Planned oocyte cryopreservation (Planned OC): systematic review and meta-analysis of cost-efficiency and patients' perspective

Optimizing advice and approaches for elective fertility preservation

Elective fertility preservation enables women to extend their reproductive window, potentially reducing the need for ineffective fertility treatments later in life. Oocyte cryopreservation (OC), an established fertility preservation technique, is often seen as a means of reproductive autonomy, though its impact remains debated. To avoid detrimental effects of aging it is suggested that OC should be done by 37 years. Freezing ≥20 mature oocytes before 38 years gives a 60-70°% possibility of pregnancy. Success of ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation (OTCT) in cancer survivors has encouraged its use in reproductive aging. OTCT provides a longer reproductive window, allows for spontaneous conception and restores ovarian endocrine function but is highly invasive. Ethical concerns raised for elective fertility preservation include medicalization of reproduction, idealization of the right time for pregnancy, psychological effects of advanced age parenthood and promotion of social inequity. With an increasing demand for elective oocyte freezing there is an urgent need to create awareness about the pros and cons of the techniques, the risks of pregnancy complications at an advanced maternal age and long term health of children born. Gamete preservation cannot guarantee a child. Profertility counselling should be a part of the discussion as there is no substitute for spontaneous conception at a younger age.

Return rates and pregnancy outcomes after oocyte preservation for planned fertility delay: a systematic review and meta-analysis

IMPORTANCE

Oocyte preservation for planned fertility delay, also referred to as social oocyte preservation or colloquially as "egg freezing," has become increasingly popular in the last few decades. Previous literature has suggested that there are gaps in counseling and expectations regarding the expected thaw rates and outcomes of preserved oocytes.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the literature on social oocyte preservation, specifically the return rates, thaw rates, clinical pregnancy rates, and live birth rates.

DATA SOURCES

We conducted a systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of 7 databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Emcare, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science: Core Collection, and Scopus) until January 1, 2024. The Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool was used for critical appraisal.

STUDY SELECTION AND SYNTHESIS

All original human research that reported data for individuals who underwent autologous oocyte preservation for planned fertility delay (i.e., not for medical indications such as chemotherapy) was included for analysis. A meta-analysis was conducted using descriptive statistics and pooled prevalence rates. Title and abstract screening and data extraction were conducted in duplicate by 2 independent reviewers for all studies until full agreement on eligibility was achieved through consensus-based discussion.

MAIN OUTCOMES

Return rate among those who froze oocytes for planned fertility delay, as well as live birth rate and clinical pregnancy rate among these patients.

RESULTS

After screening 1,540 references, a total of 27 studies encompassing 13,724 patients were included. Follow-up ranged from 4 to 19 years, with a median follow-up time of 7 years. A total of 17,418 oocyte retrieval cycles for planned fertility delay were reported, with most individuals undergoing a single cryopreservation cycle. Overall, 10.8% of individuals returned to thaw their eggs, with an aggregate oocyte survival rate of 81.4%. The implantation rate was 44.4% and clinical pregnancy rate was 34.2%. A live birth was reported for 28.9% of individuals across all age groups who returned to thaw eggs.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Individuals should be counseled regarding the low return rates after oocyte preservation for planned fertility delay.

Planned oocyte cryopreservation: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis

BACKGROUND

Awareness of the age-related decline in fertility potential has increased the popularity of planned oocyte cryopreservation (POC). However, data regarding outcomes of POC, including rates of women returning to thaw oocytes, as well as pregnancy and live birth rates, are scarce and based mostly on small case series.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

POC was defined as cryopreservation exclusively for prevention of future age-related fertility loss. The primary outcome was live birth rate per patient. The secondary outcomes included the return to thaw rate and laboratory outcomes. A meta-regression analysis examining the association between live birth and age above 40 or below 35 was conducted.

SEARCH METHODS

We conducted a systematic database search from inception to August 2022. The search included PubMed (MEDLINE) and EMBASE. Our search strategies employed a combination of index terms (Mesh) and free text words to compile relevant concepts. The systematic review and meta-regression were undertaken following registration of systematic review (PROSPERO registration number CRD42022361791) and were reported following guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses 2020 (PRISMA 2020).

