Long-range DNase I hypersensitivity mapping reveals the imprinted Igf2r and Air promoters share cis-regulatory elements

Long non coding RNA function in epigenetic memory with a particular emphasis on genomic imprinting and X chromosome inactivation

Cells preserve and convey certain gene expression patterns to their progeny through the mechanism called epigenetic memory. Epigenetic memory, encoded by epigenetic markers and components, determines germline inheritance, genomic imprinting, and X chromosome inactivation. First discovered long non coding RNAs were implicated in genomic imprinting and X-inactivation and these two phenomena clearly demonstrate the role of lncRNAs in epigenetic memory regulation. Undoubtedly, lncRNAs are well-suited for regulating genes in close proximity at imprinted loci. Due to prolonged association with the transcription site, lncRNAs are able to guide chromatin modifiers to certain locations, thereby enabling accurate temporal and spatial regulation. Nevertheless, the current state of knowledge regarding lncRNA biology and imprinting processes is still in its nascent phase. Herein, we provide a synopsis of recent scientific advancements to enhance our comprehension of lncRNAs and their functions in epigenetic memory, with a particular emphasis on genomic imprinting and X chromosome inactivation, thus gaining a deeper understanding of the role of lncRNAs in epigenetic regulatory networks.

Advances in research regarding the roles of non-coding RNAs in non-syndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To investigate by means of a literature review, what non-coding RNAs engage in non-syndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate (NSCL/P) and how they lead to the occurrence of this malformation.

DESIGN

A literature search of online databases (Medline via PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase) was performed using appropriate keywords (e.g. non-coding RNA, miRNA, lncRNA, NSCL/P, non-syndromic cleft lip only, and non-syndromic orofacial cleft). The risk of bias in the included studies was then assessed, and a comprehensive review of reported non-coding RNAs associated with NSCL/P was performed.

RESULTS

The initial search retrieved 133 studies reporting non-coding RNAs associated with NSCL/P; after excluding 18 replicates and 77 ineligible studies, 35 remained. Of these, 16 studies fulfilled all the criteria and were included in the systematic review. These studies established the roles of non-coding RNAs in the development of craniofacial structures. The differential expression of these non-coding RNAs could lead to orofacial clefts, indicating their significance in NSCL/P and their profound research value.

CONCLUSION

There is evidence that non-coding RNAs are involved in the formation of NSCL/P. Specifically, they play significant roles in the regulation of genes and signalling pathways related to NSCL/P.

The Airn lncRNA does not require any DNA elements within its locus to silence distant imprinted genes

Long non-coding (lnc) RNAs are numerous and found throughout the mammalian genome, and many are thought to be involved in the regulation of gene expression. However, the majority remain relatively uncharacterised and of uncertain function making the use of model systems to uncover their mode of action valuable. Imprinted lncRNAs target and recruit epigenetic silencing factors to a cluster of imprinted genes on the same chromosome, making them one of the best characterized lncRNAs for silencing distant genes in cis. In this study we examined silencing of the distant imprinted gene Slc22a3 by the lncRNA Airn in the Igf2r imprinted cluster in mouse. Previously we proposed that imprinted lncRNAs may silence distant imprinted genes by disrupting promoter-enhancer interactions by being transcribed through the enhancer, which we called the enhancer interference hypothesis. Here we tested this hypothesis by first using allele-specific chromosome conformation capture (3C) to detect interactions between the Slc22a3 promoter and the locus of the Airn lncRNA that silences it on the paternal chromosome. In agreement with the model, we found interactions enriched on the maternal allele across the entire Airn gene consistent with multiple enhancer-promoter interactions. Therefore, to test the enhancer interference hypothesis we devised an approach to delete the entire Airn gene. However, the deletion showed that there are no essential enhancers for Slc22a2, Pde10a and Slc22a3 within the Airn gene, strongly indicating that the Airn RNA rather than its transcription is responsible for silencing distant imprinted genes. Furthermore, we found that silent imprinted genes were covered with large blocks of H3K27me3 on the repressed paternal allele. Therefore we propose an alternative hypothesis whereby the chromosome interactions may initially guide the lncRNA to target imprinted promoters and recruit repressive chromatin, and that these interactions are lost once silencing is established.

