1
|
Dong Q, Ullah MN, Innes D, Watkins RD, Chang CM, Zou SJ, Groll A, Sacco I, Chinn G, Levin CS. PETcoil: first results from a second-generation RF-penetrable TOF-PET brain insert for simultaneous PET/MRI. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:185007. [PMID: 39168156 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad7221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2024] [Accepted: 08/21/2024] [Indexed: 08/23/2024]
Abstract
Simultaneous positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance imaging provides concurrent information about anatomic, functional, and molecular changes in disease. We are developing a second generation MR-compatible RF-penetrable TOF-PET insert. The insert has a smaller scintillation crystal size and ring diameter compared to clinical whole-body PET scanners, resulting in higher spatial resolution and sensitivity. This paper reports the initial system performance of this full-ring PET insert. The global photopeak energy resolution and global coincidence time resolution, 11.74 ± 0.03 % FWHM and 238.1 ± 0.5 ps FWHM, respectively, are preserved as we scaled up the system to a full ring comprising 12, 288 LYSO-SiPM channels (crystal size: 3.2 × 3.2 × 20 mm3). Throughout a ten-hour experiment, the system performance remained stable, exhibiting a less than 1% change in all measured parameters. In a resolution phantom study, the system successfully resolved all 2.8 mm diameter rods, achieving an average VPR of 0.28 ± 0.08 without TOF and 0.24 ± 0.07 with TOF applied. Moreover, the implementation of TOF in the Hoffman phantom study also enhanced image quality. Initial MR compatibility studies of the full PET ring were performed with it unpowered as a milestone to focus on looking for material and geometry-related artifacts. During all MR studies, the MR body coil functioned as both the transmit and receive coil, and no observable artifacts were detected. As expected, using the body coil also as the RF receiver, MR image signal-to-noise ratio exhibited degradation (∼30%), so we are developing a high quality receive-only coil that resides inside the PET ring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qian Dong
- Molecular Imaging Instrumentation Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America
| | - Muhammad Nasir Ullah
- Molecular Imaging Instrumentation Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America
| | - Derek Innes
- Molecular Imaging Instrumentation Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America
| | - Ronald D Watkins
- Molecular Imaging Instrumentation Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America
| | - Chen-Ming Chang
- Molecular Imaging Instrumentation Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America
| | - Sarah J Zou
- Molecular Imaging Instrumentation Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America
| | - Andrew Groll
- Molecular Imaging Instrumentation Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America
| | - Ilaria Sacco
- Molecular Imaging Instrumentation Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America
| | - Garry Chinn
- Molecular Imaging Instrumentation Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America
| | - Craig S Levin
- Molecular Imaging Instrumentation Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Akram MSH, Levin CS, Nishikido F, Takyu S, Obata T, Yamaya T. Study on the radiofrequency transparency of partial-ring oval-shaped prototype PET inserts in a 3 T clinical MRI system. Radiol Phys Technol 2024; 17:60-70. [PMID: 37874462 DOI: 10.1007/s12194-023-00747-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Revised: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the RF field responses of partial-ring RF-shielded oval-shaped positron emission tomography (PET) inserts that are used in combination with an MRI body RF coil. Partial-ring PET insert is particularly suitable for interventional investigation (e.g., trimodal PET/MRI/ultrasound imaging) and intraoperative (e.g., robotic surgery) PET/MRI studies. In this study, we used electrically floating Faraday RF shield cages to construct different partial-ring configurations of oval and cylindrical PET inserts and performed experiments on the RF field, spin echo and gradient echo images for a homogeneous phantom in a 3 T clinical MRI system. For each geometry, partial-ring configurations were studied by removing an opposing pair or a single shield cage from different positions of the PET ring. Compared to the MRI-only case, reduction in mean RF homogeneity, flip angle, and SNR for the detector opening in the first and third quadrants was approximately 13%, 15%, and 43%, respectively, whereas the values were 8%, 23%, and 48%, respectively, for the detector openings in the second and fourth quadrants. The RF field distribution also varied for different partial-ring configurations. It can be concluded that the field penetration was high for the detector openings in the first and third quadrants of both the inserts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Md Shahadat Hossain Akram
- Department of Advanced Nuclear Medicine Sciences, Institute of Quantum Medical Science, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology (QST), 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan.
