Angle estimation of human femora in a three-dimensional virtual environment

Correlation Between Reduction Quality of Femoral Neck Fracture and Femoral Head Necrosis Based on Biomechanics

Objective

To investigate the biomechanical effects of reduction quality on patients after femoral neck fracture internal fixation.

Methods

The data of individual patients with femoral neck fractures were reviewed. Data for patients with simple unilateral femoral neck fractures whose reduction quality was evaluated as good by hip X‐ray films after internal fixation were collected from January 2013 to January 2017. The CT data of the patients was used to reconstruct 3D models of the femur and the screw. The spatial displacement after the operation of femoral neck fracture was measured, which included the displacement of the deepest portion of the femoral head fovea, the displacement of the center of the femoral head, and the rotational angle. The cases were followed up by telephone consultation and clinical review to determine whether the osteonecrosis of the femoral head occurred. Follow‐up time should be more than 18 months after surgery. The cases were grouped according to the results into an osteonecrosis of the femoral head group and a non‐osteonecrosis of the femoral head group. Finally, the differences in postoperative spatial displacement between the two groups were compared and analyzed. In addition, a mechanical analysis of femoral force during gait was performed via finite element analysis.

Results

Data for 241 patients with femoral neck fractures who were treated with closed reduction and internal fixation were collected. 3D measurement showed the average displacement value, including the center of the femoral head (5.90 ± 3.4 mm), the deepest portion of the femoral head fovea (9.32 ± 4.8 mm), and the rotational angle (16.1° ± 9.4°). After telephone consultation and clinical review, osteonecrosis of the femoral head was diagnosed in 28 (11.62%) of the patients. In the osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) group, the displacement of the deepest portion of the femoral head fovea was 10.92 ± 9.18 mm; the displacement was 8.86 ± 6.29 mm in the non‐ONFH group. The displacement of the center of the femoral head in the ONFH group was 7.575 ± 5.69 mm and 5.31 ± 4.05 mm in non‐ONFH group. The rotational angle was 20.11° ± 10.27° in the ONFH group and 14.19° ± 11.09° in the non‐ONFH group. The statistical analysis showed that the postoperative spatial displacements, including the displacement of the deepest portion of the femoral head fovea, the displacement of the center of the femoral head, and the rotational angle between the two groups, had statistical differences. Finite element analysis showed that as the spatial displacement increased, the stress, the displacement, and the equivalent strain of the proximal femur also increased.

Conclusion

Poor reduction quality after femoral neck fracture is a risk factor for re‐fracture and femoral head necrosis, and the measurement method of this study can be used to predict the occurrence of femoral head necrosis early after femoral neck fracture.

Standardization of torsional CT measurements of the lower limbs with threshold values for corrective osteotomy

INTRODUCTION

Re-establishing anatomic rotational alignment of shaft fractures of the lower extremities remains challenging. Clinical evaluation in combination with radiological measurements is important in pre- and post-surgical assessment. Based on computed tomography (CT), a range of reference values for femoral torsion (FT) and tibial torsion (TT) have historically been reported, which require standardization to optimize the significant intra- and inter-observer variability. The aims of this study were (re-)evaluation of the reference FT and TT angles, determination of the normal intra-individual side-to-side torsional differences to aid the surgical decision-making process for reoperation, and development of a novel 3D measurement method for FT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, we included 55 patients, without any known torsional deformities of the lower extremities. Two radiologists, independently, measured the rotational profile of the femora using the Hernandez and Weiner CT methods for FT, and the tibiae using the bimalleolar method for TT. The intra-individual side-to-side difference in paired femora and paired tibiae was determined. A 3D technique for FT assessment using InSpace^® was designed.

RESULTS

FT and TT demographic values were lower than previously reported, with mean FT values of 5.1°-8.8° and mean TT values of 25.5°-27.7°. Maximal side-to-side differences were 12°-13° for FT and 12° for TT. The Weiner method for FT was less variable than the Hernandez method. The new 3D method was equivocal to the conventional CT measurements.

CONCLUSION

The results from this study showed that the maximal side-to-side tolerance in asymptomatic normal adult lower extremities is 12°-13° for FT and 12° for TT, which could be a useful threshold for surgeons as indication for revision surgery (e.g., derotational osteotomy). We developed a new 3D CT method for FT measurement which is similar to 2D and could be used in the future for virtual 3D planning.

