1
|
Poldrugovac M, Wammes JD, Bos VLLC, Barbazza E, Ivanković D, Merten H, MacNeil Vroomen JL, Klazinga NS, Kringos DS. Performance indicators on long-term care for older people in 43 high- and middle-income countries: literature review, web search and expert consultation. BMC Health Serv Res 2025; 25:460. [PMID: 40148928 PMCID: PMC11951636 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-025-12573-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2024] [Accepted: 03/13/2025] [Indexed: 03/29/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long-term care (LTC) for older people is an area of focus for many health and social policies in high- and middle-income countries. Performance Indicators are used to provide national and subnational jurisdictions with insights to ensure quality of the provided LTC services for older people. Although LTC systems vary across jurisdictions, there is demand for internationally comparable indicators to support countries in monitoring LTC and facilitate mutual learning. The aim of this study was to provide an overview of indicators currently employed to monitor the performance of LTC systems and services in high- and middle- income countries and describe their key characteristics. METHODS A review of the literature in six scientific databases (literature review) and web searches of relevant sites across 43 selected countries (web search) was conducted. We asked country representatives from the Working Party on Health Care Quality and Outcomes of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, where most of these countries are represented, to cross-validate the sources of information found (expert consultation). We then extracted and analysed the data from all obtained sources based on a predetermined set of characteristics. RESULTS The search of scientific databases yielded 12,960 records, from which forty papers were selected for inclusion. The scientific literature findings were complemented by 34 grey literature sources. In total, we identified performance indicators being used to monitor LTC systems and services across 29 national and subnational jurisdictions in 24 out of 43 countries. In total, 620 indicators were identified. All jurisdictions used indicators related to institutional LTC and 16 also used indicators on home care. The most frequently monitored structures, processes, and results were pressure ulcers, falls, use of restraints and pain management. CONCLUSIONS We identified LTC performance indicators currently being monitored in 29 jurisdictions across 24 countries. Many jurisdictions are monitoring similar structures, processes, and results. This presents an opportunity to develop internationally comparable LTC performance indicators based on existing efforts across countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mircha Poldrugovac
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
- National Institute of Public Health of Slovenia, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
| | - Joost D Wammes
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section Geriatrics, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Aging & Later Life, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Véronique L L C Bos
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Quality of Care, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Erica Barbazza
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Aging & Later Life, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Damir Ivanković
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Quality of Care, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hanneke Merten
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Quality of Care, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Janet L MacNeil Vroomen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section Geriatrics, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Aging & Later Life, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Niek S Klazinga
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Quality of Care, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dionne S Kringos
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Quality of Care, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Smith S, Martin‐Khan M, Travers C. What constitutes a quality community aged care service-client perspectives: An international scoping study. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY 2022; 30:e3593-e3628. [PMID: 36083293 PMCID: PMC10087212 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.13998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Revised: 06/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/20/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Overwhelmingly, older Australians (people aged 65 years and older or 50 years and older for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people) prefer to remain living in their own home rather than moving into residential care. To enable older Australians who require assistance to remain living at home, the Federal Government provides a wide range of community care services, the provision of which has increased substantially over the last 15 years. The importance of client preferences, prefaced by the introduction of consumer directed care across community aged care services, has gathered momentum in Australia following legislation in 2015. Older peoples' preferences differ in comparison to younger people with disability and those with mental health concerns. Older people focus more on the provision of services rather than the notion of independent living itself. This scoping review aimed to explore what aspects people aged 65 years and older consider to be important qualities of aged care services delivered in the community. A computerised search in MEDLINE, CINAHL, PubMed and PsychINFO and hand searches of the Cochrane database and Google Scholar were completed in May 2022. Sixty-two articles met the selection criteria and were included in the review. Data were extracted using a fit-for-purpose protocol and analysed using the Miles and Huberman Model for thematic analysis. Results identified five themes representing quality domains that describe features that are important to clients: staff knowledge, respect for clients, a person-centred approach, a collaborative partnership with clients and clear communication. When providers of community aged care services are planning to assess the quality of their services, these findings could be used to guide their evaluation. This will ensure that future services delivered accommodate the needs and preferences of clients who receive them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Smith
- Centre for Health Services ResearchThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | - Melinda Martin‐Khan
- Centre for Health Services ResearchThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | - Catherine Travers
- School of Health and Rehabilitation SciencesThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Huotari P, Havrdová Z. Stakeholders' roles and responsibilities regarding quality of care. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 2017; 29:864-76. [PMID: 27671422 DOI: 10.1108/ijhcqa-06-2015-0070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to describe how different stakeholders (society, managers, employees and clients) can together ensure the quality of care. Design/methodology/approach Qualitative data were collected from four focus group interviews conducted in three countries. All interviewees were pursuing a master's degree in social and/or health care management and had begun working in their field after completing their bachelor's degree. The data were analysed using inductive content analysis. Findings The society and managers are responsible for the care system as a whole and must apply system-oriented, rather than sector-oriented, thinking. Employees are responsible for ensuring the continuity of client services in their work, and managers and employees share the responsibility of achieving the organisational goals and quality standards. The clients are responsible for acting as responsible service users and providing the required information to obtain care. Communication was strongly emphasised in the data, and it necessitates cross-professional and organisational boundaries, professional and political boundaries, as well as boundaries between the professional and the client. Research limitations/implications Since the interviewees were all pursuing a master's degree in social and/or health care management, when reflecting on their work experience, they may have also been reflecting what they had learned in university. Practical implications This study emphasises the importance of collaboration and communication between stakeholders in ensuring the quality of care. Unpredictable economies, the ageing population and the ongoing integration and reorganisation of health and social care services in Europe highlight systematic and strategic approach in quality of care. Originality/value This paper claims that communication between different care stakeholders gives a more systematic and coherent framework for the quality of care. Quality of care is a strategic choice and part of the strategic decision making at the societal, political, organisational and managerial levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Päivi Huotari
- Faculty of Social and Health Care, Lahti University of Applied Sciences , Lahti, Finland
| | - Zuzana Havrdová
- Faculty of Humanities, Charles University , Prague, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|