Analysis of mouse model pathology: a primer for studying the anatomic pathology of genetically engineered mice

Working with Miraculous Mice: Mus musculus as a Model Organism

The laboratory mouse has been described as a "miracle" model organism, providing a window by which we may gain an understanding of ourselves. Since the first recorded mouse experiment in 1664, the mouse has become the most used animal model in biomedical research. Mice are ideally suited as a model organism because of their small size, short gestation period, large litter size, and genetic similarity to humans. This article provides a broad overview of the laboratory mouse as a model organism and is intended for undergraduates and those new to working with mice. We delve into the history of the laboratory mouse and outline important terminology to accurately describe research mice. The types of laboratory mice available to researchers are reviewed, including outbred stocks, inbred strains, immunocompromised mice, and genetically engineered mice. The critical role mice have played in advancing knowledge in the areas of oncology, immunology, and pharmacology is highlighted by examining the significant contribution of mice to Nobel Prize winning research. International mouse mutagenesis programs and accurate phenotyping of mouse models are outlined. We also explain important considerations for working with mice, including animal ethics; the welfare principles of replacement, refinement, and reduction; and the choice of mouse model in experimental design. Finally, we present practical advice for maintaining a mouse colony, which involves adequate training of staff, the logistics of mouse housing, monitoring colony health, and breeding strategies. Useful resources for working with mice are also listed. The aim of this overview is to equip the reader with a broad appreciation of the enormous potential and some of the complexities of working with the laboratory mouse in a quest to improve human health. © 2024 The Author(s). Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

A Primer for Research Scientists on Assessing Mouse Gross and Histopathology Images in the Biomedical Literature

Advances in genomic technologies have enabled the development of abundant mouse models of human disease, requiring accurate phenotyping to elucidate the consequences of genetic manipulation. Anatomic pathology, an important component of the mouse phenotyping pipeline, is ideally performed by human or veterinary pathologists; however, due to insufficient numbers of pathologists qualified to assess these mouse models morphologically, research scientists may perform "do-it-yourself" pathology, resulting in diagnostic error. In the biomedical literature, pathology data is commonly presented as images of tissue sections, stained with either hematoxylin and eosin or antibodies via immunohistochemistry, accompanied by a figure legend. Data presented in such images and figure legends may contain inaccuracies. Furthermore, there is limited guidance for non-pathologist research scientists concerning the elements required in an ideal pathology image and figure legend in a research publication. In this overview, the components of an ideal pathology image and figure legend are outlined and comprise image quality, image composition, and image interpretation. Background knowledge is important for producing accurate pathology images and critically assessing these images in the literature. This foundational knowledge includes understanding relevant human and mouse anatomy and histology and, for cancer researchers, an understanding of human and mouse tumor classification and morphology, mouse stain background lesions, and tissue processing artifacts. Accurate interpretation of immunohistochemistry is also vitally important and is detailed with emphasis on the requirement for tissue controls and the distribution, intensity, and intracellular location of staining. Common pitfalls in immunohistochemistry interpretation are outlined, and a checklist of questions is provided by which any pathology image may be critically examined. Collaboration with pathologist colleagues is encouraged. This overview aims to equip researchers to critically assess the quality and accuracy of pathology images in the literature to improve the reliability and reproducibility of published pathology data. © 2023 The Authors. Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Correlation of in vivo imaging to morphomolecular pathology in translational research: challenge accepted

Correlation of in vivo imaging to histomorphological pathology in animal models requires comparative interdisciplinary expertise of different fields of medicine. From the morphological point of view, there is an urgent need to improve histopathological evaluation in animal model-based research to expedite translation into clinical applications. While different other fields of translational science were standardized over the last years, little was done to improve the pipeline of experimental pathology to ensure reproducibility based on pathological expertise in experimental animal models with respect to defined guidelines and classifications. Additionally, longitudinal analyses of preclinical models often use a variety of imaging methods and much more attention should be drawn to enable for proper co-registration of in vivo imaging methods with the ex vivo morphological read-outs. Here we present the development of the Comparative Experimental Pathology (CEP) unit embedded in the Institute of Pathology of the Technical University of Munich during the Collaborative Research Center 824 (CRC824) funding period together with selected approaches of histomorphological techniques for correlation of in vivo imaging to morphomolecular pathology.

