1
|
Abdolalipour S, Abbasalizadeh S, Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi S, Abbasalizadeh F, Jahanfar S, Raphi F, Mirghafourvand M. Effect of implementation of the WHO intrapartum care model on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a randomized control trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2024; 24:283. [PMID: 38632530 PMCID: PMC11022439 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06449-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2018, the World Health Organization published a set of recommendations for further emphasis on the quality of intrapartum care to improve the childbirth experience. This study aimed to determine the effects of the WHO intrapartum care model on the childbirth experience, fear of childbirth, the quality of intrapartum care (primary outcomes), as well as post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms, postpartum depression, the duration of childbirth stages, the frequency of vaginal childbirth, Apgar score less than 7, desire for subsequent childbearing, and exclusive breastfeeding in the 4 to 6 weeks postpartum period (secondary outcomes). METHODS This study was a randomized controlled trial involving 108 pregnant women admitted to the maternity units of Al-Zahra and Taleghani hospitals in Tabriz-Iran. Participants were allocated to either the intervention group, which received care according to the ' 'intrapartum care model, or the control group, which received the' 'hospital's routine care, using the blocked randomization method. A Partograph chart was drawn for each participant during pregnancy. A delivery fear scale was completed by all participants both before the beginning of the active phase (pre-intervention) and during 7 to 8 cm dilation (post-intervention). Participants in both groups were followed up for 4 to 6 weeks after childbirth and were asked to complete questionnaires on childbirth experience, postpartum depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms, as well as the pregnancy and childbirth questionnaire and checklists on the desire to have children again and exclusive breastfeeding. The data were analyzed using independent T and Mann-Whitney U tests and analysis of covariance ANCOVA with adjustments for the parity variable and the baseline scores or childbirth fear. RESULTS The average score for the childbirth experience total was notably higher in the intervention group (Adjusted Mean Difference (AMD) (95% Confidence Interval (CI)): 7.0 (0.6 to 0.8), p < 0.001). Similarly, the intrapartum care quality score exhibited a significant increase in the intervention group (AMD (95% CI): 7.0 (4.0 to 10), p < 0.001). Furthermore, the post-intervention fear of childbirth score demonstrated a substantial decrease in the intervention group (AMD (95% CI): -16.0 (-22.0 to -10.0), p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of mean scores for depression, PTSD symptoms, duration of childbirth stages, frequency of vaginal childbirth, Apgar score less than 7, and exclusive breastfeeding in the 4 to 6 weeks postpartum (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION The intrapartum care model endorsed by the World Health Organization (WHO) has demonstrated effectiveness in enhancing childbirth experiences and increasing maternal satisfaction with the quality of obstetric care. Additionally, it contributes to the reduction of fear associated with labor and childbirth. Future research endeavors should explore strategies to prioritize and integrate respectful, high-quality care during labor and childbirth alongside clinical measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Somayeh Abdolalipour
- Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, IR, Iran
| | - Shamsi Abbasalizadeh
- Women's Reproductive Health Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | | | - Fatemeh Abbasalizadeh
- Women's Reproductive Health Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Shayesteh Jahanfar
- Tufts School of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Boston, USA
| | - Fatemeh Raphi
- Master of Midwifery, Clinical Research Development Unit, Taleghani Hospital, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, IR, Iran
| | - Mojgan Mirghafourvand
- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, IR, Iran.
- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Huurnink JME, Blix E, Hals E, Kaasen A, Bernitz S, Lavender T, Ahlberg M, Øian P, Høifødt AI, Miltenburg AS, Pay ASD. Labor curves based on cervical dilatation over time and their accuracy and effectiveness: A systematic scoping review. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0298046. [PMID: 38517902 PMCID: PMC10959354 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/24/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This systematic scoping review was conducted to 1) identify and describe labor curves that illustrate cervical dilatation over time; 2) map any evidence for, as well as outcomes used to evaluate the accuracy and effectiveness of the curves; and 3) identify areas in research that require further investigation. METHODS A three-step systematic literature search was conducted for publications up to May 2023. We searched the Medline, Maternity & Infant Care, Embase, Cochrane Library, Epistemonikos, CINAHL, Scopus, and African Index Medicus databases for studies describing labor curves, assessing their effectiveness in improving birth outcomes, or assessing their accuracy as screening or diagnostic tools. Original research articles and systematic reviews were included. We excluded studies investigating adverse birth outcomes retrospectively, and those investigating the effect of analgesia-related interventions on labor progression. Study eligibility was assessed, and data were extracted from included studies using a piloted charting form. The findings are presented according to descriptive summaries created for the included studies. RESULTS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH Of 26,073 potentially eligible studies, 108 studies were included. Seventy-three studies described labor curves, of which ten of the thirteen largest were based mainly on the United States Consortium on Safe Labor cohort. Labor curve endpoints were 10 cm cervical dilatation in 69 studies and vaginal birth in 4 studies. Labor curve accuracy was assessed in 26 studies, of which all 15 published after 1986 were from low- and middle-income countries. Recent studies of labor curve accuracy in high-income countries are lacking. The effectiveness of labor curves was assessed in 13 studies, which failed to prove the superiority of any curve. Patient-reported health and well-being is an underrepresented outcome in evaluations of labor curves. The usefulness of labor curves is still a matter of debate, as studies have failed to prove their accuracy or effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanne Mamohau Egenberg Huurnink
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ellen Blix
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Elisabeth Hals
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Lillehammer, Norway
| | - Anne Kaasen
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Stine Bernitz
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Østfold Hospital Trust, Grålum, Norway