Long non-coding (lnc) RNAs are numerous in the mammalian genome and many have been implicated in gene regulation. However, the vast majority are uncharacterised and of uncertain function making known functional lncRNAs valuable models for understanding their mechanism of action. One mode of lncRNA action is to recruit epigenetic silencing to target distant genes on the same chromosome. A well-characterized group of lncRNAs that act in this way to silence genes are imprinted lncRNAs. In this study we examined how the imprinted lncRNA Airn silences genes in the Igf2r imprinted cluster, focusing primarily on silencing of the distant imprinted gene Slc22a3. We found that Airn expression blocks chromosome interactions between the Slc22a3 promoter and the Airn gene locus. By making a large genomic deletion including the Airn gene we showed that these interactions are not essential enhancer/promoter interactions, but may help to guide the Airn RNA to target genes to recruit epigenetic silencing. Our study adds to the understanding of how lncRNAs may act to silence distant genes.

Dlk1-Dio3 locus-derived lncRNAs perpetuate postmitotic motor neuron cell fate and subtype identity

The mammalian imprinted Dlk1-Dio3 locus produces multiple long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) from the maternally inherited allele, including Meg3 (i.e., Gtl2) in the mammalian genome. Although this locus has well-characterized functions in stem cell and tumor contexts, its role during neural development is unknown. By profiling cell types at each stage of embryonic stem cell-derived motor neurons (ESC~MNs) that recapitulate spinal cord development, we uncovered that lncRNAs expressed from the Dlk1-Dio3 locus are predominantly and gradually enriched in rostral motor neurons (MNs). Mechanistically, Meg3 and other Dlk1-Dio3 locus-derived lncRNAs facilitate Ezh2/Jarid2 interactions. Loss of these lncRNAs compromises the H3K27me3 landscape, leading to aberrant expression of progenitor and caudal Hox genes in postmitotic MNs. Our data thus illustrate that these lncRNAs in the Dlk1-Dio3 locus, particularly Meg3, play a critical role in maintaining postmitotic MN cell fate by repressing progenitor genes and they shape MN subtype identity by regulating Hox genes.

When a gene is active, its DNA sequence is ‘transcribed’ to form a molecule of RNA. Many of these RNAs act as templates for making proteins. But for some genes, the protein molecules are not their final destinations. Their RNA molecules instead help to control gene activity, which can alter the behaviour or the identity of a cell. For example, experiments performed in individual cells suggest that so-called long non-coding RNAs (or lncRNAs for short) guide how stem cells develop into different types of mature cells. However, it is not clear whether lncRNAs play the same critical role in embryos.

Yen et al. used embryonic stem cells to model how motor neurons develop in the spinal cord of mouse embryos. This revealed that motor neurons produce large amounts of a specific group of lncRNAs, particularly one called Meg3. Further experiments showed that motor neurons in mouse embryos that lack Meg3 do not correctly silence a set of genes called the Hox genes, which are crucial for laying out the body plans of many different animal embryos. These neurons also incorrectly continue to express genes that are normally active in an early phase of the stem-like cells that make motor neurons.

There is wide interest in how lncRNAs help to regulate embryonic development. With this new knowledge of how Meg3 regulates the activity of Hox genes in motor neurons, research could now be directed toward investigating whether lncRNAs help other tissues to develop in a similar way.

The Role of Long Noncoding RNAs in Central Nervous System and Neurodegenerative Diseases

Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) refer to a group of noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) that has a transcript of more than 200 nucleotides in length in eukaryotic cells. The lncRNAs regulate gene expression at epigenetic, transcriptional, and post-transcriptional levels by multiple action modes. In this review, we describe the diverse roles reported for lncRNAs, and discuss how they could mechanistically be involved in the development of central nervous system (CNS) and neurodegenerative diseases. Further studies on the function of lncRNAs and their mechanism will help deepen our understanding of the development, function, and diseases of the CNS, and provide new ideas for the design and development of some therapeutic drugs.

