1
|
Yiu C, Liu Y, Park W, Li J, Huang X, Yao K, Gao Y, Zhao G, Chu H, Zhou J, Li D, Li H, Zhang B, Chow L, Huang Y, Xu Q, Yu X. Skin-interfaced multimodal sensing and tactile feedback system as enhanced human-machine interface for closed-loop drone control. SCIENCE ADVANCES 2025; 11:eadt6041. [PMID: 40138404 PMCID: PMC11939050 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adt6041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2024] [Accepted: 02/24/2025] [Indexed: 03/29/2025]
Abstract
Unmanned aerial vehicles have undergone substantial development and market growth recently. With research focusing on improving control strategies for better user experience, feedback systems, which are vital for operator awareness of surroundings and flight status, remain underdeveloped. Current bulky manipulators also hinder accuracy and usability. Here, we present an enhanced human-machine interface based on skin-integrated multimodal sensing and feedback devices for closed-loop drone control. This system captures hand gestures for intuitive, rapid, and precise control. An integrated tactile actuator array translates the drone's posture into two-dimensional tactile information, enhancing the operator's perception of the flight situation. Integrated obstacle detection and neuromuscular electrical stimulation-based force feedback system enable collision avoidance and flight path correction. This closed-loop system combines intuitive controls and multimodal feedback to reduce training time and cognitive load while improving flight stability, environmental awareness, and the drone's posture. The use of stretchable electronics also addresses wearability and bulkiness issues in traditional systems, advancing human-machine interface design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chunki Yiu
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- Hong Kong Center for Cerebra-Cardiovascular Health Engineering, Hong Kong Science Park, New Territories, Hong Kong, China
| | - Yiming Liu
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Systems, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Wooyoung Park
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Jian Li
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- Hong Kong Center for Cerebra-Cardiovascular Health Engineering, Hong Kong Science Park, New Territories, Hong Kong, China
| | - Xingcan Huang
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Kuanming Yao
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Yuyu Gao
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Guangyao Zhao
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Hongwei Chu
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Jingkun Zhou
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- Hong Kong Center for Cerebra-Cardiovascular Health Engineering, Hong Kong Science Park, New Territories, Hong Kong, China
| | - Dengfeng Li
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Hu Li
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Binbin Zhang
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- Hong Kong Center for Cerebra-Cardiovascular Health Engineering, Hong Kong Science Park, New Territories, Hong Kong, China
| | - Lung Chow
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Ya Huang
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Qingsong Xu
- Department of Electromechanical Engineering, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Macau, Taipa, Macau, China
| | - Xinge Yu
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- Hong Kong Center for Cerebra-Cardiovascular Health Engineering, Hong Kong Science Park, New Territories, Hong Kong, China
- Institute of Digital Medicine, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
- Hong Kong Institute for Clean Energy, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zikmund P, Horpatzka M, Macik M. Learning Effect in Joystick Tactile Guidance. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON HAPTICS 2024; 17:567-577. [PMID: 38386582 DOI: 10.1109/toh.2024.3368663] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/24/2024]
Abstract
Haptic feedback is a method to provide tactile guidance in scenarios requiring multiple senses and divided attention like aviation. Earlier tests on a flight simulator and an in-flight test using the proposed tactile guidance method have shown the need to study its learning process. In this study, twelve participants completed two tactile guidance tasks without visual feedback across twelve sessions to analyze the learning effect. The paper shows an improvement between sessions in guidance accuracy, response time, and self-assessed workload. On the other hand, reaction delay is not affected by the training. The percentage improvement between the initial and trained skills reached 30% in guidance accuracy performance.
Collapse
|
3
|
Lee JW, Yu KH. Wearable Drone Controller: Machine Learning-Based Hand Gesture Recognition and Vibrotactile Feedback. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2023; 23:2666. [PMID: 36904870 PMCID: PMC10006975 DOI: 10.3390/s23052666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Revised: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
We proposed a wearable drone controller with hand gesture recognition and vibrotactile feedback. The intended hand motions of the user are sensed by an inertial measurement unit (IMU) placed on the back of the hand, and the signals are analyzed and classified using machine learning models. The recognized hand gestures control the drone, and the obstacle information in the heading direction of the drone is fed back to the user by activating the vibration motor attached to the wrist. Simulation experiments for drone operation were performed, and the participants' subjective evaluations regarding the controller's convenience and effectiveness were investigated. Finally, experiments with a real drone were conducted and discussed to validate the proposed controller.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji-Won Lee
- KEPCO Research Institute, Daejeon 34056, Republic of Korea
| | - Kee-Ho Yu
- Department of Aerospace Engineering, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Republic of Korea
- Future Air Mobility Research Center, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abdi E, Kulic D, Croft E. Haptics in Teleoperated Medical Interventions: Force Measurement, Haptic Interfaces and Their Influence on User's Performance. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2020; 67:3438-3451. [PMID: 32305890 DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2020.2987603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Haptics in teleoperated medical interventions enables measurement and transfer of force information to the operator during robot-environment interaction. This paper provides an overview of the current research in this domain and guidelines for future investigations. METHODS We review current technologies in force measurement and haptic devices as well as their experimental evaluation and influence on user's performance. RESULTS Force sensing is moving away from the conventional proximal measurement methods to distal sensing and contact-less methods. Wearable devices that deliver haptic feedback on different body parts are increasingly playing an important role. Performance and accuracy improvement are the widely reported benefits of haptic feedback, while there is a debate on its effect on task completion time and exerted force. CONCLUSION With the surge of new ideas, there is a need for better and more systematic validation of the new sensing and feedback technology, through better user studies and novel methods like validated benchmarks and new taxonomies. SIGNIFICANCE This review investigates haptics from sensing to interfaces within the context of user's performance and the validation procedures to highlight salient advances. It provides guidelines to future developments and highlights the shortcomings in the field.
Collapse
|