| | - Tina Lavender
- Department of International Public Health, Centre for Childbirth, Women’s and Newborn Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Mia Ahlberg
- Department of Medicine, Clinical Epidemiology Division, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Pål Øian
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Aase Irene Høifødt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Aase Serine Devold Pay
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bærum Hospital, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Bærum, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vogel JP, Pujar Y, Vernekar SS, Armari E, Pingray V, Althabe F, Gibbons L, Berrueta M, Somannavar M, Ciganda A, Rodriguez R, Bendigeri S, Kumar JA, Patil SB, Karinagannanavar A, Anteen RR, Mallappa Ramachandrappa P, Shetty S, Bommanal L, Haralahalli Mallesh M, Gaddi SS, Chikkagowdra S, Raghavendra B, Homer CSE, Lavender T, Kushtagi P, Hofmeyr GJ, Derman R, Goudar S. Effects of the WHO Labour Care Guide on cesarean section in India: a pragmatic, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized pilot trial. Nat Med 2024; 30:463-469. [PMID: 38291297 PMCID: PMC10878967 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-023-02751-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2023] [Accepted: 12/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Abstract
Cesarean section rates worldwide are rising, driven by medically unnecessary cesarean use. The new World Health Organization Labour Care Guide (LCG) aims to improve the quality of care for women during labor and childbirth. Using the LCG might reduce overuse of cesarean; however, its effects have not been evaluated in randomized trials. We conducted a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized pilot trial in four hospitals in India to evaluate the implementation of an LCG strategy intervention, compared with routine care. We performed this trial to pilot the intervention and obtain preliminary effectiveness data, informing future research. Eligible clusters were four hospitals with >4,000 births annually and cesarean rates ≥30%. Eligible women were those giving birth at ≥20 weeks' gestation. One hospital transitioned to intervention every 2 months, according to a random sequence. The primary outcome was the cesarean rate among women in Robson Group 1 (that is, those who were nulliparous and gave birth to a singleton, term pregnancy in cephalic presentation and in spontaneous labor). A total of 26,331 participants gave birth. A 5.5% crude absolute reduction in the primary outcome was observed (45.2% versus 39.7%; relative risk 0.85, 95% confidence interval 0.54-1.33). Maternal process-of-care outcomes were not significantly different, though labor augmentation with oxytocin was 18.0% lower with the LCG strategy. No differences were observed for other health outcomes or women's birth experiences. These findings can guide future definitive effectiveness trials, particularly in settings where urgent reversal of rising cesarean section rates is needed. Clinical Trials Registry India number: CTRI/2021/01/030695 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua P Vogel
- Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Yeshita Pujar
- Women's and Children's Health Research Unit, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belgaum, India
| | - Sunil S Vernekar
- Women's and Children's Health Research Unit, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belgaum, India
| | - Elizabeth Armari
- Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Veronica Pingray
- Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Fernando Althabe
- Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Luz Gibbons
- Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Mabel Berrueta
- Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Manjunath Somannavar
- Women's and Children's Health Research Unit, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belgaum, India
| | - Alvaro Ciganda
- Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Rocio Rodriguez
- Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Savitri Bendigeri
- Women's and Children's Health Research Unit, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belgaum, India
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Suman S Gaddi
- Vijayanagar Institute of Medical Sciences (VIMS), Ballari, India
| | | | | | - Caroline S E Homer
- Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Tina Lavender
- Department of International Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - G Justus Hofmeyr
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana
- University of the Witwatersrand and Walter Sisulu University, East London, South Africa
| | | | - Shivaprasad Goudar
- Women's and Children's Health Research Unit, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belgaum, India
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Weckend M, McCullough K, Duffield C, Bayes S, Davison C. Failure to progress or just normal? A constructivist grounded theory of physiological plateaus during childbirth. Women Birth 2024; 37:229-239. [PMID: 37867094 DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2023.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2023] [Revised: 10/08/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PROBLEM During childbirth, one of the most common diagnoses of pathology is 'failure to progress', frequently resulting in labour augmentation and intervention cascades. However, failure to progress is poorly defined and evidence suggests that some instances of slowing, stalling and pausing labour patterns may represent physiological plateaus. AIM To explore how midwives conceptualise physiological plateaus and the significance such plateaus may have for women's labour trajectory and birth outcome. METHODS Twenty midwives across Australia participated in semi-structured interviews between September 2020 and February 2022. Constructivist grounded theory methodology was applied to analyse data, including multi-phasic coding and application of constant comparative methods, resulting in a novel theory of physiological plateaus that is firmly supported by participant data. FINDINGS This study found that the conceptualisation of plateauing labour depends largely on health professionals' philosophical assumptions around childbirth. While the Medical Dominant Paradigm frames plateaus as invariably pathological, the Holistic Midwifery Paradigm acknowledges plateaus as a common and valuable element of labour that serves a self-regulatory purpose and results in good birth outcomes for mother and baby. DISCUSSION Contemporary medicalised approaches in maternity care, which are based on an expectation of continuous labour progress, appear to carry a risk for a misinterpretation of physiological plateaus as pathological. CONCLUSION This study challenges the widespread bio-medical conceptualisation of plateauing labour as failure to progress, encourages a renegotiation of what can be considered healthy and normal during childbirth, and provides a stimulus to acknowledge the significance of childbirth philosophy for maternity care practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Weckend
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia.