Airn Regulates Igf2bp2 Translation in Cardiomyocytes

RATIONALE

Increasing evidence indicates the presence of lncRNAs in various cell types. Airn is an imprinting gene transcribed from the paternal chromosome. It is in antisense orientation to the imprinted, but maternally derived, Igf2r gene, on which Airn exerts its regulation in cis. Although Airn is highly expressed in the heart, functions aside from imprinting remain unknown.

OBJECTIVE

Here, we studied the functions of Airn in the heart, especially cardiomyocytes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Silencing of Airn via siRNAs augmented cell death, vulnerability to cellular stress, and reduced cell migration. To find the cause of such phenotypes, the potential binding partners of Airn were identified via RNA pull-down followed by mass spectrometry, which indicated Igf2bp2 (insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding protein 2) and Rpa1 (replication protein A1) as potential binding partners. Further experiments showed that Airn binds to Igf2bp2 to control the translation of several genes. Moreover, silencing of Airn caused less binding of Igf2bp2 to other mRNAs and reduced translation of Igf2bp2 protein.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study uncovers a new function of Airn and demonstrates that Airn is important for the physiology of cardiomyocytes.

Gene regulation by the act of long non-coding RNA transcription

Long non-protein-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are proposed to be the largest transcript class in the mouse and human transcriptomes. Two important questions are whether all lncRNAs are functional and how they could exert a function. Several lncRNAs have been shown to function through their product, but this is not the only possible mode of action. In this review we focus on a role for the process of lncRNA transcription, independent of the lncRNA product, in regulating protein-coding-gene activity in cis. We discuss examples where lncRNA transcription leads to gene silencing or activation, and describe strategies to determine if the lncRNA product or its transcription causes the regulatory effect.

Imprinted Igf2r silencing depends on continuous Airn lncRNA expression and is not restricted to a developmental window

The imprinted Airn macro long non-coding (lnc) RNA is an established example of a cis-silencing lncRNA. Airn expression is necessary to initiate paternal-specific silencing of the Igf2r gene, which is followed by gain of a somatic DNA methylation imprint on the silent Igf2r promoter. However, the developmental requirements for Airn initiation of Igf2r silencing and the role of Airn or DNA methylation in maintaining stable Igf2r repression have not been investigated. Here, we use inducible systems to control Airn expression during mouse embryonic stem cell (ESC) differentiation. By turning Airn expression off during ESC differentiation, we show that continuous Airn expression is needed to maintain Igf2r silencing, but only until the paternal Igf2r promoter is methylated. By conditionally turning Airn expression on, we show that Airn initiation of Igf2r silencing is not limited to one developmental 'window of opportunity' and can be maintained in the absence of DNA methylation. Together, this study shows that Airn expression is both necessary and sufficient to silence Igf2r throughout ESC differentiation and that the somatic methylation imprint, although not required to initiate or maintain silencing, adds a secondary layer of repressive epigenetic information.

DNaseI hypersensitivity and ultraconservation reveal novel, interdependent long-range enhancers at the complex Pax6 cis-regulatory region

The PAX6 gene plays a crucial role in development of the eye, brain, olfactory system and endocrine pancreas. Consistent with its pleiotropic role the gene exhibits a complex developmental expression pattern which is subject to strict spatial, temporal and quantitative regulation. Control of expression depends on a large array of cis-elements residing in an extended genomic domain around the coding region of the gene. The minimal essential region required for proper regulation of this complex locus has been defined through analysis of human aniridia-associated breakpoints and YAC transgenic rescue studies of the mouse smalleye mutant. We have carried out a systematic DNase I hypersensitive site (HS) analysis across 200 kb of this critical region of mouse chromosome 2E3 to identify putative regulatory elements. Mapping the identified HSs onto a percent identity plot (PIP) shows many HSs correspond to recognisable genomic features such as evolutionarily conserved sequences, CpG islands and retrotransposon derived repeats. We then focussed on a region previously shown to contain essential long range cis-regulatory information, the Pax6 downstream regulatory region (DRR), allowing comparison of mouse HS data with previous human HS data for this region. Reporter transgenic mice for two of the HS sites, HS5 and HS6, show that they function as tissue specific regulatory elements. In addition we have characterised enhancer activity of an ultra-conserved cis-regulatory region located near Pax6, termed E60. All three cis-elements exhibit multiple spatio-temporal activities in the embryo that overlap between themselves and other elements in the locus. Using a deletion set of YAC reporter transgenic mice we demonstrate functional interdependence of the elements. Finally, we use the HS6 enhancer as a marker for the migration of precerebellar neuro-epithelium cells to the hindbrain precerebellar nuclei along the posterior and anterior extramural streams allowing visualisation of migratory defects in both pathways in Pax6(Sey/Sey) mice.

