1
|
Cui H, Cao J, Hao Q, Zhou D, Zhang H, Zhang Y. Foveated panoramic ghost imaging. OPTICS EXPRESS 2023; 31:12986-13002. [PMID: 37157446 DOI: 10.1364/oe.482168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
Panoramic ghost imaging (PGI) is a novel method by only using a curved mirror to enlarge the field of view (FOV) of ghost imaging (GI) to 360°, making GI a breakthrough in the applications with a wide FOV. However, high-resolution PGI with high efficiency is a serious challenge because of the large amount of data. Therefore, inspired by the variant-resolution retina structure of human eye, a foveated panoramic ghost imaging (FPGI) is proposed to achieve the coexistence of a wide FOV, high resolution and high efficiency on GI by reducing the resolution redundancy, and further to promote the practical applications of GI with a wide FOV. In FPGI system, a flexible variant-resolution annular pattern structure via log-rectilinear transformation and log-polar mapping is proposed to be used for projection, which can allocate the resolution of the region of interest (ROI) and the other region of non-interest (NROI) by setting related parameters in the radial and poloidal directions independently to meet different imaging requirements. In addition, in order to reasonably reduce the resolution redundancy and avoid the loss of the necessary resolution on NROI, the variant-resolution annular pattern structure with a real fovea is further optimized to keep the ROI at any position in the center of 360° FOV by flexibly changing the initial position of the start-stop boundary on the annular pattern structure. The experimental results of the FPGI with one fovea and multiple foveae demonstrate that, compared to the traditional PGI, the proposed FPGI not only can improve the imaging quality on the ROIs with a high resolution and flexibly remain a lower-resolution imaging on the NROI with different required resolution reduction; but also reduce the reconstruction time to improve the imaging efficiency due to the reduction of the resolution redundancy.
Collapse
|
2
|
Meng F, Shi Y, Li C, Li L, Qin W, Zhu S. Hybrid model of photon propagation based on the analytical and Monte Carlo methods for a dual-head PET system. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66. [PMID: 34330106 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac195b] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2020] [Accepted: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
The construction of photon propagation has a close relationship with the quality of reconstructed images. The classical Monte Carlo (MC) based method can model the photon propagation precisely, but it is time-consuming. The analytical method can often quickly construct a model, but its precision is a problem. How to fully exploit the advantages of the MC simulation and analytical model is an open problem. Inspired by the characteristics of the depth of interaction (DOI) detectors, which can help confirm the deposited position of a photon with DOI-encoding technology, we virtually discretize each crystal into several subcrystals to obtain the statistical distribution by MC-based simulation. Then, the statistical distribution is combined with a spatially variant solid-angle model. This combination strategy provides a hybrid model to describe photon propagation with relatively high accuracy and low computational cost. Three discretization schemes are compared to optimize the constructed photon propagation model. Several experiments are carried out to evaluate the performance of the proposed hybrid method. The metrics of full width at half maximum (FWHM), contrast recovery (CR), and coefficient of variation (COV) are adopted to quantitate the imaging results. The classical MC-based method is compared as a gold-standard reference. When a crystal is divided into two discretized positions, the convergent tendencies of CRs and COVs are consistent with that based on MC simulation method, respectively. In terms of FWHMs, the resolutions of using the MC-based model and the proposed hybrid model are 0.71 mm and 0.68 mm in the direction parallel to the detector head, respectively. This indicates the potential of the proposed method in positron emission tomography imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fanzhen Meng
- Engineering Research Center of Molecular and Neuro Imaging, Ministry of Education, School of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710071, People's Republic of China
| | - Yu Shi
- Engineering Research Center of Molecular and Neuro Imaging, Ministry of Education, School of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710071, People's Republic of China
| | - Chenfeng Li
- Engineering Research Center of Molecular and Neuro Imaging, Ministry of Education, School of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710071, People's Republic of China
| | - Lei Li
- Engineering Research Center of Molecular and Neuro Imaging, Ministry of Education, School of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710071, People's Republic of China
| | - Wei Qin
- Engineering Research Center of Molecular and Neuro Imaging, Ministry of Education, School of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710071, People's Republic of China
| | - Shouping Zhu
