Yarach U, Chatnuntawech I, Setsompop K, Suwannasak A, Angkurawaranon S, Madla C, Hanprasertpong C, Sangpin P. Improved reconstruction for highly accelerated propeller diffusion 1.5 T clinical MRI.
MAGMA (NEW YORK, N.Y.) 2024;
37:283-294. [PMID:
38386154 DOI:
10.1007/s10334-023-01142-7]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE
Propeller fast-spin-echo diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (FSE-dMRI) is essential for the diagnosis of Cholesteatoma. However, at clinical 1.5 T MRI, its signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) remains relatively low. To gain sufficient SNR, signal averaging (number of excitations, NEX) is usually used with the cost of prolonged scan time. In this work, we leveraged the benefits of Locally Low Rank (LLR) constrained reconstruction to enhance the SNR. Furthermore, we enhanced both the speed and SNR by employing Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) for the accelerated PROPELLER FSE-dMRI on a 1.5 T clinical scanner.
METHODS
Residual U-Net (RU-Net) was found to be efficient for propeller FSE-dMRI data. It was trained to predict 2-NEX images obtained by Locally Low Rank (LLR) constrained reconstruction and used 1-NEX images obtained via simplified reconstruction as the inputs. The brain scans from healthy volunteers and patients with cholesteatoma were performed for model training and testing. The performance of trained networks was evaluated with normalized root-mean-square-error (NRMSE), structural similarity index measure (SSIM), and peak SNR (PSNR).
RESULTS
For 4 × under-sampled with 7 blades data, online reconstruction appears to provide suboptimal images-some small details are missing due to high noise interferences. Offline LLR enables suppression of noises and discovering some small structures. RU-Net demonstrated further improvement compared to LLR by increasing 18.87% of PSNR, 2.11% of SSIM, and reducing 53.84% of NRMSE. Moreover, RU-Net is about 1500 × faster than LLR (0.03 vs. 47.59 s/slice).
CONCLUSION
The LLR remarkably enhances the SNR compared to online reconstruction. Moreover, RU-Net improves propeller FSE-dMRI as reflected in PSNR, SSIM, and NRMSE. It requires only 1-NEX data, which allows a 2 × scan time reduction. In addition, its speed is approximately 1500 times faster than that of LLR-constrained reconstruction.
Collapse