Identification of a secondary RET mutation in a pediatric patient with relapsed acute myeloid leukemia leads to the diagnosis and treatment of asymptomatic metastatic medullary thyroid cancer in a parent: a case for sequencing the germline

Controversy on the management of patients carrying RET p.V804M mutation

CONTEXT

RET p.V804M is classified as a moderate risk mutation for familial medullary thyroid cancer (FMTC). There is a significant controversy on the management of patients carrying this mutation. We describe a family incidentally discovered to have this mutation and review the literature on RET p.V804M mutation.

RESULTS

The proband was born to first-degree relative parents. He was noticed to have hypertrophy of some parts of the body and vascular skin changes. Whole-exome sequencing of DNA extracted from a skin biopsy showed a mutation in the PIK3CA (c.3132T>G, p.ASN1044LYS). This variant was not found in DNA extracted from blood. This confirmed the diagnosis of CLOVES syndrome (Congenital Lipomatous Overgrowth, Vascular malformations, Epidermal nevi and Scoliosis, skeletal or spinal anomalies). Another incidentally found mutation in the skin biopsy and blood sample was RET p.V804M. Although there was no family history of MTC or MEN 2 syndromes, family screening revealed RET p.V804M mutation and FMTC in the proband's father, paternal grandmother, one sister, and one aunt. There was significant interfamilial heterogeneity in the age of presentation and pathology. A review of literature showed that RET p.V804M mutation is a moderate risk mutation associated with late-onset FMTC, usually at middle to old age.

CONCLUSION

Despite the controversy and the heterogeneous presentation of patients with RET p.V804M mutation, our study and review of the literature suggest that this seemingly "low" risk mutation is associated with late-onset but potentially aggressive MTC. This indicates the need for follow-up and timely intervention based on calcitonin level elevation.

A systematic literature review of disclosure practices and reported outcomes for medically actionable genomic secondary findings

Purpose:

Secondary findings (SF) are present in 1–4% of individuals undergoing genome/exome sequencing. A review of how SF are disclosed and what outcomes result from their receipt is urgent and timely.

Methods:

We conducted a systematic literature review of SF disclosure practices and outcomes after receipt including cascade testing, family and provider communication, and healthcare actions. Of the 1,184 non-duplicate records screened we summarize findings from 27 included research articles describing SF disclosure practices, outcomes after receipt, or both.

Results:

The included articles reported 709 unique SF index recipients/families. Referrals and/or recommendations were provided 647 SF recipients and outcome data were available for 236. At least one recommended evaluation was reported for 146 SF recipients; 16 reports of treatment or prophylactic surgery were identified. We found substantial variations in how the constructs of interest were defined and described.

Conclusion:

Variation in how SF disclosure and outcomes were described limited our ability to compare findings. We conclude the literature provided limited insight into how the ACMG guidelines have been translated into precision health outcomes for SF recipients. Robust studies of SF recipients are needed and should be prioritized for future research.