1
|
Brink WM, Yousefi S, Bhatnagar P, Remis RF, Staring M, Webb AG. Personalized local SAR prediction for parallel transmit neuroimaging at 7T from a single T1-weighted dataset. Magn Reson Med 2022; 88:464-475. [PMID: 35344602 PMCID: PMC9314883 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2021] [Revised: 01/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Parallel RF transmission (PTx) is one of the key technologies enabling high quality imaging at ultra‐high fields (≥7T). Compliance with regulatory limits on the local specific absorption rate (SAR) typically involves over‐conservative safety margins to account for intersubject variability, which negatively affect the utilization of ultra‐high field MR. In this work, we present a method to generate a subject‐specific body model from a single T1‐weighted dataset for personalized local SAR prediction in PTx neuroimaging at 7T. Methods Multi‐contrast data were acquired at 7T (N = 10) to establish ground truth segmentations in eight tissue types. A 2.5D convolutional neural network was trained using the T1‐weighted data as input in a leave‐one‐out cross‐validation study. The segmentation accuracy was evaluated through local SAR simulations in a quadrature birdcage as well as a PTx coil model. Results The network‐generated segmentations reached Dice coefficients of 86.7% ± 6.7% (mean ± SD) and showed to successfully address the severe intensity bias and contrast variations typical to 7T. Errors in peak local SAR obtained were below 3.0% in the quadrature birdcage. Results obtained in the PTx configuration indicated that a safety margin of 6.3% ensures conservative local SAR estimates in 95% of the random RF shims, compared to an average overestimation of 34% in the generic “one‐size‐fits‐all” approach. Conclusion A subject‐specific body model can be automatically generated from a single T1‐weighted dataset by means of deep learning, providing the necessary inputs for accurate and personalized local SAR predictions in PTx neuroimaging at 7T.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wyger M Brink
- C.J. Gorter Center for High Field MRI, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Sahar Yousefi
- C.J. Gorter Center for High Field MRI, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Division of Image Processing, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Prernna Bhatnagar
- C.J. Gorter Center for High Field MRI, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Circuits and Systems Group, Department of Microelectronics, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - Rob F Remis
- Circuits and Systems Group, Department of Microelectronics, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - Marius Staring
- Division of Image Processing, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Andrew G Webb
- C.J. Gorter Center for High Field MRI, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Milshteyn E, Guryev G, Torrado-Carvajal A, Adalsteinsson E, White JK, Wald LL, Guerin B. Individualized SAR calculations using computer vision-based MR segmentation and a fast electromagnetic solver. Magn Reson Med 2020; 85:429-443. [PMID: 32643152 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2019] [Revised: 04/28/2020] [Accepted: 06/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We propose a fast, patient-specific workflow for on-line specific absorption rate (SAR) supervision. An individualized electromagnetic model is created while the subject is on the table, followed by rapid SAR estimates for that individual. Our goal is an improved correspondence between the patient and model, reducing reliance on general anatomical body models. METHODS A 3D fat-water 3T acquisition (~2 minutes) is automatically segmented using a computer vision algorithm (~1 minute) into what we found to be the most important electromagnetic tissue classes: air, bone, fat, and soft tissues. We then compute the individual's EM field exposure and global and local SAR matrices using a fast electromagnetic integral equation solver. We assess the approach in 10 volunteers and compare to the SAR seen in a standard generic body model (Duke). RESULTS The on-the-table workflow averaged 7'44″. Simulation of the simplified Duke models confirmed that only air, bone, fat, and soft tissue classes are needed to estimate global and local SAR with an error of 6.7% and 2.7%, respectively, compared to the full model. In contrast, our volunteers showed a 16.0% and 20.3% population variability in global and local SAR, respectively, which was mostly underestimated by the Duke model. CONCLUSION Timely construction and deployment of a patient-specific model is computationally feasible. The benefit of resolving the population heterogeneity compared favorably to the modest modeling error incurred. This suggests that individualized SAR estimates can improve electromagnetic safety in MRI and possibly reduce conservative safety margins that account for patient-model mismatch, especially in non-standard patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eugene Milshteyn
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Georgy Guryev
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Angel Torrado-Carvajal
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Medical Image Analysis and Biometry Laboratory, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Elfar Adalsteinsson
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.,Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.,Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Jacob K White
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Lawrence L Wald
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Bastien Guerin
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|