Topological rearrangements and local search method for tandem duplication trees

Predicting the Evolution of Syntenies—An Algorithmic Review

Syntenies are genomic segments of consecutive genes identified by a certain conservation in gene content and order. The notion of conservation may vary from one definition to another, the more constrained requiring identical gene contents and gene orders, while more relaxed definitions just require a certain similarity in gene content, and not necessarily in the same order. Regardless of the way they are identified, the goal is to characterize homologous genomic regions, i.e., regions deriving from a common ancestral region, reflecting a certain gene co-evolution that can enlighten important functional properties. In addition of being able to identify them, it is also necessary to infer the evolutionary history that has led from the ancestral segment to the extant ones. In this field, most algorithmic studies address the problem of inferring rearrangement scenarios explaining the disruption in gene order between segments with the same gene content, some of them extending the evolutionary model to gene insertion and deletion. However, syntenies also evolve through other events modifying their content in genes, such as duplications, losses or horizontal gene transfers, i.e., the movement of genes from one species to another. Although the reconciliation approach between a gene tree and a species tree addresses the problem of inferring such events for single-gene families, little effort has been dedicated to the generalization to segmental events and to syntenies. This paper reviews some of the main algorithmic methods for inferring ancestral syntenies and focus on those integrating both gene orders and gene trees.

Analysis of gene order evolution beyond single-copy genes

The purpose of this chapter is to provide a comprehensive review of the field of genome rearrangement, i.e., comparative genomics, based on the representation of genomes as ordered sequences of signed genes. We specifically focus on the "hard part" of genome rearrangement, how to handle duplicated genes. The main questions are: how have present-day genomes evolved from a common ancestor? What are the most realistic evolutionary scenarios explaining the observed gene orders? What was the content and structure of ancestral genomes? We aim to provide a concise but complete overview of the field, starting with the practical problem of finding an appropriate representation of a genome as a sequence of ordered genes or blocks, namely the problems of orthology, paralogy, and synteny block identification. We then consider three levels of gene organization: the gene family level (evolution by duplication, loss, and speciation), the cluster level (evolution by tandem duplications), and the genome level (all types of rearrangement events, including whole genome duplication).

Evolution of orthologous tandemly arrayed gene clusters

BACKGROUND

Tandemly Arrayed Gene (TAG) clusters are groups of paralogous genes that are found adjacent on a chromosome. TAGs represent an important repertoire of genes in eukaryotes. In addition to tandem duplication events, TAG clusters are affected during their evolution by other mechanisms, such as inversion and deletion events, that affect the order and orientation of genes. The DILTAG algorithm developed in 1 makes it possible to infer a set of optimal evolutionary histories explaining the evolution of a single TAG cluster, from an ancestral single gene, through tandem duplications (simple or multiple, direct or inverted), deletions and inversion events.

RESULTS

We present a general methodology, which is an extension of DILTAG, for the study of the evolutionary history of a set of orthologous TAG clusters in multiple species. In addition to the speciation events reflected by the phylogenetic tree of the considered species, the evolutionary events that are taken into account are simple or multiple tandem duplications, direct or inverted, simple or multiple deletions, and inversions. We analysed the performance of our algorithm on simulated data sets and we applied it to the protocadherin gene clusters of human, chimpanzee, mouse and rat.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results obtained on simulated data sets showed a good performance in inferring the total number and size distribution of duplication events. A limitation of the algorithm is however in dealing with multiple gene deletions, as the algorithm is highly exponential in this case, and becomes quickly intractable.

Inferring the evolutionary history of gene clusters from phylogenetic and gene order data

Gene duplication is frequent within gene clusters and plays a fundamental role in evolution by providing a source of new genetic material upon which natural selection can act. Although classical phylogenetic inference methods provide some insight into the evolutionary history of a gene cluster, they are not sufficient alone to differentiate single- from multiple gene duplication events and to answer other questions regarding the nature and size of evolutionary events. In this paper, we present an algorithm allowing to infer a set of optimal evolutionary histories for a gene cluster in a single species, according to a general cost model involving variable length duplications (in tandem or inverted), deletions, and inversions. We applied our algorithm to the human olfactory receptor and protocadherin gene clusters, showing that the duplication size distribution differs significantly between the two gene families. The algorithm is available through a web interface at http://www-lbit.iro.umontreal.ca/DILTAG/.

