Prehospital intubation in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a review

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a global health burden, with an incidence of 874-1005/100 000. It is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in all ages. TBI is a heterogeneous entity, with a variety of definitions. Treatment starts at a prehospital level and aims to prevent secondary injury. Airway management is vital to prevent hypoxia, hypercapnia, and aspiration which could contribute to secondary injuries. In some systems, it is current practice to perform endotracheal intubation in the prehospital setting to secure the airway and permit controlled ventilation, as opposed to using basic maneuvers and adjuncts with supplemental oxygen. This study aims to review the effect of prehospital tracheal intubation on mortality and functional outcome in adult and pediatric patients with severe TBI compared with patients not intubated in the prehospital setting. A digital literary search of four databases using variations of the terms 'Endotracheal Intubation', 'Laryngeal Mask Airway', and 'Traumatic Brain Injury" included reports up to 31 March 2023. Of 7242, 33 studies were included. The overall risk of bias was moderate to serious. Nine studies noted an increase in mortality associated with prehospital intubation, four studies demonstrated a significant decrease in mortality and five studies reported poorer functional outcomes using various scales. Only three reports, including the only randomized controlled trial (RCT), showed improved functional outcomes with prehospital intubation. In eight studies, the prehospital intubation cohort had significantly more severe injuries. The majority of studies showed no effect on or increased mortality, and no significant association with functional outcome in patients with severe TBI who underwent prehospital intubation. However, all but one were retrospective and with a moderate to serious risk of bias. The cause of the mortality increase is uncertain and possibly a result of more severe injuries in the prehospital intubation group. The single available RCT reported improved functional outcomes with prehospital intubation but has yet to be replicated. The current evidence for prehospital intubation is uncertain in either direction, and there is a need for new prospective research, ideally with uniform outcome measures and the application of up-to-date intubation practices in the prehospital field.

Emergency medicine updates: Endotracheal intubation

INTRODUCTION

Airway management including endotracheal intubation (ETI) is a key skill for emergency clinicians. Therefore, it is important for emergency clinicians to be aware of the current evidence regarding the identification and management of patients requiring ETI.

OBJECTIVE

This paper evaluates key evidence-based updates concerning ETI for the emergency clinician.

DISCUSSION

ETI is commonly performed in the emergency department (ED) setting but has many nuanced components. There are several tools that have been used to predict a difficult airway which incorporate anatomic and physiologic features. While helpful, these tools should not be used in isolation. Preoxygenation and apneic oxygenation are recommended to reduce the risk of desaturation and patient decompensation, particularly with noninvasive ventilation in critically ill patients. Induction and neuromuscular blocking medications should be tailored to the clinical scenario. Video laryngoscopy is superior to direct laryngoscopy among novice users, while both techniques are reasonable among more experienced clinicians. Recent literature suggests using a bougie during the first attempt. Point-of-care ultrasound is helpful for confirming correct placement and depth of the endotracheal tube.

CONCLUSIONS

An understanding of literature updates can improve the ED care of patients requiring emergent intubation.

The effect of a dedicated intensivist staffing to a medical emergency team on airway management in general wards

Although medical emergency teams (METs) have been widely introduced, studies on the importance of a dedicated intensivist staffing to METs are lacking. A single-center retrospective before-and-after study was performed. Deteriorating patients who required emergency airway management in general wards by MET were included in this study. We divided the study period according to the presence of a dedicated intensivist staff in MET: (1) non-staffed period (from January 2016 to February 2018, n = 971) and (2) staffed period (from March 2018 to December 2019, n = 651), and compared emergency airway management-related variables and outcomes between the periods. Among 1622 patients included, mean age was 63.0 years and male patients were 64.2% (n = 1042). The first-pass success rate was significantly increased in the staffed period (85.9% in the non-staffed vs 89.2% in the staffed; P = .047). Compliance to rapid sequence intubation was increased (9.4% vs 34.4%; P < .001) and vocal cords were more clearly open (P < .001) in the staffed period. The SpO2/FiO2 ratio (median [interquartile range], 125 [113-218] vs 136 [116-234]; P = .007) and the ROX index (4.6 [3.4-7.6] vs 5.1 [3.6-8.5]; P = .013) at the time of intubation was higher in the staffed period, suggesting the decision on intubation was made earlier. The post-intubation hypoxemia was less commonly occurred in the staffed period (7.2% vs 4.2%, P = .018). In multivariate analysis, the rank of operator was a strong predictor of the first-pass success (adjusted OR [95% CI], 2.280 [1.639-3.172]; P < .001 for fellow and 5.066 [1.740-14.747]; P < .001 for staff, relative to resident). In our hospital, a dedicated intensivist staffing to MET was associated with improved emergency airway management in general wards. Staffing an intensivist to MET needs to be encouraged to improve the performance of MET and the patient safety.

Nurse Practitioners in Critical Care Transport

The inclusion of nurse practitioners (NPs) in critical care transport teams has the potential to enhance patient care and improve team operations. NPs can manage complex clinical situations during transport and excel in various roles such as leadership, education, mentoring, research, quality improvement, and clinical expertise. As we navigate the evolving landscape of critical care transport, it is crucial to explore the potential benefits offered by NPs. Their distinct skills and experiences effectively position them to improve patient outcomes, enhance team performance, and contribute to health care's financial sustainability. This article discusses the role of NPs in critical care transport, providing insight into their current uses, and recommendations for optimal use.

Point-of-care ultrasound for airway management in the emergency and critical care setting

Airway management is a common procedure within emergency and critical care medicine. Traditional techniques for predicting and managing a difficult airway each have important limitations. As the field has evolved, point-of-care ultrasound has been increasingly utilized for this application. Several measures can be used to sonographically predict a difficult airway, including skin to epiglottis, hyomental distance, and tongue thickness. Ultrasound can also be used to confirm endotracheal tube intubation and assess endotracheal tube depth. Ultrasound is superior to the landmark-based approach for locating the cricothyroid membrane, particularly in patients with difficult anatomy. Finally, we provide an algorithm for using ultrasound to manage the crashing patient on mechanical ventilation. After reading this article, readers will have an enhanced understanding of the role of ultrasound in airway management.

Effect of Bougie Use on First-Attempt Success in Tracheal Intubations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The use of a bougie, a flexible endotracheal tube introducer, has been proposed to optimize first-attempt success in emergency department intubations. We aimed to evaluate the available evidence on the association of bougie use in the first attempt and success in tracheal intubations. This was a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that evaluated first-attempt success between adults intubated with a bougie versus without a bougie (usually with a stylet) in all settings. Manikin and cadaver studies were excluded. A medical librarian searched Ovid Cochrane Central, Ovid Embase, Ovid Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials and comparative observational studies from inception to June 2023. Study selection and data extraction were done in duplicate by 2 independent reviewers. We conducted a meta-analysis with random-effects models, and we used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence at the outcome level. We screened a total of 2,699 studies, and 133 were selected for full-text review. A total of 18 studies, including 12 randomized controlled trials, underwent quantitative analysis. In the meta-analysis of 18 studies (9,151 patients), bougie use was associated with increased first-attempt intubation success (pooled risk ratio [RR] 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06 to 1.17, low certainty evidence). Bougie use was associated with increased first-attempt success across all analyzed subgroups with similar effect estimates, including in emergency intubations (9 studies; 8,070 patients; RR 1.11, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.16, low certainty). The highest point estimate favoring the use of a bougie was in the subgroup of patients with Cormack-Lehane III or IV (5 studies, 585 patients, RR 1.60, 95% CI 1.40 to 1.84, moderate certainty). In this meta-analysis, the bougie as an aid in the first intubation attempt was associated with increased success. Despite the certainty of evidence being low, these data suggest that a bougie should probably be used first and not as a rescue device in emergency intubations.

