1
|
Madsen DØ, Slåtten K, Johanson D. The emergence and evolution of benchmarking: a management fashion perspective. BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL 2017. [DOI: 10.1108/bij-05-2016-0077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to make a contribution to the benchmarking literature by examining the historical emergence and evolution of benchmarking using the management fashion perspective as a theoretical lens.
Design/methodology/approach
The research approach followed in this paper can be characterized as explorative and theoretical. Insights from different data sources have been combined to provide a rich description of the emergence and evolution of benchmarking.
Findings
This analysis casts new light on several aspects of benchmarking’s emergence and evolution pattern. The characteristics of the benchmarking idea give it potential as a fashionable management tool. The widespread popularity and longevity of benchmarking can to a large extent be explained by the efforts of various actors to turn benchmarking into an institution.
Research limitations/implications
The paper is explorative and is limited by a reliance on secondary sources.
Originality/value
Although some researchers have noted that benchmarking could be viewed as a management fashion, management fashion theory has, only to a very limited extent, been used as a theoretical lens in the context of benchmarking. This research paper demonstrates that management fashion theory can provide valuable insights for research on benchmarking.
Collapse
|
2
|
Min H, Ahn YH. Dynamic Benchmarking of Mass Transit Systems in the United States Using Data Envelopment Analysis and the Malmquist Productivity Index. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS LOGISTICS 2017. [DOI: 10.1111/jbl.12148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
3
|
Min H, Ahn YH, Lambert T. Benchmarking and improving mass transit systems in the United States based on best-in class practices. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT 2017. [DOI: 10.1108/ijlm-01-2015-0031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to find ways to develop more efficient mass transit systems across the USA and, thus, make the best use of state/federal/municipal government funds and taxpayers’ monies. This paper conducts benchmarking studies. In doing so, this paper identifies the best-in class mass transit practices that every regional mass transit system can emulate.
Design/methodology/approach
The continuous underutilization of a mass transit system can increase public scrutiny concerning the increased investment in mass transit services. To defuse such scrutiny, this paper analyzes the past (in year 2011) performances of 515 mass transit agencies in the USA using data envelopment analysis (DEA). Also, to identify which factors influences those performances, the authors paired DEA scores for transit efficiency at the state level against a set of independent variables using a special form of regression analysis called Tobit regression.
Findings
The authors found that the greater population density of the service area, the greater number of riders can be served in a short amount of distance and time. Also, the authors discovered that the transportation mode of mass transit services could affect mass transit efficiency. On the other hand, the authors found no evidence indicating that the public ownership or private operation of transit systems could make any differences in the transit efficiency.
Originality/value
This paper is one of the few that assessed the performance of mass transit systems in comparison to their peers using a large-scale data and identify the leading causes of mass transit inefficiency. Thus, this paper helps transit authorities in handling juggling acts of protecting the conflicting interests of government policy makers against the general public and, then, make sensible future investment decisions.
Collapse
|
4
|
Min H, Ahn YH, Lambert TE. Evaluating the comparative efficiency of urban mass transit systems: a longitudinal analysis of the Ohio case. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOGISTICS-RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS 2015. [DOI: 10.1080/13675567.2014.992304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
5
|
Gomes CF, Yasin MM, Lisboa JV, Small MH. Discerning competitive strategy through an assessment of competitive methods. SERVICE INDUSTRIES JOURNAL 2014. [DOI: 10.1080/02642069.2014.915946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
6
|
Mugion RG, Musella F. Customer satisfaction and statistical techniques for the implementation of benchmarking in the public sector. TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE 2013. [DOI: 10.1080/14783363.2012.733260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
7
|
Gomes CF, Yasin MM. An assessment of performance-related practices in service operational settings: measures and utilization patterns. SERVICE INDUSTRIES JOURNAL 2013. [DOI: 10.1080/02642069.2011.600441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
8
|
Yasin MM, Gomes CF. Performance management in service operational settings: a selective literature examination. BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL 2010. [DOI: 10.1108/14635771011036311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
9
|
Lambert TE, Min H, Srinivasan AK. Benchmarking and measuring the comparative efficiency of emergency medical services in major US cities. BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL 2009. [DOI: 10.1108/14635770910972450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
10
|
Fuzzy multiple criteria base realignment and closure (BRAC) benchmarking system at the Department of Defense. BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL 2009. [DOI: 10.1108/14635770910948222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
11
|
Gurumurthy A, Kodali R. Application of benchmarking for assessing the lean manufacturing implementation. BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL 2009. [DOI: 10.1108/14635770910948268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|