Autism spectrum disorders in high secure psychiatric care: a review of literature, future research and clinical directions

The effectiveness of interventions for offending behaviours in adults with autism spectrum disorders (ASD): a systematic PRISMA review

Previous research has suggested that the core features of autism spectrum disorders (ASD) may contribute to offending behaviours and increased vulnerability within the Criminal Justice System. To date, there is a paucity of evidence assessing the effectiveness of interventions for offending behaviour in adults with ASD but without co-occurring intellectual disability (ID) across a broad range of forensic settings. The lack of robust evidence is concerning, as limited effectiveness may contribute to an increased likelihood of prolonged incarceration, particularly in the most restrictive settings. A PRISMA systematic review was conducted with a narrative synthesis to: (a) evaluate the evidence of the effectiveness of interventions aimed at reducing recidivism, (b) assess whether the core features of ASD impact the effectiveness of these interventions, and (c) identify additional factors that may affect the effectiveness of interventions within this population. Seven studies involving ten male participants were identified. The findings suggest that interventions for offending behaviours in adults with ASD without intellectual disability (ID) are largely inadequate, and that core ASD features need to be considered. Additionally, a complex interplay of risk factors potentially impacting intervention effectiveness was suggested. Limitations include heterogeneity across intervention types, measures of effectiveness, and what constitutes effectiveness. Despite the limited number of studies and data quality, the review aligns with a growing body of literature highlighting vulnerability and a need for evidence-based interventions for people with ASD. The review also discusses the broader implications of ineffective interventions.

Autism: Implications for high secure psychiatric care and move towards best practice

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To explore the role of high secure psychiatric care (HSPC) in the assessment and management of individuals with an Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) using published studies and clinical experience. Key areas of exploration include the prevalence of ASD within HSPC, some autism specific issues including clinical and cognitive characteristics, psychopathy and emotional regulation, presence of incompatibilities and use of seclusion, as well as experiences of being detained in HSPC. Developing best practice and a specialist ASD service in HSPC is also discussed.

METHOD

A discussion of available literature, supported by clinical experience.

CONCLUSIONS

Although individuals with an ASD admitted to HSPC comprise a small group, they are likely to be overrepresented relative to the general prevalence of ASD in the population and present with specific issues. Whilst individuals report a generally positive experience of HSPC, therapeutic outcomes are variable and the factors influencing them poorly understood. Staff knowledge and application of ASD theory and practice appears to have a significant influence on outcomes.

IMPLICATIONS

Although best practice concerning ASD secure services will continue to be improved and developed, the role of HSPC in the assessment and management of some individuals with an ASD who present with complex needs and high risk behaviours remains clear.