| | - Kylie McCullough
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia
| | - Christine Duffield
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia; Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
| | - Sara Bayes
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia; Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Australian Catholic University, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia
| | - Clare Davison
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia; Ngangk Yira Institute for Change, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lundborg L, Åberg K, Sandström A, Liu X, Tilden EL, Bolk J, Ladfors LV, Stephansson O, Ahlberg M. First stage of labour duration and associated risk of adverse neonatal outcomes. Sci Rep 2023; 13:12569. [PMID: 37532775 PMCID: PMC10397187 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-39480-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Prior evidence evaluating the benefits and harms of expectant labour duration during active first stage is inconclusive regarding potential consequences for the neonate. Population-based cohort study in Stockholm-Gotland region, Sweden, including 46,040 women (Robson 1), between October 1st, 2008 and June 15th, 2020. Modified Poisson regression was used for the association between active first stage of labour duration and adverse neonatal outcomes. 94.2% experienced a delivery with normal neonatal outcomes. Absolute risk for severe outcomes increased from 1.9 to 3.0%, moderate outcomes increased from 2.8 to 6.2% (> 10.1 h). Compared to the reference, (< 5.1 h; median), the adjusted relative risk (aRR) of severe neonatal outcome significantly increased beyond 10.1 h (> 90th percentile) (aRR 1.53, 95% CI 1.26, 1.87), for moderate neonatal outcome the aRR began to slowly increase beyond 5.1 h (≥ 50 percentile; aRR 1.40, 95% CI 1.24, 1.58). Mediation analysis indicate that most of the association was due to a longer active first stage of labour, 13% (severe neonatal outcomes) and 20% (moderate neonatal outcomes) of the risk was mediated (indirect effect) by longer second stage of labour duration. We report an association between increasing active first stage duration and increased risk of adverse neonatal outcomes. We did not observe a clear labour duration risk threshold.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Lundborg
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Katarina Åberg
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anna Sandström
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Division of Obstetrics, Department of Women's Health, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Xingrong Liu
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ellen L Tilden
- Department of Nurse-Midwifery, Oregon Health & Science University School of Nursing, Portland, OR, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Jenny Bolk
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Science and Education Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Sachs' Children and Youth Hospital, South General Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Linnea V Ladfors
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Olof Stephansson
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Division of Obstetrics, Department of Women's Health, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mia Ahlberg
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Division of Obstetrics, Department of Women's Health, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bernitz S, Betran AP, Gunnes N, Zhang J, Blix E, Øian P, Eggebø TM, Dalbye R. Association of oxytocin augmentation and duration of labour with postpartum haemorrhage: A cohort study of nulliparous women. Midwifery 2023; 123:103705. [PMID: 37244235 DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2023.103705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Revised: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 04/26/2023] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Both duration of labour and use of oxytocin for augmentation are known risk factors for postpartum haemorrhage but distinguishing between the significance of these factors is complex. In this study, we aimed to investigate the association between both labour duration and oxytocin augmentation, for postpartum haemorrhage. DESIGN A cohort study based on a secondary analysis of a cluster-randomised trial. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING Term nulliparous women with a single foetus in cephalic presentation, spontaneous onset of active labour and a vaginal birth. The participants were originally included in cluster-randomised trial conducted in Norway from December 1, 2014, to January 31, 2017, that aimed to compare the frequency of intrapartum caesarean sections when adhering to the WHO partograph versus Zhang's guideline. MEASUREMENTS The data were analysed through four statistical models. Model 1 investigated the effect of oxytocin augmentation as a dichotomous variable (yes/no); Model 2 investigated the effect of the duration of oxytocin augmentation; Model 3 investigated the effect of the maximum dose of oxytocin; and Model 4 investigated the effect of both the duration of augmentation and the maximum dose of oxytocin. All four models included duration of labour divided into five time-intervals. We used binary logistic regression to estimate the odds ratios of postpartum haemorrhage, defined as blood loss of ≥ 1000 ml, including a random intercept for hospital and mutually adjusting for oxytocin augmentation and labour duration in addition to maternal age, maternal marital status, maternal higher education level, maternal smoking habits in the first trimester, maternal body mass index and birth weight. FINDINGS Model 1 found a significant association between the use of oxytocin and postpartum haemorrhage. In Model 2, oxytocin augmentation of ≥ 4.5 h was associated with postpartum haemorrhage. In Model 3, we found an association between a maximum dose of oxytocin of ≥ 20 mU/min and postpartum haemorrhage. Model 4 showed that a maximum dose of oxytocin ≥ 20 mU/min was associated with postpartum haemorrhage both for those augmented < 4.5 h and for those augmented ≥ 4.5 h. Duration of labour was associated with postpartum haemorrhage in all models if lasting ≥ 16 h. KEY CONCLUSIONS We found both oxytocin augmentation and labour duration to be associated with postpartum haemorrhage. Oxytocin doses of ≥ 20 mU/min and a labour duration of ≥ 16 h showed an independent association. IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE The potent drug oxytocin should be carefully administered, as doses of ≥ 20 mU/min were associated with an increased risk of PPH, regardless of the duration of oxytocin augmentation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stine Bernitz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Østfold Hospital Trust, Grålum, Norway; Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Ana Pilar Betran
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Switzerland
| | - Nina Gunnes
- Norwegian Research Centre for Women's Health, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jun Zhang
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Ellen Blix
- Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Pål Øian
- University Hospital of North Norway, Norway
| | - Torbjørn Moe Eggebø
- National Center for Fetal Medicine, St. Olavs hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Rebecka Dalbye
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Østfold Hospital Trust, Grålum, Norway; Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tilden EL, Caughey AB, Ahlberg M, Lundborg L, Wikström AK, Liu X, Ng K, Lapidus J, Sandström A. Latent phase duration and associated outcomes: a contemporary, population-based observational study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2023; 228:S1025-S1036.e9. [PMID: 37164487 PMCID: PMC10172685 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Revised: 10/05/2022] [Accepted: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 03/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about the latent phase of labor, including whether its duration influences subsequent labor processes or birth outcomes. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to describe the duration of the latent phase of labor from self-report of the onset of painful contractions to a cervical dilation of 5 cm in a large, Swedish population and evaluate the association between the duration of the latent phase of labor and perinatal processes and outcomes that occurred during the active phase of labor, second stage of labor, birth and immediately after delivery, stratified by parity. STUDY DESIGN This was a population-based cohort study of 67,267 pregnancies with deliveries between 2008 and 2020 in the Stockholm-Gotland Regions, Sweden. Nulliparous and parous women without a history of cesarean delivery in spontaneous labor with a term (≥37 weeks of gestation), singleton, live, and vertex fetus without major malformations were included. Imputation was used if the notation of the end of the latent phase of labor (ie, cervical dilation of 5 cm) was missing in the partograph. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the association with adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals, controlling for potential covariates. RESULTS Including the time from painful contraction onset to a cervical dilation of 5 cm, the median durations of the latent phase of labor were 16.0 (interquartile range, 10.0-26.6) hours for nulliparous women and 9.4 (interquartile range, 5.9-15.3) hours for multiparous women. The durations of the latent phase of labor beyond the median were associated with increased odds of labor dystocia diagnosis during the first stage active phase or second stage of labor and interventions commonly associated with dystocia (amniotomy, oxytocin augmentation, epidural, and cesarean delivery). The duration of the latent phase of labor of ≥90th percentile vs less than the median in nulliparous women demonstrated an increased risk of adverse neonatal outcomes (Apgar score of <7 at 5 minutes and neonatal intensive care unit admission), chorioamnionitis, and fetal occiput posterior. In multiparous women, longer duration of the latent phase of labor was associated with an increased risk of neonatal intensive care unit admission and chorioamnionitis but was not associated with an Apgar score of <7 at 5 minutes. The duration of the latent phase of labor was not associated with additional markers of maternal risk. CONCLUSION The duration of the latent phase of labor in nulliparous women was longer than that of multiparous women at each point of distribution. A longer duration of the latent phase of labor was associated with more frequent dystocia diagnoses and related interventions during the first stage active phase or second stage of labor, including cesarean delivery, nulliparous fetal occiput posterior position, chorioamnionitis, and markers of neonatal morbidity. More research is needed to identify potential mediating paths between the duration of the latent phase of labor and neonatal morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen L Tilden
