in the United States, Europe, and other countries. In this multicenter, double-blind, phase 3 study, 598 adult ABSSSI patients in China, Taiwan, the Philippines, and the United States were randomized to receive 200 mg of tedizolid, intravenously (i.v.)/orally (p.o.), once daily for 6 days or 600 mg of linezolid, i.v./p.o.

Tedizolid phosphate is approved for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection (ABSSSI) caused by Gram-positive bacteria in the United States, Europe, and other countries. In this multicenter, double-blind, phase 3 study, 598 adult ABSSSI patients in China, Taiwan, the Philippines, and the United States were randomized to receive 200 mg of tedizolid, intravenously (i.v.)/orally (p.o.), once daily for 6 days or 600 mg of linezolid, i.v./p.o. twice daily for 10 days. The primary endpoint was early clinical response rate at 48 to 72 h. Secondary endpoints included programmatic and investigator-assessed outcomes at end-of-therapy (EOT) and posttherapy evaluation (PTE) visits. Safety was also evaluated. In the intent-to-treat (ITT) population, 75.3% of tedizolid-treated patients and 79.9% of linezolid-treated patients were early responders (treatment difference, –4.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], –11.2, 2.2). After exclusion of patients who never received the study drug (tedizolid, n = 8; linezolid, n = 1; modified ITT), comparable early response rates were observed (tedizolid, 77.4%; linezolid, 80.1%; treatment difference, –2.7%; 95% CI, –9.4, 3.9). Secondary endpoints showed high and similar clinical success rates in the ITT and clinically evaluable (CE) populations at EOT and PTE visits (e.g., CE-PTE for tedizolid, 90.4%; for linezolid, 93.5%). Both drugs were well tolerated, and no death occurred. Eight patients experienced phlebitis with tedizolid while none did with linezolid; hence, drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in a slightly higher proportion in the tedizolid (20.9%) arm than in the linezolid arm (15.8%). The study demonstrated that tedizolid in a primarily Asian population was an efficacious and well-tolerated treatment option for ABSSSI patients. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT02066402.)

Comparative in vitro potency and kill curve activity of tedizolid and linezolid against Gram-positive bacteria isolated from Chinese hospitalized patients in 2013-2016

We compared the kill-curve activity of tedizolid and linezolid at clinically relevant (total or free plasma, lung) concentrations against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae (PRSP) isolated from Chinese patients. Tedizolid had greater in vitro potency than linezolid against staphylococci, streptococci and enterococci species (tedizolid minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) range: ≤ 0.016-0.5 µg/mL; linezolid MIC range: 0.25-2 µg/mL). In kill-curve experiments, growth of MRSA was inhibited at tedizolid concentration of 0.6 µg/mL (i.e. 4.8 × MIC; MIC = 0.125 µg/mL) and linezolid concentration of 2 µg/mL (2× MIC; MIC = 1 µg/mL). Against PRSP, tedizolid at a concentration of 0.25 µg/mL (representing its MIC) was bacteriostatic, but exerted a bactericidal effect at higher concentrations. Results were similar for linezolid, however, even at 21 µg/mL, a small proportion of organisms survived beyond 24 h. The results demonstrated the potency of tedizolid against clinical strains of Gram-positive pathogens supporting its use as a suitable alternative to linezolid in Chinese patients.

New Antibiotics for Pneumonia

Delayed antimicrobial prescriptions and inappropriate treatment can lead to poor outcomes in pneumonia. In nosocomial infections, especially in countries reporting high rates of antimicrobial resistance, the presence of multidrug-resistant gram-negative and gam-positive bacteria can limit options for adequate antimicrobial treatment. New antibiotics, belonging to known classes of antimicrobials or characterized by novel mechanisms of actions, have recently been approved or are under development. Advantages of the new compounds include enhanced spectrum of activity against resistant bacteria, high lung penetration, good tolerability, and possibility for intravenous to oral sequential therapy. This article reviews characteristics of newly approved and investigational compounds.

