Managing death: navigating divergent logics in end-of-life care

End-of-life care discussions with healthcare providers and dying experiences: A latent class analysis using the health and retirement study

BACKGROUND

The impact of provider-patient end-of-life care conversations on the dying experience as a multi-dimensional concept among non-White population is understudied. The study examines whether such discussions are effective at improving end-of-life experiences among U.S. older adults with diverse backgrounds.

METHODS

The analytic sample featured 9,733 older adults who died between 2002 and 2019 in the Health and Retirement Study. Latent class analysis was used with sixteen end-of-life indicators, including service utilization of seven aggressive and supportive care, symptom management, and quality of care. Multinomial logistic regression was conducted to estimate the effects of provider-patient end-of-life discussions on the predicted membership.

RESULTS

Three types of end-of-life experiences were identified. People in "minimum service user with good death" (44.54 %) were least likely to use any type of medical care, either aggressive or comforting, and had best end-of-life symptom management and quality of care. Intensive care users (20.70 %) are characterized by very high use of aggressive treatments and low use of supportive care. "Extensive service user with uncomfortable death" (34.76 %) had high likelihoods of using both aggressive and comforting care and had the worst dying experience. Older adults who discussed their end-of-life wishes with providers were 49 % and 51 % more likely to be an intensive care user and extensive service user with uncomfortable death, respectively, rather than a minimum service user with good death.

CONCLUSION

Discussing end-of-life care wishes with providers is associated with worse end-of-life experiences. Efforts are needed to facilitate early initiation and effectiveness of the provider-patient end-of-life care conversation.

How End-of-Life Blogs Re-Affirm the "Power to be Oneself"

Powerlessness generally denotes loss of control and may be experienced among those with a terminal diagnosis and, as such, empowerment is a dominant discourse in end-of-life policy in the western Anglo-Saxon world. This paper analyzes thematically blogs authored by three people with a terminal diagnosis to examine the "power to be oneself," a concept which was identified in the "Ethics of Powerlessness" project conducted in the UK. The analysis demonstrates that the bloggers assert the "power to be themselves" which is expressed in three principal ways. Firstly, through assertion of agency to promote self-affirmation and control. Secondly, through claiming a "moral authority" expressed by providing advice not just on illness and death but also on how life should be lived. Thirdly, through discussing ideas about the future and creating a legacy. The blogs are a mechanism used to express and reinforce self-identity and to carve out a "sacred space" between life and death to nurture personal change and to project this onto a public arena. This analysis demonstrates the key role patient empowerment plays in constructing an identity with a terminal diagnosis, an element that is often overlooked in end-of-life policy.

The Relationship between Practitioners and Caregivers during a Treatment of Palliative Care: A Grounded Theory of a Challenging Collaborative Process

The possibility of coming to a “good death” is a challenging issue that crosses ethical and religious beliefs, cultural assumptions, as well as medical expertise. The provision of palliative care for relieving patients’ pain is a practice that reshapes the path to the event of death and gives form to a particular context of awareness, recalling the notion proposed by Glaser and Strauss. This decision redesigns the relationships between patients, practitioners and caregivers and introduces a new pattern of collaboration between them. Our study focuses on the implications of the collaboration between practitioners and caregivers, starting from the assumption that the latter may provide support to their loved ones and to the practitioners, but need to be supported too. We provide a qualitative analysis of this collaboration based on an empirical research that took place in four different settings of provision of palliative care, reporting the contrast between the affective engagement of caregivers and the professional approach of practitioners. We claim that this ambivalent collaboration, while embedded in contingent and incommensurable experiences, brings to the fore the broader understanding of the path to a “good death,” outlining its societal representation as a collective challenge.