Mixing patterns and individual differences in networks

Adaptive robust structure exploration for complex systems based on model configuration and fusion

Analyzing and obtaining useful information is challenging when facing a new complex system. Traditional methods often focus on specific structural aspects, such as communities, which may overlook the important features and result in biased conclusions. To address this, this article suggests an adaptive algorithm for exploring complex system structures using a generative model. This method calculates and optimizes node parameters, which can reflect the latent structural characteristics of the complex system. The effectiveness and stability of this method have been demonstrated in comparative experiments on 10 sets of benchmark networks using our model parameter configuration scheme. To enhance adaptability, algorithm fusion strategies were also proposed and tested on two real-world networks. The results indicate that the algorithm can uncover multiple structural features, including clustering, overlapping, and local chaining. This adaptive algorithm provides a promising approach for exploring complex system structures.

$$\Delta $$-Conformity: multi-scale node assortativity in feature-rich stream graphs

Multi-scale strategies to estimate mixing patterns are meant to capture heterogeneous behaviors among node homophily, but they ignore an important addendum often available in real-world networks: the time when edges are present and the time-varying paths that edges form accordingly. In this work, we go beyond the assumption of a static network topology to propose a multi-scale, path- and time-aware node homophily estimator specifically tied for feature-rich stream graphs: $$\Delta $$ Δ -Conformity. Our measure can capture the homogeneous/heterogeneous tendency of nodes’ connectivity along a period of time $$\Delta $$ Δ starting from a given moment in time. Results on face-to-face interaction networks suggest it is possible to track changes in social mixing behaviors that coincide with contextually reasonable everyday patterns, e.g., medical staff disassortative behavior when exposed to patients. In a different domain, that of the Bitcoin Transaction Network, we capture relationships between the quantity of money sent from (and to) different categories/continents and their respective mixing trends over time. All these insights help us to introduce $$\Delta $$ Δ -Conformity as a suitable solution for understanding temporal homophily by capturing the mixing tendency of entities embedded in fine-grained evolving contexts.

Conflict Dynamics in Scale-Free Networks with Degree Correlations and Hierarchical Structure

We present a study of the dynamic interactions between actors located on complex networks with scale-free and hierarchical scale-free topologies with assortative mixing, that is, correlations between the degree distributions of the actors. The actor's state evolves according to a model that considers its previous state, the inertia to change, and the influence of its neighborhood. We show that the time evolution of the system depends on the percentage of cooperative or competitive interactions. For scale-free networks, we find that the dispersion between actors is higher when all interactions are either cooperative or competitive, while a balanced presence of interactions leads to a lower separation. Moreover, positive assortative mixing leads to greater divergence between the states, while negative assortative mixing reduces this dispersion. We also find that hierarchical scale-free networks have both similarities and differences when compared with scale-free networks. Hierarchical scale-free networks, like scale-free networks, show the least divergence for an equal mix of cooperative and competitive interactions between actors. On the other hand, hierarchical scale-free networks, unlike scale-free networks, show much greater divergence when dominated by cooperative rather than competitive actors, and while the formation of a rich club (adding links between hubs) with cooperative interactions leads to greater divergence, the divergence is much less when they are fully competitive. Our findings highlight the importance of the topology where the interaction dynamics take place, and the fact that a balanced presence of cooperators and competitors makes the system more cohesive, compared to the case where one strategy dominates.

Identifying spreading influence nodes for social networks

The identification of spreading influence nodes in social networks, which studies how to detect important individuals in human society, has attracted increasing attention from physical and computer science, social science and economics communities. The identification algorithms of spreading influence nodes can be used to evaluate the spreading influence, describe the node’s position, and identify interaction centralities. This review summarizes the recent progress about the identification algorithms of spreading influence nodes from the viewpoint of social networks, emphasizing the contributions from physical perspectives and approaches, including the microstructure-based algorithms, community structure-based algorithms, macrostructure-based algorithms, and machine learning-based algorithms. We introduce diffusion models and performance evaluation metrics, and outline future challenges of the identification of spreading influence nodes.

Comprehensive influence of topological location and neighbor information on identifying influential nodes in complex networks

Identifying the influential nodes of complex networks is now seen as essential for optimizing the network structure or efficiently disseminating information through networks. Most of the available methods determine the spreading capability of nodes based on their topological locations or the neighbor information, the degree of node is usually used to denote the neighbor information, and the k-shell is used to denote the locations of nodes, However, k-shell does not provide enough information about the topological connections and position information of the nodes. In this work, a new hybrid method is proposed to identify highly influential spreaders by not only considering the topological location of the node but also the neighbor information. The percentage of triangle structures is employed to measure both the connections among the neighbor nodes and the location of nodes, the contact distance is also taken into consideration to distinguish the interaction influence by different step neighbors. The comparison between our proposed method and some well-known centralities indicates that the proposed measure is more highly correlated with the real spreading process, Furthermore, another comprehensive experiment shows that the top nodes removed according to the proposed method are relatively quick to destroy the network than other compared semi-local measures. Our results may provide further insights into identifying influential individuals according to the structure of the networks.

The transsortative structure of networks

Network topologies can be highly non-trivial, due to the complex underlying behaviours that form them. While past research has shown that some processes on networks may be characterized by local statistics describing nodes and their neighbours, such as degree assortativity, these quantities fail to capture important sources of variation in network structure. We define a property called transsortativity that describes correlations among a node's neighbours. Transsortativity can be systematically varied, independently of the network's degree distribution and assortativity. Moreover, it can significantly impact the spread of contagions as well as the perceptions of neighbours, known as the majority illusion. Our work improves our ability to create and analyse more realistic models of complex networks.

Cumulative effects of triadic closure and homophily in social networks

Social network structure has often been attributed to two network evolution mechanisms-triadic closure and choice homophily-which are commonly considered independently or with static models. However, empirical studies suggest that their dynamic interplay generates the observed homophily of real-world social networks. By combining these mechanisms in a dynamic model, we confirm the longheld hypothesis that choice homophily and triadic closure cause induced homophily. We estimate how much observed homophily in friendship and communication networks is amplified due to triadic closure. We find that cumulative effects of homophily amplification can also lead to the widely documented core-periphery structure of networks, and to memory of homophilic constraints (equivalent to hysteresis in physics). The model shows that even small individual bias may prompt network-level changes such as segregation or core group dominance. Our results highlight that individual-level mechanisms should not be analyzed separately without considering the dynamics of society as a whole.