The Effect of Surgery for Endometriomas on Fertility: Scientific Impact Paper No. 55

Laser vaporization compared with other surgical techniques in women with ovarian endometrioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes after laparoscopic cystectomy versus laser vaporization in women of reproductive age with ovarian endometrioma.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

Our systematic review and meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021281781) and was done according to the PRISMA 2020 checklist. Studies (published until October 2021) were identified by searching PubMed, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases (key words "cystectomy", "laser vaporization", and "endometrioma"). The search was conducted independently by two investigators (L.P. and S.I.). Inclusion criteria were: women of reproductive age undergoing surgery for symptomatic endometriomas larger than 30 mm. The exclusion criteria were: women who undergo conservative treatment. Outcomes were: risk ratio for recurrence, ovarian reserve and pregnancy rates. The studies included were randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and nonrandomized clinical trials (prospective controlled, prospective cohort, retrospective studies, and other types of studies) that included a minimum of 10 patients and written in English. Tools recommended by the Cochrane Society achieved risk-of-bias assessment.

RESULTS

Totally, 874 studies were found, 9 studies were included in qualitative synthesis (822 patients). All the authors compared the efficacy and safety of cystectomy or laser vaporization in reproductive-aged women with ovarian endometrioma. The overall risk of bias for the randomized trials was 80% 'some concerns' and 20% 'low', and for the cohort studies, 50% 'some concerns' and 50% 'low'. The primary meta-analysis focused on recurrence rates (4 studies included) with no statistically significant differences found between these two interventions (RR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.24 to 1.21, P = 0.13). The next meta-analysis estimated antral follicle count (3 studies) which was significantly lower in cystectomy group (RR = - 2.56, 95% CI - 3.71 to - 1.42, P < 0.0001). Pregnancy rates were analyzed in 3 studies with no statistically significant difference (RR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.14, P = 0.64).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no statistical difference in the recurrence rate and pregnancy rates, but the antral follicle count was higher in the laser vaporization group. However, we need more clinical trials to make stronger recommendations.

Hormonal treatments for endometriosis: The endocrine background

Endometriosis is a benign uterine disorder characterized by menstrual pain and infertility, deeply affecting women's health. It is a chronic disease and requires a long term management. Hormonal drugs are currently the most used for the medical treatment and are based on the endocrine pathogenetic aspects. Estrogen-dependency and progesterone-resistance are the key events which cause the ectopic implantation of endometrial cells, decreasing apoptosis and increasing oxidative stress, inflammation and neuroangiogenesis. Endometriotic cells express AMH, TGF-related growth factors (inhibin, activin, follistatin) CRH and stress related peptides. Endocrine and inflammatory changes explain pain and infertility, and the systemic comorbidities described in these patients, such as autoimmune (thyroiditis, arthritis, allergies), inflammatory (gastrointestinal/urinary diseases) and mental health disorders.The hormonal treatment of endometriosis aims to block of menstruation through an inhibition of hypothalamus-pituitary-ovary axis or by causing a pseudodecidualization with consequent amenorrhea, impairing the progression of endometriotic implants. GnRH agonists and antagonists are effective on endometriosis by acting on pituitary-ovarian function. Progestins are mostly used for long term treatments (dienogest, NETA, MPA) and act on multiple sites of action. Combined oral contraceptives are also used for reducing endometriosis symptoms by inhibiting ovarian function. Clinical trials are currently going on selective progesterone receptor modulators, selective estrogen receptor modulators and aromatase inhibitors. Nowadays, all these hormonal drugs are considered the first-line treatment for women with endometriosis to improve their symptoms, to postpone surgery or to prevent post-surgical disease recurrence. This review aims to provide a comprehensive state-of-the-art on the current and future hormonal treatments for endometriosis, exploring the endocrine background of the disease.