- Department of Nurse-Midwifery, Oregon Health & Science University School of Nursing, Portland, OR; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
| | - Aaron B Caughey
- Department of Nurse-Midwifery, Oregon Health & Science University School of Nursing, Portland, OR; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Mia Ahlberg
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Division of Obstetrics, Department of Women's Health, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Louise Lundborg
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anna-Karin Wikström
- Division of Obstetrics, Department of Women's Health, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Xingrong Liu
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kevin Ng
- School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University and Portland State University, Portland, OR
| | - Jodi Lapidus
- School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University and Portland State University, Portland, OR
| | - Anna Sandström
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Division of Obstetrics, Department of Women's Health, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abalos E, Adanu R, Bernitz S, Binfa L, Dao B, Downe S, Hofmeyr JG, Homer CSE, Hundley V, GaladanciGogoi HA, Lavender T, Lissauer D, Lumbiganon P, Pattinson R, Qureshi Z, Stringer JSA, Pujar YV, Vogel JP, Yunis K, Nkurunziza T, De Mucio B, Gholbzouri K, Jayathilaka A, Aderoba AK, Pingray V, Althabe F, Betran AP, Bonet M, Bucagu M, Oladapo O, Souza JP. Global research priorities related to the World Health Organization Labour Care Guide: results of a global consultation. Reprod Health 2023; 20:57. [PMID: 37029413 PMCID: PMC10082494 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-023-01600-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 04/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The World Health Organization (WHO) published the WHO Labour Care Guide (LCG) in 2020 to support the implementation of its 2018 recommendations on intrapartum care. The WHO LCG promotes evidence-based labour monitoring and stimulates shared decision-making between maternity care providers and labouring women. There is a need to identify critical questions that will contribute to defining the research agenda relating to implementation of the WHO LCG. METHODS This mixed-methods prioritization exercise, adapted from the Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative (CHNRI) and James Lind Alliance (JLA) methods, combined a metrics-based design with a qualitative, consensus-building consultation in three phases. The exercise followed the reporting guideline for priority setting of health research (REPRISE). First, 30 stakeholders were invited to submit online ideas or questions (generation of research ideas). Then, 220 stakeholders were invited to score "research avenues" (i.e., broad research ideas that could be answered through a set of research questions) against six independent and equally weighted criteria (scoring of research avenues). Finally, a technical working group (TWG) of 20 purposively selected stakeholders reviewed the scoring, and refined and ranked the research avenues (consensus-building meeting). RESULTS Initially, 24 stakeholders submitted 89 research ideas or questions. A list of 10 consolidated research avenues was scored by 75/220 stakeholders. During the virtual consensus-building meeting, research avenues were refined, and the top three priorities agreed upon were: (1) optimize implementation strategies of WHO LCG, (2) improve understanding of the effect of WHO LCG on maternal and perinatal outcomes, and the process and experience of labour and childbirth care, and (3) assess the effect of the WHO LCG in special situations or settings. Research avenues related to the organization of care and resource utilization ranked lowest during both the scoring and consensus-building process. CONCLUSION This systematic and transparent process should encourage researchers, program implementers, and funders to support research aligned with the identified priorities related to WHO LCG. An international collaborative platform is recommended to implement prioritized research by using harmonized research tools, establishing a repository of research priorities studies, and scaling-up successful research results.
Collapse
|
9
|
The active phase of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2023; 228:S1037-S1049. [PMID: 36997397 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.12.269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Revised: 12/27/2021] [Accepted: 12/28/2021] [Indexed: 03/17/2023]
Abstract
The active phase of labor begins at various degrees of dilatation when the rate of dilatation transitions from the relatively flat slope of the latent phase to a more rapid slope. No diagnostic manifestations demarcate its onset, other than accelerating dilatation. It ends with apparent slowing of dilatation, a deceleration phase, which is usually short in duration and frequently undetected. Several aberrant labor patterns can be detected during the active phase, including protracted dilatation, arrest of dilatation, prolonged deceleration phase and failure of descent. Underlying factors may include cephalopelvic disproportion, excessive neuraxial block, poor uterine contractility, fetal malpositions, malpresentations, uterine infection, maternal obesity, advanced maternal age and previous cesarean delivery. When an active-phase disorder is identified, cesarean delivery is justifiable if there is compelling clinical evidence of disproportion. A prolonged deceleration disorder is strongly associated with disproportion and second stage abnormalities. Shoulder dystocia may occur if vaginal delivery eventuates. This review discusses several issues raised by the introduction of new clinical practice guidelines for labor management.
Collapse
|
10
|
Usman S, Hanidu A, Kovalenko M, Hassan WA, Lees C. The sonopartogram. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2023; 228:S997-S1016. [PMID: 37164504 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.06.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2021] [Revised: 06/15/2022] [Accepted: 06/16/2022] [Indexed: 03/17/2023]
Abstract
The assessment of labor progress from digital vaginal examination has remained largely unchanged for at least a century, despite the current major advances in maternal and perinatal care. Although inconsistently reproducible, the findings from digital vaginal examination are customarily plotted manually on a partogram, which is composed of a graphical representation of labor, together with maternal and fetal observations. The partogram has been developed to aid recognition of failure to labor progress and guide management-specific obstetrical intervention. In the last decade, the use of ultrasound in the delivery room has increased with the advent of more powerful, portable ultrasound machines that have become more readily available for use. Although ultrasound in intrapartum practice is predominantly used for acute management, an ultrasound-based partogram, a sonopartogram, might represent an objective tool for the graphical representation of labor. Demonstrating greater accuracy for fetal head position and more objectivity in the assessment of fetal head station, it could be considered complementary to traditional clinical assessment. The development of the sonopartogram concept would require further undertaking of serial measurements. Advocates of ultrasound will concede that its use has yet to demonstrate a difference in obstetrical and neonatal morbidity in the context of the management of labor and delivery. Taking a step beyond the descriptive graphical representation of labor progress is the question of whether a specific combination of clinical and demographic parameters might be used to inform knowledge of labor outcomes. Intrapartum cesarean deliveries and deliveries assisted by forceps and vacuum are all associated with a heightened risk of maternal and perinatal adverse outcomes. Although these outcomes cannot be precisely predicted, many known risk factors exist. Malposition and high station of the fetal head, short maternal stature, and other factors, such as caput succedaneum, are all implicated in operative delivery; however, the contribution of individual parameters based on clinical and ultrasound assessments has not been quantified. Individualized risk prediction models, including maternal characteristics and ultrasound findings, are increasingly used in women's health-for example, in preeclampsia or trisomy screening. Similarly, intrapartum cesarean delivery models have been developed with good prognostic ability in specifically selected populations. For intrapartum ultrasound to be of prognostic value, robust, externally validated prediction models for labor outcome would inform delivery management and allow shared decision-making with parents.