| | - Craig S Levin
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305-5128, USA
| | - Fumihiko Nishikido
- Department of Advanced Nuclear Medicine Sciences, Institute of Quantum Medical Science, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology (QST), 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan
| | - Sodai Takyu
- Department of Advanced Nuclear Medicine Sciences, Institute of Quantum Medical Science, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology (QST), 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan
| | - Takayuki Obata
- Department of Applied MRI Research, Institute of Quantum Medical Science, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology (QST), Anagawa 4-9-1, Inage, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan
| | - Taiga Yamaya
- Department of Advanced Nuclear Medicine Sciences, Institute of Quantum Medical Science, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology (QST), 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Choi CH, Felder J, Lerche C, Shah NJ. MRI Coil Development Strategies for Hybrid MR-PET Systems: A Review. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng 2024; 17:342-350. [PMID: 37015609 DOI: 10.1109/rbme.2022.3227337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Simultaneously operating MR-PET systems have the potential to provide synergetic multi-parametric information, and, as such, interest surrounding their use and development is increasing. However, despite the potential advantages offered by fully combined MR-PET systems, implementing this hybrid integration is technically laborious, and any factors degrading the quality of either modality must be circumvented to ensure optimal performance. In order to attain the best possible quality from both systems, most full MR-PET integrations tend to place the shielded PET system inside the MRI system, close to the target volume of the subject. The radiofrequency (RF) coil used in MRI systems is a key factor in determining the quality of the MR images, and, in simultaneous acquisition, it is generally positioned inside the PET system and PET imaging region, potentially resulting in attenuation and artefacts in the PET images. Therefore, when designing hybrid MR-PET systems, it is imperative that consideration be given to the RF coils inside the PET system. In this review, we present current state-of-the-art RF coil designs used for hybrid MR-PET experiments and discuss various design strategies for constructing PET transparent RF coils.
Collapse
|
4
|
Sang Z, Kuang Z, Wang X, Ren N, Wu S, Niu M, Cong L, Liu Z, Hu Z, Sun T, Liang D, Liu X, Zheng H, Li Y, Yang Y. Mutual interferences between SIAT aPET insert and a 3 T uMR 790 MRI scanner. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68. [PMID: 36549011 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acae17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Objective.Dual-modality small animal PET/MR imaging provides temporally correlated information on two biochemical processes of a living object. An magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-compatible small animal PET insert named Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology (SIAT) aPET was developed by using dual-ended readout depth encoding detectors to simultaneously achieve a uniform high spatial resolution and high sensitivity at the SIAT. In this work, the mutual interferences between SIAT aPET and the 3 T uMR 790 MRI scanner of United Imaging was quantitatively evaluated.Approach.To minimize the mutual interferences, only the PET detectors and the readout electronics were placed inside the MRI scanner, the major signal processing electronic was placed in the corner of the MRI room and the auxiliary unit was placed in the MRI technical room. A dedicated mouse radio fRequency (RF) coil with a transmitter and receiver was developed for the PET insert. The effects of PET scanner on theB0andB1field of the MRI scanner and the quality of the MRI images were measured. The effects of MRI imaging on the performance of both the PET detectors and scanner were also measured.Main results.The electronic and mechanical components of the PET insert affected the homogeneity of theB0field. The PET insert had no effect on the homogeneity ofB1produced by the dedicated mouse coil but slightly reduced the strength ofB1. The mean and standard deviation of the RF noise map were increased by 2.2% and 11.6%, respectively, while the PET insert was placed in the MRI scanner and powered on. Eddy current was produced while the PET insert was placed in the MRI scanner, and it was further increased while the PET insert was powered on. Despite the above-mentioned interferences from the PET insert, the MR images of a uniform cylindrical water phantom showed that the changes in the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and homogeneity as the PET insert was placed in the MRI scanner were acceptable regardless of whether the PET insert was powered off or powered on. The maximum reduction of SNR was less than 11%, and the maximum reduction of homogeneity was less than 2.5% while the PET insert was placed inside the MRI scanner and powered on for five commonly used MRI sequences. MRI using gradient echo (GRE), spin echo (SE) and fast spin echo (FSE) sequences had negligible effects on the flood histograms and energy resolution of the PET detectors, as well as the spatial resolution and sensitivity of the PET scanner.Significance.The mutual interference between the SIAT aPET and the 3 T uMR 790 MRI scanner are acceptable. Simultaneous PET/MRI imaging of small animals can be performed with the two scanners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziru Sang