Assisted reproductive treatment outcomes of women with endometriomas: Either with or without previous ovarian surgery

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to evaluate and compare the assisted reproductive technique (ART) outcomes of women with endometriomas either with or without prior endometrioma surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 122 women with endometriomas underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer (ICSI-ET) at a tertiary IVF Center, between 2014 and 2019, were included in this retrospective study. Of this group, 38 patients had recurrent endometriomas and 84 patients had primary endometrioma without a previous endometrioma surgery. The outcomes of ART treatment including cancellation rates before ET, numbers of oocytes obtained, implantation, clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were compared between the groups. A logistic regression model including potential confounders as age and presence of male factor infertility was used to evaluate the possible effect of recurrent endometriomas on the live birth.

RESULTS

The baseline characteristics of the groups were similar. The poor ovarian response rate, defined as the harvest of fewer than four oocytes, was identified in 35.7% and 42.1% of primary and recurrent endometrioma groups, respectively. The implantation (27.2 ± 42.7% vs 24.1 ± 41.4%, P = .74), clinical pregnancy/ET (30.9% vs 27.6%, P = .93 ) and live birth rates/ET (22.1% vs 17.2%, P = .79) CONCLUSION: The ART outcomes of patients with primary and recurrent endometriomas do not seem different in terms of response to ovarian stimulation and live birth rates after ICSI. These results may indicate that the recurrence of the endometrioma might not have a further detrimental effect on ART outcome than the disease itself.

Managing endometrioma to optimize future fertility

The management of endometriomas in women wishing to preserve their fertility is complex. While surgery can help to achieve pregnancy in some, it may also have a detrimental effect on a woman's ovarian reserve. The present article reviews the impact of endometriomas on fertility and the different management approaches that should be considered in women who wish to preserve their fertility. This study also reviews the role of assisted reproduction in the setting of endometriomas, and the evolving role of oocyte cryopreservation for this benign but progressive disease. Using evidence from the latest guidelines and major publications, we emphasize the need to consider the woman's future fertility when navigating the diverse range of management strategies available, and outline an evidence-based framework to help facilitate fertility-friendly discussion, counseling and management of this complex disease.

Preoperative Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Level is a Predictor of Postoperative Fertility in Infertile Patients with Ovarian Endometrioma

To investigate the predictive efficacy of the preoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) for natural pregnancy outcome after laparoscopic cystectomy in infertile patients with ovarian endometrioma (OMA). Current evidence suggests that endometriosis likely induces local and systemic inflammatory processes. The NLR has been demonstrated to be of great utility in the diagnosis of endometriosis. However, the association between NLR and natural pregnancy outcome after laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis remains unknown. Data on infertile OMA patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery from January 2014 to October 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Cox regression analysis was used to identify predictors of natural pregnancy outcome. A predictive model was then established using the nomogram. Among 217 patients, 115 patients (53.0%) experienced natural pregnancy after surgery. Compared with patients with pregnancy failure, those with pregnancy success had a significantly higher NLR (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that age, least function (LF) score, and NLR were independent predictors of postoperative pregnancy (all P < 0.05). The NLA (NLR, LF score and age) scoring was then established and had a high predictive ability (AUC = 0.725). Patients were divided into three groups (low-, intermediate- and high-risk) based on the scoring, and the 1-year pregnancy rates were 43.5%, 34.4%, and 21.0%, respectively (P < 0.05). The preoperative NLR level was significantly associated with natural pregnancy outcome in infertile OMA patients after surgery. A predictive model combining NLR, LF score, and age could assist in the clinical decision-making process.

Do techniques of surgical management of ovarian endometrioma affect ovarian reserve? A narrative review

Endometriotic ovarian cysts are one of the more common gynecological disorders found in reproductive-aged and infertile women. The aim of this review is to summarise information regarding the effect of surgical treatment of endometrioma on ovarian reserve. In women with endometrioma ovarian reserve is decreased compared to similarly aged healthy women and surgical management techniques cause an additional reduction. Evidence suggests that laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy via stripping is the preferable surgical technique for management of endometrioma, compared with excisional/ablative techniques, in the fields of pain improvement, spontaneous pregnancy rates, and ovarian cyst recurrences. Ablation techniques, combined technique and three-step approach demonstrate a less decline in anti-Müllerian hormone postoperatively. A successful operation involves not only removal of ovarian pathology, but also maintenance of ovarian function and future reproductive potential. Patients should be counselled about the risks of surgery and the management plan should be individualised to patient's symptoms and reproductive goals.