An RNA-Seq strategy to detect the complete coding and non-coding transcriptome including full-length imprinted macro ncRNAs

Imprinted macro non-protein-coding (nc) RNAs are cis-repressor transcripts that silence multiple genes in at least three imprinted gene clusters in the mouse genome. Similar macro or long ncRNAs are abundant in the mammalian genome. Here we present the full coding and non-coding transcriptome of two mouse tissues: differentiated ES cells and fetal head using an optimized RNA-Seq strategy. The data produced is highly reproducible in different sequencing locations and is able to detect the full length of imprinted macro ncRNAs such as Airn and Kcnq1ot1, whose length ranges between 80–118 kb. Transcripts show a more uniform read coverage when RNA is fragmented with RNA hydrolysis compared with cDNA fragmentation by shearing. Irrespective of the fragmentation method, all coding and non-coding transcripts longer than 8 kb show a gradual loss of sequencing tags towards the 3′ end. Comparisons to published RNA-Seq datasets show that the strategy presented here is more efficient in detecting known functional imprinted macro ncRNAs and also indicate that standardization of RNA preparation protocols would increase the comparability of the transcriptome between different RNA-Seq datasets.

How genome-wide approaches can be used to unravel the remaining secrets of the imprintome

Genomic imprinting is the differential expression of genes according to their transmitting parent and is achieved by labelling of the two alleles with different epigenetic marks. The majority of described imprinted genes are present in clusters with coordinate regulation. Multiple mechanisms are known to regulate this differential expression, including repression of one allele by the action of cis-acting macro non-coding RNAs, insulator elements, allele specific histone modifications and DNA methylation. A hallmark of all imprinted regions described so far is the presence of one or more differentially methylated regions (DMRs). A DMR is a nucleotide sequence rich in CpG dinucleotides that is specifically methylated on one parental chromosome and unmethylated on the allele derived from the other parent. This parent-specific differential methylation may be imparted during spermatogenesis or oogenesis (as is the case for gametic DMRs) or may be acquired during embryogenesis (somatic DMRs). This review will describe the advantages and disadvantages of some of the techniques that can be used to compare epigenetic marks between parental chromosomes and to understand how these marks affect the 3D interactions and monoallelic expression at imprinted loci. Recent advances in sequencing technologies, in particular, provide exciting new opportunities to study imprinting. These analyses are likely to lead to the full characterization of the 'imprintome', which includes uncovering the totality of imprinted genes within a genome, their epigenetic landscape and unique features that render them resistant to epigenetic reprogramming in the early embryo.

An in vitro ES cell imprinting model shows that imprinted expression of the Igf2r gene arises from an allele-specific expression bias