- Paul C Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518055, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhonghua Kuang
- Paul C Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518055, People's Republic of China.,Shenzhen College of Advanced Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen 518055, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaohui Wang
- Paul C Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518055, People's Republic of China
| | - Ning Ren
- Paul C Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518055, People's Republic of China
| | - San Wu
- Paul C Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518055, People's Republic of China
| | - Ming Niu
- Paul C Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518055, People's Republic of China
| | - Longhan Cong
- Paul C Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518055, People's Republic of China
| | - Zheng Liu
- Paul C Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518055, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhanli Hu
- Paul C Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518055, People's Republic of China
| | - Tao Sun
- Paul C Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518055, People's Republic of China
| | - Dong Liang
- Paul C Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518055, People's Republic of China
| | - Xin Liu
- Paul C Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518055, People's Republic of China
| | - Hairong Zheng
- Paul C Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518055, People's Republic of China
| | - Ye Li
- Paul C Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518055, People's Republic of China
| | - Yongfeng Yang
- Paul C Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518055, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zeng T, Zheng J, Xia X, Chen X, Wang B, Zhang S, Chandler A, Cao T, Hu L, Chen Q, Chu X. Design and system evaluation of a dual-panel portable PET (DP-PET). EJNMMI Phys 2021; 8:47. [PMID: 34117943 PMCID: PMC8197684 DOI: 10.1186/s40658-021-00392-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Integrated whole-body PET/MR technology continues to mature and is now extensively used in clinical settings. However, due to the special design architecture, integrated whole-body PET/MR comes with a few inherent limitations. Firstly, whole-body PET/MR lacks sensitivity and resolution for focused organs. Secondly, broader clinical access of integrated PET/MR has been significantly restricted due to its prohibitively high cost. The MR-compatible PET insert is an independent and removable PET scanner which can be placed within an MRI bore. However, the mobility and configurability of all existing MR-compatible PET insert prototypes remain limited. METHODS An MR-compatible portable PET insert prototype, dual-panel portable PET (DP-PET), has been developed for simultaneous PET/MR imaging. Using SiPM, digital readout electronics, novel carbon fiber shielding, phase-change cooling, and MRI compatible battery power, DP-PET was designed to achieve high-sensitivity and high-resolution with compatibility with a clinical 3-T MRI scanner. A GPU-based reconstruction method with resolution modeling (RM) has been developed for the DP-PET reconstruction. We evaluated the system performance on PET resolution, sensitivity, image quality, and the PET/MR interference. RESULTS The initial results reveal that the DP-PET prototype worked as expected in the MRI bore and caused minimal compromise to the MRI image quality. The PET performance was measured to show a spatial resolution ≤ 2.5 mm (parallel to the detector panels), maximum sensitivity = 3.6% at the center of FOV, and energy resolution = 12.43%. MR pulsing introduces less than 2% variation to the PET performance measurement results. CONCLUSIONS We developed a MR-compatible PET insert prototype and performed several studies to begin to characterize the performance of the proposed DP-PET. The results showed that the proposed DP-PET performed well in the MRI bore and would cause little influence on the MRI images. The Derenzo phantom test showed that the proposed reconstruction method could obtain high-quality images using DP-PET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tianyi Zeng
- Shanghai Advanced Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 201210, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
| | - Jiaxu Zheng
- Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd., Shanghai, 201807, China
| | - Xinyuan Xia
- Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd., Shanghai, 201807, China
| | - Xin Chen
- Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd., Shanghai, 201807, China
| | - Beien Wang
- Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd., Shanghai, 201807, China
| | - Shuangyue Zhang
- Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd., Shanghai, 201807, China
| | - Adam Chandler
- United Imaging Healthcare, America, Houston, TX, 77054, USA
| | - Tuoyu Cao
- Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd., Shanghai, 201807, China
| | - Lingzhi Hu
- United Imaging Healthcare, America, Houston, TX, 77054, USA.
