Segmentation of brain tumors in MRI images using multi-scale gradient vector flow

Brain Tumor Segmentation Using Convolutional Neural Networks in MRI Images

In medical image processing, Brain tumor segmentation plays an important role. Early detection of these tumors is highly required to give Treatment of patients. The patient's life chances are improved by the early detection of it. The process of diagnosing the brain tumoursby the physicians is normally carried out using a manual way of segmentation. It is time consuming and a difficult one. To solve these problems, Enhanced Convolutional Neural Networks (ECNN) is proposed with loss function optimization by BAT algorithm for automatic segmentation method. The primary aim is to present optimization based MRIs image segmentation. Small kernels allow the design in a deep architecture. It has a positive consequence with respect to overfitting provided the lesser weights are assigned to the network. Skull stripping and image enhancement algorithms are used for pre-processing. The experimental result shows the better performance while comparing with the existing methods. The compared parameters are precision, recall and accuracy. In future, different selecting schemes can be adopted to improve the accuracy.

Automated detection of brain abnormalities in neonatal hypoxia ischemic injury from MR images

We compared the efficacy of three automated brain injury detection methods, namely symmetry-integrated region growing (SIRG), hierarchical region splitting (HRS) and modified watershed segmentation (MWS) in human and animal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) datasets for the detection of hypoxic ischemic injuries (HIIs). Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI, 1.5T) data from neonatal arterial ischemic stroke (AIS) patients, as well as T2-weighted imaging (T2WI, 11.7T, 4.7T) at seven different time-points (1, 4, 7, 10, 17, 24 and 31 days post HII) in rat-pup model of hypoxic ischemic injury were used to assess the temporal efficacy of our computational approaches. Sensitivity, specificity, and similarity were used as performance metrics based on manual ('gold standard') injury detection to quantify comparisons. When compared to the manual gold standard, automated injury location results from SIRG performed the best in 62% of the data, while 29% for HRS and 9% for MWS. Injury severity detection revealed that SIRG performed the best in 67% cases while 33% for HRS. Prior information is required by HRS and MWS, but not by SIRG. However, SIRG is sensitive to parameter-tuning, while HRS and MWS are not. Among these methods, SIRG performs the best in detecting lesion volumes; HRS is the most robust, while MWS lags behind in both respects.