Therapeutic Efficacy of Catheter-directed Ethanol Sclerotherapy and Its Impact on Ovarian Reserve in Patients with Ovarian Endometrioma at Risk of Decreased Ovarian Reserve: A Preliminary Study

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To investigate the therapeutic efficacy of catheter-directed ethanol sclerotherapy (CDS) and its effect on ovarian reserve in patients with endometrioma at risk of decreased ovarian reserve.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

We evaluated 18 patients with ovarian endometrioma measuring ≥3 cm and preprocedural serum antimüllerian hormone (AMH) levels of <2 ng/mL.

INTERVENTIONS

An 8.5-F catheter was inserted either transabdominally or transvaginally into the endometrioma. After aspiration, sclerotherapy with 99% ethanol was performed, with a subsequent 20-minute ethanol retention.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Ultrasonography was performed preprocedurally and 6 months after CDS to evaluate any recurrence or changes in cyst size. Furthermore, serum AMH levels, cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) levels, and the visual analog scale scores for dysmenorrhea were obtained to analyze the ovarian reserve and treatment efficacy, preprocedurally and at 6 months after CDS. The mean cyst size on ultrasonography and serum CA-125 levels decreased 6 months after CDS (p <.001 and p = .001, respectively). All patients reported a decreased visual analog scale score for dysmenorrhea (p <.001). However, the difference in serum AMH levels before and after CDS was statistically insignificant (p = .875).

CONCLUSION

CDS was efficacious in reducing pain and serum CA-125 levels in patients with low AMH levels without adversely affecting their ovarian reserve.

Analysis of 2438 cycles for the impact of endometrioma and its surgery on the IVF outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Management of ovarian endometrioma before IVF treatment is still challenging. We aimed to assess the effect of the pre-cycle surgical removal of endometriomas on IVF outcomes in a large number of cycles in patients undergoing IVF/ICSI treatment. Besides this, we also proposed to compare the cycle outcomes within both normo and poor responder patients to evaluate the impact of endometrioma and its surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a private IVF clinic between September 2014 and December 2018. A total of 2438 IVF/ICSI cycles of 1936 patients were reviewed. Patients who had previous endometrioma surgery (Group 1), patients with non-operated endometrioma (Group 2), and patients without endometriosis, including tubal factor infertility confirmed by laparoscopy and unexplained infertility without endometrioma (Group 3) were analyzed in this study.

RESULTS

Total dose of gonadotropins was significantly higher in group 1 than others (p < 0.05). However, antral follicle counts, estradiol levels on the day of hCG trigger, the number of retrieved and metaphase II oocytes were significantly lower in group 1 than in other groups (p < 0.05). Poor response to gonadotropins was more frequent in group 1 as compared to other groups (47.9%, 34.3%, 35.5%, respectively) (p < 0.05). Cycle cancellation rates were significantly higher in group 1 than in other groups (6.7%, 1.4%, and 2.8%, respectively) (p < 0.05). Clinical pregnancy (CPR) and live birth rates (LBR) per cycle and embryo transfer were not different among groups. However, CPR per cycle and embryo transfer were significantly higher in the operated endometrioma group within unexpected poor responders (p = 0.023, p = 0.010, respectively). CPR and LBR per cycle and per embryo transfer were similar within normo-responder patients. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that female age and poor response to gonadotropins were the significant variables in predicting live birth (OR: 0.946, CI: 0.926-0.966, p < 0.001 and OR: 3.294, CI: 2.336-4.645, p < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Pre-cyle removal of endometrioma may have an adverse impact on ovarian reserve, and pregnancy outcomes seem to be similar with or without surgery in patients undergoing IVF treatment. However, endometrioma surgery may be considered in the subsequent IVF cycles of patients with lower than expected ovarian response.