Comparison of Upper Airway Ultrasonography Against Quantitative Waveform Capnography for Validating Endotracheal Tube Position in a South Indian Population

INTRODUCTION

The utilization of ultrasonography (USG) is progressively growing to verify the accurate positioning of the endotracheal tube (ETT). Non-detection of the esophageal intubation can be fatal. Various techniques are employed to confirm the placement of the ETT, but none of them are considered optimal. Quantitative waveform capnography (qWC) is often regarded as the most reliable method for this purpose; however, it may not necessarily be accessible and can be expensive. Hence, this investigation was carried out to contrast the use of bedside upper airway USG with qWC in order to confirm the accurate positioning of the ETT following intubation.  Methods: A prospective validation study was undertaken in the emergency department (ED) of Lourdes Hospital, Kochi. This study includes subjects who are of the age group >18 years of either sex requiring intubation in the ED for causes like respiratory failure, cardiac arrest, coma, head injury, and poisoning and cases in which intubation was achieved in the first attempt. The sample size calculated was 77. Intubation in our ED includes both elective and emergency. For all the patients undergoing intubation, consent was taken before the procedure (from close relatives of the patients) by another staff after explaining the procedure to be conducted by the doctor. Following the acquisition of consent, the intubation procedure was executed in accordance with the established hospital protocol. This protocol included verifying the intubation's success as well as employing clinical techniques such as observing bilateral chest expansion, conducting a five-point auscultation, and monitoring pulse oximetry. Furthermore, USG was employed to assess the positioning of the ETT placement. The time taken by each of these methods to confirm tube placement was noted, and the findings were assessed for the sensitivity (SN) and specificity (SP) of USG against the gold standard qWC to confirm endotracheal intubation.

RESULTS

Eighty patients were enrolled in the study. All 80 patients were subjected to both ultrasound and end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2). Of the 80 patients, six subjects (7.5%) underwent esophageal intubation, which was observed through the use of USG. Four patients had esophageal intubations and were correctly detected by EtCO2. All four esophageal intubations were correctly confirmed by EtCO2. Additionally, USG detected six intubations, out of which four were true and two were tracheal which was correctly confirmed by EtCO2. The bedside upper airway USG demonstrated an SN of 78 subjects at 97.4% (95% CI: 90.8-99.7%), an SP of 80 subjects at 100% (95% CI: 39.7-100%), a positive predictive value of 80 subjects at 100% (95% CI: 93.8-100%), and a negative predictive value of 53 subjects at 66.7% (95% CI: 33.7-88.7%). A positive test had an infinite likelihood ratio, whereas a negative test had a likelihood ratio of 0.03 (95% CI: 0.01-0.10). The average duration for confirmation by USG was 10.10 seconds.  Conclusion: The study's outcomes highlight the importance of incorporating USG into the clinical toolkit of ED physicians, ultimately contributing to enhanced patient safety and the optimization of endotracheal intubation procedures in the ED.

Improvement in intubation success during COVID-19 pandemic with a simple and low-cost intervention: A quasi-experimental study

OBJECTIVES

primary objective: to improve the FPS rates after an educational intervention.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVE

to describe variables related to FPS in an ED and determine which ones were related to the highest number of attempts.

DESIGN

it was a prospective quasi-experimental study.

SETTING

done in an ED in a public Hospital in Argentina.

PATIENTS

there were patients of all ages with intubation in ED.

INTERVENTIONS

in the middle of the study, an educational intervention was done to improve FPS. Cognitive aids and pre- intubation Checklists were implemented.

MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST

the operator experience, the number of intubation attempts, intubation judgment, predictors of a difficult airway, Cormack score, assist devices, complications, blood pressure, heart rate, and pulse oximetry before and after intubation All the intubations were done by direct laryngoscopy (DL).

RESULTS

data from 266 patients were included of which 123 belonged to the basal period and 143 belonged to the post-intervention period. FPS percentage of the pre-intervention group was 69.9% (IC95%: 60.89-77.68) whereas the post-intervention group was 85.3% (IC95%: 78.20-90.48). The difference between these groups was statistically significant (p=0.002). Factors related to the highest number of attempts were low operator experience, Cormack-Lehane 3 score and no training.

CONCLUSIONS

a low-cost and simple educational intervention in airway management was significantly associated with improvement in FPS, reaching the same rate of FPS than in high income countries.

Non-theatre emergency airway management: a multicentre prospective observational study

Emergency airway management events are common, unpredictable and associated with high complication rates. This multicentre prospective observational study across eight acute NHS hospitals in southeast England reports the incidence and nature of non-theatre emergency airway management events. Data were collected from non-theatre emergency airway management, including adverse events, over a continuous 28-day window, and recorded on an electronic case report form. Events were classified according to type (advanced airway; simple airway; and cardiac arrest). A total of 166 events were recorded, with 111 advanced airway events involving tracheal intubation or tracheostomy management. Senior personnel with three or more years of airway management experience were present for 105/111 (95%) advanced airway management episodes. There was a significant reduction in consultant or equivalent presence out-of-hours (21/64, 33%) vs. in-hours (34/47, 72%) (p < 0.001). We found high utilisation of videolaryngoscopy (95/106, 90%) and universal use of capnography for all advanced airway management events. This was lower during cardiac arrest when videolaryngoscopy was used in 11/16 (69%) of tracheal intubations and capnography in 21/32 (66%) of all cardiac arrest episodes. Adverse outcomes during advanced airway management (excluding during cardiac arrest) occurred in 53/111 (48%) episodes, including hypoxia (desaturation to Sp O2 < 80% in 14/111, 13%) and hypotension (systolic blood pressure < 80 mmHg in 27/111, 25%). Adverse outcomes were not associated with time of day or experience level of airway practitioners. We conclude that there is a disparity between consultant presence for advanced airway interventions in- and out-of-hours; high utilisation of videolaryngoscopy and capnography, especially for advanced airway interventions; and a high incidence of hypotension and hypoxaemia, including critical values, during non-theatre airway management.

Outcomes of Invasive and Noninvasive Ventilation in a Haitian Emergency Department

Background

Limited data exist on the outcomes of patients requiring invasive ventilation or noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) in low-income countries. To our knowledge, no study has investigated this topic in Haiti.

Objectives

We describe the clinical epidemiology, treatment, and outcomes of patients requiring NIPPV or intubation in an emergency department (ED) in rural Haiti.

Methods

This is an observational study utilizing a convenience sample of adult and pediatric patients requiring NIPPV or intubation in the ED at an academic hospital in central Haiti from January 2019-February 2021. Patients were prospectively identified at the time of clinical care. Data on demographics, clinical presentation, management, and ED disposition were extracted from patient charts using a standardized form and analyzed in SAS v9.4. The primary outcome was survival to discharge.

Findings

Of 46 patients, 27 (58.7%) were female, mean age was 31 years, and 14 (30.4%) were pediatric (age <18 years). Common diagnoses were cardiogenic pulmonary edema, pneumonia/pulmonary sepsis, and severe asthma. Twenty-three (50.0%) patients were initially treated with NIPPV, with 4 requiring intubation; a total of 27 (58.7%) patients were intubated. Among those for whom intubation success was documented, first-pass success was 57.7% and overall success was 100% (one record missing data); intubation was associated with few immediate complications. Twenty-two (47.8%) patients died in the ED. Of the 24 patients who survived, 4 were discharged, 19 (intubation: 12; NIPPV: 9) were admitted to the intensive care unit or general ward, and 1 was transferred. Survival to discharge was 34.8% (intubation: 22.2%; NIPPV: 52.2%); 1 patient left against medical advice following admission.

