Heart Rate Variability Analysis on CEBS Database Signals

Camera-Based Seismocardiogram for Heart Rate Variability Monitoring

Heart rate variability (HRV) is a crucial metric that quantifies the variation between consecutive heartbeats, serving as a significant indicator of autonomic nervous system (ANS) activity. It has found widespread applications in clinical diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of cardiovascular diseases. In this study, we proposed an optical model for defocused speckle imaging, to simultaneously incorporate out-of-plane translation and rotation-induced motion for highly-sensitive non-contact seismocardiogram (SCG) measurement. Using electrocardiogram (ECG) signals as the gold standard, we evaluated the performance of photoplethysmogram (PPG) signals and speckle-based SCG signals in assessing HRV. The results indicated that the HRV parameters measured from SCG signals extracted from laser speckle videos showed higher consistency with the results obtained from the ECG signals compared to PPG signals. Additionally, we confirmed that even when clothing obstructed the measurement site, the efficacy of SCG signals extracted from the motion of laser speckle patterns persisted in assessing the HRV levels. This demonstrates the robustness of camera-based non-contact SCG in monitoring HRV, highlighting its potential as a reliable, non-contact alternative to traditional contact-PPG sensors.

Heart Rate Variability Analysis on Electrocardiograms, Seismocardiograms and Gyrocardiograms of Healthy Volunteers and Patients with Valvular Heart Diseases

Heart rate variability (HRV) is the physiological variation in the intervals between consecutive heartbeats that reflects the activity of the autonomic nervous system. This parameter is traditionally evaluated based on electrocardiograms (ECG signals). Seismocardiography (SCG) and/or gyrocardiography (GCG) are used to monitor cardiac mechanical activity; therefore, they may be used in HRV analysis and the evaluation of valvular heart diseases (VHDs) simultaneously. The purpose of this study was to compare the time domain, frequency domain and nonlinear HRV indices obtained from electrocardiograms, seismocardiograms (SCG signals) and gyrocardiograms (GCG signals) in healthy volunteers and patients with valvular heart diseases. An analysis of the time domain, frequency domain and nonlinear heart rate variability was conducted on electrocardiograms and gyrocardiograms registered from 29 healthy male volunteers and 30 patients with valvular heart diseases admitted to the Columbia University Medical Center (New York City, NY, USA). The results of the HRV analysis show a strong linear correlation with the HRV indices calculated from the ECG, SCG and GCG signals and prove the feasibility and reliability of HRV analysis despite the influence of VHDs on the SCG and GCG waveforms.

Time Domain and Frequency Domain Heart Rate Variability Analysis on Electrocardiograms and Mechanocardiograms from Patients with Valvular Diseases

Heart rate variability (HRV) is a physiological phenomenon of the variation of a cardiac interval (interbeat) over time that reflects the activity of the autonomic nervous system. HRV analysis is usually based on electrocardiograms (ECG signals) and has found many applications in the diagnosis of cardiac diseases, including valvular diseases. This analysis could also be performed on seismocardiograms (SCG signals) and gyrocardiograms (GCG signals) that provide information on cardiac cycles and the state of heart valves. In our study, we sought to evaluate the influence of valvular heart disease on the correlations between HRV indices obtained from electrocardiograms, seismocardiograms, and gyrocardiograms and to compare the HRV indices obtained from the three aforementioned cardiac signals. The results of HRV analysis in the time domain and frequency domain of the ECG, SCG, and GCG signals are within the standard deviation and have a strong linear correlation. This means that despite the influence of VHDs on the SCG and GCG waveforms, the HRV indices are valid. Clinical Relevance-Cardiac mechanical signals (seismocar-diograms and gyrocardiograms) can be applied to evaluate heart rate variability despite the influence of valvular diseases on the morphology of cardiac mechanical signals.

Gyrocardiography: A Review of the Definition, History, Waveform Description, and Applications

Gyrocardiography (GCG) is a non-invasive technique of analyzing cardiac vibrations by a MEMS (microelectromechanical system) gyroscope placed on a chest wall. Although its history is short in comparison with seismocardiography (SCG) and electrocardiography (ECG), GCG becomes a technique which may provide additional insight into the mechanical aspects of the cardiac cycle. In this review, we describe the summary of the history, definition, measurements, waveform description and applications of gyrocardiography. The review was conducted on about 55 works analyzed between November 2016 and September 2020. The aim of this literature review was to summarize the current state of knowledge in gyrocardiography, especially the definition, waveform description, the physiological and physical sources of the signal and its applications. Based on the analyzed works, we present the definition of GCG as a technique for registration and analysis of rotational component of local cardiac vibrations, waveform annotation, several applications of the gyrocardiography, including, heart rate estimation, heart rate variability analysis, hemodynamics analysis, and classification of various cardiac diseases.

Time Domain And Frequency Domain Heart Rate Variability Analysis on Gyrocardiograms

Heart rate variability (HRV) is a valuable noninvasive tool of assessing the state of cardiovascular autonomic function. The interest in heart rate monitoring without electrodes led to the rise of alternative heart beat monitoring methods, such as gyrocardiography (GCG). The purpose of this study was to compare HRV indices calculated on GCG and ECG signals. The study on time domain and and frequency domain heart rate variability analysis was conducted on electrocardiograms and gyrocardiograms registered on 29 healthy male volunteers. ECG signals were used as a reference and the HRV analysis was performed using PhysioNet Cardiovascular Signal Toolbox. The results of HRV analysis show great similarity and strong linear correlation of HRV indices calculated from ECG and GCG indicate the feasibility and reliability of HRV analysis based on gyrocardiograms.