Collapse
|
11
|
Vogel JP, Pingray V, Althabe F, Gibbons L, Berrueta M, Pujar Y, Somannavar M, Vernekar SS, Ciganda A, Rodriguez R, Welling SA, Revankar A, Bendigeri S, Kumar JA, Patil SB, Karinagannanavar A, Anteen RR, Pavithra MR, Shetty S, Latha B, Megha HM, Gaddi SS, Chikkagowdra S, Raghavendra B, Armari E, Scott N, Eddy K, Homer CSE, Goudar SS. Implementing the WHO Labour Care Guide to reduce the use of Caesarean section in four hospitals in India: protocol and statistical analysis plan for a pragmatic, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized pilot trial. Reprod Health 2023; 20:18. [PMID: 36670438 PMCID: PMC9862839 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-022-01525-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The World Health Organization (WHO) Labour Care Guide (LCG) is a paper-based labour monitoring tool designed to facilitate the implementation of WHO's latest guidelines for effective, respectful care during labour and childbirth. Implementing the LCG into routine intrapartum care requires a strategy that improves healthcare provider practices during labour and childbirth. Such a strategy might optimize the use of Caesarean section (CS), along with potential benefits on the use of other obstetric interventions, maternal and perinatal health outcomes, and women's experience of care. However, the effects of a strategy to implement the LCG have not been evaluated in a randomised trial. This study aims to: (1) develop and optimise a strategy for implementing the LCG (formative phase); and (2) To evaluate the implementation of the LCG strategy compared with usual care (trial phase). METHODS In the formative phase, we will co-design the LCG strategy with key stakeholders informed by facility assessments and provider surveys, which will be field tested in one hospital. The LCG strategy includes a LCG training program, ongoing supportive supervision from senior clinical staff, and audit and feedback using the Robson Classification. We will then conduct a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized pilot trial in four public hospitals in India, to evaluate the effect of the LCG strategy intervention compared to usual care (simplified WHO partograph). The primary outcome is the CS rate in nulliparous women with singleton, term, cephalic pregnancies in spontaneous labour (Robson Group 1). Secondary outcomes include clinical and process of care outcomes, as well as women's experience of care outcomes. We will also conduct a process evaluation during the trial, using standardized facility assessments, in-depth interviews and surveys with providers, audits of completed LCGs, labour ward observations and document reviews. An economic evaluation will consider implementation costs and cost-effectiveness. DISCUSSION Findings of this trial will guide clinicians, administrators and policymakers on how to effectively implement the LCG, and what (if any) effects the LCG strategy has on process of care, health and experience outcomes. The trial findings will inform the rollout of LCG internationally. TRIAL REGISTRATION CTRI/2021/01/030695 (Protocol version 1.4, 25 April 2022).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua P. Vogel
- grid.1056.20000 0001 2224 8486Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC Australia
| | - Veronica Pingray
- grid.414661.00000 0004 0439 4692Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Fernando Althabe
- grid.414661.00000 0004 0439 4692Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Luz Gibbons
- grid.414661.00000 0004 0439 4692Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Mabel Berrueta
- grid.414661.00000 0004 0439 4692Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Yeshita Pujar
- grid.414956.b0000 0004 1765 8386Women’s and Children’s Health Research Unit, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belgaum, Karnataka India
| | - Manjunath Somannavar
- grid.414956.b0000 0004 1765 8386Women’s and Children’s Health Research Unit, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belgaum, Karnataka India
| | - Sunil S. Vernekar
- grid.414956.b0000 0004 1765 8386Women’s and Children’s Health Research Unit, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belgaum, Karnataka India
| | - Alvaro Ciganda
- grid.414661.00000 0004 0439 4692Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Rocio Rodriguez
- grid.414661.00000 0004 0439 4692Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Saraswati A. Welling
- grid.414956.b0000 0004 1765 8386Women’s and Children’s Health Research Unit, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belgaum, Karnataka India
| | - Amit Revankar
- grid.414956.b0000 0004 1765 8386Women’s and Children’s Health Research Unit, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belgaum, Karnataka India
| | - Savitri Bendigeri
- grid.414956.b0000 0004 1765 8386Women’s and Children’s Health Research Unit, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belgaum, Karnataka India
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Shukla Shetty
- grid.418280.70000 0004 1794 3160JJM Medical College, Davangere, Karnataka India
| | - B. Latha
- grid.418280.70000 0004 1794 3160JJM Medical College, Davangere, Karnataka India
| | - H. M. Megha
- grid.418280.70000 0004 1794 3160JJM Medical College, Davangere, Karnataka India
| | - Suman S. Gaddi
- grid.416866.b0000 0004 0556 696XVijayanagar Institute of Medical Sciences (VIMS), Ballari, Karnataka India
| | - Shaila Chikkagowdra
- grid.416866.b0000 0004 0556 696XVijayanagar Institute of Medical Sciences (VIMS), Ballari, Karnataka India
| | - Bellara Raghavendra
- grid.416866.b0000 0004 0556 696XVijayanagar Institute of Medical Sciences (VIMS), Ballari, Karnataka India
| | - Elizabeth Armari
- grid.1056.20000 0001 2224 8486Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC Australia
| | - Nick Scott
- grid.1056.20000 0001 2224 8486Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC Australia
| | - Katherine Eddy
- grid.1056.20000 0001 2224 8486Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC Australia
| | - Caroline S. E. Homer
- grid.1056.20000 0001 2224 8486Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC Australia
| | - Shivaprasad S. Goudar
- grid.414956.b0000 0004 1765 8386Women’s and Children’s Health Research Unit, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belgaum, Karnataka India