Conclusions

Patients with acute respiratory failure in this Haitian ED were successfully treated with both NIPPV and intubation. While overall survival to discharge remains relatively low, this study supports developing capacity for advanced respiratory interventions in low-resource settings.

Defining Successful Intubation on the First Attempt Using Both Laryngoscope and Endotracheal Tube Insertions: A Secondary Analysis of Clinical Trial Data

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Successful intubation on the first attempt has historically been defined as successful placement of an endotracheal tube (ETT) using a single laryngoscope insertion. More recent studies have defined successful placement of an ETT using a single laryngoscope insertion followed by a single ETT insertion. We sought to estimate the prevalence of first-attempt success using these 2 definitions and estimate their associations with the duration of intubation and serious complications.

METHODS

We performed a secondary analysis of data from 2 multicenter randomized trials of critically ill adults being intubated in the emergency department or ICU. We calculated the percent difference in successful intubations on the first attempt, median difference in the duration of intubation, and percent difference in the development of serious complications by definition.

RESULTS

The study population included 1,863 patients. Successful intubation on the first attempt decreased by 4.9% (95% confidence interval 2.5% to 7.3%) when defined as 1 laryngoscope insertion followed by 1 ETT insertion (81.2%) compared with when defined as only 1 laryngoscope insertion (86.0%). When successful intubation with 1 laryngoscope and 1 ETT insertion was compared with 1 laryngoscope and multiple ETT insertions, the median duration of intubation decreased by 35.0 seconds (95% confidence interval 8.9 to 61.1 seconds).

CONCLUSION

Defining successful intubation on the first attempt as placement of an ETT in the trachea using 1 laryngoscope and 1 ETT insertion identifies attempts with the shortest apneic time.

Characterization of fatal blunt injuries using postmortem computed tomography

BACKGROUND

Rapid triage of blunt agonal trauma patients is necessary to maximize survival, but autopsy is uncommon, slow, and rarely informs resuscitation guidelines. Postmortem computed tomography (PMCT) can serve as an adjunct to autopsy in guiding blunt agonal trauma resuscitation.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort review of trauma decedents who died at or within 1 hour of arrival following blunt trauma and underwent noncontrasted PMCT. Primary outcome was the prevalence of mortal injury defined as potential exsanguination (e.g., cavitary injury, long bone and pelvic fractures), traumatic brain injury, and cervical spine injury. Secondary outcomes were potentially mortal injuries (e.g., pneumothorax) and misplacement airway devices. Patients were grouped by whether arrest occurred prehospital/in-hospital. Univariate analysis was used to identify differences in injury patterns including multiple-trauma injury patterns.

RESULTS

Over a 9-year period, 80 decedents were included. Average age was 48.9 ± 21.7 years, 68% male, and an average ISS of 42.3 ± 16.3. The most common mechanism was motor vehicle accidents (67.5%) followed by pedestrian struck (15%). Of all decedents, 62 (77.5%) had traumatic arrest prehospital while 18 (22.5%) arrived with pulse. Between groups there were no significant differences in demographics including ISS. The most common mortal injuries were traumatic brain injury (40%), long bone fractures (25%), moderate/large hemoperitoneum (22.5%), and cervical spine injury (25%). Secondary outcomes included moderate/large pneumothorax (18.8%) and esophageal intubation rate of 5%. There were no significant differences in mortal or potentially mortal injuries, and no differences in multiple-trauma injury patterns.

CONCLUSION

Fatal blunt injury patterns do not vary between prehospital and in-hospital arrest decedents. High rates of pneumothorax and endotracheal tube misplacement should prompt mandatory chest decompression and confirmation of tube placement in all blunt arrest patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.

Prophylactic Administration of Vasopressors Prior to Emergency Intubation in Critically Ill Patients: A Secondary Analysis of Two Multicenter Clinical Trials

Hypotension affects approximately 40% of critically ill patients undergoing emergency intubation and is associated with an increased risk of death. The objective of this study was to examine the association between prophylactic vasopressor administration and the incidence of peri-intubation hypotension and other clinical outcomes.

DESIGN

A secondary analysis of two multicenter randomized clinical trials. The clinical effect of prophylactic vasopressor administration was estimated using a one-to-one propensity-matched cohort of patients with and without prophylactic vasopressors.

SETTING

Seven emergency departments and 17 ICUs across the United States.

PATIENTS

One thousand seven hundred ninety-eight critically ill patients who underwent emergency intubation at the study sites between February 1, 2019, and May 24, 2021.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary outcome was peri-intubation hypotension defined as a systolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg occurring between induction and 2 minutes after tracheal intubation. A total of 187 patients (10%) received prophylactic vasopressors prior to intubation. Compared with patients who did not receive prophylactic vasopressors, those who did were older, had higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores, were more likely to have a diagnosis of sepsis, had lower pre-induction systolic blood pressures, and were more likely to be on continuous vasopressor infusions prior to intubation. In our propensity-matched cohort, prophylactic vasopressor administration was not associated with reduced risk of peri-intubation hypotension (41% vs 32%; p = 0.08) or change in systolic blood pressure from baseline (-12 vs -11 mm Hg; p = 0.66).

CONCLUSIONS

The administration of prophylactic vasopressors was not associated with a lower incidence of peri-intubation hypotension in our propensity-matched analysis. To address potential residual confounding, randomized clinical trials should examine the effect of prophylactic vasopressor administration on peri-intubation outcomes.

Intubation practices and outcomes for patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19: a national observational study by the Canadian COVID-19 Emergency Department Rapid Response Network (CCEDRRN)

OBJECTIVE

Intubation practices changed during the COVID-19 pandemic to protect healthcare workers from transmission of disease. Our objectives were to describe intubation characteristics and outcomes for patients tested for SARS CoV-2 infection. We compared outcomes between patients testing SARS COV-2 positive with those testing negative.

METHODS

We conducted a health records review using the Canadian COVID-19 Emergency Department Rapid Response Network (CCEDRRN) registry. We included consecutive eligible patients who presented to one of 47 EDs across Canada between March 1, 2020 and June 20, 2021, were tested for SARS-CoV-2 and intubated in the ED. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients experiencing a post-intubation adverse event during the ED stay. Secondary outcomes included first-pass success, intubation practices, and hospital mortality. We used descriptive statistics to summarize variables with subgroup differences examined using t tests, z tests, or chi-squared tests where appropriate with 95% CIs.

RESULTS

Of 1720 patients with suspected COVID-19 who were intubated in the ED during the study period, 337 (19.6%) tested SARS-CoV-2 positive and 1383 (80.4%) SARS-CoV-2 negative. SARS-CoV-2 positive patients presented to hospital with lower oxygen levels than SARS-CoV-2 negative patients (mean pulse oximeter SaO2 86 vs 94%, p < 0.001). In total, 8.5% of patients experienced an adverse event post-intubation. More patients in the SARS-CoV-2 positive subgroup experienced post-intubation hypoxemia (4.5 vs 2.2%, p = 0.019). In-hospital mortality was greater for patients who experienced intubation-related adverse events (43.2 vs 33.2%, p = 0.018). There was no significant difference in adverse event-associated mortality by SARS-CoV-2 status. First-pass success was achieved in 92.4% of all intubations, with no difference by SARS-CoV-2 status.