Inferring ancestral gene orders for a family of tandemly arrayed genes

Tandemly arrayed genes (TAG) constitute a large fraction of most genomes and play important biological roles. They evolve through unequal recombination, which places duplicated genes next to the original ones (tandem duplications). Many algorithms have been proposed to infer a tandem duplication history for a TAG cluster. However, the presence of different transcriptional orientations in many clusters highlights the fact that processes such as inversions also contribute to their evolution. Moreover, existing algorithms are restricted to the study of TAGs evolution in a single species (only paralogous genes are considered). To circumvent these limitations, we consider an evolutionary model for TAGs involving duplication, gene loss, inversion, and speciation events. A general framework to infer ancestral gene orders that minimize the number of inversions in the whole evolutionary history is presented. At the methodological level, this paper integrates three approaches to genome evolution: the duplication tree reconstruction, the gene tree/species tree reconciliation theory, and the concept of inversion median used in order-based phylogeny reconstruction. An application on a cluster of olfactory receptor genes in four mammals is presented.

Evolution of C2H2-zinc finger genes and subfamilies in mammals: species-specific duplication and loss of clusters, genes and effector domains

Background

C2H2 zinc finger genes (C2H2-ZNF) constitute the largest class of transcription factors in humans and one of the largest gene families in mammals. Often arranged in clusters in the genome, these genes are thought to have undergone a massive expansion in vertebrates, primarily by tandem duplication. However, this view is based on limited datasets restricted to a single chromosome or a specific subset of genes belonging to the large KRAB domain-containing C2H2-ZNF subfamily.

Results

Here, we present the first comprehensive study of the evolution of the C2H2-ZNF family in mammals. We assembled the complete repertoire of human C2H2-ZNF genes (718 in total), about 70% of which are organized into 81 clusters across all chromosomes. Based on an analysis of their N-terminal effector domains, we identified two new C2H2-ZNF subfamilies encoding genes with a SET or a HOMEO domain. We searched for the syntenic counterparts of the human clusters in other mammals for which complete gene data are available: chimpanzee, mouse, rat and dog. Cross-species comparisons show a large variation in the numbers of C2H2-ZNF genes within homologous mammalian clusters, suggesting differential patterns of evolution. Phylogenetic analysis of selected clusters reveals that the disparity in C2H2-ZNF gene repertoires across mammals not only originates from differential gene duplication but also from gene loss. Further, we discovered variations among orthologs in the number of zinc finger motifs and association of the effector domains, the latter often undergoing sequence degeneration. Combined with phylogenetic studies, physical maps and an analysis of the exon-intron organization of genes from the SCAN and KRAB domains-containing subfamilies, this result suggests that the SCAN subfamily emerged first, followed by the SCAN-KRAB and finally by the KRAB subfamily.

Conclusion

Our results are in agreement with the "birth and death hypothesis" for the evolution of C2H2-ZNF genes, but also show that this hypothesis alone cannot explain the considerable evolutionary variation within the subfamilies of these genes in mammals. We, therefore, propose a new model involving the interdependent evolution of C2H2-ZNF gene subfamilies.

Duplication and inversion history of a tandemly repeated genes family

Given a phylogenetic tree for a family of tandemly repeated genes and their signed order on the chromosome, we aim to find the minimum number of inversions compatible with an evolutionary history of this family. This is the first attempt to account for inversions in an evolutionary model of tandemly repeated genes. We present a branch-and-bound algorithm that finds the exact solution, and a polynomial-time heuristic based on the breakpoint distance. We show, on simulated data, that those algorithms can be used to improve phylogenetic inference of tandemly repeated gene families. An application on a published phylogeny of KRAB zinc finger genes is presented.

Comparing tandem repeats with duplications and excisions of variable degree

Traditional sequence comparison by alignment employs a mutation model comprised of two events, substitutions and indels (insertions or deletions) of single positions. However, modern genetic analysis knows a variety of more complex mutation events (e.g., duplications, excisions, and rearrangements), especially regarding DNA. With ever more DNA sequence data becoming available, the need to accurately compare sequences which have clearly undergone more complicated types of mutational processes is becoming critical. Herein we introduce a new method for pairwise alignment and comparison of sequences with respect to the special evolution of tandem repeats: substitutions and indels of single positions and, additionally, duplications and excisions of variable degree (i.e., of one or more repeat copies simultaneously) are taken into account. To evaluate our method, we apply it to the spa VNTR (variable number of tandem repeats) cluster of Staphylococcus aureus, a bacterium of high medical importance.