Antimicrobial susceptibility among Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae collected globally between 2015 and 2017 as part of the Tigecycline Evaluation and Surveillance Trial (TEST)

Purpose: In order to understand the prevalence of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae globally and provide the basis for rational use of antimicrobials in clinical settings, in vitro activity of tigecycline and comparative agents was evaluated against 3929 S. pneumoniae and 4043 H. influenzae isolates obtained from 150 centers globally between 2015 and 2017 as a part of the Tigecycline Evaluation and Surveillance Trial (TEST). Methods: Broth microdilution methods were performed to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the isolates according to the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). The CLSI breakpoint was used to determine antimicrobial susceptibilities, except for that of tigecycline, for which the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) breakpoints were used. Results: More than 99% of S. pneumoniae isolates were susceptible to vancomycin (100%), linezolid (100%), tigecycline (99.9%), and levofloxacin (99.1%). Macrolides (erythromycin, azithromycin, and clarithromycin, 67.1-69.4% susceptibility globally) and penicillin (61.7% in globally) were the drugs with more resisitance to S. pneumoniae. Penicillin-intermediate and -resistant isolates were found in 24.8% and 13.6% of S. pneumoniae isolates. H. influenzae was highly susceptible (>98.7%) to all antibiotics tested except for ampicillin, for which susceptibility was 76.1%. The number of drugs with the lowest susceptibility calculated in Asia were far more than other regions, with 61.5% (8 in 13 drugs) in S. pneumoniae and 70.0% (7 in 10 drugs) in H. influenzae, respectively. Conclusions: Vancomycin, linezolid, tigecycline, and levofloxacin can be used as the first choice in the empirical therapy of infection disease caused by S. pneumoniae. But macrolides and penicillin should be used prudently in treatment of the infection caused by S. pneumoniae, as well as ampicillin treat the infection caused by H. influenzae. Asia was the region with the most severe resistance in S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae.

The Changing Pattern of Population Structure of Staphylococcus aureus from Bacteremia in China from 2013 to 2016: ST239-030-MRSA Replaced by ST59-t437

To investigate the epidemiology and genetic structure of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in China, a total of 416 isolates from 22 teaching hospitals in 12 cities from 2013 and 2016 were characterized by antibiogram analysis, multilocus sequence typing (MLST), spa typing and staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) typing. The predominant meticillin-susceptible (MSSA) genotypes in 2013 were ST188 (19.1%), ST7 (8.7%), and ST398 (7.8%), respectively, and they continued to be the main genotypes in 2016. The prevalence of meticillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) were 36.5% (66/181) and 36.6% (86/235) in 2013 and 2016, respectively. Interestingly, the susceptibility rates of MRSA to rifampicin and fluoroquinolones increased significantly from 2013 to 2016 (P < 0.01), and this was associated with changes in genetic structure. ST239-t030-MRSA, the predominant genotype among all MRSAs in 2013 (34.8%), was replaced by ST59-t437-MRSA (15.1%) in 2016. Further analysis revealed that the ST239-t030-MRSA were more resistant to rifampicin, tetracycline and fluoroquinolones than ST59-t437-MRSA (P < 0.01). To further gain insight into the mechanisms underlying the changes of genetic structure, in vitro competition and fitness measurements were performed. Importantly, ST239-t030-MRSA displayed lower growth rate and lower competitive advantage compared to ST59-t437-MRSA. Together, our findings reveal that fitness advantage of ST59-t437-MRSA over ST239-t030-MRSA may lead to changes in genetic structure and increased susceptibility of MRSA to rifampicin and fluoroquinolones in Chinese patients with S. aureus bacteremia. Our study supports temporal dynamics in MRSA clone diversities, further providing critical insights into the importance of continued monitoring of MRSA.