Genomic imprinting is an epigenetic process that results in parental-specific gene expression. Advances in understanding the mechanism that regulates imprinted gene expression in mammals have largely depended on generating targeted manipulations in embryonic stem (ES) cells that are analysed in vivo in mice. However, genomic imprinting consists of distinct developmental steps, some of which occur in post-implantation embryos, indicating that they could be studied in vitro in ES cells. The mouse Igf2r gene shows imprinted expression only in post-implantation stages, when repression of the paternal allele has been shown to require cis-expression of the Airn non-coding (nc) RNA and to correlate with gain of DNA methylation and repressive histone modifications. Here we follow the gain of imprinted expression of Igf2r during in vitro ES cell differentiation and show that it coincides with the onset of paternal-specific expression of the Airn ncRNA. Notably, although Airn ncRNA expression leads, as predicted, to gain of repressive epigenetic marks on the paternal Igf2r promoter, we unexpectedly find that the paternal Igf2r promoter is expressed at similar low levels throughout ES cell differentiation. Our results further show that the maternal and paternal Igf2r promoters are expressed equally in undifferentiated ES cells, but during differentiation expression of the maternal Igf2r promoter increases up to 10-fold, while expression from the paternal Igf2r promoter remains constant. This indicates, contrary to expectation, that the Airn ncRNA induces imprinted Igf2r expression not by silencing the paternal Igf2r promoter, but by generating an expression bias between the two parental alleles.

The Air noncoding RNA epigenetically silences transcription by targeting G9a to chromatin

A number of large noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) epigenetically silence genes through unknown mechanisms. The Air ncRNA is imprinted--monoallelically expressed from the paternal allele. Air is required for allele-specific silencing of the cis-linked Slc22a3, Slc22a2, and Igf2r genes in mouse placenta. We show that Air interacts with the Slc22a3 promoter chromatin and the H3K9 histone methyltransferase G9a in placenta. Air accumulates at the Slc22a3 promoter in correlation with localized H3K9 methylation and transcriptional repression. Genetic ablation of G9a results in nonimprinted, biallelic transcription of Slc22a3. Truncated Air fails to accumulate at the Slc22a3 promoter, which results in reduced G9a recruitment and biallelic transcription. Our results suggest that Air, and potentially other large ncRNAs, target repressive histone-modifying activities through molecular interaction with specific chromatin domains to epigenetically silence transcription.

Identification of the human homolog of the imprinted mouse Air non-coding RNA

Genomic imprinting is widely conserved amongst placental mammals. Imprinted expression of IGF2R, however, differs between mice and humans. In mice, Igf2r imprinted expression is seen in all fetal and adult tissues. In humans, adult tissues lack IGF2R imprinted expression, but it is found in fetal tissues and Wilms' tumors where it is polymorphic and only seen in a small proportion of tested samples. Mouse Igf2r imprinted expression is controlled by the Air (Airn) ncRNA whose promoter lies in an intronic maternally-methylated CpG island. The human IGF2R gene carries a homologous intronic maternally-methylated CpG island of unknown function. Here, we use transfection and transgenic studies to show that the human IGF2R intronic CpG island is a ncRNA promoter. We also identify the same ncRNA at the endogenous human locus in 16-40% of Wilms' tumors. Thus, the human IGF2R gene shows evolutionary conservation of key features that control imprinted expression in the mouse.

Sense and antisense OsDof12 transcripts in rice

Background

Antisense transcription is a widespread phenomenon in plants and mammals. Our previous data on rice gene expression analysis by microarray indicated that the sense and antisense transcripts at the OsDof12 locus were co-expressed in leaves. In current study, we analyzed the expression patterns in detail and looked for the possible mechanism related to their expression patterns.

Results

OsDof12, being a single copy gene located on rice chromosome 3, encodes a predicted Dof protein of 440 amino acids with one intron of 945 bp. The antisense transcript, OsDofl2os, overlaps with both the exonic and intronic regions of OsDof12 and encodes a functionally unknown protein of 104 amino acids with no intron. The sense-antisense OsDof12 transcripts were co-expressed within the same tissues, and their expressions were not tissue-specific in general. At different developmental stages in rice, the OsDof12 and OsDof12os transcripts exhibited reciprocal expression patterns. Interestingly, the expression of both genes was significantly induced under drought treatment, and inhibited by dark treatment. In the Pro_OsDof12-GUS and Pro_OsDof12os-GUS transgenic rice plants, the expression profiles of GUS were consistent with those of the OsDof12 and OsDof12os transcripts, respectively. In addition, the analysis of cis-regulatory elements indicated that either of the two promoters contained 74 classes of cis-regulatory elements predicted, of which the two promoter regions shared 53 classes.

