Ex Vivo Modeling of Perioperative Air Leaks in Porcine Lungs

Characterisation of pulmonary air leak measurements using a mechanical ventilator in a bench setup

Prolonged air leakage (AL) following pulmonary resections leads to prolonged hospital stay and post-operative complications. Intra- and postoperative quantification of AL might be useful for improving treatment decisions, but these measurements have not been characterised. AL calculations based on inspiratory and expiratory tidal volumes were investigated in an Intensive Care Unit mechanical ventilator circuit (Servo-I). AL was also measured by a digital chest drainage system. This study shows that AL measurements increase in accuracy when corrected for baseline deviations (R: 0.904 > 0.997, p < 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis revealed a funnel-shape, indicative of a detection threshhold. Corrected measurements were most accurate when averaged over five breaths and AL was >500 mL/min, with an estimated mean systemic bias of 7.4% (95%-limits of agreement [LoA]: 1.1%-13.7%) at 500 mL/min air leak. Breath-by-breath analysis showed most accurate results at AL >20 mL/breath (R: 0.989-0.991, p < 0.001) at tidal volumes between 350-600 mL. The digital drain had a mean systemic bias of -11.1% (95%-LoA: -18.9% to -3.3%) with homogenous scatter in Bland-Altman analysis and a strong correlation to the control measurement over a large range (0-2000mL/min, R: 0.999, p < 0.001). This study indicates that the Servo-I can be used for air leak quantification in clinically relevant ranges (>500 mL/min), but is unsuited for small leak detection due to a detection threshold. Researchers and clinicians should be aware of varying accuracy and interoperability characteristics between AL measurement devices.

Evaluating and developing sealants for the prevention of pulmonary air leakage: A systematic review of animal models

Sealants may provide a solution for pulmonary air leakage (PAL), but their clinical application is debatable. For sealant comparison, standardized animal models are lacking. This systematic review aims to assess methodology and quality of animal models for PAL and sealant evaluation. All animal models investigating lung sealing devices (e.g., staplers, glues, energy devices) to prevent or treat PAL were retrieved systematically from Embase, Pubmed and Web of science. Methodological study characteristics, risk of bias, reporting quality and publication bias were assessed. A total of 71 studies were included (N  =  75 experiments, N  =  1659 animals). Six different species and 18 strains were described; 92% of experiments used healthy animals, disease models were used in only six studies. Lesions to produce PAL were heterogenous, and only 11 studies used a previously reported technique, encompassing N  =  5 unique lesions. Clinically relevant outcomes were used in the minority of studies (imaging 16%, air leak 10.7%, air leak duration 4%). Reporting quality was poor, but revealed an upward trend per decade. Overall, high risk of bias was present, and only 18.7% used a negative control group. All but one study without control groups claimed positive outcomes (95.8%), in contrast to 84.3% using positive or negative control groups, which also concluded equivocal, adverse or inconclusive outcomes. In conclusion, animal studies evaluating sealants for prevention of PAL are heterogenous and of poor reporting quality. Using negative control groups, disease models and quantifiable outcomes seem important to increase validity and relevance. Further research is needed to reach consensus for model development and standardization.

Double stapling method for closure of intraoperative alveolar air leakage adjacent to the staple line: a randomized experimental study on ex vivo porcine lungs

Background

Alveolar air leakage from a pleural defect around the staple line is one of the complications after wedge resection of the lung. An intraoperative closure of the pleural defect by suturing can cause additional pleural rupture due to tension of the pleura adjacent to staple lines. Therefore, we have introduced a novel closure method for pleural defect adjacent to the staple line, named the double stapling method. This study compared the efficacy of two closure methods; the double stapling method and conventional suturing method with pledgets using ex vivo porcine lungs.

Methods

The double stapling method involves closing the pleural defect by suturing the two parallel staple lines at both sides of the pleural defect. This method was developed to distribute the pleural tension around the needle holes of suturing. As a model of pleural defect adjacent to the staple line after wedge resection, wedge resection of the caudal lobe of left porcine lungs was performed, and a superficial square pleural defect (10 mm × 10 mm) adjacent to the staple line was made by scalpel. The defect was closed using the following two methods: (I) suturing with pledgets (n=10); and (II) double stapling method (n=10). The lobe was inflated in water at an airway pressure of 20, 25, and 30 cmH₂O; closure success or failure was judged by the absence or presence of air leakage.

