Crystal structure of the effector-binding domain of Synechococcus elongatus CmpR in complex with ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate

Fundamentals and Exceptions of the LysR-type Transcriptional Regulators

LysR-type transcriptional regulators (LTTRs) are emerging as a promising group of macromolecules for the field of biosensors. As the largest family of bacterial transcription factors, the LTTRs represent a vast and mostly untapped repertoire of sensor proteins. To fully harness these regulators for transcription factor-based biosensor development, it is crucial to understand their underlying mechanisms and functionalities. In the first part, this Review discusses the established model and features of LTTRs. As dual-function regulators, these inducible transcription factors exude precise control over their regulatory targets. In the second part of this Review, an overview is given of the exceptions to the "classic" LTTR model. While a general regulatory mechanism has helped elucidate the intricate regulation performed by LTTRs, it is essential to recognize the variations within the family. By combining this knowledge, characterization of new regulators can be done more efficiently and accurately, accelerating the expansion of transcriptional sensors for biosensor development. Unlocking the pool of LTTRs would significantly expand the currently limited range of detectable molecules and regulatory functions available for the implementation of novel synthetic genetic circuitry.

LysR-type transcriptional regulators: state of the art

The LysR-type transcriptional regulators (LTTRs) are DNA-binding proteins present in bacteria, archaea, and in algae. Knowledge about their distribution, abundance, evolution, structural organization, transcriptional regulation, fundamental roles in free life, pathogenesis, and bacteria-plant interaction has been generated. This review focuses on these aspects and provides a current picture of LTTR biology.

Isocitrate binds to the itaconic acid-responsive LysR-type transcriptional regulator RipR in Salmonella pathogenesis

Macrophages produce itaconic acid in phagosomes in response to bacterial cell wall component lipopolysaccharide to eliminate invading pathogenic bacteria. Itaconic acid competitively inhibits the first enzyme of the bacterial glyoxylate cycle. To overcome itaconic acid stress, bacteria employ the bacterial LysR-type transcriptional regulator RipR. However, it remains unknown which molecule activates RipR in bacterial pathogenesis. In this study, we determined the crystal structure of the regulatory domain of RipR from the intracellular pathogen Salmonella. The RipR regulatory domain structure exhibited the typical dimeric arrangement with the putative ligand-binding site between the two subdomains. Our isothermal titration calorimetry experiments identified isocitrate as the physiological ligand of RipR, whose intracellular level is increased in response to itaconic acid stress. We further found that 3-phenylpropionic acid significantly decreased the resistance of the bacteria to an itaconic acid challenge. Consistently, the complex structure revealed that the compound is antagonistically bound to the RipR ligand-binding site. This study provides the molecular basis of bacterial survival in itaconic acid stress from our immune systems. Further studies are required to reveal biochemical activity, which would elucidate how Salmonella survives in macrophage phagosomes by defending against itaconic acid inhibition of bacterial metabolism.

Crystal structures of YeiE from Cronobacter sakazakii and the role of sulfite tolerance in gram-negative bacteria

YeiE has been identified as a master virulence factor of Cronobacter sakazakii. In this study, we determined the crystal structures of the regulatory domain of YeiE in complex with its physiological ligand sulfite ion (SO₃²⁻). The structure provides the basis for the molecular mechanisms for sulfite sensing and the ligand-dependent conformational changes of the regulatory domain. The genes under the control of YeiE in response to sulfite were investigated to reveal the functional roles of YeiE in the sulfite tolerance of the bacteria. We propose the molecular mechanism underlying the ability of gram-negative pathogens to defend against the innate immune response involving sulfite, thus providing a strategy to control the pathogenesis of bacteria.

Cronobacter sakazakii is an emerging gram-negative pathogenic bacterium that causes meningitis, bacteremia, and necrotizing enterocolitis in infants and has a high mortality rate. The YeiE homolog (gpESA_01081) was identified as a global virulence regulator of bacterial pathogenesis in C. sakazakii. YeiE is a LysR-type transcriptional regulator (LTTR) composed of a DNA binding domain and a regulatory domain to recognize the unknown ligand. To reveal the molecular mechanism and function of YeiE, we determined the crystal structure of the regulatory domain of YeiE. A sulfite ion was bound at the putative ligand-binding site, and subsequent studies revealed that the sulfite is the physiological ligand for YeiE. Structural comparisons to its sulfite-free structure further showed the sulfite-dependent conformational change of YeiE. The essential role of YeiE in defending against toxicity from sulfite during the growth of C. sakazakii and Escherichia coli was examined. Furthermore, the target genes and functional roles of YeiE in H₂S production and survival capability from neutrophils were investigated. Our findings provide insights into the sophisticated behaviors of pathogenic gram-negative bacteria in response to sulfite from the environment and host.

Stress Signaling in Cyanobacteria: A Mechanistic Overview

Cyanobacteria are highly diverse, widely distributed photosynthetic bacteria inhabiting various environments ranging from deserts to the cryosphere. Throughout this range of niches, they have to cope with various stresses and kinds of deprivation which threaten their growth and viability. In order to adapt to these stresses and survive, they have developed several global adaptive responses which modulate the patterns of gene expression and the cellular functions at work. Sigma factors, two-component systems, transcriptional regulators and small regulatory RNAs acting either separately or collectively, for example, induce appropriate cyanobacterial stress responses. The aim of this review is to summarize our current knowledge about the diversity of the sensors and regulators involved in the perception and transduction of light, oxidative and thermal stresses, and nutrient starvation responses. The studies discussed here point to the fact that various stresses affecting the photosynthetic capacity are transduced by common mechanisms.

Carbon/nitrogen homeostasis control in cyanobacteria

Carbon/nitrogen (C/N) balance sensing is a key requirement for the maintenance of cellular homeostasis. Therefore, cyanobacteria have evolved a sophisticated signal transduction network targeting the metabolite 2-oxoglutarate (2-OG), the carbon skeleton for nitrogen assimilation. It serves as a status reporter for the cellular C/N balance that is sensed by transcription factors NtcA and NdhR and the versatile PII-signaling protein. The PII protein acts as a multitasking signal-integrating regulator, combining the 2-OG signal with the energy state of the cell through adenyl-nucleotide binding. Depending on these integrated signals, PII orchestrates metabolic activities in response to environmental changes through binding to various targets. In addition to 2-OG, other status reporter metabolites have recently been discovered, mainly indicating the carbon status of the cells. One of them is cAMP, which is sensed by the PII-like protein SbtB. The present review focuses, with a main emphasis on unicellular model strains Synechoccus elongatus and Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, on the physiological framework of these complex regulatory loops, the tight linkage to metabolism and the molecular mechanisms governing the signaling processes.

Carbohydrate structure hits the groove

An introduction to the Acta Cryst. F special issue on glycoproteins and protein–carbohydrate complexes in which the contents, the current state of the field and the future of glycan structural biology are briefly discussed.