1
|
Papaleo ED, D'Alonzo M, Fiori F, Piombino V, Falato E, Pilato F, De Liso A, Di Lazzaro V, Di Pino G. Integration of proprioception in upper limb prostheses through non-invasive strategies: a review. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2023; 20:118. [PMID: 37689701 PMCID: PMC10493033 DOI: 10.1186/s12984-023-01242-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Proprioception plays a key role in moving our body dexterously and effortlessly. Nevertheless, the majority of investigations evaluating the benefits of providing supplemental feedback to prosthetics users focus on delivering touch restitution. These studies evaluate the influence of touch sensation in an attempt to improve the controllability of current robotic devices. Contrarily, investigations evaluating the capabilities of proprioceptive supplemental feedback have yet to be comprehensively analyzed to the same extent, marking a major gap in knowledge within the current research climate. The non-invasive strategies employed so far to restitute proprioception are reviewed in this work. In the absence of a clearly superior strategy, approaches employing vibrotactile, electrotactile and skin-stretch stimulation achieved better and more consistent results, considering both kinesthetic and grip force information, compared with other strategies or any incidental feedback. Although emulating the richness of the physiological sensory return through artificial feedback is the primary hurdle, measuring its effects to eventually support the integration of cumbersome and energy intensive hardware into commercial prosthetic devices could represent an even greater challenge. Thus, we analyze the strengths and limitations of previous studies and discuss the possible benefits of coupling objective measures, like neurophysiological parameters, as well as measures of prosthesis embodiment and cognitive load with behavioral measures of performance. Such insights aim to provide additional and collateral outcomes to be considered in the experimental design of future investigations of proprioception restitution that could, in the end, allow researchers to gain a more detailed understanding of possibly similar behavioral results and, thus, support one strategy over another.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ermanno Donato Papaleo
- Research Unit of Neurophysiology and Neuroengineering of Human-Technology Interaction (NeXTlab), Università Campus Bio-Medico Di Roma, Via Álvaro Del Portillo 21, 00128, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco D'Alonzo
- Research Unit of Neurophysiology and Neuroengineering of Human-Technology Interaction (NeXTlab), Università Campus Bio-Medico Di Roma, Via Álvaro Del Portillo 21, 00128, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Fiori
- Research Unit of Neurophysiology and Neuroengineering of Human-Technology Interaction (NeXTlab), Università Campus Bio-Medico Di Roma, Via Álvaro Del Portillo 21, 00128, Rome, Italy
| | - Valeria Piombino
- Research Unit of Neurophysiology and Neuroengineering of Human-Technology Interaction (NeXTlab), Università Campus Bio-Medico Di Roma, Via Álvaro Del Portillo 21, 00128, Rome, Italy
| | - Emma Falato
- Research Unit of Neurology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico Di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 21, 00128, Rome, Italy
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabio Pilato
- Research Unit of Neurology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico Di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 21, 00128, Rome, Italy
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128, Rome, Italy
| | - Alfredo De Liso
- Research Unit of Neurology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico Di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 21, 00128, Rome, Italy
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128, Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Di Lazzaro
- Research Unit of Neurology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico Di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 21, 00128, Rome, Italy
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Di Pino
- Research Unit of Neurophysiology and Neuroengineering of Human-Technology Interaction (NeXTlab), Università Campus Bio-Medico Di Roma, Via Álvaro Del Portillo 21, 00128, Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Eftekari SC, Sears L, Moura SP, Garelick S, Donnelly DT, Shaffrey EC, Dingle AM. A framework for understanding prosthetic embodiment for the plastic surgeon. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2023; 84:469-486. [PMID: 37418846 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.06.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2023] [Revised: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 06/09/2023] [Indexed: 07/09/2023]
Abstract
Plastic surgeons play a critical role in the management of amputations and are uniquely positioned to improve the lives and functional abilities of patients with limb loss. The embodiment of a prosthesis describes how effectively it replaces a missing limb and is an important aspect of patient care. Despite its importance, the current prosthetics literature lacks a formal definition of embodiment, and descriptions are often vague or incomplete. In this narrative review, we assess the current literature on prosthetic embodiment to explore the main mechanisms of embodiment and how each allows a prosthesis to interface with the human body. In doing so, we provide a comprehensive, holistic framework for understanding this concept.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sahand C Eftekari
- Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Lucas Sears
- Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Steven P Moura
- Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Sydney Garelick
- Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - D'Andrea T Donnelly
- Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Ellen C Shaffrey
- Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Aaron M Dingle
- Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Keri MI, Shehata AW, Marasco PD, Hebert JS, Vette AH. A Cost-Effective Inertial Measurement System for Tracking Movement and Triggering Kinesthetic Feedback in Lower-Limb Prosthesis Users. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2021; 21:1844. [PMID: 33800790 PMCID: PMC7961441 DOI: 10.3390/s21051844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2021] [Revised: 02/28/2021] [Accepted: 03/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Advances in lower-limb prosthetic technologies have facilitated the restoration of ambulation; however, users of such technologies still experience reduced balance control, also due to the absence of proprioceptive feedback. Recent efforts have demonstrated the ability to restore kinesthetic feedback in upper-limb prosthesis applications; however, technical solutions to trigger the required muscle vibration and provide automated feedback have not been explored for lower-limb prostheses. The study's first objective was therefore to develop a feedback system capable of tracking lower-limb movement and automatically triggering a muscle vibrator to induce the kinesthetic illusion. The second objective was to investigate the developed system's ability to provide kinesthetic feedback in a case participant. A low-cost, wireless feedback system, incorporating two inertial measurement units to trigger a muscle vibrator, was developed and tested in an individual with limb loss above the knee. Our system had a maximum communication delay of 50 ms and showed good tracking of Gaussian and sinusoidal movement profiles for velocities below 180 degrees per second (error < 8 degrees), mimicking stepping and walking, respectively. We demonstrated in the case participant that the developed feedback system can successfully elicit the kinesthetic illusion. Our work contributes to the integration of sensory feedback in lower-limb prostheses, to increase their use and functionality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- McNiel-Inyani Keri
- Donadeo Innovation Centre for Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta, 9211 116 Street NW, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada;
| | - Ahmed W. Shehata
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, 5005 Katz Group Centre, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E1, Canada; (A.W.S.); (J.S.H.)
| | - Paul D. Marasco
- Laboratory for Bionic Integration, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, ND20, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA;
- Advanced Platform Technology Center, Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 10701 East Boulevard 151 W/APT, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - Jacqueline S. Hebert
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, 5005 Katz Group Centre, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E1, Canada; (A.W.S.); (J.S.H.)
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, 1098 Research Transition Facility, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2V2, Canada
- Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital, Alberta Health Services, 10230 111 Avenue NW, Edmonton, AB T5G 0B7, Canada
| | - Albert H. Vette
- Donadeo Innovation Centre for Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta, 9211 116 Street NW, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada;
- Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital, Alberta Health Services, 10230 111 Avenue NW, Edmonton, AB T5G 0B7, Canada
| |
Collapse
|