Conclusion

Based on the expression profiles of OsDof12 and OsDof12os, the expression patterns of GUS in the Pro_OsDof12-GUS and Pro_OsDof12os-GUS transgenic rice plants and the predicted common cis-regulatory elements shared by the two promoters, we suggest that the co-expression patterns of OsDof12 and OsDof12os might be attributed to the basically common nature of the two promoters.

Imprinted expression of the canine IGF2R, in the absence of an anti-sense transcript or promoter methylation

Imprinted genes are epigenetically modified in a parent of origin-dependent manner, and as a consequence, are differentially expressed. Although the evolution of genomic imprinting is a subject of intense debate, imprinted genes have been studied primarily in mice and humans and in a small number of marsupial mammals. Comparative studies involving rodents and primates are of limited value, as they belong to the same superordinal group of eutherian mammals (Euarchontoglires). On the other hand, comparisons involving marsupials may not be informative, due to phylogenetic distance. Canis familiaris belongs to Laurasiatheria, a sister-group of Euarchontoglires, and should prove useful in comparative studies of imprinted genes. Using RT-PCR we demonstrate monoallelic expression of the canine IGF2R in several tissues, including uterus and umbilical cord. In the case of umbilical cord, we identify the expressed allele as maternally derived. The canine IGF2R is thus an imprinted gene. Using bisulfite sequencing, we show that the canine IGF2R resembles the imprinted mouse Igf2r in having a CpG island in intron 2 that is hemi-methylated. However, it differs from the mouse gene in that maintenance of the monoallelic expression of canine IGF2R does not require expression of an anti-sense transcript from the paternally derived allele, or methylation of the repressed IGF2R promoter. In these two important features, the imprinted canine gene resembles the imprinted opossum IGF2R. Our data suggest that these features were properties of the ancestral imprinted IGF2R and that the anti-sense transcript (Air) and promoter methylation observed in mouse are derived features of the mouse Igf2r locus.

Noncoding but nonexpendable: transcriptional regulation by large noncoding RNA in eukaryotes

Genome sequencing and annotation has advanced our understanding of genome organization and gene structure but initially only allowed predictions of how many genes might be present. Mechanisms such as alternative splicing reveal that these predictions only scratch the surface of the true nature of the transcriptome. Several thousand expressed partial gene fragments have been cloned but were considered transcriptional noise or cloning artifacts. We now know that genomes are indeed expressed at much higher levels than was previously predicted, and much of the additional transcription maps to intergenic regions, intron sequences, and untranslated regions of mRNAs. These transcripts are expressed from either the sense or the antisense strand and can be confirmed by conventional techniques. In addition to the already established roles for small RNAs in gene regulation, large noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) are also emerging as potent regulators of gene expression. In this review, we summarize several illustrative examples of gene regulatory mechanisms that involve large ncRNAs. We describe several distinct regulatory mechanisms that involve large ncRNAs, such as transcriptional interference and promoter inactivation, as well as indirect effects on transcription regulatory proteins and in genomic imprinting. These diverse functions for large ncRNAs are likely to be only the first of many novel regulatory mechanisms emerging from this growing field.

Active and repressive chromatin are interspersed without spreading in an imprinted gene cluster in the mammalian genome

The Igf2r imprinted cluster is an epigenetic silencing model in which expression of a ncRNA silences multiple genes in cis. Here, we map a 250 kb region in mouse embryonic fibroblast cells to show that histone modifications associated with expressed and silent genes are mutually exclusive and localized to discrete regions. Expressed genes were modified at promoter regions by H3K4me3 + H3K4me2 + H3K9Ac and on putative regulatory elements flanking active promoters by H3K4me2 + H3K9Ac. Silent genes showed two types of nonoverlapping profile. One type spread over large domains of tissue-specific silent genes and contained H3K27me3 alone. A second type formed localized foci on silent imprinted gene promoters and a nonexpressed pseudogene and contained H3K9me3 + H4K20me3 +/- HP1. Thus, mammalian chromosome arms contain active chromatin interspersed with repressive chromatin resembling the type of heterochromatin previously considered a feature of centromeres, telomeres, and the inactive X chromosome.

