Silicone rubber trileaflet valve assessment using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging

Polymeric Heart Valves: Do They Represent a Reliable Alternative to Current Prosthetic Devices?

With the increasing number of people suffering from heart valve diseases (e.g., stenosis and/or insufficiency), the attention paid to prosthetic heart valves has grown significantly. Developing a prosthetic device that fully replaces the functionality of the native valve remains a huge challenge. Polymeric heart valves (PHVs) represent an appealing option, offering the potential to combine the robustness of mechanical valves with the enhanced biocompatibility of bioprosthetic ones. Over the years, novel biomaterials (such as promising new polymers and nanocomposites) and innovative designs have been explored for possible applications in manufacturing PHVs. This work provides a comprehensive overview of PHVs' evolution in terms of materials, design, and fabrication techniques, including in vitro and in vivo studies. Moreover, it addresses the drawbacks associated with PHV implementation, such as their limited biocompatibility and propensity for sudden failure in vivo. Future directions for further development are presented. Notably, PHVs can be particularly relevant for transcatheter application, the most recent minimally invasive approach for heart valve replacement. Despite current challenges, PHVs represent a promising area of research with the potential to revolutionize the treatment of heart valve diseases, offering more durable and less invasive solutions for patients.

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance evaluation of aortic stenosis severity using single plane measurement of effective orifice area

BACKGROUND

Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the standard method for the evaluation of the severity of aortic stenosis (AS). Valve effective orifice area (EOA) measured by the continuity equation is one of the most frequently used stenotic indices. However, TTE measurement of aortic valve EOA is not feasible or not reliable in a significant proportion of patients. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has emerged as a non-invasive alternative to evaluate EOA using velocity measurements. The objectives of this study were: 1) to validate a new CMR method using jet shear layer detection (JSLD) based on acoustical source term (AST) concept to estimate the valve EOA; 2) to introduce a simplified JSLD method not requiring vorticity field derivation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed an in vitro study where EOA was measured by CMR in 4 fixed stenoses (EOA = 0.48, 1.00, 1.38 and 2.11 cm²) under the same steady flow conditions (4-20 L/min). The in vivo study included eight (8) healthy subjects and 37 patients with mild to severe AS (0.72 cm² ≤ EOA ≤ 1.71 cm²). All subjects underwent TTE and CMR examinations. EOA was determinated by TTE with the use of continuity equation method (TTE(CONT)). For CMR estimation of EOA, we used 3 methods: 1) Continuity equation (CMR(CONT)); 2) Shear layer detection (CMR(JSLD)), which was computed from the velocity field of a single CMR velocity profile at the peak systolic phase; 3) Single plane velocity truncation (CMR(SPVT)), which is a simplified version of CMR(JSLD) method. There was a good agreement between the EOAs obtained in vitro by the different CMR methods and the EOA predicted from the potential flow theory. In the in vivo study, there was good correlation and concordance between the EOA measured by the TTE(CONT) method versus those measured by each of the CMR methods: CMR(CONT) (r = 0.88), CMR(JSLD) (r = 0.93) and CMR(SPVT) (r = 0.93). The intra- and inter- observer variability of EOA measurements was 5 ± 5% and 9 ± 5% for TTE(CONT), 2 ± 1% and 7 ± 5% for CMR(CONT), 7 ± 5% and 8 ± 7% for CMR(JSLD), 1 ± 2% and 3 ± 2% for CMR(SPVT). When repeating image acquisition, reproducibility of measurements was 10 ± 8% and 12 ± 5% for TTE(CONT), 9 ± 9% and 8 ± 8% for CMR(CONT), 6 ± 5% and 7 ± 4% for CMR(JSLD) and 3 ± 2% and 2 ± 2% for CMR(SPVT).

CONCLUSION

There was an excellent agreement between the EOA estimated by the CMR(JSLD) or CMR(SPVT) methods and: 1) the theoretical EOA in vitro, and 2) the TTE(CONT) EOA in vivo. The CMR(SPVT) method was superior to the TTE and other CMR methods in terms of measurement variability. The novel CMR-based methods proposed in this study may be helpful to corroborate stenosis severity in patients for whom Doppler-echocardiography exam is inconclusive.

A new index measured by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging to detect mechanical heart valve malfunction

More than two thirds of valve replacement operations performed each year used mechanical heart valve. These valves are subject to complications such: pannus and/or thrombus formation. One other potential complication is a malfunction in one of the valve leaflets. It is then important to develop parameters that will allow a non-invasive diagnosis of such valve malfunction. In the present study, we evaluated under steady low flow (1-8 L/min) and pulsatile flow (3, 5 and 7 L/min) a bileafleat mechanical heart valve with normal function, 50% and 100% of one valve leaflet malfunction. Image analysis was performed using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate transvalvular pressure gradients (TPG), effective orifice area and a new index given by central/lateral velocity ratio downstream of the valve. Our results showed that the flow upstream and downstream of the defective valve is highly influenced by malfunction severity. TPG did not allow differentiating valve malfunction at low flow under steady and pulsatile conditions. However the new index given by central/lateral ratio allowed differentiating the presence of valve malfunction using a single transverse velocity measurement.