Role of surgical treatment in endometriosis

Endometriosis can take one of three forms depending on its clinical presentation and management: endometriotic ovarian cyst (ovarian endometrioma), superficial or peritoneal endometriosis and deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE).¹Among them, DIE is considered the most aggressive, and the patient is often affected by more than one type together. The therapeutic methodology should not be influenced by a combination of different types of endometriotic lesion. According to the clinical context and the patient's needs, the treatment of this pathology can be medical or surgical. Although medical therapy could improve endometriosis-associated symptoms, it never offers a definite treatment for symptomatic patients, who often require surgical treatment. The rationale behind endometriosis surgical treatment is to achieve the complete removal of all lesions through a one-step surgical procedure; to obtain promising long-term results for pelvic pain, recurrence rate, and fertility; and to protect the functionality of the involved organs. Achieving these results depends on the total removal of the pathology from the pelvis, in an attempt to preserve, as much as possible, the healthy tissues surrounding the site of the disease. The choice of a surgical approach rather than medical therapy is subject to the patient's expectations, such as pregnancy desire, the effectiveness of treatment compared to possible complications, the type of pain and its intensity, and the location and severity of the disease. In this context, surgical management using a multidisciplinary endometriosis team is an important factor for achieving good outcomes.

Serum anti-Mullerian hormone, prolactin and estradiol concentrations in infertile women with endometriosis

OBJECTIVE

Endometriosis is a benign gynecological disease, which significantly impairs fertility. However, the contribution of specific hormonal parameters to the proper diagnosis of endometriosis in infertility states has not been adequately determined. The aim of this study was to compare ant-Mullerian hormone (AMH), prolactin and estradiol concentrations between infertile women with and without endometriosis, as well as to estimate the effect of endometrioid heterotopia on ovarian reserve.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, mean baseline serum AMH, prolactin and estradiol levels were assessed in infertile women with and without endometriosis. Descriptive statistics are presented in the form of arithmetic mean ± standard deviation (SD). The comparison of indicators was performed by using parametric (t-test) and non-parametric criteria (Mann-Whitney).

RESULTS

Seventy-two infertile women with endometriosis (group A; mean age: 32 ± 4.3 years) and 77 infertile women without endometriosis (group B; mean age: 32.4 ± 3.7 years) were studied. Mean baseline prolactin concentrations were higher in group A (16.9 ± 5.7 ng/mL) compared with group B (15 ± 4.3 ng/mL; p = .023), whereas mean AMH concentrations were lower (2.8 ± 1.9 ng/mL and 3.5 ± 1.8 ng/mL, respectively; p = .018). The highest prolactin and the lowest AMH concentrations were found in women with ovarian endometriomas than in those with deep infiltrative endometriosis and adenomyosis. There was no difference in estradiol levels between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Infertile women with endometriosis demonstrated higher prolactin and lower AMH concentrations, compared with infertile women without endometriosis. The highest prolactin and the lowest AMH concentrations were observed in patients with ovarian endometriomas.

Impact of Surgical Management of Endometrioma on AMH Levels and Pregnancy Rates: A Review of Recent Literature

Ovarian endometrioma are found in up to 40% of women with endometriosis and 50% of infertile women. The best surgical approach for endometrioma and its impact on pregnancy rates is still controversial. Therefore, we conducted a literature review on surgical management of ovarian endometrioma and its impact on pregnancy rates and ovarian reserve, assessed by anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) serum levels. Ovarian cystectomy is the preferred technique, as it is associated with lower recurrence and higher spontaneous pregnancy rate. However, ablative approaches and combined techniques are becoming more popular as ovarian reserve is less affected and there are slightly higher pregnancy rates. Preoperative AMH level might be useful to predict the occurrence of pregnancy. In conclusion, AMH should be included in the preoperative evaluation of reproductive aged women with endometriosis. The surgical options for ovarian endometrioma should be individualized. The endometrioma ablation procedure seems to be the most promising treatment.

Affected Ovary Relative Volume: A Novel Sonographic Predictor of Ovarian Reserve in Patients with Unilateral Endometrioma-A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

The assessment of ovarian reserve in the case of endometrioma is of pivotal importance for planning a tailored management. However, both the antral follicle count (AFC) and the antimüllerian hormone (AMH) dosage are subject to a fair degree of variability in ovarian endometriosis. This study aimed to identify a sonographic parameter of ovarian reserve that could implement current available markers in patients with unilateral endometrioma.