| | - Qun Chen
- Shanghai Advanced Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 201210, China
- Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd., Shanghai, 201807, China
| | - Xu Chu
- Shanghai Advanced Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 201210, China
- Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd., Shanghai, 201807, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yin L, Schrank F, Gross-Weege N, Schug D, Schulz V. RF shielding materials for highly-integrated PET/MRI systems. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66. [PMID: 33831853 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abf606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Accepted: 04/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Integration of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) into a simultaneous device calls for adaptations of the radio frequency (RF) shielding concept. Conventional PET module housings fully encase the entire PET detector to reduce mutual interference. Excluding passive components, i.e. scintillators, from the housings, offers integration advantages, e.g. by reducing the overall housing volume or utilizing bigger scintillators. However, locating the scintillator outside of the RF shielding requires an optically transparent RF shielding interface between the scintillators and the photodetector to close the aperture. Therefore, a careful evaluation and selection of RF materials is essential to ensure an excellent PET/MRI system performance. To this end, we examined 10 materials (coated glasses, coated foils, meshes). The shielding effectiveness (SE) was evaluated at 100 and 300 MHz. PET performance was tested for single event registration and coincident events by integrating the material into the PET detector stack between the digital silicon photomultiplier photodetector array and one-to-one coupled scintillator. We determined photon attenuation (PA), energy resolution (dE/E), and coincidence resolving time (CRT) and compared to reference measurements for each material group. MRI compatibility was assessed by analyzing the material influence on the main magnetic field (B0) homogeneity. The coated glasses and foils exhibited SEs of up to 25 dB at 300 MHz. Both had a PA < 23% with dE/E and CRT comparable to the reference measurements, and no measurable impact on the B0field was registered. The meshes exhibited higher SEs up to 56 dB, but also a PA > 58% with a higher impact on dE/E and CRT. Only one mesh affected B0homogeneity. Overall, we recommend the coated foil HS 9400 for integration concepts as it exhibited a good performance with SE = 25 dB, PA = 22%, resulting in a PET performance of dE/E = 12% and CRT = 274 ps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laiyin Yin
- Department of Physics of Molecular Imaging Systems, Institute for Experimental Molecular Imaging, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Franziska Schrank
- Department of Physics of Molecular Imaging Systems, Institute for Experimental Molecular Imaging, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Nicolas Gross-Weege
- Department of Physics of Molecular Imaging Systems, Institute for Experimental Molecular Imaging, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - David Schug
- Department of Physics of Molecular Imaging Systems, Institute for Experimental Molecular Imaging, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.,Hyperion Hybrid Imaging Systems GmbH, Aachen, Germany
| | - Volkmar Schulz
- Department of Physics of Molecular Imaging Systems, Institute for Experimental Molecular Imaging, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.,Hyperion Hybrid Imaging Systems GmbH, Aachen, Germany.,Physics Institute III B, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.,Fraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS, Aachen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Branderhorst W, Steensma BR, Beijst C, Huijing ER, Alborahal C, Versteeg E, Weissler B, Schug D, Gebhardt P, Gross-Weege N, Mueller F, Krueger K, Dey T, Radermacher H, Lips O, Lagendijk J, Schulz V, de Jong HWAM, Klomp DWJ. Evaluation of the radiofrequency performance of a wide-bore 1.5 T positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging body coil for radiotherapy planning. PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY 2020; 17:13-19. [PMID: 33898772 PMCID: PMC8057958 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2020.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2020] [Revised: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 12/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Background and purpose The restricted bore diameter of current simultaneous positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) systems can be an impediment to achieving similar patient positioning during PET/MRI planning and radiotherapy. Our goal was to evaluate the B1 transmit (B1+) uniformity, B1+ efficiency, and specific absorption rate (SAR) of a novel radiofrequency (RF) body coil design, in which RF shielded PET detectors were integrated with the specific aim of enabling a wide-bore PET/MRI system. Materials and methods We designed and constructed a wide-bore PET/MRI RF body coil to be integrated with a clinical MRI system. To increase its inner bore diameter, the PET detectors were positioned between the conductors and the RF shield of the RF body coil. Simulations and experiments with phantoms and human volunteers were performed to compare the B1+ uniformity, B1+ efficiency, and SAR between our design and the clinical body coil. Results In the simulations, our design achieved nearly the same B1+ field uniformity as the clinical body coil and an almost identical SAR distribution. The uniformity findings were confirmed by the physical experiments. The B1+ efficiency was 38% lower compared to the clinical body coil. Conclusions To achieve wide-bore PET/MRI, it is possible to integrate shielding for PET detectors between the body coil conductors and the RF shield without compromising MRI performance. Reduced B1+ efficiency may be compensated by adding a second RF amplifier. This finding may facilitate the application of simultaneous whole-body PET/MRI in radiotherapy planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Woutjan Branderhorst