Three-dimensional femoral head coverage in the standing position represents that measured in vivo during gait

Individuals with over- or under-covered hips may develop hip osteoarthritis. Femoral head coverage is typically evaluated using radiographs, and/or computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance images obtained supine. Yet, these static assessments of coverage may not provide accurate information regarding the dynamic, three-dimensional (3-D) relationship between the femoral head and acetabulum. The objectives of this study were to: (1) quantify total and regional 3-D femoral head coverage in a standing position and during gait, and (2) quantify the relationship between 3-D femoral head coverage in standing to that measured during gait. The kinematic position of the hip during standing and gait was measured in vivo for 11 asymptomatic morphologically normal subjects using dual fluoroscopy and model-based tracking of 3-D CT models. Percent coverage in the standing position and during gait was measured overall and on a regional basis (anterior, superior, posterior, inferior). Coverage in standing was correlated with that measured during gait. For total coverage, very little change in coverage occurred during gait (range: 35.0-36.7%; mean: 36.2%). Coverage at each time point of gait strongly correlated with coverage during standing (r = 0.929-0.989). The regions thought to play an important role in weight bearing (i.e. anterior, superior, posterior) were significantly correlated with coverage in standing during the stance phase. Our results suggest that coverage measured in a standing position is a good surrogate for coverage measured during gait. Clin. Anat. 31:1177-1183, 2018. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Hip rotation during standing and dynamic activities and the compensatory effect of femoral anteversion: An in-vivo analysis of asymptomatic young adults using three-dimensional computed tomography models and dual fluoroscopy

BACKGROUND

Individuals are thought to compensate for femoral anteversion by altering hip rotation. However, the relationship between hip rotation in a neutral position (i.e. static rotation) and dynamic hip rotation is poorly understood, as is the relationship between anteversion and hip rotation.

RESEARCH OBJECTIVE

Herein, anteversion and in-vivo hip rotation during standing, walking, and pivoting were measured in eleven asymptomatic, morphologically normal, young adults using three-dimensional computed tomography models and dual fluoroscopy.

METHODS

Using correlation analyses, we: 1) determined the relationship between hip rotation in the static position to that measured during dynamic activities, and 2) evaluated the association between femoral anteversion and hip rotation during dynamic activities. Hip rotation was calculated while standing (static-rotation), throughout gait, as a mean during gait (mean gait rotation), and as a mean (mid-pivot rotation), maximum (max-rotation) and minimum (min-rotation) during pivoting.

RESULTS

Static-rotation (mean ± standard deviation; 11.3° ± 7.3°) and mean gait rotation (7.8° ± 4.7°) were positively correlated (r = 0.679, p = 0.022). Likewise, static-rotation was strongly correlated with mid-pivot rotation (r = 0.837, p = 0.001), max-rotation (r = 0.754, p = 0.007), and min-rotation (r = 0.835, p = 0.001). Strong positive correlations were found between anteversion and hip internal rotation during all of the stance phase (0-60% gait) and during mid- and terminal-swing (86-100% gait) (all r > 0.607, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that the static position may be used cautiously to express the neutral rotational position of the femur for dynamic movements. Further, our results indicate that femoral anteversion is compensated for by altering hip rotation. As such, both anteversion and hip rotation may be important to consider when diagnosing hip pathology and planning for surgical procedures.

Algorithm for automatic angles measurement and screening for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH)

Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH) is a medical term represent the hip joint instability that appear mainly in infants. The examination for this condition can be done by ultrasound for children under 6 months old and by X-ray for children over 6 months old. Physician's assessment is based on certain angles derived from those images, namely the Acetabular Angle, and the Center Edge Angle. In this paper, we are presenting a novel, fully automatic algorithm for measuring the diagnostic angles of DDH from the X-ray images. Our algorithm consists of Automatic segmentation and extraction of anatomical landmarks from X-ray images. Both of Acetabular angle and Center edge angle are automatically calculated. The analysis included X-ray images for 16 children recruited for the purposed of this study. The automatically acquired angles accuracy for Acetabular Angle was around 85%, and an absolute deviation of 3.4°±3.3° compared to the physician's manually calculated angle. The results of this method are very promising for the future development of an automatic method for screening X-ray images DDH that complement and aid the physicians' manual methods.