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bohren MA, Hazfiarini A, Vazquez Corona M, Colomar M, De Mucio B, Tunçalp Ö, Portela A. From global recommendations to (in)action: A scoping review of the coverage of companion of choice for women during labour and birth. PLOS GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 3:e0001476. [PMID: 36963069 PMCID: PMC10021298 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Women greatly value and benefit from the presence of someone they trust to support them throughout labour and childbirth ('labour companion of choice'). Labour companionship improves maternal and perinatal outcomes, including enhancing physiological labour and birth experiences. Despite clear benefits, implementation is slow. We conducted a scoping review to assess coverage and models of labour companionship, including quantitative studies reporting coverage of labour companionship in any level health facility globally. We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Global Health from 1 January 2010-14 December 2021. We extracted data on study design, labour companionship coverage, timing and type of companions allowed, and recoded data into categories for comparison across studies. We included data from a maternal health sentinel network of hospitals in Latin America, using descriptive statistics to assess coverage among 120,581 women giving birth in these sites from April 2018-April 2022. In the scoping review, we included 77 studies from 27 countries. There was wide variation in the coverage of labour companionship: almost one-third of studies reported coverage less than 40%, and one-third of studies reported coverage between 40-80%. Husbands or partners were the most frequent companion (37.7%, 29/77), followed by family member or friend (gender not specified) (32.5%, 25/77), family member or friend (female-only) (13.0%, 10/77). Across nine sentinel hospitals in five Latin American countries, there was variation in coverage, with no companion at any time ranging from 14.9%-93.8%. Despite the well-known benefits and factors affecting implementation of labour companionship, more work is needed to improve equitable coverage. Concerted efforts are needed to engage with communities, health workers, health managers, and policy-makers to establish policies, address implementation barriers, and integrate data on coverage into perinatal records and quality processes to ensure that all women have access. Harmonized reporting of labour companionship would greatly enhance understanding at global level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan A Bohren
- Gender and Women's Health Unit, Centre for Health Equity, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alya Hazfiarini
- Gender and Women's Health Unit, Centre for Health Equity, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Martha Vazquez Corona
- Gender and Women's Health Unit, Centre for Health Equity, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mercedes Colomar
- The Latin American Center for Perinatology/Women´s and Reproductive Health Unit, Pan American Health Organization, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - Bremen De Mucio
- The Latin American Center for Perinatology/Women´s and Reproductive Health Unit, Pan American Health Organization, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - Özge Tunçalp
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Anayda Portela
- Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ghulaxe Y, Tayade S, Huse S, Chavada J. Advancement in Partograph: WHO's Labor Care Guide. Cureus 2022; 14:e30238. [PMID: 36381845 PMCID: PMC9652267 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.30238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Worldwide, the partograph, also known as a partogram, is used as a labor monitoring tool to detect difficulties early, allowing for referral, intervention, or closer observations to follow. Despite widespread support from health experts, there are worries that the partograph has not yet fully realized its potential for enhancing therapeutic results. As a result, the instrument has undergone several changes, and numerous studies have been conducted to examine the obstacles and enablers to its use. Nevertheless, the partograph was widely embraced and has been a component of evaluating labor progress. Earlier it was also used as a standard method for monitoring labor progress. Even though it is widely used, there have been reports of usage and accurate execution rates. The WHO Labor Care Guide (LCG) was created so that medical professionals could keep an eye on the health of pregnant women and their unborn children during labor by conducting routine evaluations to spot any abnormalities. The tool intends to enhance women-centered care and encourage collaborative decision-making between women and healthcare professionals. The LCG is designed to be a tool for ensuring high-quality research centered on health, reducing pointless measures, and offering comfort measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yash Ghulaxe
- Medical Student, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Wardha, IND
| | - Surekha Tayade
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Wardha, IND
| | - Shreyash Huse
- Medical Student, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Wardha, IND
| | - Jay Chavada
- Medical Student, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Wardha, IND
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Fumagalli S, Antolini L, Cosmai G, Gramegna T, Nespoli A, Pedranzini A, Colciago E, Valsecchi MG, Vergani P, Locatelli A. Development and validation of a predictive model to identify the active phase of labor. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2022; 22:641. [PMID: 35971093 PMCID: PMC9377074 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-04946-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The diagnosis of the active phase of labor is a crucial clinical decision, thus requiring an accurate assessment. This study aimed to build and to validate a predictive model, based on maternal signs and symptoms to identify a cervical dilatation ≥4 cm. Methods A prospective study was conducted from May to September 2018 in a II Level Maternity Unit (development data), and from May to September 2019 in a I Level Maternity Unit (validation data). Women with singleton, term pregnancy, cephalic presentation and presence of contractions were consecutively enrolled during the initial assessment to diagnose the stage of labor. Women < 18 years old, with language barrier or induction of labor were excluded. A nomogram for the calculation of the predictions of cervical dilatation ≥4 cm on the ground of 11 maternal signs and symptoms was obtained from a multivariate logistic model. The predictive performance of the model was investigated by internal and external validation. Results A total of 288 assessments were analyzed. All maternal signs and symptoms showed a significant impact on increasing the probability of cervical dilatation ≥4 cm. In the final logistic model, “Rhythm” (OR 6.26), “Duration” (OR 8.15) of contractions and “Show” (OR 4.29) confirmed their significance while, unexpectedly, “Frequency” of contractions had no impact. The area under the ROC curve in the model of the uterine activity was 0.865 (development data) and 0.927 (validation data), with an increment to 0.905 and 0.956, respectively, when adding maternal signs. The Brier Score error in the model of the uterine activity was 0.140 (development data) and 0.097 (validation data), with a decrement to 0.121 and 0.092, respectively, when adding maternal signs. Conclusion Our predictive model showed a good performance. The introduction of a non-invasive tool might assist midwives in the decision-making process, avoiding interventions and thus offering an evidenced-base care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simona Fumagalli
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Via Cadore 48, 20900, Monza, Italy.