The imprinted Air ncRNA is an atypical RNAPII transcript that evades splicing and escapes nuclear export

Expression of the Air ncRNA is necessary to silence multiple genes in cis in the imprinted Igf2r cluster. However, its mode of action is unknown. Here, we characterize co- and post-transcriptional features of Air that identify it as a new member of the class of nuclear regulatory RNAs. We show that Air is transcribed from a DNA methylation-sensitive promoter by RNA polymerase II (RNAPII). However, although it is capped and polyadenylated similar to other RNAPII transcripts, the majority of Air transcripts evade cotranscriptional splicing resulting in a mature 108 kb ncRNA. As a consequence, the mature unspliced Air is nuclear localized and highly unstable. These features show that Air is an atypical RNAPII transcript whose properties indicate that its mode of action in gene silencing may not depend on the RNA per se but instead is related to its actual transcription.

The principles of guiding by RNA: chimeric RNA-protein enzymes

The non-protein-coding transcriptional output of the cell is far greater than previously thought. Although the functions, if any, of the vast majority of these RNA transcripts remain elusive, out of those for which functions have already been established, most act as RNA guides for protein enzymes. Common features of these RNAs provide clues about the evolutionary constraints that led to the development of RNA-guided proteins and the specific biological environments in which target specificity and diversity are most crucial to the cell.

Recruitment of PRC1 function at the initiation of X inactivation independent of PRC2 and silencing

In mammals X inactivation is initiated by expression of Xist RNA and involves the recruitment of Polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1) and 2 (PRC2), which mediate chromosome-wide ubiquitination of histone H2A and methylation of histone H3, respectively. Here, we show that PRC1 recruitment by Xist RNA is independent of gene silencing. We find that Eed is required for the recruitment of the canonical PRC1 proteins Mph1 and Mph2 by Xist. However, functional Ring1b is recruited by Xist and mediates ubiquitination of histone H2A in Eed deficient embryonic stem (ES) cells, which lack histone H3 lysine 27 tri-methylation. Xist expression early in ES cell differentiation establishes a chromosomal memory, which allows efficient H2A ubiquitination in differentiated cells and is independent of silencing and PRC2. Our data show that Xist recruits PRC1 components by both PRC2 dependent and independent modes and in the absence of PRC2 function is sufficient for the establishment of Polycomb-based memory systems in X inactivation.

The imprinted mouse Igf2r/Air cluster – a model maternal imprinting system

Every diploid organism inherits a complete chromosome set from its father and mother in addition to the sex chromosomes, so that all autosomal genes are available in two copies. For most genes, both copies are expressed without preference. Imprinted genes, however, are expressed depending on their parental origin, being active on the paternal or maternal allele only. To date 73 imprinted genes are known in mouse (www.mgu.har.mrc.ac.uk/research/imprinting), 37 show paternal expression while 36 show maternal expression, indicating no bias for imprinting to occur in one sex or the other. Therefore, two different parental-specific imprinting systems may have evolved in mammals, acting specifically in the paternal or maternal gamete. Similarities and differences between the two imprinting systems will be reviewed, with specific reference to the role of non-coding RNAs and chromatin modifications. The mouse Igf2r/Air cluster is presented as a model of the maternal imprinting system.

RNomics: identification and function of small non-protein-coding RNAs in model organisms

In the recent past, our knowledge on small non-protein-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) has exponentially grown. Different approaches to identify novel ncRNAs that include computational and experimental RNomics have led to a plethora of novel ncRNAs. A picture emerges, in which ncRNAs have a variety of roles during regulation of gene expression. Thereby, many of these ncRNAs appear to function in guiding specific protein complexes to target nucleic acids. The concept of RNA guiding seems to be a widespread and very effective regulatory mechanism. In addition to guide RNAs, numerous RNAs were identified by RNomics screens, lacking known sequence and structure motifs; hence no function could be assigned to them as yet. Future challenges in the field of RNomics will include elucidation of their biological roles in the cell.