What is new in the management of skin and soft tissue infections in 2016?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) are the most frequent infectious cause of referrals to emergency departments and hospital admissions in developed world, contributing to significant morbidity and healthcare expenditures. We sought to review recent literature covering epidemiology and management of SSTIs.

RECENT FINDINGS

Incidence trends of SSTIs were increasing worldwide with Staphylococcus aureus and streptococci predominating and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) posing additional challenges, because of high rates of treatment failure and relapse. Development of new antimicrobials was associated with an appraisal of regulatory definitions and endpoints. Prediction of clinical response can be very tricky, because of variable risk factors for recurrence or treatment failure, depending mostly on the host. Precise indications for new antimicrobials should be established; their integration into clinical practice algorithms may serve reduction of unnecessary admissions, overtreatment and total costs.

SUMMARY

New antimicrobials with activity against MRSA have been recently launched. Long-acting agents, mainly oritavancin and dalbavancin, provide the opportunity of single-dose treatment and early discharge. Further outpatient treatment options include new per os antibiotics such as oxazolidinones. Validated assessment tools are urgently needed to support decision-making toward rational resource utilization and delivery of optimal treatment.

The emerging problem of linezolid-resistant enterococci

Enterococcus is a significant pathogen in numerous infections, particularly in nosocomial infections, and is thus a great challenge to clinicians. Linezolid (LNZ), an oxazolidinone antibiotic, is an important therapeutic option for infections caused by Gram-positive bacterial pathogens, especially vancomycin-resistant enterococci. A systematic review was performed of the available literature on LNZ-resistant enterococci (LRE) to characterise these infections with respect to epidemiological, microbiological and clinical features. The results validated the potency of LNZ against enterococcal infections, with a sustained susceptibility rate of 99.8% in ZAAPS and 99.2% in LEADER surveillance programmes. Patients with LRE had been predominantly exposed to LNZ prior to isolation of LRE, with a mean treatment duration of 29.8±48.8days for Enterococcus faecalis and 23.1±21.4days for Enterococcus faecium. Paradoxically, LRE could also develop in patients without prior LNZ exposure. LNZ resistance was attributed to 23S rRNA (G2576T) mutations (51.2% of E. faecalis and 80.5% of E. faecium) as well as presence of the cfr gene (4.7% and 4.8%, respectively), which could transfer horizontally among the strains. In addition to the cfr gene, 32 cases of optrA-positive LRE were identified. Further study is required to determine the prevalence of novel resistance genes. The emergence of LRE thus hampers the treatment of such infections, which warrants worldwide surveillance.

Antimicrobial activity among gram-positive and gram-negative organisms collected from the Asia-Pacific region as part of the Tigecycline Evaluation and Surveillance Trial: Comparison of 2015 results with previous years

We report the in vitro activity of tigecycline and comparators against Gram-negative and Gram-positive organisms collected from Asia-Pacific during 2004-2010 and 2015. MICs were determined by broth microdilution using CLSI guidelines. Antimicrobial susceptibility was assessed using CLSI breakpoints, except for tigecycline FDA breakpoints. For Acinetobacter baumannii, multidrug-resistant (MDR) rates were 81.8% in 2015 and 48.5% during 2004-2010. Among Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae respectively, rates of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producers in 2015 were 24.6% and 15.8%, and during 2004-2010, 21.6% and 23.8%. Pseudomonas aeruginosa MDR rates were 12.7% in 2015 and 18.5% during 2004-2010. For Staphylococcus aureus, 57.1% were methicillin-resistant in 2015 and 46.3% between 2004 and 2010. For Streptococcus pneumoniae, 32.1% were penicillin-resistant in 2015 and 29.9% between 2004 and 2010. Tigecycline MIC₉₀ values were ≤2mg/L against all species except P. aeruginosa, against which tigecycline is inactive. Antimicrobial resistance in Asia-Pacific is widespread, including a concerning increase in MDR A. baumannii.