Development of Sensor-Based Measures of Upper Extremity Interlimb Coordination

Technology-Based Compensation Assessment and Detection of Upper Extremity Activities of Stroke Survivors: Systematic Review

Background

Upper extremity (UE) impairment affects up to 80% of stroke survivors and accounts for most of the rehabilitation after discharge from the hospital release. Compensation, commonly used by stroke survivors during UE rehabilitation, is applied to adapt to the loss of motor function and may impede the rehabilitation process in the long term and lead to new orthopedic problems. Intensive monitoring of compensatory movements is critical for improving the functional outcomes during rehabilitation.

Objective

This review analyzes how technology-based methods have been applied to assess and detect compensation during stroke UE rehabilitation.

Methods

We conducted a wide database search. All studies were independently screened by 2 reviewers (XW and YF), with a third reviewer (BY) involved in resolving discrepancies. The final included studies were rated according to their level of clinical evidence based on their correlation with clinical scales (with the same tasks or the same evaluation criteria). One reviewer (XW) extracted data on publication, demographic information, compensation types, sensors used for compensation assessment, compensation measurements, and statistical or artificial intelligence methods. Accuracy was checked by another reviewer (YF). Four research questions were presented. For each question, the data were synthesized and tabulated, and a descriptive summary of the findings was provided. The data were synthesized and tabulated based on each research question.

Results

A total of 72 studies were included in this review. In all, 2 types of compensation were identified: disuse of the affected upper limb and awkward use of the affected upper limb to adjust for limited strength, mobility, and motor control. Various models and quantitative measurements have been proposed to characterize compensation. Body-worn technology (25/72, 35% studies) was the most used sensor technology to assess compensation, followed by marker-based motion capture system (24/72, 33% studies) and marker-free vision sensor technology (16/72, 22% studies). Most studies (56/72, 78% studies) used statistical methods for compensation assessment, whereas heterogeneous machine learning algorithms (15/72, 21% studies) were also applied for automatic detection of compensatory movements and postures.

Conclusions

This systematic review provides insights for future research on technology-based compensation assessment and detection in stroke UE rehabilitation. Technology-based compensation assessment and detection have the capacity to augment rehabilitation independent of the constant care of therapists. The drawbacks of each sensor in compensation assessment and detection are discussed, and future research could focus on methods to overcome these disadvantages. It is advised that open data together with multilabel classification algorithms or deep learning algorithms could benefit from automatic real time compensation detection. It is also recommended that technology-based compensation predictions be explored.

Classifying Unimanual and Bimanual Upper Extremity Tasks in Individuals Post-Stroke

After stroke, many individuals develop impairments that lead to compensatory motions. Compensation allows individuals to achieve tasks but has long-term detrimental effects and represents maladaptive motor strategies. Increased use of bimanual motions may serve as a biomarker for recovery (and the reduction of reliance on compensatory motion), and tracking such motion using sensor data may provide critical data for health care specialists. However, past work by the authors demonstrated individual variation in motor strategies results in noisy and chaotic sensor data. The goal of the current work is to develop classifiers capable of differentiating unimanual, bimanaual asymmetric, and bimanual symmetric gestures using wearable sensor data. Twenty participants post-stroke (and 20 age-matched controls) performed a set of tasks under the supervision of a trained occupational therapist. Sensor data were recorded for each task. Classifiers were developed using artificial neural networks (ANNs) as a baseline, and the echo state neural network (ESNN) which has demonstrated efficacy with chaotic data. We find that, for control and post-stroke participants, the ESNN results in improved testing accuracy performance (91.3% and 80.3%, respectively). These results suggest a novel method for classifying gestures in individuals post-stroke, and the developed classifiers may facilitate longitudinal monitoring and correction of compensatory motion.

A Fully Wireless Wearable Motion Tracking System with 3D Human Model for Gait Analysis

This paper presents a wearable motion tracking system with recording and playback features. This system has been designed for gait analysis and interlimb coordination studies. It can be implemented to help reduce fall risk and to retrain gait in a rehabilitation setting. Our system consists of ten custom wearable straps, a receiver, and a central computer. Comparing with similar existing solutions, the proposed system is affordable and convenient, which can be used in both indoor and outdoor settings. In the experiment, the system calculates five gait parameters and has the potential to identify deviant gait patterns. The system can track upper body parameters such as arm swing, which has potential in the study of pathological gaits and the coordination of the limbs.

Comparison of Machine Learning approaches for Classifying Upper Extremity Tasks in Individuals Post-Stroke

After a stroke, individuals often exhibit upper extremity (UE) motor dysfunction, influencing the performance of everyday tasks. Characterizing UE movements is useful to track recovery and response to intervention. Yet, due to the complexity of the recovery process, UE movements may be extremely variable and person-specific. While this renders automatic recognition of these gestures challenging, machine learning methods could be used to classify UE movements in atypical populations. In the current study, we utilize data from 20 individuals post-stroke and 20 age-matched controls to identify an optimal set of sensor-extracted features for the classification of unimanual and bimanual gestures during task performance. We found that using fewer than 100 features along with a random forest classifier produced the best performance across both groups, with both user-dependent and user-independent models.