CONCLUSIONS

During the COVID-19 pandemic, we observed a low risk of adverse events associated with intubation, even though hypoxemia was common in patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2. We observed high rates of first-pass success and low rates of inability to intubate. The limited number of adverse events precluded multivariate adjustments. Study findings should reassure emergency medicine practitioners that system modifications made to intubation processes in response to the COVID-19 pandemic do not appear to be associated with worse outcomes compared to pre-COVID-19 practices.

A Prospective Observational Study of Endotracheal Intubation Practices in an Academic Emergency Department of a Tertiary Care Hospital in South India

INTRODUCTION

Airway management is the first critical step to be addressed in the airway, breathing, and circulation algorithm for stabilizing critically ill patients. Since the emergency department (ED) is the primary contact of these patients in health care, doctors in the ED should be trained to perform advanced airway management. In India, emergency medicine has been recognized as a new specialty by the Medical Council of India (now the National Medical Commission) since 2009. Data related to airway management in the ED in India is sparse.

METHODS

We conducted a one-year prospective observational study to establish descriptive data regarding endotracheal intubations performed in our ED. Descriptive data related to intubation was collected using a standardized proforma that was filled by the physician performing intubation.

RESULTS

A total of 780 patients were included, of which 58.8% were intubated in the first attempt. The majority (60.4%) of the intubations were performed in non-trauma patients and the remaining 39.6% in trauma patients. Oxygenation failure was the most common indication (40%) for intubation followed by a low Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score (35%). Rapid sequence intubation (RSI) was performed in 36.9% of patients, and intubation was done with sedation only in 36.9% of patients. Midazolam was the most commonly used drug - either alone or in combination with other drugs. We found a strong association of first-pass success (FPS) with the method of intubation, Cormack-Lehane grading, predicted difficulty in intubation, and experience of the physician performing the first attempt of intubation (P<0.05). Hypoxemia (34.6%) and airway trauma (15.6%) were the most commonly encountered complications.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed an FPS of 58.8%. Complications were seen in 49% of intubations. Our study highlights the areas for quality improvement in intubation practices in our ED, like the use of videolaryngoscopy, RSI, airway adjuncts like stylet and bougie, and intubation by more experienced physicians in patients with anticipated difficult intubation.

Airway registries in primarily adult, emergent endotracheal intubation: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Emergency Department (ED) airway registries are formalized methods to collect and document airway practices and outcomes. Airway registries have become increasingly common in EDs globally; yet there is no consensus of airway registry methodology or intended utility. This review builds on previous literature and aims to provide a thorough description of international ED airway registries and discuss how airway registry data is utilized.

METHODS

A search of Medline, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Libraries, Web of Science, and Google Scholar was performed with no date limitations applied. English language full-text publications and grey literature from centres implementing an ongoing airway registry to monitor intubations performed in mainly adult patients in an ED setting were included. Non-English publications and publications describing airway registries to monitor intubation practices in predominantly paediatric patients or settings outside of the ED were excluded. Study screening for eligibility was performed by two team members individually, with any disagreements resolved by a third team member. Data was charted using a standardized data charting tool created for this review.

RESULTS

Our review identified 124 eligible studies from 22 airway registries with a global distribution. We found that airway registry data is used for quality assurance, quality improvement, and clinical research regarding intubation practices and contextual factors. This review also demonstrates that there is a great deal of heterogeneity in definitions of first-pass success and adverse events in the peri-intubation period.

CONCLUSIONS

Airway registries are used as a crucial tool to monitor and improve intubation performance and patient care. ED airway registries inform and document the efficacy of quality improvement initiatives to improve intubation performance in EDs globally. Standardized definitions of first-pass success and peri-intubation adverse events, such as hypotension and hypoxia, may allow for airway management performance to be compared on a more equivalent basis and allow for the development of more reliable international benchmarks for first-pass success and rates of adverse events in the future.

A prospective observational study comparing outcomes before and after the introduction of an intubation protocol during the COVID-19 pandemic

OBJECTIVE

Orotracheal intubation is a life-saving procedure commonly performed in the Intensive Care unit and Emergency Department as a part of emergency airway management. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, our center undertook a prospective observational study to characterize emergency intubation performed in the emergency department and critical care settings at Manitoba's largest tertiary hospital. During this study, a natural experiment emerged when a standardized "COVID-Protected Rapid Sequence Intubation Protocol" was implemented in response to the pandemic. The resultant study aimed to answer the question; in adult ED patients undergoing emergent intubation by EM and CCM teams, does the use of a "COVID-Protected Rapid Sequence Intubation Protocol" impact first-pass success or other intubation-related outcomes?

METHODS

A single-center prospective quasi-experimental before and after study was conducted. Data were prospectively collected on consecutive emergent intubations. The primary outcome was the difference in first-pass success rates. Secondary outcomes included best Modified Cormack-Lehane view, hypoxemia, hypotension, esophageal intubation, cannot intubate cannot oxygenate scenarios, CPR post intubation, vasopressors required post intubation, Intensive Care Unit (ICU) mortality, ICU length of stay (LOS), and mechanical ventilation days.

RESULTS

Data were collected on 630 patients, 416 in the pre-protocol period and 214 in the post-protocol period. First-pass success rates in the pre-protocol period were found to be 73.1% (n = 304). Following the introduction of the protocol, first-pass success rates increased to 82.2% (n = 176, p = 0.0105). There was a statistically significant difference in Modified Cormack-Lehane view favoring the protocol (p = 0.0191). Esophageal intubation rates were found to be 5.1% pre-protocol introduction versus 0.5% following the introduction of the protocol (p = 0.0172).

CONCLUSION

A "COVID-Protected Protocol" implemented by Emergency Medicine and Critical Care teams in response to the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with increased first-pass success rates and decreases in adverse events.

Shoulder Abduction While Using the Bougie: A Common Mistake

CASE PRESENTATION

A 72-year-old female presented to the emergency department (ED) with exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and congestive heart failure. The patient required intubation for airway protection and hypercapnic respiratory failure. The ED team used a video laryngoscope, Macintosh 3 blade and bougie as the endotracheal tube delivery device. Despite a grade 2a Cormack-Lehane airway view, the bougie repeatedly missed left posterolateral to the airway. During these missed attempts, the emergency medicine (EM) resident's shoulder was noted to be abducted. The EM resident then readjusted his technique by adducting the shoulder. which allowed the tip of the bougie to pass the vocal cords resulting in successful intubation.

DISCUSSION

The bougie is a useful endotracheal tube delivery device when used properly. Optimal body mechanics and device orientation are critical to successful use. Shoulder abduction while using the bougie is a frequent mistake, which can lead to left posterolateral malposition in relation to the glottis/airway. In this brief review our goal is to aid the intubating clinician in optimal use of the bougie, yielding more successful endotracheal tube passage.

Defining the learning curve for endotracheal intubation in the emergency department

To determine the minimum number of endotracheal intubation (ETI) attempts necessary for a novice emergency medicine (EM) trainee to become proficient with this procedure. This single-center study retrospectively analyzed data obtained from the institutional airway registry during the period from April 2014 to March 2021. All ETI attempts made by EM trainees starting their residency programs between 2014 and 2018 were evaluated. We used a first attempt success (FAS) rate of 85% as a proxy for ETI proficiency. Generalized linear mixed models were used to evaluate the association between FAS and cumulative ETI experience. The number of ETI attempts required to achieve an FAS rate of ≥ 85% was estimated using the regression coefficients obtained from the model. The study period yielded 2077 ETI cases from a total of 1979 patients. The FAS rate was 78.6% (n = 1632/2077). After adjusting for confounding factors, the cumulative number of ETI cases was associated with increased FAS (adjusted odds ratio, 1.010 per additional ETI case; 95% confidence interval 1.006-1.013; p < 0.001). A minimum of 119 ETI cases were required to establish a ≥ 85% likelihood of FAS. At least 119 ETI cases were required for EM trainees to achieve an FAS rate of ≥ 85% in the emergency department.