| | - Laura Antolini
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Via Cadore 48, 20900, Monza, Italy
| | - Greta Cosmai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MBBM Foundation at San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Teresa Gramegna
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MBBM Foundation at San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Antonella Nespoli
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Via Cadore 48, 20900, Monza, Italy
| | - Astrid Pedranzini
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MBBM Foundation at San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Colciago
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Via Cadore 48, 20900, Monza, Italy
| | - Maria Grazia Valsecchi
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Via Cadore 48, 20900, Monza, Italy
| | - Patrizia Vergani
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MBBM Foundation at San Gerardo Hospital, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Anna Locatelli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Carate Brianza Hospital, ASST Brianza, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Improving obstetric care in low-resource settings. Case Rep Womens Health 2022; 36:e00434. [PMID: 36589636 PMCID: PMC9801051 DOI: 10.1016/j.crwh.2022.e00434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
|
16
|
Impact of WHO Labor Care Guide on reducing cesarean sections at a tertiary center: an open-label randomized controlled trial. AJOG GLOBAL REPORTS 2022; 2:100075. [PMID: 36276791 PMCID: PMC9563559 DOI: 10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The World Health Organization Labor Care Guide was introduced in December 2020 to implement World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines on intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to determine the effect of the WHO Labor Care Guide on labor outcomes, especially in reducing primary cesarean deliveries, and its acceptability by healthcare providers. STUDY DESIGN This open-label randomized control trial was conducted from September 2021 to December 2021 on 280 low-risk antenatal women admitted for delivery at a busy tertiary care institute in North India. After informed consent, women were allocated into the study and control groups. Labor monitoring was performed using the WHO Labor Care Guide in the study group and the World Health Organization–modified partograph in the control group. Women who had a cesarean delivery in the latent phase of labor were excluded from the study. The primary outcome was mode of delivery, whereas the secondary outcomes were duration of active labor, maternal complications (postpartum hemorrhage and puerperal sepsis), duration of hospital stay, Apgar score at 5 minutes, and neonatal intensive care unit admission. The labor outcomes in both groups were compared. In the study group, the acceptability, difficulty, and satisfaction levels of the users were assessed using a 5-point Likert scale. The “learning curve” for the use of the Labor Care Guide (LCG) was determined. SPSS software (version 21.0; IBM Corporation, Chicago, IL) was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS After excluding women who underwent cesarean delivery in the latent phase, 136 women in the study group and 135 women in the control group were observed for labor outcomes. The cesarean delivery rate was 1.5% in the study group vs 17.8% in the control group (P=.0001). The duration of the active phase of labor was significantly shorter in the study group than in the control group (P<.001). The 2 groups were similar in terms of maternal complications, duration of hospital stay, and Apgar score. The learning curve took average levels of 6.50 and 2.25 Labor Care Guide plots to shift from “very difficult” to “neutral” and “neutral” to “easy,” respectively. After an initial learning curve, acceptability and satisfaction levels were found to be high in the WHO Labor Care Guide users. CONCLUSION The WHO Labor Care Guide is a simple labor monitoring tool for the reducing primary cesarean delivery rate without increasing the duration of hospital stay and fetomaternal complications.
Collapse
|
17
|
Ngongo CJ, Raassen TJIP, Mahendeka M, Lombard L, van Roosmalen J. Iatrogenic genito-urinary fistula following cesarean birth in nine sub-Saharan African countries: a retrospective review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2022; 22:541. [PMID: 35790950 PMCID: PMC9254569 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-04774-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Genito-urinary fistulas may occur as complications of obstetric surgery. Location and circumstances can indicate iatrogenic origin as opposed to pressure necrosis following prolonged, obstructed labor. Methods This retrospective review focuses on 787 women with iatrogenic genito-urinary fistulas among 2942 women who developed fistulas after cesarean birth between 1994 and 2017. They are a subset of 5469 women who sought obstetric fistula repair between 1994 and 2017 in Tanzania, Uganda, Kenya, Malawi, Rwanda, Somalia, South Sudan, Zambia, and Ethiopia. We compared genito-urinary fistula classifications following vaginal birth to classifications following cesarean birth. We assessed whether and how the proportion of iatrogenic genito-urinary fistula was changing over time among women with fistula, comparing women with iatrogenic fistulas to women with fistulas attributable to pressure necrosis. We used mixed effects logistic regression to model the rise in iatrogenic fistula among births resulting in fistula and specifically among cesarean births resulting in fistula. Results Over one-quarter of women with fistula following cesarean birth (26.8%, 787/2942) had an injury caused by surgery rather than pressure necrosis due to prolonged, obstructed labor. Controlling for age, parity, and previous abdominal surgery, the odds of iatrogenic origin nearly doubled over time among all births resulting in fistula (aOR 1.94; 95% CI 1.48–2.54) and rose by 37% among cesarean births resulting in fistula (aOR 1.37; 95% CI 1.02–1.83). In Kenya and Rwanda the rise of iatrogenic injury outpaced the increasing frequency of cesarean birth. Conclusions Despite the strong association between obstetric fistula and prolonged, obstructed labor, more than a quarter of women with fistula after cesarean birth had injuries due to surgical complications rather than pressure necrosis. Risks of iatrogenic fistula during cesarean birth reinforce the importance of appropriate labor management and cesarean decision-making. Rising numbers of iatrogenic fistulas signal a quality crisis in emergency obstetric care. Unaddressed, the impact of this problem will grow as cesarean births become more common. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-04774-0.
