|
1
|
Sholapurkar SL. Proof of ineffective and unnecessary prophylactic negative-pressure wound dressing (NPWD) after caesarean: extended debate to include surgical considerations. BJOG 2021; 129:509-510. [PMID: 34612576 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
|
2
|
Hyldig N, Vinter CA, Lamont RF, Joergensen JS, Möller S. Response to prophylactic negative pressure wound dressing after caesarean section: an extended debate to include surgical aspects. BJOG 2021; 129:510-511. [PMID: 34590415 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Nana Hyldig
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Christina Anne Vinter
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Ronald F Lamont
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Jan Stener Joergensen
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Sören Möller
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Open Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|