Post-mortem computed tomography assessment of medical support device position following fatal trauma: a single-center experience

PURPOSE

To evaluate the percentage of misplaced medical support lines and tubes in deceased trauma patients using post-mortem computed tomography (PMCT).

METHODS

Over a 9-year period, trauma patients who died at or soon after arrival in the emergency department were candidates for inclusion. Whole body CT was performed without contrast with support medical devices left in place. Injury severity score (ISS) was calculated by the trauma registrar based on the injuries identified on PMCT. The location of support medical devices was documented in the finalized radiology reports.

RESULTS

A total of 87 decedents underwent PMCT, of which 69% (n = 60) were male. For ten decedents, the age was unknown. For the remaining 77 decedents, the average age was 48.4 years (range 18-96). The average ISS for the cohort was 43.4. Each decedent had an average of 3.3 support devices (2.9-3.6, 95% CI), of which an average of 1 (31.3%, 0.8-1.2, 95% CI) was malpositioned. A total of 60 (69.0%) had at least one malpositioned medical support device. The most commonly malpositioned devices were decompressive needle thoracostomies (n = 25/32, 78.1%). The least malpositioned devices were intraosseous catheters (n = 7/69, 10.1%). Nearly one quarter (n = 19/82, 23.2%) of mechanical airways were malpositioned, including 4.9% with esophageal intubation.

CONCLUSION

Malpositioned supportive medical devices are commonly identified on post-mortem computed tomography trauma decedents, seen in 69.0% of the cohort, including nearly one quarter with malpositioned mechanical airways. Post-mortem CT can serve as a useful adjunct in the quality improvement process by providing data for education of trauma and emergency physicians and first responders.

Updated guideline on equipment to manage difficult airways: Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists

The Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists (ANZCA) recently reviewed and updated the guideline on equipment to manage a difficult airway. An ANZCA-established document development group, which included representatives from the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine and the College of Intensive Care Medicine of Australia and New Zealand, performed the review, which is based on expert consensus, an extensive literature review, and bi-nationwide consultation. The guideline (PG56(A) 2021, https://www.anzca.edu.au/getattachment/02fe1a4c-14f0-4ad1-8337-c281d26bfa17/PS56-Guideline-on-equipment-to-manage-difficult-airways) is accompanied by a detailed background paper (PG56(A)BP 2021, https://www.anzca.edu.au/getattachment/9ef4cd97-2f02-47fe-a63a-9f74fa7c68ac/PG56(A)BP-Guideline-on-equipment-to-manage-difficult-airways-Background-Paper), from which the current recommendations are reproduced on behalf of, and with the permission of, ANZCA. The updated 2021 guideline replaces the 2012 version and aims to provide an updated, objective, informed, transparent, and evidence-based review of equipment to manage difficult airways.

Advanced airway management and drug-assisted intubation skills in an advanced critical care practitioner team

INTRODUCTION

Airway management, including endotracheal intubation, is one of the cornerstones of care of critically ill patients. Internationally, health professionals from varying backgrounds deliver endotracheal intubation as part of their critical care role. This article considers the development of airway management skills within a single advanced critical care practitioner (ACCP) team and uses case series data to analyse the safety profile in performing this aspect of critical care. Skills were acquired during and after the ACCP training pathway. A combination of theoretical teaching, theatre experience, simulation and work-based practice was used. Case series data of all critical care intubations by ACCPs were collected. Audit results: Data collection identified 675 intubations carried out by ACCPs, 589 of those being supervised, non-cardiac arrest intubations requiring drugs. First pass success was achieved in 89.6% of cases. A second intubator was required in 4.3% of cases. Some form of complication was experienced by 42.3% of patients; however, the threshold for complications was set at a low level.

CONCLUSIONS

This ACCP service developed a process to acquire advanced airway management skills including endotracheal intubation. Under medical supervision, ACCPs delivered advanced airway management achieving a first pass success rate of 89.6%, which compares favourably with both international and national success rates. Although complications were experienced in 48.3% of patients, when similar complication cut-offs are compared with published data, ACCPs also matched favourably.

National Emergency Resuscitation Airway Audit (NERAA): a pilot multicentre analysis of emergency intubations in Irish emergency departments

BACKGROUND

There is paucity of literature on why and how patients are intubated, and by whom, in Irish Emergency Departments (EDs). The aim of this pilot study was to characterise emergency airway management (EAM) of critically unwell patients presenting to Irish EDs.

METHODS

A multisite prospective pilot study was undertaken from February 10 to May 10, 2020. This project was facilitated through the Irish Trainee Emergency Research Network (ITERN). All patients over 16 years of age requiring EAM were included. Eleven EDs participated in the project. Data recorded included patients' demographics, indication for intubation, technique of airway management, medications used to facilitate intubation, level of training and specialty of the intubating clinician, number of attempts, success/complications rates and variation across centres.

RESULTS

Over a 3-month period, 118 patients underwent 131 intubation attempts across 11 EDs. The median age was 57 years (IQR: 40-70). Medical indications were reported in 83% of patients compared to 17% for trauma. Of the 118 patients intubated, Emergency Medicine (EM) doctors performed 54% of initial intubations, while anaesthesiology/intensive care medicine (ICM) doctors performed 46%. The majority (90%) of intubating clinicians were at registrar level. Emergency intubation check lists, video laryngoscopy and bougie were used in 55, 53 and 64% of first attempts, respectively. The first pass success rate was 89%. Intubation complications occurred in 19% of patients. EM doctors undertook a greater proportion of intubations in EDs with > 50,000 attendance (65%) compared to EDs with < 50,000 attendances (16%) (p < 0.000).

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to describe EAM in Irish EDs, and demonstrates comparable first pass success and complication rates to international studies. This study highlights the need for continuous EAM surveillance and could provide a vector for developing national standards for EAM and EAM training in Irish EDs.

Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Difficult Airway and First-Pass Success in the Emergency Department: Multicenter Prospective Observational Study

Background

There is still room for improvement in the modified LEMON (look, evaluate, Mallampati, obstruction, neck mobility) criteria for difficult airway prediction and no prediction tool for first-pass success in the emergency department (ED).

Objective

We applied modern machine learning approaches to predict difficult airways and first-pass success.

Methods

In a multicenter prospective study that enrolled consecutive patients who underwent tracheal intubation in 13 EDs, we developed 7 machine learning models (eg, random forest model) using routinely collected data (eg, demographics, initial airway assessment). The outcomes were difficult airway and first-pass success. Model performance was evaluated using c-statistics, calibration slopes, and association measures (eg, sensitivity) in the test set (randomly selected 20% of the data). Their performance was compared with the modified LEMON criteria for difficult airway success and a logistic regression model for first-pass success.

