Objective functions of online weight noise injection training algorithms for MLPs

Regularization Effect of Random Node Fault/Noise on Gradient Descent Learning Algorithm

For decades, adding fault/noise during training by gradient descent has been a technique for getting a neural network (NN) tolerant to persistent fault/noise or getting an NN with better generalization. In recent years, this technique has been readvocated in deep learning to avoid overfitting. Yet, the objective function of such fault/noise injection learning has been misinterpreted as the desired measure (i.e., the expected mean squared error (mse) of the training samples) of the NN with the same fault/noise. The aims of this article are: 1) to clarify the above misconception and 2) investigate the actual regularization effect of adding node fault/noise when training by gradient descent. Based on the previous works on adding fault/noise during training, we speculate the reason why the misconception appears. In the sequel, it is shown that the learning objective of adding random node fault during gradient descent learning (GDL) for a multilayer perceptron (MLP) is identical to the desired measure of the MLP with the same fault. If additive (resp. multiplicative) node noise is added during GDL for an MLP, the learning objective is not identical to the desired measure of the MLP with such noise. For radial basis function (RBF) networks, it is shown that the learning objective is identical to the corresponding desired measure for all three fault/noise conditions. Empirical evidence is presented to support the theoretical results and, hence, clarify the misconception that the objective function of a fault/noise injection learning might not be interpreted as the desired measure of the NN with the same fault/noise. Afterward, the regularization effect of adding node fault/noise during training is revealed for the case of RBF networks. Notably, it is shown that the regularization effect of adding additive or multiplicative node noise (MNN) during training an RBF is reducing network complexity. Applying dropout regularization in RBF networks, its effect is the same as adding MNN during training.

A Limitation of Gradient Descent Learning

Over decades, gradient descent has been applied to develop learning algorithm to train a neural network (NN). In this brief, a limitation of applying such algorithm to train an NN with persistent weight noise is revealed. Let V(w) be the performance measure of an ideal NN. V(w) is applied to develop the gradient descent learning (GDL). With weight noise, the desired performance measure (denoted as J(w) ) is E[V(~w)|w] , where ~w is the noisy weight vector. Applying GDL to train an NN with weight noise, the actual learning objective is clearly not V(w) but another scalar function L(w) . For decades, there is a misconception that L(w) = J(w) , and hence, the actual model attained by the GDL is the desired model. However, we show that it might not: 1) with persistent additive weight noise, the actual model attained is the desired model as L(w) = J(w) ; and 2) with persistent multiplicative weight noise, the actual model attained is unlikely the desired model as L(w) ≠ J(w) . Accordingly, the properties of the models attained as compared with the desired models are analyzed and the learning curves are sketched. Simulation results on 1) a simple regression problem and 2) the MNIST handwritten digit recognition are presented to support our claims.

Weight Noise Injection-Based MLPs With Group Lasso Penalty: Asymptotic Convergence and Application to Node Pruning

The application and theoretical analysis of fault tolerant learning are very important for neural networks. Our objective here is to realize fault tolerant sparse multilayer perceptron (MLP) networks. The stochastic gradient descent method has been employed to perform online learning for MLPs. For weight noise injection-based network models, it is a common strategy to add a weight decay regularizer while constructing the objective function for learning. However, this l₂ -norm penalty does not generate sparse optimal solutions. In this paper, a group lasso penalty term is used as a regularizer, where a group is defined by the set of weights connected to a node from nodes in the preceding layer. Group lasso penalty enables us to prune redundant hidden nodes. Due to its nondifferentiability at the origin, a smooth approximation of the group lasso penalty is developed. Then, a rigorous proof for the asymptotic convergence of the learning algorithm is provided. Finally, some simulations have been performed to verify the sparseness of the network and the theoretical results.

Learning Algorithm for Boltzmann Machines With Additive Weight and Bias Noise

This brief presents analytical results on the effect of additive weight/bias noise on a Boltzmann machine (BM), in which the unit output is in {-1, 1} instead of {0, 1}. With such noise, it is found that the state distribution is yet another Boltzmann distribution but the temperature factor is elevated. Thus, the desired gradient ascent learning algorithm is derived, and the corresponding learning procedure is developed. This learning procedure is compared with the learning procedure applied to train a BM with noise. It is found that these two procedures are identical. Therefore, the learning algorithm for noise-free BMs is suitable for implementing as an online learning algorithm for an analog circuit-implemented BM, even if the variances of the additive weight noise and bias noise are unknown.

Convergence analyses on on-line weight noise injection-based training algorithms for MLPs

Injecting weight noise during training is a simple technique that has been proposed for almost two decades. However, little is known about its convergence behavior. This paper studies the convergence of two weight noise injection-based training algorithms, multiplicative weight noise injection with weight decay and additive weight noise injection with weight decay. We consider that they are applied to multilayer perceptrons either with linear or sigmoid output nodes. Let w(t) be the weight vector, let V(w) be the corresponding objective function of the training algorithm, let α >; 0 be the weight decay constant, and let μ(t) be the step size. We show that if μ(t)→ 0, then with probability one E[||w(t)||2(2)] is bound and lim(t) → ∞ ||w(t)||2 exists. Based on these two properties, we show that if μ(t)→ 0, Σtμ(t)=∞, and Σtμ(t)(2) <; ∞, then with probability one these algorithms converge. Moreover, w(t) converges with probability one to a point where ∇wV(w)=0.