1
|
Kaffashan Kakhki M, Malakooti Asl N, Parirokh M. Assessment of customer knowledge management in academic libraries: Design and validation of a checklist. JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC LIBRARIANSHIP 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
2
|
Clements K, Pawlowski J, Manouselis N. Open educational resources repositories literature review – Towards a comprehensive quality approaches framework. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
3
|
Isfandyari-Moghaddam A, Danesh F, Hadji-Azizi N. Webometrics as a method for identifying the most accredited free electronic journals. ELECTRONIC LIBRARY 2015. [DOI: 10.1108/el-10-2012-0141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Purpose
– The present study aims at determining the most accredited free English electronic journals (EJs) in Medical Sciences, as finding free scholarly EJs including medical ones is difficult in the web environment.
Design/methodology/approach
– The research population consisted of 700 free EJs of Medical Sciences, which were collected from two reputable websites, namely, Directory of Open Access Journals and Free Medical Journals. After first screening, 269 free EJs including 76 journals in health, 4 journals in nursing, 175 journals in medicine and 14 free EJs in dentistry remained for final investigation […].
Findings
– The most accredited journals in four medical disciplines studied here are health: New South Wales Public Health Bulletin, PLoS Biology and Environmental Health Perspectives – National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; nursing: Online Journal of Rural Nursing and Health Care and Online Journal of Nursing Informatics […].
Originality/value
– This research can be treated as an addition to the webometrics literature.
Collapse
|
4
|
Does affinity matter? Slow effects of e-quality on information seeking in virtual communities. LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE RESEARCH 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2014.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
5
|
Zha X, Zhang J, Yan Y, Xiao Z. User perceptions of e-quality of and affinity with virtual communities: The effect of individual differences. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR 2014. [DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
6
|
Zha X, Xiao Z, Zhang J. A Survey of User Perceptions of Digital Library E-Quality and Affinity. SERIALS REVIEW 2014. [DOI: 10.1080/00987913.2014.895555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
7
|
Palavitsinis N, Manouselis N, Sanchez-Alonso S. Metadata quality in digital repositories: Empirical results from the cross-domain transfer of a quality assurance process. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 2014. [DOI: 10.1002/asi.23045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Nikos Palavitsinis
- Agro-Know Technologies; 17 Grammou Str, Vrilissia Athens Greece 15235
- University of Alcala de Henares; 28871 Alcalá de Henares Madrid Spain
| | - Nikos Manouselis
- Agro-Know Technologies; 17 Grammou Str, Vrilissia Athens Greece 15235
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yan Y, Zha X, Zhang J, Hou X. Comparing digital libraries with virtual communities from the perspective of e-quality. LIBRARY HI TECH 2014. [DOI: 10.1108/lht-04-2013-0042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Purpose
– In this study, the authors use the term “e-quality” to refer to information quality, system quality and service quality. This study aims to focus on e-quality, exploring and comparing users' perceptions of digital libraries and virtual communities in the hope that the results of this study can help lead to better understanding of the exact nature of e-quality as perceived by users.
Design/methodology/approach
– A large-scale survey was conducted for data collection. Data collected from 334 users of digital libraries and virtual communities were used for data analysis.
Findings
– The study finds that users are likely to perceive a higher level of information quality, system quality and service quality of digital libraries than of virtual communities.
Practical implications
– The authors suggest that librarians do not need to have concerns over the challenge brought by virtual communities, which indeed have an increasing impact on the way a lot of people seek and gather information. Instead, they should encourage their users to use both digital libraries and virtual communities. The authors believe that the usage of these two types of information sources by users can efficiently inform each other, thus facilitating the e-quality of both digital libraries and virtual communities to reach excellence.
Originality/value
– Building on the information systems (IS) success model, this study explores and compares users' perceptions of digital libraries and virtual communities in terms of e-quality, which the authors think presents a new view for digital library research and practice alike.
Collapse
|
9
|
Pedramnia S, Modiramani P, Ghavami Ghanbarabadi V. An analysis of service quality in academic libraries using LibQUAL scale. LIBRARY MANAGEMENT 2012. [DOI: 10.1108/01435121211217144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|