Service oriented architecture to support real-time implementation of artifact detection in critical care monitoring

Integrating Physiological Data Artifacts Detection With Clinical Decision Support Systems: Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) have the potential to lower the patient mortality and morbidity rates. However, signal artifacts present in physiological data affect the reliability and accuracy of the CDSS. Moreover, patient monitors and other medical devices generate false alarms while processing physiological data, further leading to alarm fatigue because of increased noise levels, staff disruption, and staff desensitization in busy critical care environments. This adversely affects the quality of care at the patient bedside. Hence, artifact detection (AD) algorithms play a crucial role in assessing the quality of physiological data and mitigating the impact of these artifacts.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to evaluate a novel AD framework for integrating AD algorithms with CDSS. We designed the framework with features that support real-time implementation within critical care. In this study, we evaluated the framework and its features in a false alarm reduction study. We developed static framework component models, followed by dynamic framework compositions to formulate four CDSS. We evaluated these formulations using neonatal patient data and validated the six framework features: flexibility, reusability, signal quality indicator standardization, scalability, customizability, and real-time implementation support.

METHODS

We developed four exemplar static AD components with standardized requirements and provisions interfaces that facilitate the interoperability of framework components. These AD components were mixed and matched into four different AD compositions to mitigate the artifacts' effects. We developed a novel static clinical event detection component that is integrated with each AD composition to formulate and evaluate a dynamic CDSS for peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) alarm generation. This study collected data from 11 patients with diverse pathologies in the neonatal intensive care unit. Collected data streams and corresponding alarms include pulse rate and SpO2 measured from a pulse oximeter (Masimo SET SmartPod) integrated with an Infinity Delta monitor and the heart rate derived from electrocardiography leads attached to a second Infinity Delta monitor.

RESULTS

A total of 119 SpO2 alarms were evaluated. The lowest achievable SpO2 false alarm rate was 39%, with a sensitivity of 80%. This demonstrates the framework's utility in identifying the best possible dynamic composition to serve the clinical need for false SpO2 alarm reduction and subsequent alarm fatigue, given the limitations of a small sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

The framework features, including reusability, signal quality indicator standardization, scalability, and customizability, allow the evaluation and comparison of novel CDSS formulations. The optimal solution for a CDSS can then be hard-coded and integrated within clinical workflows for real-time implementation. The flexibility to serve different clinical needs and standardized component interoperability of the framework supports the potential for a real-time clinical implementation of AD.

Implementation of artifact detection in critical care: a methodological review

Artifact detection (AD) techniques minimize the impact of artifacts on physiologic data acquired in critical care units (CCU) by assessing quality of data prior to clinical event detection (CED) and parameter derivation (PD). This methodological review introduces unique taxonomies to synthesize over 80 AD algorithms based on these six themes: 1) CCU; 2) physiologic data source; 3) harvested data; 4) data analysis; 5) clinical evaluation; and 6) clinical implementation. Review results show that most published algorithms: a) are designed for one specific type of CCU; b) are validated on data harvested only from one OEM monitor; c) generate signal quality indicators (SQI) that are not yet formalized for useful integration in clinical workflows; d) operate either in standalone mode or coupled with CED or PD applications; e) are rarely evaluated in real-time; and f) are not implemented in clinical practice. In conclusion, it is recommended that AD algorithms conform to generic input and output interfaces with commonly defined data: 1) type; 2) frequency; 3) length; and 4) SQIs. This shall promote: a) reusability of algorithms across different CCU domains; b) evaluation on different OEM monitor data; c) fair comparison through formalized SQIs; d) meaningful integration with other AD, CED and PD algorithms; and e) real-time implementation in clinical workflows.