Digital Microscopy, Image Analysis, and Virtual Slide Repository

Advancements in technology and digitization have ushered in novel ways of enhancing tissue-based research via digital microscopy and image analysis. Whole slide imaging scanners enable digitization of histology slides to be stored in virtual slide repositories and to be viewed via computers instead of microscopes. Easier and faster sharing of histologic images for teaching and consultation, improved storage and preservation of quality of stained slides, and annotation of features of interest in the digital slides are just a few of the advantages of this technology. Combined with the development of software for digital image analysis, digital slides further pave the way for the development of tools that extract quantitative data from tissue-based studies. This review introduces digital microscopy and pathology, and addresses technical and scientific considerations in slide scanning, quantitative image analysis, and slide repositories. It also highlights the current state of the technology and factors that need to be taken into account to insure optimal utility, including preanalytical considerations and the importance of involving a pathologist in all major steps along the digital microscopy and pathology workflow.

[Histopathological research laboratories in translational research : Conception and integration into the infrastructure of pathological institutes]

A systematic review of histopathology from experimental animal systems is an essential part of up-to-date biomedical research. Pathologists at university hospitals are especially and increasingly challenged by these specialized and time-consuming duties. This article presents and analyzes a new laboratory structure of comparative experimental pathology-jointly lead by veterinary and human pathologists-which might solve this problem. The focus is on the establishment and full integration of this laboratory structure into a local, regional, and nationwide biomedical research cluster. A detailed comparison with an established structure of routine histopathology laboratories discusses merits and benefits as well as disadvantages.

Pathobiology of the 129:Stat1 -/- mouse model of human age-related ER-positive breast cancer with an immune infiltrate-excluded phenotype

Background

Stat1 gene-targeted knockout mice (129S6/SvEvTac-Stat1^tm1Rds) develop estrogen receptor-positive (ER⁺), luminal-type mammary carcinomas at an advanced age. There is evidence for both host environment as well as tumor cell-intrinsic mechanisms to initiate tumorigenesis in this model. In this report, we summarize details of the systemic and mammary pathology at preneoplastic and tumor-bearing time points. In addition, we investigate tumor progression in the 129:Stat1^−/− host compared with wild-type 129/SvEv, and we describe the immune cell reaction to the tumors.

Methods

Mice housed and treated according to National Institutes of Health guidelines and Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee-approved methods were evaluated by histopathology, and their tissues were subjected to immunohistochemistry with computer-assisted quantitative image analysis. Tumor cell culture and conditioned media from cell culture were used to perform macrophage (RAW264.7) cell migration assays, including the 129:Stat1^−/−-derived SSM2 cells as well as control Met1 and NDL tumor cells and EpH4 normal cells.

Results

Tumorigenesis in 129:Stat1^−/− originates from a population of FoxA1⁺ large oval pale cells that initially appear and accumulate along the mammary ducts in segments or regions of the gland prior to giving rise to mammary intraepithelial neoplasias. Progression to invasive carcinoma is accompanied by a marked local stromal and immune cell response composed predominantly of T cells and macrophages. In conditioned media experiments, cells derived from 129:Stat1^−/− tumors secrete both chemoattractant and chemoinhibitory factors, with greater attraction in the extracellular vesicular fraction and inhibition in the soluble fraction. The result appears to be recruitment of the immune reaction to the periphery of the tumor, with exclusion of immune cell infiltration into the tumor.

Conclusions

129:Stat1^−/− is a unique model for studying the critical origins and risk reduction strategies in age-related ER⁺ breast cancer. In addition, it can be used in preclinical trials of hormonal and targeted therapies as well as immunotherapies.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13058-017-0892-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.