- Engineering Research Center of Molecular and Neuro Imaging, Ministry of Education, School of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710071, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Miranda A, Staelens S, Stroobants S, Verhaeghe J. Motion Dependent and Spatially Variant Resolution Modeling for PET Rigid Motion Correction. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING 2020; 39:2518-2530. [PMID: 32070945 DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2019.2962237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Recent advances in positron emission tomography (PET) have allowed to perform brain scans of freely moving animals by using rigid motion correction. One of the current challenges in these scans is that, due to the PET scanner spatially variant point spread function (SVPSF), motion corrected images have a motion dependent blurring since animals can move throughout the entire field of view (FOV). We developed a method to calculate the image-based resolution kernels of the motion dependent and spatially variant PSF (MD-SVPSF) to correct the loss of spatial resolution in motion corrected reconstructions. The resolution kernels are calculated for each voxel by sampling and averaging the SVPSF at all positions in the scanner FOV where the moving object was measured. In resolution phantom scans, the use of the MD-SVPSF resolution model improved the spatial resolution in motion corrected reconstructions and corrected the image deformation caused by the parallax effect consistently for all motion patterns, outperforming the use of a motion independent SVPSF or Gaussian kernels. Compared to motion correction in which the SVPSF is applied independently for every pose, our method performed similarly, but with more than two orders of magnitude faster computation time. Importantly, in scans of freely moving mice, brain regional quantification in motion-free and motion corrected images was better correlated when using the MD-SVPSF in comparison with motion independent SVPSF and a Gaussian kernel. The method developed here allows to obtain consistent spatial resolution and quantification in motion corrected images, independently of the motion pattern of the subject.
Collapse
|
7
|
Kyme AZ, Angelis GI, Eisenhuth J, Fulton RR, Zhou V, Hart G, Popovic K, Akhtar M, Ryder WJ, Clemens KJ, Balleine BW, Parmar A, Pascali G, Perkins G, Meikle SR. Open-field PET: Simultaneous brain functional imaging and behavioural response measurements in freely moving small animals. Neuroimage 2018; 188:92-101. [PMID: 30502443 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.11.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2018] [Revised: 11/01/2018] [Accepted: 11/27/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
Abstract
A comprehensive understanding of how the brain responds to a changing environment requires techniques capable of recording functional outputs at the whole-brain level in response to external stimuli. Positron emission tomography (PET) is an exquisitely sensitive technique for imaging brain function but the need for anaesthesia to avoid motion artefacts precludes concurrent behavioural response studies. Here, we report a technique that combines motion-compensated PET with a robotically-controlled animal enclosure to enable simultaneous brain imaging and behavioural recordings in unrestrained small animals. The technique was used to measure in vivo displacement of [11C]raclopride from dopamine D2 receptors (D2R) concurrently with changes in the behaviour of awake, freely moving rats following administration of unlabelled raclopride or amphetamine. The timing and magnitude of [11C]raclopride displacement from D2R were reliably estimated and, in the case of amphetamine, these changes coincided with a marked increase in stereotyped behaviours and hyper-locomotion. The technique, therefore, allows simultaneous measurement of changes in brain function and behavioural responses to external stimuli in conscious unrestrained animals, giving rise to important applications in behavioural neuroscience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andre Z Kyme
- Biomedical Engineering, School of Aerospace, Mechanical & Mechatronic Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and IT, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia; Imaging Physics Laboratory, Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia; Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
| | - Georgios I Angelis
- Imaging Physics Laboratory, Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia; Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - John Eisenhuth
- Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Roger R Fulton
- Imaging Physics Laboratory, Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia; Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia; Department of Medical Physics, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, 2145, Australia
| | - Victor Zhou
- Imaging Physics Laboratory, Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Genevra Hart
- Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Kata Popovic
- Imaging Physics Laboratory, Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia; Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Mahmood Akhtar
- Imaging Physics Laboratory, Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia; Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - William J Ryder
- Imaging Physics Laboratory, Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia; Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Kelly J Clemens
- School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - Bernard W Balleine
- Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Arvind Parmar
- Imaging Physics Laboratory, Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia; Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, Sydney, NSW, 2234, Australia
| | - Giancarlo Pascali
- Imaging Physics Laboratory, Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia; Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, Sydney, NSW, 2234, Australia
| | - Gary Perkins
- Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, Sydney, NSW, 2234, Australia
| | - Steven R Meikle
- Imaging Physics Laboratory, Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia; Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|