METHODS

Patients with unilateral endometrioma admitted to our Endometriosis Center between March 2018 and April 2019 were enrolled. Transvaginal ultrasonography for the evaluation of eight sonographic indicators and AMH level determination were performed. The relationship between AMH level and each indicator was assessed.

RESULTS

Thirty-four women were included. There was a positive significant correlation between AMH level and the healthy ovary AFC (HO-AFC) (r = 0.36 p = 0.034). A stronger, negative correlation between AMH level and the ratio between the volume of the affected and the healthy ovary (affected ovary relative volume, AORV) (r = -0.47; p = 0.005) was evidenced. AORV had a satisfactory accuracy (AUC 0.73; CI 0.61-0.90; p = 0.0008), and the cut-off value of 5.96 had the best balance of sensitivity/specificity in distinguishing between patients with a good ovarian reserve (AMH ≥ 2 ng/mL) and those at risk of ovarian reserve depletion after excisional surgery.

CONCLUSION

AORV may be a useful tool to assess ovarian reserve in patients with unilateral endometrioma without previous surgery and to guide physicians in clinical management.

Effect of endometrioma and its surgical excision on fertility (Review)

Endometrioma is the cystic lesion of ovaries originating from endometrial glands and stroma; it is identified in 17-44% of patients with endometriosis. Numerous existing studies have reported the association between endometrioma and infertility. However, an absolute cause-effect association requires further confirmation. Available evidence has suggested that ovarian reserve may be impaired by spatial occupation influences, local reaction or both, affecting the reproductive health of females. Given the increased focus on the pathophysiological mechanisms of endometrioma, surgical excision has commonly been considered to avoid further ovarian damage. However, the potential adverse effect of this surgery on the ovarian reserve has recently become a focal point. Whether or not surgical excision can facilitate subsequent conception in young females planning to be pregnant is controversial. As shown in the present review on the effects of endometrioma and its removal in females requiring assisted reproductive technology, prior surgery for endometrioma may not improve assisted fertility results and may further decrease the number of oocytes retrieved in the affected females. Subsequent studies are needed to ascertain the optimal management of infertility in the setting of endometriomas.

REASONS FOR ENDOMETRIOSIS-ASSOCIATED INFERTILITY

This article discusses the causes and mechanisms of the occurrence of infertility in endometriosis within the framework of versions and contraversions. The magnitude of the described problem is noted not only from a medical, but also from a socio-economic perspective. Four main factors of endometriosis-associated infertility were identified: tubal-peritoneal, ovarian, embryonic and endometrial. Given the inconsistency of scientific data, the need for further research is noted.

Management of endometriosis-related infertility: Considerations and treatment options

Endometriosis is a common inflammatory disease in women of reproductive age and is one of the major causes of infertility. Endometriosis causes a sustained reduction of ovarian reserve through both physical mechanisms and inflammatory reactions, which result in the production of reactive oxygen species and tissue fibrosis. The severity of endometriosis is related to ovarian reserve. With regard to infertility treatment, medical therapy as a neoadjuvant or adjuvant to surgical therapy has no definite beneficial effect. Surgical treatment of endometriosis can lead to ovarian injury during the resection of endometriotic tissue, which leads to the deterioration of ovarian reserve. To overcome this disadvantage, a multistep technique has been proposed to minimize the reduction of ovarian reserve. When considering surgical treatment of endometriosis in patients experiencing infertility, it should be kept in mind that ovarian reserve can be reduced both due to endometriosis itself and by the process of removing endometriosis. In cases of mild- to moderate-stage endometriosis, intrauterine insemination with ovarian stimulation after surgical treatment may increase the likelihood of pregnancy. In cases of severe endometriosis, the characteristics of the patient should be considered in a multidisciplinary manner to determine the prioritization of treatment modalities, including surgical treatment and assisted reproduction methods such as in vitro fertilization. The risk of cancer, complications after pregnancy, and infection during oocyte retrieval should also be considered when making treatment decisions.

