Estimation of the Blood Pressure Waveform using Electrocardiography

Optimizing the input feature sets and machine learning algorithms for reliable and accurate estimation of continuous, cuffless blood pressure

The advent of mobile devices, wearables and digital healthcare has unleashed a demand for accurate, reliable, and non-interventional ways to measure continuous blood pressure (BP). Many consumer products claim to measure BP with a cuffless device, but their lack of accuracy and reliability limit clinical adoption. Here, we demonstrate how multimodal feature datasets, comprising: (i) pulse arrival time (PAT); (ii) pulse wave morphology (PWM), and (iii) demographic data, can be combined with optimized Machine Learning (ML) algorithms to estimate Systolic BP (SBP), Diastolic BP (DBP) and Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) within a 5 mmHg bias of the gold standard Intra-Arterial BP, well within the acceptable limits of the IEC/ANSI 80601-2-30 (2018) standard. Furthermore, DBP's calculated using 126 datasets collected from 31 hemodynamically compromised patients had a standard deviation within 8 mmHg, while SBP's and MAP's exceeded these limits. Using ANOVA and Levene's test for error means and standard deviations, we found significant differences in the various ML algorithms but found no significant differences amongst the multimodal feature datasets. Optimized ML algorithms and key multimodal features obtained from larger real-world data (RWD) sets could enable more reliable and accurate estimation of continuous BP in cuffless devices, accelerating wider clinical adoption.

Advancement in the Cuffless and Noninvasive Measurement of Blood Pressure: A Review of the Literature and Open Challenges

Hypertension is a chronic condition that is one of the prominent reasons behind cardiovascular disease, brain stroke, and organ failure. Left unnoticed and untreated, the deterioration in a health condition could even result in mortality. If it can be detected early, with proper treatment, undesirable outcomes can be avoided. Until now, the gold standard is the invasive way of measuring blood pressure (BP) using a catheter. Additionally, the cuff-based and noninvasive methods are too cumbersome or inconvenient for frequent measurement of BP. With the advancement of sensor technology, signal processing techniques, and machine learning algorithms, researchers are trying to find the perfect relationships between biomedical signals and changes in BP. This paper is a literature review of the studies conducted on the cuffless noninvasive measurement of BP using biomedical signals. Relevant articles were selected using specific criteria, then traditional techniques for BP measurement were discussed along with a motivation for cuffless measurement use of biomedical signals and machine learning algorithms. The review focused on the progression of different noninvasive cuffless techniques rather than comparing performance among different studies. The literature survey concluded that the use of deep learning proved to be the most accurate among all the cuffless measurement techniques. On the other side, this accuracy has several disadvantages, such as lack of interpretability, computationally extensive, standard validation protocol, and lack of collaboration with health professionals. Additionally, the continuing work by researchers is progressing with a potential solution for these challenges. Finally, future research directions have been provided to encounter the challenges.

Accurate Blood Pressure Estimation During Activities of Daily Living: A Wearable Cuffless Solution

The objective is to develop a cuffless method that accurately estimates blood pressure (BP) during activities of daily living. User-specific nonlinear autoregressive models with exogenous inputs (NARX) are implemented using artificial neural networks to estimate the BP waveforms from electrocardiography and photoplethysmography signals. To broaden the range of BP in the training data, subjects followed a short procedure consisting of sitting, standing, walking, Valsalva maneuvers, and static handgrip exercises. The procedure was performed before and after a six-hour testing phase wherein five participants went about their normal daily living activities. Data were further collected at a four-month time point for two participants and again at six months for one of the two. The performance of three different NARX models was compared with three pulse arrival time (PAT) models. The NARX models demonstrate superior accuracy and correlation with "ground truth" systolic and diastolic BP measures compared to the PAT models and a clear advantage in estimating the large range of BP. Preliminary results show that the NARX models can accurately estimate BP even months apart from the training. Preliminary testing suggests that it is robust against variabilities due to sensor placement. This establishes a method for cuffless BP estimation during activities of daily living that can be used for continuous monitoring and acute hypotension and hypertension detection.