OUTCOMES

The database search yielded 3847 records. After the selection process, 10 studies, conducted from 1999 to 2020, were included. Overall, 8750 women underwent POC, with a mean cryopreservation age of 37.2 (±0.8). Of those, 1517 women returned to use their oocytes with a return rate of 11.1% (± 4.7%). The mean age at the time of cryopreservation for women who returned to use their oocytes was 38.1 (±0.4), with an average of 12.6 (±3.6) cryopreserved oocytes per woman. In a meta-analysis, the oocyte survival rate was 78.5% with a 95% CI of 0.74-0.83 (I2 = 93%). The live birth rate per patient was 28% with a 95% CI of 0.24-0.33 (I2 = 92%). Overall, 447 live births were reported. In a sub-group analysis, women who underwent cryopreservation at age ≥40 achieved a live birth rate per patient of 19% (95% CI 0.13-0.29, I2 = 6%), while women aged ≤35 years old or younger had a higher live birth rate per patient of 52% (95% CI 0.41-0.63, I2 = 7%).

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

POC emerges as a feasible option for women aiming to improve their chances of conceiving at a later reproductive age. Nonetheless, it must be acknowledged that the overall success rates of POC are limited and that the likelihood of successful live birth declines as the age at cryopreservation rises. With increasing interest in POC, the collation of comprehensive and high-quality data is imperative to clearly define the outcomes for various age groups.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022361791.

Information and decision support needs: A survey of women interested in receiving planned oocyte cryopreservation information

PURPOSE

Identifying the information and decision support needs of women interested in receiving planned oocyte cryopreservation (POC) information.

METHODS

An online survey of Australian women, aged 18-45, interested in receiving POC information, proficient in English, with internet access. The survey covered POC information sources, information delivery preferences, POC and age-related infertility knowledge (study-specific scale), Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS), and time spent considering POC. Target sample size (n=120) was determined using a precision-based method.

RESULTS

Of 332 participants, 249 (75%) had considered POC, whilst 83 (25%) had not. Over half (54%) had searched for POC information. Fertility clinic websites were predominately used (70%). Most (73%) believed women should receive POC information between ages 19-30 years. Preferred information providers were fertility specialists (85%) and primary care physicians (81%). Other methods rated most useful to deliver POC information were online. Mean knowledge score was 8.9/14 (SD:2.3). For participants who had considered POC, mean DCS score was 57.1/100 (SD:27.2) and 78% had high decisional conflict (score >37.5). In regression, lower DCS scores were associated with every 1-point increase in knowledge score (-2.4; 95% CI [-3.9, -0.8]), consulting an IVF specialist (-17.5; [-28.0, -7.1]), and making a POC decision (-18.4; [-27.5, -9.3]). Median time to decision was 24-months (IQR: 12.0-36.0) (n=53).

CONCLUSION

Women interested in receiving POC information had knowledge gaps, and wanted to be informed about the option by age 30 years from healthcare professionals and online resources. Most women who considered using POC had high decisional conflict indicating a need for decision support.

Oocyte Cryopreservation for Medical and Planned Indications: A Practical Guide and Overview

Oocyte cryopreservation (OC) is the process in which ovarian follicles are stimulated, the follicular fluid is retrieved, and mature oocytes are isolated and vitrified. Since the first successful pregnancy utilizing previously cryopreserved oocytes in 1986, OC has become increasingly utilized as an option for future biologic children in patients facing gonadotoxic therapies, such as for the treatment of cancer. Planned OC, also termed elective OC, is growing in popularity as a means to circumvent age-related fertility decline. In this narrative review, we describe both medically indicated and planned OC, focusing on the physiology of ovarian follicular loss, OC technique and risks, timing of when OC should be performed, associated financial considerations, and outcomes.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of ovarian function preservation with GnRH agonist during chemotherapy in premenopausal women with early breast cancer

STUDY QUESTION

Is it economically worthwhile to use GnRH agonist (GnRHa) to prevent menopausal symptoms (MS) and protect fertility in premenopausal women with breast cancer (BC) during chemotherapy from the US perspective?

SUMMARY ANSWER

It is cost-effective to administer GnRHa during chemotherapy in order to forefend MS in premenopausal patients with BC when the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold is $50 000.00 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), and to preserve fertility in young patients with BC who undergo oocyte cryopreservation (OC), or no OC, when the WTP thresholds per live birth are $71 333.33 and $61 920.00, respectively.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Chemotherapy often results in premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) in premenopausal survivors of BC, causing MS and infertility. Administering GnRHa during chemotherapy has been recommended for ovarian function preservation by international guidelines.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

Two decision-analytic models were developed, respectively, for preventing MS and protecting fertility over a 5-year period, which compared the cost-effectiveness of two strategies: adding GnRHa during chemotherapy (GnRHa plus Chemo) or chemotherapy alone (Chemo).