Results

Of 10,741 patients who underwent intubation, 543 patients (5.1%) had a difficult airway, and 7690 patients (71.6%) had first-pass success. In predicting a difficult airway, machine learning models—except for k-point nearest neighbor and multilayer perceptron—had higher discrimination ability than the modified LEMON criteria (all, P≤.001). For example, the ensemble method had the highest c-statistic (0.74 vs 0.62 with the modified LEMON criteria; P<.001). Machine learning models—except k-point nearest neighbor and random forest models—had higher discrimination ability for first-pass success. In particular, the ensemble model had the highest c-statistic (0.81 vs 0.76 with the reference regression; P<.001).

Conclusions

Machine learning models demonstrated greater ability for predicting difficult airway and first-pass success in the ED.

Reasons behind failed prehospital intubation attempts while combining C-MAC videolaryngoscope and Frova introducer

BACKGROUND

High first-pass success rate is achieved with the routine use of C-MAC videolaryngoscope and Frova introducer. We aim to identify potential reasons and subgroups associated with failed intubation attempts, analyse actions taken after them and study possible complications.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective observational study of adult intubated patients at a single helicopter emergency medical service unit in southern Finland between 2016 and 2018. We collected data on patient characteristics, reasons for failed attempts, complications and follow-up measures from a national helicopter emergency medical service database and from prehospital patient records.

RESULTS

1011 tracheal intubations were attempted. First attempt was successful in 994 cases (FPS 994/1011, 98.3%), 15 needed a second or third attempt and two a surgical airway (non-FPS 17/1011, 1.7%, 95% CI 1.0-2.7). The failed first attempt group had heterogenous characteristics. The most common cause for a failed first attempt was obstruction of the airway by vomit, food, mucus or blood (10/13, 76%). After the failed first attempt, there were six cases (6/14, 43%) of deviation from the protocol and the most frequent complications were five cases (5/17, 29%) of hypoxia and four cases (4/17, 24%) of hypotension.

CONCLUSIONS

When a protocol combining the C-MAC videolaryngoscope and Frova introducer is used, the most common reason for a failed first attempt is an airway blocked by gastric content, blood or mucus. These findings highlight the importance of effective airway decontamination methods and questions the appropriateness of anatomically focused pre-intubation assessment tools when such protocol is used.

Frequency, indications and success of out-of-hospital intubations in Finnish children

BACKGROUND

Earlier studies have shown variable results regarding the success of paediatric emergency endotracheal intubation between different settings and operators. We aimed to describe the paediatric population intubated by physician-staffed helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) and evaluate the factors associated with overall and first-pass success (FPS).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study in Finland including all children less than 16 years old who required endotracheal intubation by a HEMS physician from January 2014 to August 2019. Utilising a national HEMS database, we analysed the incidence, indications, overall and first-pass success rates of endotracheal intubation.

RESULTS

A total of 2731 children were encountered by HEMS, and intubation was attempted in 245 (9%); of these, 22 were younger than 1 year, 103 were aged 1-5 years and 120 were aged 6-15 years. The most common indications for airway management were cardiac arrest for the youngest age group, neurological reasons (e.g., seizures) for those aged 1-5 years and trauma for those aged 6-15. The HEMS physicians had an overall success rate of 100% (95% CI: 98-100) and an FPS rate of 86% (95% CI: 82-90). The FPS rate was lower in the youngest age group (p = .002) and for patients in cardiac arrest (p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Emergency endotracheal intubation of children is successfully performed by a physician staffed HEMS unit even though these procedures are rare. To improve the care, emphasis should be on airway management of infants and patients in cardiac arrest.

Drug-free tracheal intubation by specialist paramedics (critical care) in a United Kingdom ambulance service: a service evaluation

BACKGROUND

Drug-free tracheal intubation has been a common intervention in the context of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest for many years, however its use by paramedics has recently been the subject of much debate. Recent international guidance has recommended that only those achieving high tracheal intubation success should continue to use it.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective service evaluation of all drug-free tracheal intubation attempts by specialist paramedics (critical care) from South East Coast Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust between 1st January and 31st December 2019. Our primary outcome was first-pass success rate, and secondary outcomes were success within two attempts, overall success, Cormack-Lehane grade of view, and use of bougie.

RESULTS

There were 663 drug-free tracheal intubations and following screening, 605 were reviewed. There was a first-pass success rate of 81.5%, success within two attempts of 96.7%, and an overall success rate of 98.35%. There were ten unsuccessful attempts (1.65%). Bougie use was documented in 83.4% on the first attempt, 93.5% on the second attempt and 100% on the third attempt, CONCLUSION: Specialist paramedics (critical care) are able to deliver drug-free tracheal intubation with good first-pass success and high overall success and are therefore both safe and competent at this intervention.

Video Laryngoscopy Is Associated With First-Pass Success in Emergency Department Intubations for Trauma Patients: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of the National Emergency Airway Registry

STUDY OBJECTIVE

We sought to (1) characterize emergency department (ED) intubations in trauma patients and estimate (2) first-pass success and (3) the association between patient and intubation characteristics and first-pass success.

METHODS

We performed a secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective observational cohort of ED intubations from the National Emergency Airway Registry (NEAR). Descriptive statistics were calculated for all patients who were intubated for trauma at 23 NEAR EDs between 2016 and 2018. We evaluated first-pass success in patients intubated by (1) emergency or pediatric emergency physicians, (2) using rapid sequence intubation or no medications, and (3) either direct laryngoscopy or video laryngoscopy. We used propensity score matching with a generalized linear mixed-effects model to estimate the associations between patient and intubation characteristics and first-pass success.

RESULTS

Of the 19,071 intubations in NEAR, 4,449 (23%) were for trauma, and nearly all (88%) had at least one difficult airway characteristic. Prevalence of first-pass success was 86.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 83.3% to 90.3%). Most patients were intubated with video laryngoscopy, and patients were more likely to be intubated on first-pass with video laryngoscopy as compared to direct laryngoscopy (90% versus 79%). After propensity score matching, video laryngoscopy remained associated with first-pass success (adjusted risk difference 11%, 95% CI: 8% to 14%; and OR 2.2, 95% CI: 1.6 to 2.9). Additionally, an initial impression of difficult airway, blood/vomit in the airway, and use of external laryngeal manipulation were all associated with decreased odds of first-pass success.

CONCLUSION

Emergency physicians are successful at intubating patients in the setting of trauma, and video laryngoscopy is associated with twice the odds of first-pass success when compared to direct laryngoscopy.

Risk factors of laryngeal injuries in extubated critical pediatric patients

Background

The larynx in children is unique compared to adults. This makes the larynx more prone to trauma during intubation. Under sedation and frequent repositioning of the tube are recorded as risk factors for laryngeal injury. We examined the larynx of 40 critically ill children in the first 24 h after extubation to estimate the frequency and analyze the risk factors for laryngeal trauma using the classification system for acute laryngeal injury (CALI).

Results

The post-extubation stridor patients had a higher frequency of diagnosis of inborn errors of metabolism, longer duration of ventilation, longer hospital stay, moderate to severe involvement of glottic and subglottic area, frequent intubation attempts, and more than 60 s to intubate Regression analysis of the risk factors of severity of the injury has shown that development of ventilator-associated pneumonia carried the highest risk (OR 32.111 95% CI 5.660 to 182.176), followed by time elapsed till intubation in seconds (OR 11.836, 95% CI 2.889 to 48.490), number of intubation attempts (OR 10.8, CI 2.433 to 47.847), and development of pneumothorax (OR 10.231, 95% CI 1.12 to 93.3).

Conclusion

The incidence of intubation-related laryngeal trauma in pediatric ICU is high and varies widely from mild, non-symptomatic to moderate, and severe and could be predicted by any of the following: prolonged days of ventilation, pneumothorax, multiple tube changes, or difficult intubation.