Results

The closure success was confirmed in 2 (20%) out of 10 cases in the suturing with pledgets group and 9 (90%) out of 10 in the double stapling method group (P=0.007). In 4 out of 10 cases in the suturing with pledgets group, new pleural clefts longer than 3 mm were created around the needle holes of suturing.

Conclusions

Ex vivo experiments have suggested the superiority of the double stapling method for the intraoperative closure of alveolar air leakage adjacent to the staple line after wedge resection, compared to conventional suturing with the pledget method.

Air leaks: Stapling affects porcine lungs biomechanics

During thoracic operations, surgical staplers resect cancerous tumors and seal the spared lung. However, post-operative air leaks are undesirable clinical consequences: staple legs wound lung tissue. Subsequent to this trauma, air leaks from lung tissue into the pleural space. This affects the lung's physiology and patients' recovery. The objective is to biomechanically and visually characterize porcine lung tissue with and without staples in order to gain knowledge on air leakage following pulmonary resection. Therefore, a syringe pump filled with air inflates and deflates eleven porcine lungs cyclically without exceeding 10 cmH₂O of pressure. Cameras capture stereo-images of the deformed lung surface at regular intervals while a microcontroller simultaneously records the alveolar pressure and the volume of air pumped. The raw images are then used to compute tri-dimensional displacements and strains with the Digital Image Correlation method (DIC). Air bubbles originated at staple holes of inner row from exposed porcine lung tissue due to torn pleural on costal surface. Compared during inflation, left upper or lower lobe resections have similar compliance (slope of the pressure vs volume curve), which are 9% lower than healthy lung compliance. However, lower lobes statistically burst at lower pressures than upper lobes (p-value<0.046) in ex vivo conditions confirming previous clinical in vivo studies. In parallel, the lung deformed mostly in the vicinity of staple holes and presented maximum shear strain near the observed leak location. To conclude, a novel technique DIC provided concrete evidence of the post-operative air leaks biomechanics. Further studies could investigate causal relationships between the mechanical parameters and the development of an air leak.

Recent advances in human respiratory epithelium models for drug discovery

The respiratory epithelium is intimately associated with the pathophysiologies of highly infectious viral contagions and chronic illnesses such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, presently the third leading cause of death worldwide with a projected economic burden of £1.7 trillion by 2030. Preclinical studies of respiratory physiology have almost exclusively utilised non-humanised animal models, alongside reductionistic cell line-based models, and primary epithelial cell models cultured at an air-liquid interface (ALI). Despite their utility, these model systems have been limited by their poor correlation to the human condition. This has undermined the ability to identify novel therapeutics, evidenced by a 15% chance of success for medicinal respiratory compounds entering clinical trials in 2018. Consequently, preclinical studies require new translational efficacy models to address the problem of respiratory drug attrition. This review describes the utility of the current in vivo (rodent), ex vivo (isolated perfused lungs and precision cut lung slices), two-dimensional in vitro cell-line (A549, BEAS-2B, Calu-3) and three-dimensional in vitro ALI (gold-standard and co-culture) and organoid respiratory epithelium models. The limitations to the application of these model systems in drug discovery research are discussed, in addition to perspectives of the future innovations required to facilitate the next generation of human-relevant respiratory models.

Preclinical quantification of air leaks in a physiologic lung model: effects of ventilation modality and staple design

Purpose

Thoracic air leaks are a common complication following pulmonary resections. Limitations in clinical studies and preclinical models have hindered efforts to understand the pathophysiology of air leaks. With an emphasis on staple-line specific air leaks, we hypothesize that ventilation modality – intraoperative positive pressure vs postoperative negative pressure – and stapler design may play a role in air leaks.

Methods

Using a novel physiologic lung model, air leaks associated with graduated and uniform staple designs were evaluated under positive and negative pressure ventilation, simulating perioperative breathing in porcine lungs. Air leak incidence, air leak volume, and air leak rate were captured along with ventilation pressure and tidal volume.

Results

In all cases, negative pressure ventilation was associated with a higher occurrence of leaks when compared to positive pressure ventilation. Lungs leaked more air and at a faster rate under negative pressure ventilation compared to positive pressure ventilation. Graduated staple designs were associated with higher occurrence of leaks as well as larger leak rates when compared to uniform staples. Tissue thickness was not associated with differences in air leaks when tested with appropriate staple heights.

Conclusion

Using a novel lung model to investigate the pathophysiology of air leaks, we have identified breathing modality and staple design as two important variables that may impact air leaks. This work will help guide device design and drive future studies in human tissue, and it may help inform clinical practice to ultimately improve patient outcomes.