On the evolution of specificity and catalysis in subtilisin

Structural basis of substrate specificity in the serine proteases

Structure-based mutational analysis of serine protease specificity has produced a large database of information useful in addressing biological function and in establishing a basis for targeted design efforts. Critical issues examined include the function of water molecules in providing strength and specificity of binding, the extent to which binding subsites are interdependent, and the roles of polypeptide chain flexibility and distal structural elements in contributing to specificity profiles. The studies also provide a foundation for exploring why specificity modification can be either straightforward or complex, depending on the particular system.

The antigenic domain of flagellin from S. paratyphi shares a structural fold with subtilisin

Bacterial flagellin has two domains: the polymerizing domain consisting of N- and C-terminal regions which are partly disordered in the monomeric state; and the central antigenic domain with compact globular structure. The polymerizing domain is highly conserved in flagellins from different species but the antigenic domain is diverse in sequence and size. Whereas the former has direct functional significance for bacterial motility, the latter has not been identified as having a specific function except for defining the distinct serotype of the bacterium. The sequence alignment of flagellin from S. paratyphi with proteins of known three-dimensional structure reveals significant homology of the central 265 residue stretch with the bacterial serine protease, subtilisin. This homology is evident also in the comparison of the predicted secondary structure of flagellin with the observed secondary structural features in subtilisin. The deletions/insertions arising due to optimal alignment of the two proteins occur on the surface loops in the structure. Thus, a domain of S. paratyphi flagellin and subtilisin appear to have similar structural folds.

Probing the mechanism and improving the rate of substrate-assisted catalysis in subtilisin BPN'

A mutant of the serine protease, subtilisin BPN', in which the catalytic His64 is replaced by Ala (H64A), is very specific for substrates containing a histidine, presumably by the substrate-bound histidine assisting in catalysis [Carter, P., & Wells, J.A. (1987) Science (Washington, D.C.) 237, 394-399]. Here we probe the catalytic mechanism of H64A subtilisin for cleaving His and non-His substrates. We show that the ratio of aminolysis to hydrolysis is the same for ester and amide substrates as catalyzed by the H64A subtilisin. This is consistent with formation of a common acyl-enzyme intermediate for H64A subtilisin, analogous to the mechanism of the wild-type enzyme. However, the catalytic efficiencies (kcat/KM) for amidase and esterase activities with His-containing substrates are reduced by 5000-fold and 14-fold, respectively, relative to wild-type subtilisin BPN, suggesting that acylation is more compromised than deacylation in the H64A mutant. High concentrations of imidazole are much less effective than His substrates in promoting hydrolysis by the H64A variant, suggesting that the His residue on the bound (not free) substrate is involved in catalysis. The reduction in catalytic efficiency kcat/KM for hydrolysis of the amide substrate upon replacement of the oxyanion stabilizing asparagine (N155G) is only 7-fold greater for wild-type than H64A subtilisin. In contrast, the reductions in kcat/KM upon replacement of the catalytic serine (S221A) or aspartate (D32A) are about 3000-fold greater for wild-type than H64A subtilisin, suggesting that the functional interactions between the Asp32 and Ser221 with the substrate histidine are more compromised in substrate-assisted catalysis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)