1
|
Caldwell R, Cui Y, Guo HK, Mandic V, Mariotti A, No JM, Ramsey-Musolf MJ, Sakellariadou M, Sinha K, Wang LT, White G, Zhao Y, An H, Bian L, Caprini C, Clesse S, Cline JM, Cusin G, Fornal B, Jinno R, Laurent B, Levi N, Lyu KF, Martinez M, Miller AL, Redigolo D, Scarlata C, Sevrin A, Haghi BSE, Shu J, Siemens X, Steer DA, Sundrum R, Tamarit C, Weir DJ, Xie KP, Yang FW, Zhou S. Detection of early-universe gravitational-wave signatures and fundamental physics. GENERAL RELATIVITY AND GRAVITATION 2022; 54:156. [PMID: 36465478 PMCID: PMC9712380 DOI: 10.1007/s10714-022-03027-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2022] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Detection of a gravitational-wave signal of non-astrophysical origin would be a landmark discovery, potentially providing a significant clue to some of our most basic, big-picture scientific questions about the Universe. In this white paper, we survey the leading early-Universe mechanisms that may produce a detectable signal-including inflation, phase transitions, topological defects, as well as primordial black holes-and highlight the connections to fundamental physics. We review the complementarity with collider searches for new physics, and multimessenger probes of the large-scale structure of the Universe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Caldwell
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
| | - Yanou Cui
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521 USA
| | - Huai-Ke Guo
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
| | - Vuk Mandic
- School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
| | - Alberto Mariotti
- Theoretische Natuurkunde and IIHE/ELEM, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, and International Solvay Institutes, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jose Miguel No
- Instituto de Física Teórica UAM/CSIC, C/ Nicolás Cabrera 13- 15, Campus de Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain
| | - Michael J. Ramsey-Musolf
- Tsung Dao Lee Institute/Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200120 People’s Republic of China
- University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
| | | | - Kuver Sinha
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019 USA
| | - Lian-Tao Wang
- Department of Physics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
| | - Graham White
- Kavli IPMU (WPI), UTIAS, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8583 Japan
| | - Yue Zhao
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
| | - Haipeng An
- Department of Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084 People’s Republic of China
- Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084 People’s Republic of China
- Center for High Energy Physics, Peking University, Beijing, 100871 People’s Republic of China
| | - Ligong Bian
- Center for High Energy Physics, Peking University, Beijing, 100871 People’s Republic of China
- Department of Physics and Chongqing Key Laboratory for Strongly Coupled Physics, Chongqing University, Chongqing, 401331 People’s Republic of China
| | - Chiara Caprini
- Theoretical Physics Department, University of Geneva, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
- CERN, Theoretical Physics Department, 1 Esplanade des Particules, 1211 Genève 23, Switzerland
| | - Sebastien Clesse
- Service de Physique Théorique (CP225), University of Brussels (ULB), Boulevard du Triomphe, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
| | - James M. Cline
- Department of Physics, McGill University, Montréal, QC H3A2T8 Canada
| | - Giulia Cusin
- Theoretical Physics Department, University of Geneva, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
- Sorbonne Université, CNRS, UMR 7095, Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Bartosz Fornal
- Department of Chemistry and Physics, Barry University, Miami Shores, FL 33161 USA
| | - Ryusuke Jinno
- Instituto de Física Teórica UAM/CSIC, C/ Nicolás Cabrera 13- 15, Campus de Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain
| | - Benoit Laurent
- Department of Physics, McGill University, Montréal, QC H3A2T8 Canada
| | - Noam Levi
- Raymond and Beverly Sackler School of Physics and Astronomy, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, 69978 Israel
| | - Kun-Feng Lyu
- School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
| | - Mario Martinez
- Institut de Física d’Altes Energies, Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology and ICREA, 08193 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Andrew L. Miller
- Université catholique de Louvain, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Diego Redigolo
- INFN, Sezione di Firenze Via G. Sansone 1, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy
| | - Claudia Scarlata
- School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
| | - Alexander Sevrin
- Theoretische Natuurkunde and IIHE/ELEM, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, and International Solvay Institutes, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Barmak Shams Es Haghi
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
| | - Jing Shu
- CAS Key Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, Insitute of Theoretical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190 People’s Republic of China
- School of Physical Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049 People’s Republic of China
- School of Fundamental Physics and Mathematical Sciences, Hangzhou Institute for Advanced Study, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310024 People’s Republic of China
- International Center for Theoretical Physics Asia-Pacific, Beijing, Hanzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xavier Siemens
- Department of Physics, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
| | - Danièle A. Steer
- Laboratoire Astroparticule et Cosmologie, CNRS, Université Paris Cité, 75013 Paris, France
| | | | - Carlos Tamarit
- Physik-Department T70, Technische Universität München, James-Franck-Straße, 85748 Garching, Germany
| | - David J. Weir
- Department of Physics and Helsinki Institute of Physics, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 64, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ke-Pan Xie
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68588 USA
| | - Feng-Wei Yang
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
| | - Siyi Zhou
- Department of Physics, Kobe University, Kobe, 657-8501 Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
In the present work, we examine the following points in the context of curvature coupling helical magnetogenesis scenario where the electromagnetic field couples with the background Ricci scalar as well as with the background Gauss-Bonnet cuvature term: (1) whether the model is consistent with the predictions of perturbative quantum field theory (QFT) and (2) whether the curvature perturbation induced by the generated electromagnetic (EM) field during inflation is consistent with the Planck data. Such requirements are well motivated in order to argue for the viability of the magnetogenesis model under consideration. In fact, our recently proposed helical magnetogenesis scenario seems to predict sufficient magnetic strength over large scales and also leads to the correct baryon asymmetry of the universe for a suitable range of the model parameter. However in the realm of inflationary magnetogenesis, these requirements are not enough to argue for the viability of the model; in particular, one needs to examine some more important requirements in this regard. We may recall that the calculations generally used to determine the magnetic field’s power spectrum are based on the perturbative QFT; therefore, it is important to examine whether the predictions of such perturbative QFT are consistent with the observational bounds of the model parameter. On other hand, the generated gauge field acts as a source of the curvature perturbation which needs to be suppressed compared to that contributed from the inflaton field in order to be consistent with the Planck observation. For the perturbative requirement, we examine whether the condition SCBScan<1 is satisfied, where SCB and Scan are the non-minimal and the canonical action of the EM field, respectively. Moreover, we determine the power spectrum of the curvature perturbation sourced by the EM field during inflation and evaluate necessary constraints in order to be consistent with the Planck data. Interestingly, both the aforementioned requirements in the context of the curvature coupling helical magnetogenesis scenario are found to be simultaneously satisfied by that range of the model parameter which leads to the correct magnetic strength over the large scale modes.
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
This is a very comprehensible review of some key issues in modern cosmology. Simple mathematical examples and analogies are used, whenever available. The starting point is the well-known Big Bang cosmology (BBC). We deal with the mathematical singularities appearing in this theory and discuss some ways to remove them. Next, and before introducing the inflationary paradigm by means of clear examples, we review the horizon and flatness problems of the old BBC model. We then consider the current cosmic acceleration and, as a procedure to deal with both periods of cosmic acceleration in a unified way, we study quintessential inflation. Finally, the reheating stage of the universe via gravitational particle production, which took place after inflation ended, is discussed in clear mathematical terms, by involving the so-called α-attractors in the context of quintessential inflation.
Collapse
|