Analysis of IVF/ICSI-FET Outcomes in Women With Advanced Endometriosis: Influence on Ovarian Response and Oocyte Competence

Aims: To determine the impact of advanced endometriosis (EMS) on in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection and frozen-thawed embryo transfer (IVF/ICSI-FET) outcomes and analyze the influencing factors. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on sterile women with ovarian endometriomas (OMAs), including patients who underwent laparoscopic cystectomy (n = 224, 224 IVF/ICSI cycles, 205 FET cycles) and aspiration (n = 139, 139 IVF/ICSI cycles, 148 FET cycles); peritoneal EMS (n = 96, 96 IVF/ICSI cycles, 89 FET cycles); and tubal factors (n = 360, 360 IVF/ICSI cycles, 474 FET cycles). Our main outcomes included the number of MII oocytes retrieved, fertilization rate, the number of viable embryos, viable embryo rate per oocyte retrieved in oocyte retrieval cycles, and clinical pregnancy rate per transfer, live birth rate per transfer, and cumulative clinical pregnancy rate of this oocyte retrieval cycle in FET cycles. Finally, binary logistic regression analysis was performed to generate a prediction model for cumulative clinical pregnancy. Results: The results showed that significantly fewer MII oocytes retrieved and viable embryos and lower viable embryo rate and cumulative clinical pregnancy rate were observed in women with EMS compared with the control. Women with peritoneal EMS had lower fertilization rate and viable embryo rate per oocyte retrieved than patients with OMA (all p < 0.05). However, the pregnancy outcomes were not significantly different between the two phenotypes. The patients who underwent laparoscopic cystectomy had fewer MII oocytes retrieved and viable embryos compared with those with intact endometrioma(s) but no significant difference in pregnancy outcomes between the two types of OMA patients. By binary logistic regression analysis, antral follicle count (AFC) was found to be an independent factor associated with cumulative clinical pregnancy in this oocyte retrieval cycle (odds ratio = 1.054; 95% confidence interval, 1.011-1.100; p = 0.014), and the AFC prediction model of cumulative clinical pregnancy was established, with an area under the curve of 0.60. Conclusions: Our data supported that advanced EMS has negative effect on cumulative clinical pregnancy per oocyte retrieval cycle, and AFC is an independent predictor, which is mainly caused by poor ovarian response associated with OMA per se or its surgery and the damage of peritoneal EMS to oocyte maturation.

The effect of endometriosis on the antimüllerian hormone level in the infertile population

PURPOSE

To determine whether the presence of endometriosis in infertile women without prior ovarian surgery influences markers of ovarian reserve, AMH and FSH.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study included three groups of women who presented for IVF treatment at our tertiary care center from 04/27/2015 to 05/31/2017: women with endometriosis and prior ovarian surgery (EnSx), women with endometriosis without prior ovarian surgery (En), and women with a primary diagnosis of male factor infertility (MF; reference group).

RESULTS

There were 671 patients that met inclusion criteria (78 EnSx, 60 En, and 533 MF). Compared to the MF group (3.6 ± 3.0), a lower mean AMH level (ng/mL) was observed in the EnSx group (2.5 ± 2.5; aβ - 1.21; 95% CI [- 1.79, -0.62]) and in the En group (2.5 ± 2.2; aβ - 1.11; 95% CI [- 1.68, - 0.54]). Both endometriosis groups had a statistically significantly higher proportion of patients with an AMH < 1 (EnSx, 24.4%; OR, 2.39 [95% CI, 1.31, 4.36]; En, 28.3%; OR, 2.67 [95% CI, 1.41, 5.08]) compared to the MF group (13.9%). The mean baseline FSH level (lU/L) was statistically significantly higher in both endometriosis groups (EnSx, 8.6 ± 4.3; β, 1.37 [95% CI, 0.39, 2.34]; En, 8.4 ± 3.7; β, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.04, 1.87]) compared to the MF group (7.3 ± 2.2).

CONCLUSIONS

Among infertility patients with endometriosis, with and without a history of ovarian surgery, ovarian reserve markers were worse (lower AMH and higher FSH) and a higher proportion had decreased ovarian reserve as measured by AMH compared to women with MF.