An Angle-Independent Cross-Sectional Doppler Method for Flow Estimation in the Common Carotid Artery

Quantitative assessment of carotid ultrasound diameter measurements in the operating room: a comparable analysis of long-axis versus rotated and tilted orientation

Objective. Carotid ultrasound (US) has been studied as a non-invasive alternative for hemodynamic monitoring. A long-axis (LA) view is traditionally employed but is difficult to maintain and operator experience may impact the diameter estimates, making it unsuitable for monitoring. Preliminary results show that a new, i.e. rotated and tilted (RT) view is more robust to motion and less operator-dependent. This study aimed to quantitatively assess common carotid diameter estimates obtained in a clinical setting from an RT view and compare those to corresponding estimates obtained using other views.Approach. Carotid US measurements were performed in 30 adult cardiac-surgery patients (26 males, 4 females) with short-axis (SA), LA, and RT probe orientations, the first being used as a reference for measuring the true vessel diameter. Per 30 s acquisition, the median and spread in diameter values were computed, the latter representing a measure of robustness, and were statistically compared between views.Main results. The median (IQR) over all the patients of the median diameter per 30 s acquisition was 7.15 (1.15) mm for the SA view, 7.03 (1.51) mm for the LA view, and 6.99 (1.72) mm for the RT view. The median spread in diameter values was 0.18 mm for the SA view, 0.16 mm for the LA view, and 0.18 mm for the RT view. There were no statistically significant differences between views in the median diameter values (p= 0.088) or spread (p= 0.122).Significance. The RT view results in comparable and equally robust median carotid diameter values compared to the reference. These findings open the path for future studies investigating the use of the RT view in new applications, such as in wearable ultrasound devices.

New Hemodynamic Parameters in Peri-Operative and Critical Care-Challenges in Translation

Hemodynamic monitoring technologies are evolving continuously-a large number of bedside monitoring options are becoming available in the clinic. Methods such as echocardiography, electrical bioimpedance, and calibrated/uncalibrated analysis of pulse contours are becoming increasingly common. This is leading to a decline in the use of highly invasive monitoring and allowing for safer, more accurate, and continuous measurements. The new devices mainly aim to monitor the well-known hemodynamic variables (e.g., novel pulse contour, bioreactance methods are aimed at measuring widely-used variables such as blood pressure, cardiac output). Even though hemodynamic monitoring is now safer and more accurate, a number of issues remain due to the limited amount of information available for diagnosis and treatment. Extensive work is being carried out in order to allow for more hemodynamic parameters to be measured in the clinic. In this review, we identify and discuss the main sensing strategies aimed at obtaining a more complete picture of the hemodynamic status of a patient, namely: (i) measurement of the circulatory system response to a defined stimulus; (ii) measurement of the microcirculation; (iii) technologies for assessing dynamic vascular mechanisms; and (iv) machine learning methods. By analyzing these four main research strategies, we aim to convey the key aspects, challenges, and clinical value of measuring novel hemodynamic parameters in critical care.

Unsupervised domain adaptation method for segmenting cross-sectional CCA images

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Automatic vessel segmentation in ultrasound is challenging due to the quality of the ultrasound images, which is affected by attenuation, high level of speckle noise and acoustic shadowing. Recently, deep convolutional neural networks are increasing in popularity due to their great performance on image segmentation problems, including vessel segmentation. Traditionally, large labeled datasets are required to train a network that achieves high performance, and is able to generalize well to different orientations, transducers and ultrasound scanners. However, these large datasets are rare, given that it is challenging and time-consuming to acquire and manually annotate in-vivo data.

METHODS

In this work, we present a model-based, unsupervised domain adaptation method that consists of two stages. In the first stage, the network is trained on simulated ultrasound images, which have an accurate ground truth. In the second stage, the network continues training on in-vivo data in an unsupervised way, therefore not requiring the data to be labelled. Rather than using an adversarial neural network, prior knowledge on the elliptical shape of the segmentation mask is used to detect unexpected outputs.

RESULTS

The segmentation performance was quantified using manually segmented images as ground truth. Due to the proposed domain adaptation method, the median Dice similarity coefficient increased from 0 to 0.951, outperforming a domain adversarial neural network (median Dice 0.922) and a state-of-the-art Star-Kalman algorithm that was specifically designed for this dataset (median Dice 0.942).

CONCLUSIONS

The results show that it is feasible to first train a neural network on simulated data, and then apply model-based domain adaptation to further improve segmentation performance by training on unlabeled in-vivo data. This overcomes the limitation of conventional deep learning approaches to require large amounts of manually labeled in-vivo data. Since the proposed domain adaptation method only requires prior knowledge on the shape of the segmentation mask, performance can be explored in various domains and applications in future research.