Predictors of first pass success without hypoxemia in trauma patients requiring emergent rapid sequence intubation

Objective

The predictors of first pass success (FPS) without hypoxemia among trauma patients requiring rapid sequence intubation (RSI) in the emergent setting are unknown.

Methods

Retrospective study of adult trauma patients requiring RSI during a 5-year period comparing the trauma patients achieving FPS without hypoxemia to those who did not. The primary outcome was FPS without hypoxemia evaluated by multivariate logistic regression adjusting for the neuromuscular blocking agent used (succinylcholine or rocuronium), hypoxemia prior to RSI, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores, the presence of head or facial trauma, and intubating operator level of training.

Results

246 patients met our inclusion criteria. The overall FPS rate was 89%, and there was no statistical difference between those receiving either paralytic agent. 167 (69%) patients achieved FPS without hypoxemia. The two groups (those achieving FPS without hypoxemia and those who did not) had similar mean GCS, mean Injury Severity Scores, presence of head or facial trauma, the presence of penetrating trauma, intubating operator-level training, use of direct laryngoscopy, hypoxemia prior to RSI, heart rate per minute, mean systolic blood pressure, and respiratory rate. In the multivariate regression analysis, the use of succinylcholine and GCS score of 13–15 were found to have adjusted ORs of 2.1 (95% CI 1.2 to 3.8) and 2.0 (95% CI 1.0 to 3.3) for FPS without hypoxemia, respectively.

Conclusion

Trauma patients requiring emergency department RSI with high GCS score and those who received succinylcholine had higher odds of achieving FPS without hypoxemia, a patient safety goal requiring more study.

Level of evidence

IV.

Study type

Prognostic.

Emergency Airway Management Outside the Operating Room: Current Evidence and Management Strategies

Emergency airway management outside the operating room (OR) is often associated with an increased risk of airway related, as well as cardiopulmonary, complications which can impact morbidity and mortality. These emergent airways may take place in the intensive care unit (ICU), where patients are critically ill with minimal physiological reserve, or other areas of the hospital where advanced equipment and personnel are often unavailable. As such, emergency airway management outside the OR requires expertise at manipulation of not only the anatomically difficult airway but also the physiologically and situationally difficult airway. Adequate preparation and appropriate use of airway management techniques are important to prevent complications. Judicious utilization of pre- and apneic oxygenation is important as is the choice of medications to facilitate intubation in this at-risk population. Recent study in critically ill patients has shown that postintubation hemodynamic and respiratory compromise is common, independently associated with poor outcomes and can be impacted by the choice of drugs and techniques used. In addition to adequately preparing for a physiologically difficult airway, enhancing the ability to predict an anatomically difficult airway is essential in reducing complication rates. The use of artificial intelligence in the identification of difficult airways has shown promising results and could be of significant advantage in uncooperative patients as well as those with a questionable airway examination. Incorporating this technology and understanding the physiological, anatomical, and logistical challenges may help providers better prepare for managing such precarious airways and lead to successful outcomes. This review discusses the various challenges associated with airway management outside the OR, provides guidance on appropriate preparation, airway management skills, medication use, and highlights the role of a coordinated multidisciplinary approach to out-of-OR airway management.

Case series and review of emergency front-of-neck surgical airways from The Australian and New Zealand Emergency Department Airway Registry

BACKGROUND

An emergency front-of-neck access (eFONA), also called can't intubate, can't oxygenate (CICO) rescue, is a rare event. Little is known about the performance of surgical or percutaneous airways in EDs across Australia and New Zealand.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the management of cases resulting in an eFONA, and recorded in The Australian and New Zealand Emergency Department Airway Registry (ANZEDAR).

METHODS

A retrospective case series and review of ED patients undergoing surgical or percutaneous airways. Data were collected prospectively over 60 months between 2010 and 2015 from 44 participating EDs.

RESULTS

An eFONA/CICO rescue airway was performed on 15 adult patients: 14 cricothyroidotomies (0.3% of registry intubations) and one tracheostomy. The indication for intubation was 60% trauma and 40% medical aetiologies. The intubator specialty was emergency medicine in eight (53.3%) episodes. Thirteen (86.7%) cricothyroidotomies and the sole tracheostomy (6.7%) were performed at major referral hospitals with 12 (80%) surgical airways out of hours. In four (26.7%) cases, cricothyroidotomy was performed as the primary intubation method. Pre-oxygenation techniques were used in 14 (93.3%) episodes; apnoeic oxygenation in four (26.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Most cases demonstrated deviations from standard difficult airway practice, which may have increased the likelihood of performance of a surgical airway, and its increased likelihood out of hours. Our findings may inform training strategies to improve care for ED patients requiring this critical intervention. We recommend further discussion of proposed standard terminology for emergency surgical or percutaneous airways, to facilitate clear crisis communication.

BOugie or stylet in patients UnderGoing Intubation Emergently (BOUGIE): protocol and statistical analysis plan for a randomised clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

Intubation-related complications are less frequent when intubation is successful on the first attempt. The rate of first attempt success in the emergency department (ED) and intensive care unit (ICU) is typically less than 90%. The bougie, a semirigid introducer that can be placed into the trachea to facilitate a Seldinger-like technique of tracheal intubation and is typically reserved for difficult or failed intubations, might improve first attempt success. Evidence supporting its use, however, is from a single academic ED with frequent bougie use. Validation of these findings is needed before widespread implementation.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The BOugie or stylet in patients Undergoing Intubation Emergently trial is a prospective, multicentre, non-blinded randomised trial being conducted in six EDs and six ICUs in the USA. The trial plans to enrol 1106 critically ill adults undergoing orotracheal intubation. Eligible patients are randomised 1:1 for the use of a bougie or use of an endotracheal tube with stylet for the first intubation attempt. The primary outcome is successful intubation on the first attempt. The secondary outcome is severe hypoxaemia, defined as an oxygen saturation less than 80% between induction until 2 min after completion of intubation. Enrolment began on 29 April 2019 and is expected to be completed in 2021.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The trial protocol was approved with waiver of informed consent by the Central Institutional Review Board at Vanderbilt University Medical Center or the local institutional review board at an enrolling site. The results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at scientific conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT03928925).

Emergency Tracheal Intubation in Patients with COVID-19: A Single-center, Retrospective Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study was to compare airway management technique, performance, and peri-intubation complications during the novel coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) using a single-center cohort of patients requiring emergent intubation.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data on non-operating room (OR) intubations from February 1-April 23, 2020. All patients undergoing emergency intubation outside the OR were eligible for inclusion. Data were entered using an airway procedure note integrated within the electronic health record. Variables included level of training and specialty of the laryngoscopist, the patient's indication for intubation, methods of intubation, induction and paralytic agents, grade of view, use of video laryngoscopy, number of attempts, and adverse events. We performed a descriptive analysis comparing intubations with an available positive COVID-19 test result with cases that had either a negative or unavailable test result.

RESULTS

We obtained 406 independent procedure notes filed between February 1-April 23, 2020, and of these, 123 cases had a positive COVID-19 test result. Residents performed fewer tracheal intubations in COVID-19 cases when compared to nurse anesthetists (26.0% vs 37.4%). Video laryngoscopy was used significantly more in COVID-19 cases (91.1% vs 56.8%). No difference in first-pass success was observed between COVID-19 positive cases and controls (89.4% vs. 89.0%, p = 1.0). An increased rate of oxygen desaturation was observed in COVID-19 cases (20.3% vs. 9.9%) while there was no difference in the rate of other recorded complications and first-pass success.

