1
|
Koch KM, Sherafati M, Arpinar VE, Bhave S, Ausman R, Nencka AS, Lebel RM, McKinnon G, Kaushik SS, Vierck D, Stetz MR, Fernando S, Mannem R. Analysis and Evaluation of a Deep Learning Reconstruction Approach with Denoising for Orthopedic MRI. Radiol Artif Intell 2021; 3:e200278. [PMID: 34870214 PMCID: PMC8637471 DOI: 10.1148/ryai.2021200278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Revised: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 07/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate two settings (noise reduction of 50% or 75%) of a deep learning (DL) reconstruction model relative to each other and to conventional MR image reconstructions on clinical orthopedic MRI datasets. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective study included 54 patients who underwent two-dimensional fast spin-echo MRI for hip (n = 22; mean age, 44 years ± 13 [standard deviation]; nine men) or shoulder (n = 32; mean age, 56 years ± 17; 17 men) conditions between March 2019 and June 2020. MR images were reconstructed with conventional methods and the vendor-provided and commercially available DL model applied with 50% and 75% noise reduction settings (DL 50 and DL 75, respectively). Quantitative analytics, including relative anatomic edge sharpness, relative signal-to-noise ratio (rSNR), and relative contrast-to-noise ratio (rCNR) were computed for each dataset. In addition, the image sets were randomized, blinded, and presented to three board-certified musculoskeletal radiologists for ranking based on overall image quality and diagnostic confidence. Statistical analysis was performed with a nonparametric hypothesis comparing derived quantitative metrics from each reconstruction approach. In addition, inter- and intrarater agreement analysis was performed on the radiologists' rankings. RESULTS Both denoising settings of the DL reconstruction showed improved edge sharpness, rSNR, and rCNR relative to the conventional reconstructions. The reader rankings demonstrated strong agreement, with both DL reconstructions outperforming the conventional approach (Gwet agreement coefficient = 0.98). However, there was lower agreement between the readers on which DL reconstruction denoising setting produced higher-quality images (Gwet agreement coefficient = 0.31 for DL 50 and 0.35 for DL 75). CONCLUSION The vendor-provided DL MRI reconstruction showed higher edge sharpness, rSNR, and rCNR in comparison with conventional methods; however, optimal levels of denoising may need to be further assessed.Keywords: MRI Reconstruction Method, Deep Learning, Image Analysis, Signal-to-Noise Ratio, MR-Imaging, Neural Networks, Hip, Shoulder, Physics, Observer Performance, Technology Assessment Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin M. Koch
- From the Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701
Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI 53226 (K.M.K., M.S., V.E.A., S.B., R.A.,
A.S.N., M.R.S., S.F., R.M.); Department of MR Applications and Workflow, GE
Healthcare, Waukesha, Wis (R.M.L., G.M., S.S.K.); and Center for Diagnostic
Imaging, Milwaukee, Wis (D.V.)
| | - Mohammad Sherafati
- From the Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701
Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI 53226 (K.M.K., M.S., V.E.A., S.B., R.A.,
A.S.N., M.R.S., S.F., R.M.); Department of MR Applications and Workflow, GE
Healthcare, Waukesha, Wis (R.M.L., G.M., S.S.K.); and Center for Diagnostic
Imaging, Milwaukee, Wis (D.V.)
| | - V. Emre Arpinar
- From the Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701
Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI 53226 (K.M.K., M.S., V.E.A., S.B., R.A.,
A.S.N., M.R.S., S.F., R.M.); Department of MR Applications and Workflow, GE
Healthcare, Waukesha, Wis (R.M.L., G.M., S.S.K.); and Center for Diagnostic
Imaging, Milwaukee, Wis (D.V.)
| | - Sampada Bhave
- From the Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701
Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI 53226 (K.M.K., M.S., V.E.A., S.B., R.A.,
A.S.N., M.R.S., S.F., R.M.); Department of MR Applications and Workflow, GE
Healthcare, Waukesha, Wis (R.M.L., G.M., S.S.K.); and Center for Diagnostic
Imaging, Milwaukee, Wis (D.V.)
| | - Robin Ausman
- From the Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701
Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI 53226 (K.M.K., M.S., V.E.A., S.B., R.A.,
A.S.N., M.R.S., S.F., R.M.); Department of MR Applications and Workflow, GE
Healthcare, Waukesha, Wis (R.M.L., G.M., S.S.K.); and Center for Diagnostic
Imaging, Milwaukee, Wis (D.V.)
| | - Andrew S. Nencka
- From the Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701
Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI 53226 (K.M.K., M.S., V.E.A., S.B., R.A.,
A.S.N., M.R.S., S.F., R.M.); Department of MR Applications and Workflow, GE
Healthcare, Waukesha, Wis (R.M.L., G.M., S.S.K.); and Center for Diagnostic
Imaging, Milwaukee, Wis (D.V.)
