1
|
Kerek Á, Román I, Szabó Á, Kovács D, Kardos G, Kovács L, Jerzsele Á. Antibiotic resistance genes in Escherichia coli - literature review. Crit Rev Microbiol 2025:1-35. [PMID: 40249005 DOI: 10.1080/1040841x.2025.2492156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2023] [Revised: 03/25/2025] [Accepted: 04/07/2025] [Indexed: 04/19/2025]
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance threatens humans and animals worldwide and is recognized as one of the leading global public health issues. Escherichia coli (E. coli) has an unquestionable role in carrying and transmitting antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs), which in many cases are encoded on plasmids or phage, thus creating the potential for horizontal gene transfer. In this literature review, the authors summarize the major antibiotic resistance genes occurring in E. coli bacteria, through the major antibiotic classes. The aim was not only listing the resistance genes against the clinically relevant antibiotics, used in the treatment of E. coli infections, but also to cover the entire resistance gene carriage in E. coli, providing a more complete picture. We started with the long-standing antibiotic groups (beta-lactams, aminoglycosides, tetracyclines, sulfonamides and diaminopyrimidines), then moved toward the newer groups (phenicols, peptides, fluoroquinolones, nitrofurans and nitroimidazoles), and in every group we summarized the resistance genes grouped by the mechanism of their action (enzymatic inactivation, antibiotic efflux, reduced permeability, etc.). We observed that the frequency of antibiotic resistance mechanisms changes in the different groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ádám Kerek
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Veterinary Medicine Budapest, Budapest, Hungary
- National Laboratory of Infectious Animal Diseases, Antimicrobial Resistance, Veterinary Public Health and Food Chain Safety, University of Veterinary Medicine Budapest, Budapest, Hungary
| | - István Román
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Veterinary Medicine Budapest, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Ábel Szabó
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Veterinary Medicine Budapest, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Dóra Kovács
- National Laboratory of Infectious Animal Diseases, Antimicrobial Resistance, Veterinary Public Health and Food Chain Safety, University of Veterinary Medicine Budapest, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Gábor Kardos
- One Health Institute, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
- National Public Health Center, Budapest, Hungary
- Department of Gerontology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Debrecen, Nyíregyháza, Hungary
| | - László Kovács
- National Laboratory of Infectious Animal Diseases, Antimicrobial Resistance, Veterinary Public Health and Food Chain Safety, University of Veterinary Medicine Budapest, Budapest, Hungary
- Department of Animal Hygiene, Herd Health and Mobile Clinic, University of Veterinary Medicine, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Ákos Jerzsele
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Veterinary Medicine Budapest, Budapest, Hungary
- National Laboratory of Infectious Animal Diseases, Antimicrobial Resistance, Veterinary Public Health and Food Chain Safety, University of Veterinary Medicine Budapest, Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
As the ratio of the copy number of the most replicated to the unreplicated regions in the same chromosome, the definition of chromosomal replication complexity (CRC) appears to leave little room for variation, being either two during S-phase or one otherwise. However, bacteria dividing faster than they replicate their chromosome spike CRC to four and even eight. A recent experimental inquiry about the limits of CRC in Escherichia coli revealed two major reasons to avoid elevating it further: (i) increased chromosomal fragmentation and (ii) complications with subsequent double-strand break repair. Remarkably, examples of stable elevated CRC in eukaryotic chromosomes are well known under various terms like "differential replication," "underreplication," "DNA puffs," "onion-skin replication," or "re-replication" and highlight the phenomenon of static replication fork (sRF). To accurately describe the resulting "amplification by overinitiation," I propose a new term: "replification" (subchromosomal overreplication). In both prokaryotes and eukaryotes, replification, via sRF processing, causes double-strand DNA breaks and, with their repair elevating chromosomal rearrangements, represents a novel genome instability factor. I suggest how static replication bubbles could be stabilized and speculate that some tandem duplications represent such persistent static bubbles. Moreover, I propose how static replication bubbles could be transformed into tandem duplications, double minutes, or inverted triplications. Possible experimental tests of these models are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrei Kuzminov
- Department of Microbiology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Khan SR, Mahaseth T, Kouzminova EA, Cronan GE, Kuzminov A. Static and Dynamic Factors Limit Chromosomal Replication Complexity in Escherichia coli, Avoiding Dangers of Runaway Overreplication. Genetics 2016; 202:945-60. [PMID: 26801182 PMCID: PMC4788131 DOI: 10.1534/genetics.115.184697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2015] [Accepted: 01/17/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
We define chromosomal replication complexity (CRC) as the ratio of the copy number of the most replicated regions to that of unreplicated regions on the same chromosome. Although a typical CRC of eukaryotic or bacterial chromosomes is 2, rapidly growing Escherichia coli cells induce an extra round of replication in their chromosomes (CRC = 4). There are also E. coli mutants with stable CRC∼6. We have investigated the limits and consequences of elevated CRC in E. coli and found three limits: the "natural" CRC limit of ∼8 (cells divide more slowly); the "functional" CRC limit of ∼22 (cells divide extremely slowly); and the "tolerance" CRC limit of ∼64 (cells stop dividing). While the natural limit is likely maintained by the eclipse system spacing replication initiations, the functional limit might reflect the capacity of the chromosome segregation system, rather than dedicated mechanisms, and the tolerance limit may result from titration of limiting replication factors. Whereas recombinational repair is beneficial for cells at the natural and functional CRC limits, we show that it becomes detrimental at the tolerance CRC limit, suggesting recombinational misrepair during the runaway overreplication and giving a rationale for avoidance of the latter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharik R Khan
- Department of Microbiology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801
| | - Tulip Mahaseth
- Department of Microbiology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801
| | - Elena A Kouzminova
- Department of Microbiology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801
| | - Glen E Cronan
- Department of Microbiology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801
| | - Andrei Kuzminov
- Department of Microbiology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jiménez-Sánchez A. Chromosome replication status and DNA content at any cell age in a bacterial cell cycle. J Theor Biol 2015; 380:585-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2015.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2015] [Revised: 04/23/2015] [Accepted: 06/01/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
5
|
González Moreno S, Mata Martín C, Ferrera Guillén E, Guzmán EC. Tuning the replication fork progression by the initiation frequency. Environ Microbiol 2013; 15:3240-51. [PMID: 23607621 DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.12127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2013] [Revised: 03/19/2013] [Accepted: 03/22/2013] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The thermo-resistant period of the thermo-sensitive ribonucleotide reductase RNR101 encoded by the nrdA101 allele in Escherichia coli is prolonged for 50 min at 42°C, enabling an increase in DNA content of about 45%. Assuming that fork progression in the nrdA101 mutant is impaired, the question whether reduced number of ongoing replication rounds altered the thermo-resistant period in this strain was investigated. Decreases in the oriC/terC ratio and in the number of oriC per cell at 30°C were found in the presence of oriC228, oriC229 and oriC239 alleles in strain nrdA101. Correlated with this effect, increased thermo-resistance period of the RNR101 was allowed, and the detrimental effects on cell division, chromosome segregation and cell viability observed in the nrdA101 mutant at 42°C were suppressed. These results indicate that conditions leading to chromosome initiation deficiency at 30°C enhance the replication fork progression in the nrdA101 mutant at 42°C. We propose that coordination between initiation frequency and replication fork progression could be significant for most of the replication systems with important consequences in their cell cycle regulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara González Moreno
- Departmento de Bioquímica Biología Molecular y Genética, Universidad de Extremadura, 06071, Badajoz, Spain
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|