Structure of the Escherichia coli RNA polymerase alpha subunit C-terminal domain

Structural basis of transcription activation by the global regulator Spx

Spx is a global transcriptional regulator in Gram-positive bacteria and has been inferred to efficiently activate transcription upon oxidative stress by engaging RNA polymerase (RNAP) and promoter DNA. However, the precise mechanism by which it interacts with RNAP and promoter DNA to initiate transcription remains obscure. Here, we report the cryo-EM structure of an intact Spx-dependent transcription activation complex (Spx-TAC) from Bacillus subtilis at 4.2 Å resolution. The structure traps Spx in an active conformation and defines key interactions accounting for Spx-dependent transcription activation. Strikingly, an oxidized Spx monomer engages RNAP by simultaneously interacting with the C-terminal domain of RNAP alpha subunit (αCTD) and σA. The interface between Spx and αCTD is distinct from those previously reported activators, indicating αCTD as a multiple target for the interaction between RNAP and various transcription activators. Notably, Spx specifically wraps the conserved -44 element of promoter DNA, thereby stabilizing Spx-TAC. Besides, Spx interacts extensively with σA through three different interfaces and promotes Spx-dependent transcription activation. Together, our structural and biochemical results provide a novel mechanistic framework for the regulation of bacterial transcription activation and shed new light on the physiological roles of the global Spx-family transcription factors.

The RNA Polymerase α Subunit Recognizes the DNA Shape of the Upstream Promoter Element

We demonstrate here that the α subunit C-terminal domain of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (αCTD) recognizes the upstream promoter (UP) DNA element via its characteristic minor groove shape and electrostatic potential. In two compositionally distinct crystallized assemblies, a pair of αCTD subunits bind in tandem to the UP element consensus A-tract that is 6 bp in length (A₆-tract), each with their arginine 265 guanidinium group inserted into the minor groove. The A₆-tract minor groove is significantly narrowed in these crystal structures, as well as in computationally predicted structures of free and bound DNA duplexes derived by Monte Carlo and molecular dynamics simulations, respectively. The negative electrostatic potential of free A₆-tract DNA is substantially enhanced compared to that of generic DNA. Shortening the A-tract by 1 bp is shown to "knock out" binding of the second αCTD through widening of the minor groove. Furthermore, in computationally derived structures with arginine 265 mutated to alanine in either αCTD, either with or without the "knockout" DNA mutation, contact with the DNA is perturbed, highlighting the importance of arginine 265 in achieving αCTD-DNA binding. These results demonstrate that the importance of the DNA shape in sequence-dependent recognition of DNA by RNA polymerase is comparable to that of certain transcription factors.

RNA polymerase II plays an active role in the formation of gene loops through the Rpb4 subunit

Gene loops are formed by the interaction of initiation and termination factors occupying the distal ends of a gene during transcription. RNAPII is believed to affect gene looping indirectly owing to its essential role in transcription. The results presented here, however, demonstrate a direct role of RNAPII in gene looping through the Rpb4 subunit. 3C analysis revealed that gene looping is abolished in the rpb4Δ mutant. In contrast to the other looping-defective mutants, rpb4Δ cells do not exhibit a transcription termination defect. RPB4 overexpression, however, rescued the transcription termination and gene looping defect of sua7-1, a mutant of TFIIB. Furthermore, RPB4 overexpression rescued the ssu72-2 gene looping defect, while SSU72 overexpression restored the formation of gene loops in rpb4Δ cells. Interestingly, the interaction of TFIIB with Ssu72 is compromised in rpb4Δ cells. These results suggest that the TFIIB-Ssu72 interaction, which is critical for gene loop formation, is facilitated by Rpb4. We propose that Rpb4 is promoting the transfer of RNAPII from the terminator to the promoter for reinitiation of transcription through TFIIB-Ssu72 mediated gene looping.

Structural biology of bacterial RNA polymerase

Since its discovery and characterization in the early 1960s (Hurwitz, J. The discovery of RNA polymerase. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 42477-42485), an enormous amount of biochemical, biophysical and genetic data has been collected on bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP). In the late 1990s, structural information pertaining to bacterial RNAP has emerged that provided unprecedented insights into the function and mechanism of RNA transcription. In this review, I list all structures related to bacterial RNAP (as determined by X-ray crystallography and NMR methods available from the Protein Data Bank), describe their contributions to bacterial transcription research and discuss the role that small molecules play in inhibiting bacterial RNA transcription.