| | - R. Marc Lebel
- From the Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701
Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI 53226 (K.M.K., M.S., V.E.A., S.B., R.A.,
A.S.N., M.R.S., S.F., R.M.); Department of MR Applications and Workflow, GE
Healthcare, Waukesha, Wis (R.M.L., G.M., S.S.K.); and Center for Diagnostic
Imaging, Milwaukee, Wis (D.V.)
| | - Graeme McKinnon
- From the Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701
Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI 53226 (K.M.K., M.S., V.E.A., S.B., R.A.,
A.S.N., M.R.S., S.F., R.M.); Department of MR Applications and Workflow, GE
Healthcare, Waukesha, Wis (R.M.L., G.M., S.S.K.); and Center for Diagnostic
Imaging, Milwaukee, Wis (D.V.)
| | - S. Sivaram Kaushik
- From the Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701
Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI 53226 (K.M.K., M.S., V.E.A., S.B., R.A.,
A.S.N., M.R.S., S.F., R.M.); Department of MR Applications and Workflow, GE
Healthcare, Waukesha, Wis (R.M.L., G.M., S.S.K.); and Center for Diagnostic
Imaging, Milwaukee, Wis (D.V.)
| | - Douglas Vierck
- From the Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701
Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI 53226 (K.M.K., M.S., V.E.A., S.B., R.A.,
A.S.N., M.R.S., S.F., R.M.); Department of MR Applications and Workflow, GE
Healthcare, Waukesha, Wis (R.M.L., G.M., S.S.K.); and Center for Diagnostic
Imaging, Milwaukee, Wis (D.V.)
| | - Michael R. Stetz
- From the Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701
Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI 53226 (K.M.K., M.S., V.E.A., S.B., R.A.,
A.S.N., M.R.S., S.F., R.M.); Department of MR Applications and Workflow, GE
Healthcare, Waukesha, Wis (R.M.L., G.M., S.S.K.); and Center for Diagnostic
Imaging, Milwaukee, Wis (D.V.)
| | - Sujan Fernando
- From the Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701
Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI 53226 (K.M.K., M.S., V.E.A., S.B., R.A.,
A.S.N., M.R.S., S.F., R.M.); Department of MR Applications and Workflow, GE
Healthcare, Waukesha, Wis (R.M.L., G.M., S.S.K.); and Center for Diagnostic
Imaging, Milwaukee, Wis (D.V.)
| | - Rajeev Mannem
- From the Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701
Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI 53226 (K.M.K., M.S., V.E.A., S.B., R.A.,
A.S.N., M.R.S., S.F., R.M.); Department of MR Applications and Workflow, GE
Healthcare, Waukesha, Wis (R.M.L., G.M., S.S.K.); and Center for Diagnostic
Imaging, Milwaukee, Wis (D.V.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nencka AS, Arpinar VE, Bhave S, Yang B, Banerjee S, McCrea M, Mickevicius NJ, Muftuler LT, Koch KM. Split-slice training and hyperparameter tuning of RAKI networks for simultaneous multi-slice reconstruction. Magn Reson Med 2020; 85:3272-3280. [PMID: 33331002 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2020] [Revised: 11/11/2020] [Accepted: 11/12/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Simultaneous multi-slice acquisitions are essential for modern neuroimaging research, enabling high temporal resolution functional and high-resolution q-space sampling diffusion acquisitions. Recently, deep learning reconstruction techniques have been introduced for unaliasing these accelerated acquisitions, and robust artificial-neural-networks for k-space interpolation (RAKI) have shown promising capabilities. This study systematically examines the impacts of hyperparameter selections for RAKI networks, and introduces a novel technique for training data generation which is analogous to the split-slice formalism used in slice-GRAPPA. METHODS RAKI networks were developed with variable hyperparameters and with and without split-slice training data generation. Each network was trained and applied to five different datasets including acquisitions harmonized with Human Connectome Project lifespan protocol. Unaliasing performance was assessed through L1 errors computed between unaliased and calibration frequency-space data. RESULTS Split-slice training significantly improved network performance in nearly all hyperparameter configurations. Best unaliasing results were achieved with three layer RAKI networks using at least 64 convolutional filters with receptive fields of 7 voxels, 128 single-voxel filters in the penultimate RAKI layer, batch normalization, and no training dropout with the split-slice augmented training dataset. Networks trained without the split-slice technique showed symptoms of network over-fitting. CONCLUSIONS Split-slice training for simultaneous multi-slice RAKI networks positively impacts network performance. Hyperparameter tuning of such reconstruction networks can lead to further improvements in unaliasing performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew S Nencka
- Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.,Center for Imaging Research, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Volkan E Arpinar
- Center for Imaging Research, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | | | | | | | - Michael McCrea
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | | | - L Tugan Muftuler
- Center for Imaging Research, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Kevin M Koch
- Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.,Center for Imaging Research, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|