Rapid macrolide and amikacin resistance testing for Mycobacterium abscessus in people with cystic fibrosis

Cystic Fibrosis-Related Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Pulmonary Disease

Non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) infection is a major cause of morbidity in people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) with rates of infection increasing worldwide. Accurate diagnosis and decisions surrounding best management remain challenging. Treatment guidelines have been developed to assist physicians in managing NTM in pwCF, but involve prolonged and complex mycobacterial regimens, often associated with significant toxicity. Fortunately, current management and outcomes of NTM in CF are likely to evolve due to improved understanding of disease acquisition, better diagnostics, emerging antimycobacterial therapies, and the widespread uptake of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator therapies.

Nontuberculous Mycobacteria in Cystic Fibrosis in the Era of Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Regulator Modulators

Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are a group of mycobacteria which represent opportunistic pathogens that are of increasing concern in people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF). The acquisition has been traditionally though to be from environmental sources, though recent work has suggested clustered clonal infections do occur and transmission potential demonstrated among pwCF attending CF specialist centers. Guidelines for the screening, diagnosis, and identification of NTM and management of pwCF have been published. The emergence of CF-specific therapies, in particular cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator (CFTR) modulator drugs, have led to significant improvement in the health and well-being of pwCF and may lead to challenges in sampling the lower respiratory tract including to screen for NTM. This review highlights the epidemiology, modes of acquisition, screening and diagnosis, therapeutic approaches in the context of improved clinical status for pwCF, and the clinical application of CFTR modulator therapies.

Detection of Mixed Populations of Clarithromycin-Susceptible and -Resistant Mycobacterium abscessus Strains

Clarithromycin resistance in Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. abscessus, massiliense, and bolletii occurs through induction of erm(41) or mutations in rrl (23S rRNA) genes. Phenotypic detection of clarithromycin resistance is hindered by the need for extended incubation as well as co-occurrence of mixed populations of M. abscessus with different susceptibility profiles. We developed a quantitative EvaGreen-based droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) scheme for rapid detection of full-length or truncated erm(41) and a probe based ddPCR screening assay for assessment of 23S rRNA rrl mutational resistance. We tested 100 M. abscessus strains, synthetic mixes with different susceptibility profiles, and 13 positive MGIT samples. Truncated and full-length erm(41) genes were detected in 27/100 and 73/100 strains and 4/13 and 9/13 MGIT samples, respectively yielding a sensitivity and specificity of 100%. Clarithromycin resistance mutations in rrl were detected in 26/100 isolates, i.e., A2058G (18/100), A2058C (7/100), and A2059G (1/100), and in 3/13 MGIT samples, i.e., A2058G (2/13) and A2059G (1/13). A screening assay of rrl ddPCR (A2058A/A2058G probes) showed 100% sensitivity in detecting the wild type or A2058G mutation as well as identifying samples requiring further testing. Upon inclusion of additional ddPCR assays, we were able to detect A2058C and A2059G clarithromycin resistance-conferring mutations in the rrl gene. Our ddPCR scheme can differentiate between full-length and truncated erm(41) and identify clarithromycin resistance-conferring mutations in the rrl gene from clinical isolates and positive MGIT samples as well as deconvolute and quantitate mixed populations of M. abscessus with different clarithromycin resistance traits.

In vitro efficacy of relebactam versus avibactam against Mycobacterium abscessus complex

Infections resulting from Mycobacterium abscessus are increasing in prevalence worldwide, with the greatest risk posed to patients with underlying respiratory conditions. Treatment for infections is difficult due to wide ranging intrinsic antimicrobial resistance, which is compounded by the existence of a range of subspecies within the M. abscessus complex, each with varying additional antimicrobial resistance profiles. Previously, the use of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors within a combination therapy has been proposed as an effective treatment option for pulmonary M. abscessus infections. Here, we assess the in vitro efficacy of two non-β-lactam based inhibitors, relebactam and avibactam, as agents against M. abscessus with their respective partner drugs imipenem and ceftazidime, as well as in triplicate combinations with additional β-lactam antibiotics against the M. abscessus complex. We have shown that the commercially available ratio of imipenem to relebactam is the appropriate ratio for bactericidal activity against M. abscessus, whereas the ratio between ceftazidime and avibactam is redundant, due to inactivity of ceftazidime to inhibit the bacteria. We have identified that the use of imipenem and meropenem alongside either relebactam or avibactam yield low minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBC) for each M. abscessus subspecies, which are within the therapeutically achievable concentration ranges within the epithelial lining fluid of the lungs. We propose the implementation of imipenem with relebactam in place of stand-alone imipenem into the current treatment regime, alongside meropenem, as a future front-line treatment option for M. abscessus complex infections.