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Bart R Steensma
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Casper Beijst
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Erik R Huijing
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cezar Alborahal
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Edwin Versteeg
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Bjoern Weissler
- Department of Physics of Molecular Imaging Systems, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - David Schug
- Department of Physics of Molecular Imaging Systems, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Pierre Gebhardt
- Department of Physics of Molecular Imaging Systems, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Nicolas Gross-Weege
- Department of Physics of Molecular Imaging Systems, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Florian Mueller
- Department of Physics of Molecular Imaging Systems, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Karl Krueger
- Department of Physics of Molecular Imaging Systems, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Thomas Dey
- Department of Physics of Molecular Imaging Systems, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Harald Radermacher
- Department of Physics of Molecular Imaging Systems, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | | | - Jan Lagendijk
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Volkmar Schulz
- Department of Physics of Molecular Imaging Systems, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Hugo W A M de Jong
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Dennis W J Klomp
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gsell W, Molinos C, Correcher C, Belderbos S, Wouters J, Junge S, Heidenreich M, Velde GV, Rezaei A, Nuyts J, Cawthorne C, Cleeren F, Nannan L, Deroose CM, Himmelreich U, Gonzalez AJ. Characterization of a preclinical PET insert in a 7 tesla MRI scanner: beyond NEMA testing. Phys Med Biol 2020; 65:245016. [PMID: 32590380 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aba08c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
This study evaluates the performance of the Bruker positron emission tomograph (PET) insert combined with a BioSpec 70/30 USR magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner using the manufacturer acceptance protocol and the NEMA NU 4-2008 for small animal PET. The PET insert is made of 3 rings of 8 monolithic LYSO crystals (50 × 50 × 10 mm3) coupled to silicon photomultipliers (SiPM) arrays, conferring an axial and transaxial FOV of 15 cm and 8 cm. The MRI performance was evaluated with and without the insert for the following radiofrequency noise, magnetic field homogeneity and image quality. For the PET performance, we extended the NEMA protocol featuring system sensitivity, count rates, spatial resolution and image quality to homogeneity and accuracy for quantification using several MRI sequences (RARE, FLASH, EPI and UTE). The PET insert does not show any adverse effect on the MRI performances. The MR field homogeneity is well preserved (Diameter Spherical Volume, for 20 mm of 1.98 ± 4.78 without and -0.96 ± 5.16 Hz with the PET insert). The PET insert has no major effect on the radiofrequency field. The signal-to-noise ratio measurements also do not show major differences. Image ghosting is well within the manufacturer specifications (<2.5%) and no RF noise is visible. Maximum sensitivity of the PET insert is 11.0% at the center of the FOV even with simultaneous acquisition of EPI and RARE. PET MLEM resolution is 0.87 mm (FWHM) at 5 mm off-center of the FOV and 0.97 mm at 25 mm radial offset. The peaks for true/noise equivalent count rates are 410/240 and 628/486 kcps for the rat and mouse phantoms, and are reached at 30.34/22.85 and 27.94/22.58 MBq. PET image quality is minimally altered by the different MRI sequences. The Bruker PET insert shows no adverse effect on the MRI performance and demonstrated a high sensitivity, sub-millimeter resolution and good image quality even during simultaneous MRI acquisition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Willy Gsell
- Biomedical MRI, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
SPECT and PET are nuclear tomographic imaging modalities that visualize functional information based on the accumulation of radioactive tracer molecules. However, SPECT and PET lack anatomical information, which has motivated their combination with an anatomical imaging modality such as CT or MRI. This chapter begins with an overview over the fundamental physics of SPECT and PET followed by a presentation of the respective detector technologies, including detection requirements, principles and different detector concepts. The reader is subsequently provided with an introduction into hybrid imaging concepts, before a dedicated section presents the challenges that arise when hybridizing SPECT or PET with MRI, namely, mutual distortions of the different electromagnetic fields in MRI on the nuclear imaging system and vice versa. The chapter closes with an overview about current hybrid imaging systems of both clinical and preclinical kind. Finally, future developments in hybrid SPECT and PET technology are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa Nolte
- Physics of Molecular Imaging Systems, Experimental Molecular Imaging, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Nicolas Gross-Weege
- Physics of Molecular Imaging Systems, Experimental Molecular Imaging, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Volkmar Schulz
- Physics of Molecular Imaging Systems, Experimental Molecular Imaging, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
- Hyperion Hybrid Imaging Systems GmbH, Aachen, Germany.
- Fraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS, Bremen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wang Y, Zhou L, Yu B, Wang L, Zu C, Lalush DS, Lin W, Wu X, Zhou J, Shen D. 3D Auto-Context-Based Locality Adaptive Multi-Modality GANs for PET Synthesis. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING 2019; 38:1328-1339. [PMID: 30507527 PMCID: PMC6541547 DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2018.2884053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
Positron emission tomography (PET) has been substantially used recently. To minimize the potential health risk caused by the tracer radiation inherent to PET scans, it is of great interest to synthesize the high-quality PET image from the low-dose one to reduce the radiation exposure. In this paper, we propose a 3D auto-context-based locality adaptive multi-modality generative adversarial networks model (LA-GANs) to synthesize the high-quality FDG PET image from the low-dose one with the accompanying MRI images that provide anatomical information. Our work has four contributions. First, different from the traditional methods that treat each image modality as an input channel and apply the same kernel to convolve the whole image, we argue that the contributions of different modalities could vary at different image locations, and therefore a unified kernel for a whole image is not optimal. To address this issue, we propose a locality adaptive strategy for multi-modality fusion. Second, we utilize 1 ×1 ×1 kernel to learn this locality adaptive fusion so that the number of additional parameters incurred by our method is kept minimum. Third, the proposed locality adaptive fusion mechanism is learned jointly with the PET image synthesis in a 3D conditional GANs model, which generates high-quality PET images by employing large-sized image patches and hierarchical features. Fourth, we apply the auto-context strategy to our scheme and propose an auto-context LA-GANs model to further refine the quality of synthesized images. Experimental results show that our method outperforms the traditional multi-modality fusion methods used in deep networks, as well as the state-of-the-art PET estimation approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Wang
- School of Computer Science, Sichuan University, China
| | - Luping Zhou
- School of Electrical and Information Engineering, University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Biting Yu
- School of Computing and Information Technology, University of Wollongong, Australia
| | - Lei Wang
- School of Computing and Information Technology, University of Wollongong, Australia
| | - Chen Zu
- School of Computing and Information Technology, University of Wollongong, Australia
| | - David S. Lalush
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and North Carolina State University, USA
| | - Weili Lin
- Department of Radiology and BRIC, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA
| | - Xi Wu
- School of Computer Science, Chengdu University of Information Technology, China
| | - Jiliu Zhou
- School of Computer Science, Chengdu University of Information Technology, China
| | - Dinggang Shen
- IDEA Lab, Department of Radiology and BRIC, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA
- Department of Brain and Cognitive Engineering, Korea University, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gross-Weege N, Nolte T, Schulz V. MR image corrections for PET-induced gradient distortions. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 64:02NT03. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aaf97a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
12
|
Lee BJ, Watkins RD, Lee KS, Chang CM, Levin CS. Performance evaluation of RF coils integrated with an RF-penetrable PET insert for simultaneous PET/MRI. Magn Reson Med 2018; 81:1434-1446. [PMID: 30260501 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.27444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2017] [Revised: 05/01/2018] [Accepted: 06/11/2018] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE An "RF-penetrable" PET insert that allows the MR body coil to be used for RF transmission was developed to make it easier for an existing MR center to achieve simultaneous PET/MRI. This study focuses on experiments and analyses to study PET/RF coil configurations for simultaneous PET/MR studies. METHODS To investigate the appropriate RF coil design, a transmit/receive (TX/RX) birdcage coil and an RX-only phased-array coil (TX from body coil), both fitting inside the PET ring were built and characterized. For MR performance