Collapse
|
18
|
Friedman EA, Cohen WR. Are the Labor Management Guidelines evidence based? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022; 226:455-458. [PMID: 35369903 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.11.1369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2021] [Revised: 11/03/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Emanuel A Friedman
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
| | - Wayne R Cohen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Moncrieff G, Gyte GM, Dahlen HG, Thomson G, Singata-Madliki M, Clegg A, Downe S. Routine vaginal examinations compared to other methods for assessing progress of labour to improve outcomes for women and babies at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 3:CD010088. [PMID: 35244935 PMCID: PMC8896079 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd010088.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Routine vaginal examinations are undertaken at regular time intervals during labour to assess whether labour is progressing as expected. Unusually slow progress can be due to underlying problems, described as labour dystocia, or can be a normal variation of progress. Evidence suggests that if mother and baby are well, length of labour alone should not be used to decide whether labour is progressing normally. Other methods to assess labour progress include intrapartum ultrasound and monitoring external physical and behavioural cues. Vaginal examinations can be distressing for women, and overdiagnosis of dystocia can result in iatrogenic morbidity due to unnecessary intervention. It is important to establish whether routine vaginal examinations are effective, both as an accurate measure of physiological labour progress and to distinguish true labour dystocia, or whether other methods for assessing labour progress are more effective. This Cochrane Review is an update of a review first published in 2013. OBJECTIVES To compare the effectiveness, acceptability, and consequences of routine vaginal examinations compared with other methods, or different timings, to assess labour progress at term. SEARCH METHODS For this update, we searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Trials Register (which includes trials from CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and conference proceedings) and ClinicalTrials.gov (28 February 2021). We also searched the reference lists of retrieved studies. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of vaginal examinations compared with other methods of assessing labour progress and studies assessing different timings of vaginal examinations. Quasi-RCTs and cluster-RCTs were eligible for inclusion. We excluded cross-over trials and conference abstracts. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed all studies identified by the search for inclusion in the review. Four review authors independently extracted data. Two review authors assessed risk of bias and certainty of the evidence using GRADE. MAIN RESULTS We included four studies that randomised a total of 755 women, with data analysed for 744 women and their babies. Interventions used to assess labour progress were routine vaginal examinations, routine ultrasound assessments, routine rectal examinations, routine vaginal examinations at different frequencies, and vaginal examinations as indicated. We were unable to conduct meta-analysis as there was only one study for each comparison. All studies were at high risk of performance bias due to difficulties with blinding. We assessed two studies as high risk of bias and two as low or unclear risk of bias for other domains. The overall certainty of the evidence assessed using GRADE was low or very low. Routine vaginal examinations versus routine ultrasound to assess labour progress (one study, 83 women and babies) Study in Turkey involving multiparous women with spontaneous onset of labour. Routine vaginal examinations may result in a slight increase in pain compared to routine ultrasound (mean difference -1.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) -2.10 to -0.48; one study, 83 women, low certainty evidence) (pain measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS) in reverse: zero indicating 'worst pain', 10 indicating no pain). The study did not assess our other primary outcomes: positive birth experience; augmentation of labour; spontaneous vaginal birth; chorioamnionitis; neonatal infection; admission to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Routine vaginal examinations versus routine rectal examinations to assess labour progress (one study, 307 women and babies) Study in Ireland involving women in labour at term. We assessed the certainty of the evidence as very low. Compared with routine rectal examinations, routine vaginal examinations may have little or no effect on: augmentation of labour (risk ratio (RR) 1.03, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.68; one study, 307 women); and spontaneous vaginal birth (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.06; one study, 307 women). We found insufficient data to fully assess: neonatal infections (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.01 to 8.07; one study, 307 babies); and admission to NICU (RR 1.32, 95% CI 0.47 to 3.73; one study, 307 babies). The study did not assess our other primary outcomes: positive birth experience; chorioamnionitis; maternal pain. Routine four-hourly vaginal examinations versus routine two-hourly examinations (one study, 150 women and babies) UK study involving primiparous women in labour at term. We assessed the certainty of the evidence as very low. Compared with routine two-hourly vaginal examinations, routine four-hourly vaginal examinations may have little or no effect, with data compatible with both benefit and harm, on: augmentation of labour (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.57; one study, 109 women); and spontaneous vaginal birth (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.26; one study, 150 women). The study did not assess our other primary outcomes: positive birth experience; chorioamnionitis; neonatal infection; admission to NICU; maternal pain. Routine vaginal examinations versus vaginal examinations as indicated (one study, 204 women and babies) Study in Malaysia involving primiparous women being induced at term. We assessed the certainty of the evidence as low. Compared with vaginal examinations as indicated, routine four-hourly vaginal examinations may result in more women having their labour augmented (RR 2.55, 95% CI 1.03 to 6.31; one study, 204 women). There may be little or no effect on: • spontaneous vaginal birth (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.59; one study, 204 women); • chorioamnionitis (RR 3.06, 95% CI 0.13 to 74.21; one study, 204 women); • neonatal infection (RR 4.08, 95% CI 0.46 to 35.87; one study, 204 babies); • admission to NICU (RR 2.04, 95% CI 0.63 to 6.56; one study, 204 babies). The study did not assess our other primary outcomes of positive birth experience or maternal pain. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Based on these findings, we cannot be certain which method is most effective or acceptable for assessing labour progress. Further large-scale RCT trials are required. These should include essential clinical and experiential outcomes. This may be facilitated through the development of a tool to measure positive birth experiences. Data from qualitative studies are also needed to fully assess whether methods to evaluate labour progress meet women's needs for a safe and positive labour and birth, and if not, to develop an approach that does.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gill Moncrieff
- School of Community Health and Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Gillian Ml Gyte
- Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Hannah G Dahlen
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Penrith, Australia
| | - Gill Thomson
- School of Community Health and Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Mandisa Singata-Madliki
- Effective Care Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand/University of Fort Hare/East London Hospital complex, East London, South Africa
| | - Andrew Clegg
- Faculty of Health and Wellbeing, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Soo Downe
- Research in Childbirth and Health (ReaCH) unit, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Maaløe N, van Roosmalen J, Dmello B, Kwast B, van den Akker T, Housseine N, Kujabi M, Meguid T, Kidanto H. WHO next-generation partograph: revolutionary steps towards individualised labour care? BJOG 2021; 129:682-684. [PMID: 34520112 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- N Maaløe
- Global Health Section, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hvidovre University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - J van Roosmalen
- Athena Institute, VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - B Dmello
- Global Health Section, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Maternal and Newborn Health, Comprehensive Community Based Rehabilitation in Tanzania, Dar es salaam, United Republic of Tanzania.,Medical College East Africa, Aga Khan University, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania
| | - B Kwast
- International Consultant Maternal Health and Safe Motherhood, Leusden, the Netherlands
| | - T van den Akker
- Athena Institute, VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - N Housseine
- Medical College East Africa, Aga Khan University, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania
| | - M Kujabi
- Global Health Section, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - T Meguid
- Kivunge Hospital, Zanzibar, United Republic of Tanzania
| | - H Kidanto
- Medical College East Africa, Aga Khan University, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania
| |
Collapse
|