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

The participants were early premenopausal women with BC aged 18-49 years who were undergoing chemotherapy. Two decision tree models were constructed: one for MS prevention and one for fertility protection from the US perspective. All data were obtained from published literature and official websites. The models' primary outcomes included QALYs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). The robustness of the models was tested by sensitivity analyses.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

In the MS model, GnRHa plus Chemo resulted in an ICER of $17 900.85 per QALY compared with Chemo, which was greater than the WTP threshold of $50 000.00 per QALY; therefore, GnRHa plus Chemo was a cost-effective strategy for premenopausal women with BC in the USA. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) results showed an 81.76% probability of cost-effectiveness in the strategy. In the fertility model, adding GnRHa for patients undergoing OC and those who were unable to undergo OC resulted in ICERs of $67 933.50 and $60 209.00 per live birth in the USA, respectively. PSA indicated that GnRHa plus Chemo was more likely to be cost-effective over Chemo when the WTP for an additional live birth exceed $71 333.33 in Context I (adding GnRHa to preserve fertility in young patients with BC after OC) and $61 920.00 in Context II (adding GnRHa to preserve fertility in young patients with BC who cannot accept OC).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The indirect costs, such as disease-related mental impairment and non-medical costs (e.g. transportation cost) were not included. All data were derived from previously published literature and databases, which might yield some differences from the real world. In addition, the POI-induced MS with a lower prevalence and the specific strategy of chemotherapy were not considered in the MS model, and the 5-year time horizon for having a child might not be suitable for all patients in the fertility model.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

When considering the economic burden of cancer survivors, the results of this study provide an evidence-based reference for clinical decision-making, showing that it is worthwhile to employ GnRHa during chemotherapy to prevent MS and preserve fertility.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province [2021J02038]; and the Startup Fund for Scientific Research, Fujian Medical University [2021QH1059]. All authors declare no conflict of interest.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Oocyte Cryopreservation: A 9-Year Single-Centre Experience

OBJECTIVE

Oocyte cryopreservation (OC) has increased in recent years; however, there is a paucity of published data on the use of cryopreserved oocytes and associated outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 748 OC cycles between 2013 and 2022 at a private fertility centre was performed. Outcome parameters for oocyte retrieval cycles were reviewed. For patients who returned for oocyte disposition, outcomes subsequent to oocyte re-warming, fertilization, and transfer were analyzed.

RESULTS

There were 748 OC cycles (653 elective and 95 non-elective) in 646 patients (556 elective and 90 non-elective). Patients were older at the time of freezing in the elective oocyte group compared with the non-elective group (36.5 vs. 28.8 y; P < 0.001). Sixty-five patients returned to warm and fertilize their oocytes (50 in the elective group and 15 in the non-elective group). The survival rate for warmed oocytes was 76.1% (541/711), and 66.2% of surviving oocytes were successfully fertilized, and 39.1% reached blastulation. Twenty-three patients underwent embryo transfers (10 after preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy), with 15 patients having at least 1 delivery or ongoing pregnancy.

CONCLUSIONS

To date, this is the largest published experience with OC in Canada. OC can lead to successful live births but does not guarantee a viable outcome for all patients. In this study, most patients with vitrified oocytes had not returned for disposition, so long-term follow-up is still required to verify the efficacy of OC.

Factors affecting the decisions of women considering oocyte cryopreservation: A blog study

The aim was to explain the factors that affect the decision-making processes of women considering oocyte cryopreservation. In this study, a web page was scanned between March and April 2020 that was appropriate to the "Evaluation of the Quality and Content of Websites Form." As a result, 4 main themes (unknown process, financial burden, social stigma, and future concerns) were created from the experiences of 23 women. The majority of women feel anxiety associated with the oocyte cryopreservation process. It is recommended that reliable information should be presented to society by health care professionals.

Planned oocyte cryopreservation for fertility preservation

Background: Oocyte cryopreservation opens up opportunities for women to preserve fertility when it is necessary to postpone pregnancy. After the advent of vitrification, the results of oocyte cryopreservation were significantly improved compared to conventional slow-freezing. Through these improvements, oocyte cryopreservation was introduced to overcome a decline in fecundity due to an increase in age, and this modality is defined as planned oocyte cryopreservation.Current Concepts: Oocytes cryopreserved through vitrification appear to result in similar clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates compared to fresh oocytes, though the evidence is still limited. It has been reported that the live birth rate increases when the planned oocyte cryopreservation is performed at a younger age. Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes appear similar between vitrified and fresh oocytes.Discussion and Conclusion: Preliminary data supports planned oocyte cryopreservation as a feasible modality resulting in fertility preservation and subsequent live births. The fact that performing the procedure at a younger age can increase the oocyte yield, oocyte efficacy, and live birth rate can be discussed along with patient consultation. However, as there is still a lack of data on the standardized live birth rate, the number of oocytes to be collected, and the long-term effect on the children; more well-designed studies are needed to improve counseling and decision-making in patients seeking this treatment.

