1
|
Rasulo FA, Hopkins P, Lobo FA, Pandin P, Matta B, Carozzi C, Romagnoli S, Absalom A, Badenes R, Bleck T, Caricato A, Claassen J, Denault A, Honorato C, Motta S, Meyfroidt G, Radtke FM, Ricci Z, Robba C, Taccone FS, Vespa P, Nardiello I, Lamperti M. Processed Electroencephalogram-Based Monitoring to Guide Sedation in Critically Ill Adult Patients: Recommendations from an International Expert Panel-Based Consensus. Neurocrit Care 2022; 38:296-311. [PMID: 35896766 PMCID: PMC10090014 DOI: 10.1007/s12028-022-01565-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of processed electroencephalography (pEEG) for depth of sedation (DOS) monitoring is increasing in anesthesia; however, how to use of this type of monitoring for critical care adult patients within the intensive care unit (ICU) remains unclear. METHODS A multidisciplinary panel of international experts consisting of 21 clinicians involved in monitoring DOS in ICU patients was carefully selected on the basis of their expertise in neurocritical care and neuroanesthesiology. Panelists were assigned four domains (techniques for electroencephalography [EEG] monitoring, patient selection, use of the EEG monitors, competency, and training the principles of pEEG monitoring) from which a list of questions and statements was created to be addressed. A Delphi method based on iterative approach was used to produce the final statements. Statements were classified as highly appropriate or highly inappropriate (median rating ≥ 8), appropriate (median rating ≥ 7 but < 8), or uncertain (median rating < 7) and with a strong disagreement index (DI) (DI < 0.5) or weak DI (DI ≥ 0.5 but < 1) consensus. RESULTS According to the statements evaluated by the panel, frontal pEEG (which includes a continuous colored density spectrogram) has been considered adequate to monitor the level of sedation (strong consensus), and it is recommended by the panel that all sedated patients (paralyzed or nonparalyzed) unfit for clinical evaluation would benefit from DOS monitoring (strong consensus) after a specific training program has been performed by the ICU staff. To cover the gap between knowledge/rational and routine application, some barriers must be broken, including lack of knowledge, validation for prolonged sedation, standardization between monitors based on different EEG analysis algorithms, and economic issues. CONCLUSIONS Evidence on using DOS monitors in ICU is still scarce, and further research is required to better define the benefits of using pEEG. This consensus highlights that some critically ill patients may benefit from this type of neuromonitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank A Rasulo
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy. .,Department of Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
| | - Philip Hopkins
- Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Francisco A Lobo
- Institute of Anesthesiology, Cleveland Clinic, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | - Pierre Pandin
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Erasme Hospital, Universitè Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Basil Matta
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Carla Carozzi
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Istituto Neurologico C. Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Romagnoli
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Anthony Absalom
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Rafael Badenes
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Thomas Bleck
- Division of Stroke and Neurocritical Care, Department of Neurology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - Anselmo Caricato
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Gemelli University Hospital, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Jan Claassen
- Department of Neurocritical Care, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - André Denault
- Critical Care Division, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Cristina Honorato
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Saba Motta
- Scientific Library, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Geert Meyfroidt
- Department of Intensive Care, University Hospitals Leuven and Laboratory of Intensive Care Medicine, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Finn Michael Radtke
- Department of Anesthesiology IRS, Nykøbing F. Hospital, Nykøbing Falster, Denmark
| | - Zaccaria Ricci
- Department of Pediatric Anesthesia, Meyer University Hospital of Florence, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Chiara Robba
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Policlinico San Martino and University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Fabio S Taccone
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Erasme Hospital, Universitè Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Paul Vespa
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neurocritical Care, Los Angeles Medical Center, Ronald Reagan University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ida Nardiello
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Massimo Lamperti
- Institute of Anesthesiology, Cleveland Clinic, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| |
Collapse
|