Transcription inhibition by the depsipeptide antibiotic salinamide A

We report that bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP) is the functional cellular target of the depsipeptide antibiotic salinamide A (Sal), and we report that Sal inhibits RNAP through a novel binding site and mechanism. We show that Sal inhibits RNA synthesis in cells and that mutations that confer Sal-resistance map to RNAP genes. We show that Sal interacts with the RNAP active-center ‘bridge-helix cap’ comprising the ‘bridge-helix N-terminal hinge’, ‘F-loop’, and ‘link region’. We show that Sal inhibits nucleotide addition in transcription initiation and elongation. We present a crystal structure that defines interactions between Sal and RNAP and effects of Sal on RNAP conformation. We propose that Sal functions by binding to the RNAP bridge-helix cap and preventing conformational changes of the bridge-helix N-terminal hinge necessary for nucleotide addition. The results provide a target for antibacterial drug discovery and a reagent to probe conformation and function of the bridge-helix N-terminal hinge.

DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02451.001

The need for new antibiotics is becoming increasingly critical, as more and more bacteria become resistant to existing drugs. To develop new treatments, researchers need to understand how antibiotics work. One way antibiotics can kill bacteria is by targeting an enzyme called bacterial RNA polymerase. This enzyme builds chains of RNA that bacteria need to survive.

Sal is an antibiotic produced by a marine bacterium found on the surface of a species of jellyfish. Degen, Feng et al. show that Sal kills bacteria by inhibiting bacterial RNA polymerase and explain how Sal inhibits RNA polymerase. Sal binds to a rod-like structural element within RNA polymerase known as the ‘bridge helix’. The bridge helix has been proposed by others to contain two ‘hinges’ that open and close—allowing the bridge helix to bend and unbend—at specific steps in the cycle through which RNA polymerase builds an RNA chain. Degen, Feng et al. show that Sal binds directly to one of the two hinges and show that Sal binds to the hinge in the unbent state. Therefore, Degen, Feng et al. propose that Sal inhibits the enzyme by preventing the hinge from bending.

The binding site on RNA polymerase for Sal is different from, and does not overlap, the binding sites of current antibacterial drugs. As a result, Sal is able to kill bacteria that are resistant to current antibacterial drugs. When Degen, Feng et al. administered Sal in combination with a current antibacterial drug that targets RNA polymerase, bacteria did not detectably develop resistance to either Sal or the current antibacterial drug.

The structure of the complex between Sal and RNA polymerase suggests several ways that Sal could be modified to improve its ability to interact with RNA polymerase, thereby potentially increasing Sal's antibacterial activity. Future research could develop a range of new drugs based on Sal that could kill bacteria more effectively.

DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02451.002

Helicobacter pylori RNA polymerase α-subunit C-terminal domain shows features unique to ɛ-proteobacteria and binds NikR/DNA complexes

Bacterial RNA polymerase is a large, multi-subunit enzyme responsible for transcription of genomic information. The C-terminal domain of the α subunit of RNA polymerase (αCTD) functions as a DNA and protein recognition element localizing the polymerase on certain promoter sequences and is essential in all bacteria. Although αCTD is part of RNA polymerase, it is thought to have once been a separate transcription factor, and its primary role is the recruitment of RNA polymerase to various promoters. Despite the conservation of the subunits of RNA polymerase among bacteria, the mechanisms of regulation of transcription vary significantly. We have determined the tertiary structure of Helicobacter pylori αCTD. It is larger than other structurally determined αCTDs due to an extra, highly amphipathic helix near the C-terminal end. Residues within this helix are highly conserved among ɛ-proteobacteria. The surface of the domain that binds A/T rich DNA sequences is conserved and showed binding to DNA similar to αCTDs of other bacteria. Using several NikR dependent promoter sequences, we observed cooperative binding of H. pylori αCTD to NikR:DNA complexes. We also produced αCTD lacking the 19 C-terminal residues, which showed greatly decreased stability, but maintained the core domain structure and binding affinity to NikR:DNA at low temperatures. The modeling of H. pylori αCTD into the context of transcriptional complexes suggests that the additional amphipathic helix mediates interactions with transcriptional regulators.