Timely deposition of macromolecular structures is necessary for peer review

Against Method: Table 1-Cui Bono?

The almost universally required "Table 1," summarizing data-collection and data-processing statistics, has in its present form outlived its usefulness in almost all publications of biomolecular crystal structure reports. Information contained in "Table 1" is insufficient to evaluate or repeat the experiment; is redundant with information extractable from deposited diffraction data; and includes data items whose meaning is under increased scrutiny in the crystallographic community. Direct and consistent extraction and analysis of data quality metrics from preferably unmerged intensity data with graphical presentation of reciprocal space features, including impact on map and model features, should replace "Table 1."

New Biological Insights from Better Structure Models

Structure validation is a key component of all steps in the structure determination process, from structure building, refinement, deposition, and evaluation all the way to post-deposition optimisation of structures in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) by re-refinement and re-building. Today, many aspects of protein structures are understood better than 10years ago, and combined with improved software and more computing power, the automated PDB_REDO procedure can significantly improve about 85% of all X-ray structures ever deposited in the PDB. We review structure validation, structure improvement, and a series of validation resources and facilities that give access to improved PDB files and to reports on the quality of the original and the improved structures. Post-deposition optimisation generally leads to improved protein structures and a series of examples will illustrate how that, in turn, leads to improved or even novel biological insights.

Comment onTimely deposition of macromolecular structures is necessary for peer reviewby Joostenet al.(2013)

The wwPDB responds to the article by Joostenet al.[(2013),Acta Cryst.D69, 2293–2295].