1
|
Schwarz EM, McLaren AC, Sculco TP, Brause B, Bostrom M, Kates SL, Parvizi J, Alt V, Arnold WV, Carli A, Chen AF, Choe H, Coraça‐Huber DC, Cross M, Ghert M, Hickok N, Jennings JA, Joshi M, Metsemakers W, Ninomiya M, Nishitani K, Oh I, Padgett D, Ricciardi B, Saeed K, Sendi P, Springer B, Stoodley P, Wenke JC. Adjuvant antibiotic-loaded bone cement: Concerns with current use and research to make it work. J Orthop Res 2021; 39:227-239. [PMID: 31997412 PMCID: PMC7390691 DOI: 10.1002/jor.24616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2019] [Revised: 01/07/2020] [Accepted: 01/13/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC) is broadly used to treat orthopaedic infections based on the rationale that high-dose local delivery is essential to eradicate biofilm-associated bacteria. However, ALBC formulations are empirically based on drug susceptibility from routine laboratory testing, which is known to have limited clinical relevance for biofilms. There are also dosing concerns with nonstandardized, surgeon-directed, hand-mixed formulations, which have unknown release kinetics. On the basis of our knowledge of in vivo biofilms, pathogen virulence, safety issues with nonstandardized ALBC formulations, and questions about the cost-effectiveness of ALBC, there is a need to evaluate the evidence for this clinical practice. To this end, thought leaders in the field of musculoskeletal infection (MSKI) met on 1 August 2019 to review and debate published and anecdotal information, which highlighted four major concerns about current ALBC use: (a) substantial lack of level 1 evidence to demonstrate efficacy; (b) ALBC formulations become subtherapeutic following early release, which risks induction of antibiotic resistance, and exacerbated infection from microbial colonization of the carrier; (c) the absence of standardized formulation protocols, and Food and Drug Administration-approved high-dose ALBC products to use following resection in MSKI treatment; and (d) absence of a validated assay to determine the minimum biofilm eradication concentration to predict ALBC efficacy against patient specific micro-organisms. Here, we describe these concerns in detail, and propose areas in need of research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward M. Schwarz
- Department of Orthopaedics, Center for Musculoskeletal Research University of Rochester Rochester New York
| | - Alex C. McLaren
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine‐Phoenix University of Arizona Phoenix Arizona
| | - Thomas P. Sculco
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine Hospital for Special Surgery New York New York
| | - Barry Brause
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Weill Cornell Medicine Hospital for Special Surgery New York New York
| | - Mathias Bostrom
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine Hospital for Special Surgery New York New York
| | - Stephen L. Kates
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond Virginia
| | - Javad Parvizi
- Department of Orthopaedics Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Volker Alt
- Department of Trauma Surgery University Medical Centre Regensburg Regensburg Germany
| | - William V. Arnold
- Department of Orthopaedics Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Alberto Carli
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine Hospital for Special Surgery New York New York
| | - Antonia F. Chen
- Department of Orthopaedics, Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts
| | - Hyonmin Choe
- Department of Orthopaedic Yokohama City University Yokohama Japan
| | - Débora C. Coraça‐Huber
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Experimental Orthopedics, Research Laboratory for Biofilms and Implant Associated Infections Medical University of Innsbruck Innsbruck Austria
| | - Michael Cross
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine Hospital for Special Surgery New York New York
| | - Michelle Ghert
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada
| | - Noreen Hickok
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology Thomas Jefferson University Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | | | - Manjari Joshi
- Division of Infectious Diseases, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center University of Maryland Baltimore Maryland
| | | | - Mark Ninomiya
- Department of Orthopaedics, Center for Musculoskeletal Research University of Rochester Rochester New York
| | - Kohei Nishitani
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University Sakyo Kyoto Japan
| | - Irvin Oh
- Department of Orthopaedics, Center for Musculoskeletal Research University of Rochester Rochester New York
| | - Douglas Padgett
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine Hospital for Special Surgery New York New York
| | - Benjamin Ricciardi
- Department of Orthopaedics, Center for Musculoskeletal Research University of Rochester Rochester New York
| | - Kordo Saeed
- Southampton University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Microbiology, Microbiology and Innovation Research Unit (MIRU) and University of Southampton, School of Medicine Southampton UK
| | - Parham Sendi
- Institute for Infectious Diseases University of Bern, Bern and Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Epidemiology and Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Basel Basel Switzerland
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology University Hospital Basel Basel Switzerland
| | - Bryan Springer
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, OrthoCarolina Hip and Knee Center Atrium Musculoskeletal Institute Charlotte North Carolina
| | - Paul Stoodley
- Department of Microbial Infection and Immunity and Orthopaedics The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio
| | - Joseph C. Wenke
- Orthopaedic Trauma Department U.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research Fort Sam Houston Texas
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
de Senneville BD, Coupé P, Ries M, Facq L, Moonen CTW. Deep correction of breathing-related artifacts in real-time MR-thermometry. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2020; 87:101834. [PMID: 33352524 DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2020.101834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2020] [Revised: 11/10/2020] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Real-time MR-imaging has been clinically adapted for monitoring thermal therapies since it can provide on-the-fly temperature maps simultaneously with anatomical information. However, proton resonance frequency based thermometry of moving targets remains challenging since temperature artifacts are induced by the respiratory as well as physiological motion. If left uncorrected, these artifacts lead to severe errors in temperature estimates and impair therapy guidance. In this study, we evaluated deep learning for on-line correction of motion related errors in abdominal MR-thermometry. For this, a convolutional neural network (CNN) was designed to learn the apparent temperature perturbation from images acquired during a preparative learning stage prior to hyperthermia. The input of the designed CNN is the most recent magnitude image and no surrogate of motion is needed. During the subsequent hyperthermia procedure, the recent magnitude image is used as an input for the CNN-model in order to generate an on-line correction for the current temperature map. The method's artifact suppression performance was evaluated on 12 free breathing volunteers and was found robust and artifact-free in all examined cases. Furthermore, thermometric precision and accuracy was assessed for in vivo ablation using high intensity focused ultrasound. All calculations involved at the different stages of the proposed workflow were designed to be compatible with the clinical time constraints of a therapeutic procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Denis de Senneville
- University of Bordeaux, IMB, UMR CNRS 5251, Talence, France, Talence Cedex, F-33405, France; INRIA Project Team Monc, Talence, France, Talence Cedex, F-33405, France; Department of Radiotherapy, UMC Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3508 GA, The Netherlands.
