Retroactive memory interference reduces false positive outcomes of informed innocents in the P300-based concealed information test

In the Concealed Information Test (CIT), differential responses between crime-relevant and crime-irrelevant items are indicative of concealed knowledge of a crime, and are used to classify an individual as either "guilty" or "innocent". However, when crime-relevant items are leaked before the test, an innocent examinee can exhibit enhanced responses to the crime-relevant items, thus causing such examinee to be wrongly classified as guilty. In an attempt to solve this problem, we examined the role of retroactive memory interference (RI) in differentiating informed innocents from guilty participants, using a P300-based CIT. Participants acquired crime-related knowledge either by committing a mock crime (guilty group) or reading a paper that described a mock crime (informed innocent group). Subsequently, the participants within each condition were randomly assigned to either an RI group, where they were exposed to new crime-related details before the CIT, or a control group. We found an interaction between guilty and RI groups: in the guilty group, there was a significant difference in P300 amplitude between the probe and irrelevant items, regardless of RI manipulation, whereas in the informed innocent group, a difference in P300 amplitude between the probe and irrelevant items was significant only in the control group, but not in the RI group. This led to an improved detection rate of the informed innocents (31% for the control group vs. 77% for the RI group). These results suggest that RI manipulation could be used to reduce the false positive outcomes of informed innocents without affecting the detection rate of guilty participants.

Is the CIT susceptible to misleading information? A constructive replication

The Concealed Information Test (CIT) utilizes psychophysiological measures to detect crime-related knowledge in a suspect's memory. In other words, it can discriminate between knowledgeable (guilty) and unknowledgeable (innocent) suspects. The majority of CIT research is however conducted in controlled laboratory settings, which are more resistant to external influences than realistic forensic settings. Such influences include retroactive memory interferences which may threaten the validity of the CIT. One notable example is the misinformation effect - retroactive memory distortions caused by exposure to misleading information regarding a past event. The current study is a constructive replication of Volz et al. (J Forensic Sci 2017;63:1419) examining the effects of misleading information on the CIT. Participants underwent a three-stage experiment including a mock crime, exposure to misleading information, and a CIT. Results show that when misleading information was presented, explicit memory of the mock crime was reduced, but the physiological responses to the critical CIT items were only partially attenuated. This could suggest that the detection of crime-relevant information, using skin conductance and respiration measures, might be possible even when suspects are exposed to misleading information.