Heart Rate Variability Analysis on Electrocardiograms, Seismocardiograms and Gyrocardiograms on Healthy Volunteers

Physiological variation of the interval between consecutive heartbeats is known as the heart rate variability (HRV). HRV analysis is traditionally performed on electrocardiograms (ECG signals) and has become a useful tool in the diagnosis of different clinical and functional conditions. The progress in the sensor technique encouraged the development of alternative methods of analyzing cardiac activity: Seismocardiography and gyrocardiography. In our study we performed HRV analysis on ECG, seismocardiograms (SCG signals) and gyrocardiograms (GCG signals) using the PhysioNet Cardiovascular Toolbox. The heartbeats in ECG were detected using the Pan–Tompkins algorithm and the heartbeats in SCG and GCG signals were detected as peaks within 100 ms from the occurrence of the ECG R waves. The results of time domain, frequency domain and nonlinear HRV analysis on ECG, SCG and GCG signals are similar and this phenomenon is confirmed by very strong linear correlation of HRV indices. The differences between HRV indices obtained on ECG and SCG and on ECG and GCG were statistically insignificant and encourage using SCG or GCG for HRV estimation. Our results of HRV analysis confirm stronger correlation of HRV indices computed on ECG and GCG signals than on ECG and SCG signals because of greater tolerance to inter-subject variability and disturbances.

Influence of Empirical Mode Decomposition on Heart Rate Variability Indices Obtained from Smartphone Seismocardiograms

Heart rate variability (HRV) is a physiological variation of time interval between consecutive heart beats caused by the activity of autonomic nervous system. Seismocardiography (SCG) is a non-invasive method of analyzing cardiac vibrations and can be used to obtain inter-beat intervals required to perform HRV analysis. Heart beats on SCG signals are detected as the occurrences of aortic valve opening (AO) waves. Morphological variations between subjects complicate developing annotation algorithms. To overcome this obstacle we propose the empirical mode decomposition (EMD) to improve the signal quality. We used two algorithms to determine the influence of EMD on HRV indices: the first algorithm uses a band-pass filter and the second algorithm uses EMD as the first step. Higher beat detection performance was achieved for algorithm with EMD (Se=0.926, PPV=0.926 for all analyzed beats) than the algorithm with a band-pass filter (Se=0.859, PPV=0.855). The influence of analyzed algorithms on HRV indices is low despite the differences of heart beat detection performance between analyzed algorithms.

Comparison of multiple cardiac signal acquisition technologies for heart rate variability analysis

Heart rate variability analysis is a recognized non-invasive tool that is used to assess autonomic nervous system regulation in various clinical settings and medical conditions. A wide variety of HRV analysis methods have been proposed, but they all require a certain number of cardiac beats intervals. There are many ways to record cardiac activity: electrocardiography, phonocardiography, plethysmocardiography, seismocardiography. However, the feasibility of performing HRV analysis with these technologies and particularly their ability to detect autonomic nervous system changes still has to be studied. In this study, we developed a technology allowing the simultaneous monitoring of electrocardiography, phonocardiography, seismocardiography, photoplethysmocardiography and piezoplethysmocardiography and investigated whether these sensors could be used for HRV analysis. We therefore tested the evolution of several HRV parameters computed from several sensors before, during and after a postural change. The main findings of our study is that even if most sensors were suitable for mean HR computation, some of them demonstrated limited agreement for several HRV analyses methods. We also demonstrated that piezoplethysmocardiography showed better agreement with ECG than other sensors for most HRV indexes.

Comparison of HRV indices obtained from ECG and SCG signals from CEBS database

BACKGROUND

Heart rate variability (HRV) has become a useful tool of assessing the function of the heart and of the autonomic nervous system. Over the recent years, there has been interest in heart rate monitoring without electrodes. Seismocardiography (SCG) is a non-invasive technique of recording and analyzing vibrations generated by the heart using an accelerometer. In this study, we compare HRV indices obtained from SCG and ECG on signals from combined measurement of ECG, breathing and seismocardiogram (CEBS) database and determine the influence of heart beat detector on SCG signals.

METHODS

We considered two heart beat detectors on SCG signals: reference detector using R waves from ECG signal to detect heart beats in SCG and a heart beat detector using only SCG signal. We performed HRV analysis and calculated time and frequency features.

RESULTS

Beat detection performance of tested algorithm on all SCG signals is quite good on 85,954 beats ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]) despite lower performance on noisy signals. Correlation between HRV indices was calculated as coefficient of determination ([Formula: see text]) to determine goodness of fit to linear model. The highest [Formula: see text] values were obtained for mean interbeat interval ([Formula: see text] for reference algorithm, [Formula: see text] in the worst case), [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text] for the best case, [Formula: see text] for the worst case) and the lowest were obtained for [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text] in the worst case). Using robust model improved achieved correlation between HRV indices obtained from ECG and SCG signals except the [Formula: see text] values of pNN50 values in signals p001-p020 and for all analyzed signals.

CONCLUSIONS

Calculated HRV indices derived from ECG and SCG are similar using two analyzed beat detectors, except SDNN, RMSSD, NN50, pNN50, and [Formula: see text]. Relationship of HRV indices derived from ECG and SCG was influenced by used beat detection method on SCG signal.