| | - P Coupé
- CNRS, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux INP, "Laboratoire Bordelais de la Recherche Informatique" (LaBRI), UMR5800, Talence, F-33400, France
| | - M Ries
- Imaging Division, UMC Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3508 GA, The Netherlands
| | - L Facq
- University of Bordeaux, IMB, UMR CNRS 5251, Talence, France, Talence Cedex, F-33405, France
| | - C T W Moonen
- Imaging Division, UMC Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3508 GA, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lutz NW, Bernard M. Contactless Thermometry by MRI and MRS: Advanced Methods for Thermotherapy and Biomaterials. iScience 2020; 23:101561. [PMID: 32954229 PMCID: PMC7489251 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Control of temperature variation is of primordial importance in particular areas of biomedicine. In this context, medical treatments such as hyperthermia and cryotherapy, and also the development and use of hydrogel-based biomaterials, are of particular concern. To enable accurate temperature measurement without perturbing or even destroying the biological tissue or material to be monitored, contactless thermometry methods are preferred. Among these, the most suitable are based on magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy (MRI, MRS). Here, we address the latest developments in this field as well as their current and anticipated practical applications. We highlight recent progress aimed at rendering MR thermometry faster and more reproducible, versatile, and sophisticated and provide our perspective on how these new techniques broaden the range of applications in medical treatments and biomaterial development by enabling insight into finer details of thermal behavior. Thus, these methods facilitate optimization of clinical and industrial heating and cooling protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norbert W. Lutz
- Aix-Marseille University, CNRS, CRMBM, 27 Bd Jean Moulin, 13005 Marseille, France
| | - Monique Bernard
- Aix-Marseille University, CNRS, CRMBM, 27 Bd Jean Moulin, 13005 Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
|
5
|
PG K, Joseph J, Jayaraman S. A customized nonlocal restoration schemes with adaptive strength of smoothening for magnetic resonance images. Biomed Signal Process Control 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2018.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
6
|
Odéen H, Parker DL. Magnetic resonance thermometry and its biological applications - Physical principles and practical considerations. PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY 2019; 110:34-61. [PMID: 30803693 PMCID: PMC6662927 DOI: 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2019.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2018] [Accepted: 01/23/2019] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
Most parameters that influence the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signal experience a temperature dependence. The fact that MRI can be used for non-invasive measurements of temperature and temperature change deep inside the human body has been known for over 30 years. Today, MR temperature imaging is widely used to monitor and evaluate thermal therapies such as radio frequency, microwave, laser, and focused ultrasound therapy. In this paper we cover the physical principles underlying the biological applications of MR temperature imaging and discuss practical considerations and remaining challenges. For biological tissue, the MR signal of interest comes mostly from hydrogen protons of water molecules but also from protons in, e.g., adipose tissue and various metabolites. Most of the discussed methods, such as those using the proton resonance frequency (PRF) shift, T1, T2, and diffusion only measure temperature change, but measurements of absolute temperatures are also possible using spectroscopic imaging methods (taking advantage of various metabolite signals as internal references) or various types of contrast agents. Currently, the PRF method is the most used clinically due to good sensitivity, excellent linearity with temperature, and because it is largely independent of tissue type. Because the PRF method does not work in adipose tissues, T1- and T2-based methods have recently gained interest for monitoring temperature change in areas with high fat content such as the breast and abdomen. Absolute temperature measurement methods using spectroscopic imaging and contrast agents often offer too low spatial and temporal resolution for accurate monitoring of ablative thermal procedures, but have shown great promise in monitoring the slower and usually less spatially localized temperature change observed during hyperthermia procedures. Much of the current research effort for ablative procedures is aimed at providing faster measurements, larger field-of-view coverage, simultaneous monitoring in aqueous and adipose tissues, and more motion-insensitive acquisitions for better precision measurements in organs such as the heart, liver, and kidneys. For hyperthermia applications, larger coverage, motion insensitivity, and simultaneous aqueous and adipose monitoring are also important, but great effort is also aimed at solving the problem of long-term field drift which gets interpreted as temperature change when using the PRF method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henrik Odéen
- University of Utah, Utah Center for Advanced Imaging Research, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, 729 Arapeen Drive, Salt Lake City, UT 84108-1217, USA.
| | - Dennis L Parker
- University of Utah, Utah Center for Advanced Imaging Research, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, 729 Arapeen Drive, Salt Lake City, UT 84108-1217, USA.
| |
Collapse
|