Oocyte cryopreservation review: outcomes of medical oocyte cryopreservation and planned oocyte cryopreservation

BACKGROUND

The utilization of oocyte cryopreservation (OC) has become popularized with increasing numbers of reproductive-aged patients desiring to maintain fertility for future family building. OC was initially used for fertility preservation in postmenarchal patients prior to gonadotoxic therapies; however, it is now available to patients to circumvent age-related infertility and other diagnoses associated with early loss of ovarian reserve. The primary aim of this paper is to provide a narrative review of the most recent and robust data on the utilization and outcomes of OC in both patient populations. OC results in similar oocyte yield in patients facing gonadotoxic therapies and patients undergoing planned OC. Available data are insufficient to predict the live birth rates or the number of oocytes needed to result in live birth. However, oocyte yield and live birth rates are best among patients < 37.5 years old or with anti-mullerian hormone levels > 1.995 ng/dL, at the time of oocyte retrieval. There is a high 'no use' rate (58.9%) in patients using planned OC with 62.5% returning to use frozen oocytes with a spouse. The utilization rate in medical OC patients is < 10%. There is currently no data on the effects of BMI, smoking, or ethnicity on planned OC outcomes.

CONCLUSION

It is too early to draw any final conclusions on outcomes of OC in medical OC and planned OC; however, preliminary data supports that utilization of OC in both groups result in preservation of fertility and subsequent live births in patients who return to use their cryopreserved eggs. Higher oocyte yield, with fewer ovarian stimulation cycles, and higher live birth rates are seen in patients who seek OC at younger ages, reinforcing the importance of age on fertility preservation. More studies are needed in medical OC and planned OC to help guide counseling and decision-making in patients seeking these services.

Randomized control trial of a decision aid for women considering elective egg freezing: The Eggsurance study protocol

BACKGROUND

Uptake of elective egg freezing has increased globally. The decision to freeze eggs is complex, and detailed, unbiased information is needed. To address this, we developed an online Decision Aid for women considering elective egg freezing. Decision Aids are the standard of care to support complex health decisions.

OBJECTIVES

This study will measure the impact of the Decision Aid on decision-making (e.g. decisional conflict, engagement in decision-making, distress, and decision delay) and decision quality (e.g. knowledge, level of informed choice, and regret).

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A single-blinded two-arm parallel-group randomized controlled trial. Women considering elective egg freezing will be recruited using social media, newsletters, and fertility clinics. Data will be collected at baseline (recruitment), 6-month, and 12-month post-randomization. The primary hypothesis is that the intervention (Decision Aid plus Victorian Assisted Reproductive Technology Authority website) will reduce decisional conflict (measured using the Decisional Conflict Scale) at 12 months more than control (Victorian Assisted Reproductive Technology Authority website only). Secondary outcomes include engagement in decision-making (Perceived Involvement in Care Scale), distress (Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale), decision delay, knowledge, informed choice (Multi-dimensional Measure of Informed Choice), and decisional regret (Decisional Regret Scale).

ETHICS

The study was approved by the University of Melbourne Human Research Ethics Committee (Ethics ID: 2056457). Informed consent will be obtained from all participants prior to enrolment.

DISCUSSION

This is the first international randomized controlled trial that aims to investigate the effect of an elective egg freezing Decision Aid on decision-related outcomes (e.g. decisional conflict, informed choice, and regret). It is anticipated that participants who receive the Decision Aid will have better decision and health outcomes.

REGISTRATION DETAILS

ACTRN12620001032943: Comparing different information resources on the process and quality of decision-making in women considering elective egg freezing.

Current Resources for Evidence-Based Practice, September 2021

An extensive review of new resources to support the provision of evidence-based care for women and infants. The current column includes an assessment of safety of birth centers in the United States and commentaries on reviews focused on aspirin prophylaxis in pregnancy and the new gestational weight gain evidence summary from the United States Preventive Services Task Force.