evaluation, B1 field uniformity and MR image SNR were calculated. PET photon attenuation due to each coil was studied by means of CT-based attenuation maps and reconstructed PET images. RESULTS When using the RX-only phased-array coil (TX from body coil), compared with the TX/RX birdcage coil, the B1 field uniformity and the MR image (gradient echo and fast spin echo) SNR increased by 2.4±4.8%, 386.1±62.3%, and 205.0±56.5%, respectively. Although some components of the coil were distributed within the PET FOV, no significant PET photon attenuation was shown in the CT-based attenuation map and reconstructed PET images. CONCLUSION RF coil configurations for an RF-penetrable PET insert for simultaneous PET/MRI were studied. The RX-only phased-array coil (TX from body coil) outperformed the TX/RX birdcage coil with improved MR performance as well as negligible PET photon attenuation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian J Lee
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Ronald D Watkins
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Keum Sil Lee
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Chen-Ming Chang
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
- Department of Applied Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Craig S Levin
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
- Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California
- Department of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Chang CM, Lee BJ, Grant AM, Groll AN, Levin CS. Performance study of a radio-frequency field-penetrable PET insert for simultaneous PET/MRI. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RADIATION AND PLASMA MEDICAL SCIENCES 2018; 2:422-431. [PMID: 30911706 DOI: 10.1109/trpms.2018.2852686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Hybrid positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has risen to the cutting edge of medical imaging technology as it allows simultaneous acquisition of structural, functional and molecular information of the patient. A PET insert that can be installed into existing MR systems can in principle reduce the cost barriers for an existing MR site to achieve simultaneous PET/MRI compared to procuring an integrated PET+MRI system. The PET insert systems developed so far for PET/MRI require the RF transmitter coil to reside inside the PET ring as those PET inserts block the RF fields from the MRI system. Here we report for the first time on the performance of a full-ring brain-sized "RF-penetrable" PET insert we have recently completed. This insert allows the RF fields generated by the built-in body coil to penetrate the PET ring. The PET insert comprises a ring of 16 detector modules employing electro-optical coupled signal transmission and a multiplexing framework based on compressed sensing. Energy resolution, coincidence timing resolution (CTR), photopeak position, and coincidence count rate were acquired outside and inside a 3-Tesla MRI system under simultaneous acquisition to evaluate the impact of MRI on the PET performance. Coincidence count rate performance was evaluated by acquiring a cylinder source with high initial activity decaying over time. Tomographic imaging of two phantoms, a custom 6.5-cm diameter resolution phantom with hot rods of four different sizes (2.8 mm, 3.2 mm, 4.2 mm, and 5.2 mm diameter) and a 3D Hoffman brain phantom, were performed to evaluate the imaging capability of the PET insert. The energy resolution at 511 keV and CTR acquired by the PET insert were 16.2±0.1% and 5.3±0.1 ns FWHM, respectively, and remained stable during MRI operation except when the EPI sequence was applied. The PET system starts to show saturation in coincidence count rate at 2.76 million photon counts per second. Most of the 2.8-mm diameter hot rods and main features of the 3D Hoffman brain phantom were resolved by the PET insert, demonstrating its high spatial resolution and capability to image a complex tracer distribution mimicking that seen in the human brain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen-Ming Chang
- Departments of Applied Physics and Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Brian J Lee
- Departments of Mechanical Engineering and Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Alexander M Grant
- Departments of Bioengineering and Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Andrew N Groll
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Craig S Levin
- Departments of Radiology, Electrical Engineering, Bioengineering and Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA, )
| |
Collapse
|