Pressure and Bernoulli-based Flow Measurement via a Tapered Inflow VAD Cannula

A Multi-objective Physiological Control for Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices: Comparison of Estimator versus Sensor-based Feedback. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 2023;2023:1-5. [PMID: 38082905 DOI: 10.1109/embc40787.2023.10340974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0]

Left Ventricular Assist Devices have been successfully used for the treatment of Congestive Heart failure in patients who are not eligible for heart transplantation. This paper describes the implementation and comparison of the performance of a pressure sensor-based feedback controller. The strategies were tested on a mock loop of the systemic circulation. The results show that the use of pressure sensors generated a more accurate response of the controller compared to the use of estimators.Clinical Relevance- The study describes the integration of a LVAD physiological controller to a dynamic wireless monitoring system.

Physiologic Data-Driven Iterative Learning Control for Left Ventricular Assist Devices

Continuous flow ventricular assist devices (cfVADs) constitute a viable and increasingly used therapy for end-stage heart failure patients. However, they are still operating at a fixed-speed mode that precludes physiological cfVAD response and it is often related to adverse events of cfVAD therapy. To ameliorate this, various physiological controllers have been proposed, however, the majority of these controllers do not account for the lack of pulsatility in the cfVAD operation, which is supposed to be beneficial for the physiological function of the cardiovascular system. In this study, we present a physiological data-driven iterative learning controller (PDD-ILC) that accurately tracks predefined pump flow trajectories, aiming to achieve physiological, pulsatile, and treatment-driven response of cfVADs. The controller has been extensively tested in an in-silico environment under various physiological conditions, and compared with a physiologic pump flow proportional-integral-derivative controller (PF-PIDC) developed in this study as well as the constant speed (CS) control that is the current state of the art in clinical practice. Additionally, two treatment objectives were investigated to achieve pulsatility maximization and left ventricular stroke work (LVSW) minimization by implementing copulsation and counterpulsation pump modes, respectively. Under all experimental conditions, the PDD-ILC as well as the PF-PIDC demonstrated highly accurate tracking of the reference pump flow trajectories, outperforming existing model-based iterative learning control approaches. Additionally, the developed controllers achieved the predefined treatment objectives and resulted in improved hemodynamics and preload sensitivities compared to the CS support.