1
|
Moshirfar M, Omidvarnia S, Christensen MT, Porter KB, Theis JS, Olson NM, Stoakes IM, Payne CJ, Hoopes PC. Comparative Analysis of Corneal Higher-Order Aberrations after Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis, Photorefractive Keratectomy, and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction with Correlations to Change in Myopic Q-Value and Spherical Equivalent with and without Astigmatism. J Clin Med 2024; 13:1906. [PMID: 38610671 PMCID: PMC11012266 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13071906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2024] [Revised: 03/15/2024] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: This retrospective chart review compared the higher-order aberrations (HOAs) among photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) alongside changes in spherical equivalent (SEQ) and corneal shape (Q-value). Methods: Analyzing 371 myopic eyes, including 154 LASIK, 173 PRK, and 44 SMILE cases, Pentacam imaging was utilized pre-operatively and at one-year post-operative visits. Results: All procedures resulted in 100% of patients achieving an uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) of 20/40 or better, with 87% of LASIK and PRK, and 91% of SMILE patients having 20/20 or better. Significant increases in HOAs were observed across all procedures (p < 0.05), correlating positively with SEQ and Q-value changes (LASIK (0.686, p < 0.05), followed by PRK (0.4503, p < 0.05), and SMILE (0.386, p < 0.05)). Vertical coma and spherical aberration (SA) were the primary factors for heightened aberration magnitude among the procedures (p < 0.05), with the largest contribution in SMILE, which is likely attributed to the centration at the corneal apex. Notably, PRK showed insignificant changes in vertical coma (-0.197 µm ± 0.0168 to -0.192 µm ± 0.0198, p = 0.78), with an increase in oblique trefoil (p < 0.05). Conclusions: These findings underscore differences in HOAs among PRK, LASIK, and SMILE, helping to guide clinicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Majid Moshirfar
- Hoopes Vision Research Center, Hoopes Vision, 11820 S. State St., Ste. 200, Draper, UT 84020, USA; (I.M.S.); (C.J.P.); (P.C.H.)
- John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA
- Utah Lions Eye Bank, Murray, UT 84107, USA
| | | | | | - Kaiden B. Porter
- School of Medicine, University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA; (K.B.P.); (J.S.T.)
| | - Josh S. Theis
- School of Medicine, University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA; (K.B.P.); (J.S.T.)
| | - Nathan M. Olson
- College of Osteopathic Medicine, Rocky Vista University, Ivins, UT 84738, USA;
| | - Isabella M. Stoakes
- Hoopes Vision Research Center, Hoopes Vision, 11820 S. State St., Ste. 200, Draper, UT 84020, USA; (I.M.S.); (C.J.P.); (P.C.H.)
- School of Osteopathic Medicine, Pacific Northwest University of Health Sciences, Yakima, WA 98901, USA
| | - Carter J. Payne
- Hoopes Vision Research Center, Hoopes Vision, 11820 S. State St., Ste. 200, Draper, UT 84020, USA; (I.M.S.); (C.J.P.); (P.C.H.)
- School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - Phillip C. Hoopes
- Hoopes Vision Research Center, Hoopes Vision, 11820 S. State St., Ste. 200, Draper, UT 84020, USA; (I.M.S.); (C.J.P.); (P.C.H.)
| |
Collapse
|