DISCUSSION

An average twofold increase in the rate of tracheal intubation was observed after March 24, 2020, corresponding with an influx of COVID-19 positive cases. We observed adherence to society guidelines regarding performance of tracheal intubation by an expert laryngoscopist and the use of video laryngoscopy.

Difficult airway predictors were associated with decreased use of neuromuscular blocking agents in emergency airway management: a retrospective cohort study in Thailand

Background

It is recommended that difficult airway predictors be evaluated before emergency airway management. However, little is known about how patients with difficult airway predictors are managed in emergency departments. We aimed to explore the incidence, management and outcomes of patients with difficult airway predictors in an emergency department.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study using intubation data collected by a prospective registry in an academic emergency department from November 2017 to October 2018. Records with complete assessment of difficult airway predictors were included. Two categories of predictors were analyzed: predicted difficult intubation by direct laryngoscopy and predicted difficult bag-mask ventilation. The former was evaluated based on difficult external appearance, mouth opening and thyromental distance, Mallampati score, obstruction, and limited neck mobility as in the mnemonic “LEMON”. The latter was evaluated based on difficult mask sealing, obstruction or obesity, absence of teeth, advanced age and reduced pulmonary compliance as in the mnemonic “MOANS”. The incidence, management and outcomes of patients with these difficult airway predictors were explored.

Results

During the study period, 220 records met the inclusion criteria. At least 1 difficult airway predictor was present in 183 (83.2%) patients; 57 (25.9%) patients had at least one LEMON feature, and 178 (80.9%) had at least one MOANS feature. Among patients with at least one difficult airway predictor, both sedation and neuromuscular blocking agents were used in 105 (57.4%) encounters, only sedation was used in 65 (35.5%) encounters, and no medication was administered in 13 (7.1%) encounters. First-pass success was accomplished in 136 (74.3%) of the patients. Compared with patients without predictors, patients with positive LEMON criteria were less likely to receive neuromuscular blocking agents (OR 0.46 (95% CI 0.24–0.87), p = 0.02) after adjusting for operator experience and device used. There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding glottic view, first-pass success, or complications. The LEMON criteria poorly predicted unsuccessful first pass and glottic view.

Conclusions

In emergency airway management, difficult airway predictors were associated with decreased use of neuromuscular blocking agents but were not associated with glottic view, first-pass success, or complications.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12873-021-00434-2.

Virtual reality mobile application to improve videoscopic airway training: A randomised trial

Introduction: Flexible bronchoscopic intubation (FBI) is an important technique in managing an anticipated difficult airway, yet it is rarely performed and has a steep learning curve. We aim to evaluate if the integration of virtual reality gaming application into routine FBI training for emergency department doctors would be more effective than traditional teaching methods. Methods: We conducted a randomised controlled trial to compare self-directed learning using the mobile application, Airway Ex* in the intervention group versus the control group without use of the mobile application. All participants underwent conventional didactic teaching and low-fidelity simulation with trainer’s demonstration and hands-on practice on a manikin for FBI. Participants randomised to the intervention arm received an additional 30 minutes of self-directed learning using Airway Ex, preloaded on electronic devices while the control arm did not. The primary outcome was time taken to successful intubation. Results: Forty-five physicians (20 junior and 25 senior physicians) were enrolled, with male predominance (57.8%, 26/45). There was no difference in time taken to successful intubation (median 48 seconds [interquartile range, IQR 41–69] versus 44 seconds [IQR 37–60], P=0.23) between the control and intervention groups, respectively. However, the intervention group received better ratings (median 4 [IQR 4–5]) for the quality of scope manipulation skills compared to control (median 4 [IQR 3–4], adjusted P=0.03). This difference remains significant among junior physicians in stratified analysis. Conclusion: Incorporating virtual reality with traditional teaching methods allows learners to be trained on FBI safely without compromising patient care. Junior physicians appear to benefit more compared to senior physicians. Keywords: Airway management, emergency medicine, intubation, simulation education, virtual reality

Safety of rapid sequence intubation in an emergency training network

OBJECTIVE

Rapid sequence intubation (RSI) is a core critical care skill. Emergency medicine trainees are exposed to relatively low numbers of RSIs. We aimed to improve patient outcomes by implementing an RSI checklist, electronic learning and audit, in line with current best evidence.

METHODS

Prospective observational study of RSIs performed in the EDs of two Queensland hospitals between January 2014 and December 2016. Data collected included: first-pass success (FPS), predicted difficulty, indication for intubation, drugs used, positioning, number of attempts, checklist use and complications. Descriptive statistics and multivariable modelling were used to describe differences in FPS, and complications.

RESULTS

Six hundred and fifty-five patients underwent RSI with FPS of 86.6%. Complications were reported in 15.9%, mainly hypotension (10.9%) and desaturation (4.0%). FPS improved with bougie use (88.9% vs 73.0% without bougie, P < 0.001) and video-laryngoscopy (88.2% vs 72.9% using standard laryngoscopy, P < 0.001). New desaturation was reduced with apnoeic oxygenation (2.0% vs 22.2%, P < 0.001), bougie use (2.8% vs 8.9%, P < 0.001), checklist use (2.3% vs 22.7%, P < 0.001) and achieving FPS (2.1% vs 16.3%, P < 0.001). Complications were reduced with checklist use (13.3% vs 43.2%, P < 0.001) and apnoeic oxygenation use (3.9% vs 31.1%, P < 0.001). Logistic regression found checklist use was associated with reduced desaturation (OR 0.1, 95% CI 0.04-0.27) and the composite variable of any complication (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.17-0.89).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of an evidence-based care bundle and audit of practice has created a safe environment for trainees to learn the core critical care skill of RSI. In our setting, checklist use was associated with fewer complications.

Current airway management practices after a failed intubation attempt in Australian and New Zealand emergency departments

OBJECTIVE

The aims of the present study were to describe current airway management practices after a failed intubation attempt in Australian and New Zealand EDs and to explore factors associated with second attempt success.

METHODS

Data were collected from a multicentre airway registry (The Australian and New Zealand Emergency Department Airway Registry). All intubation episodes that required a second attempt between March 2010 and November 2015 were analysed. Analysis for association with success at the second attempt was undertaken for patient factors including predicted difficulty of laryngoscopy, as well as for changes in laryngoscope type, adjunct devices, intubator and intubating manoeuvres.

RESULTS

Of the 762 patients with a failed first intubation attempt, 603 (79.1%) were intubated successfully at the second attempt. The majority of second attempts were undertaken by emergency consultants (36.8%) and emergency registrars (34.2%). A change in intubator occurred in 56.5% of intubation episodes and was associated with higher second attempt success (unadjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.85; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29-2.65). In 69.7% of second attempts at intubation, there was no change in laryngoscope type. Changes in laryngoscope type, adjunct devices and intubation manoeuvres were not significantly associated with success at the second attempt. In adjusted analyses, second attempt success was higher for a change from a non-consultant intubator to a consultant intubator from any specialty (adjusted OR 2.31; 95% CI 1.35-3.95) and where laryngoscopy was not predicted to be difficult (adjusted OR 2.58; 95% CI 1.58-4.21).

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of second intubation attempts were undertaken by emergency consultants and registrars. A change from a non-consultant intubator to a consultant intubator of any specialty for the second attempt and intubation episodes where laryngoscopy was predicted to be non-difficult were associated with a higher success rate at intubation. Participation in routine collection and monitoring of airway management practices via a Registry may enable the introduction of appropriate improvements in airway procedures and reduce complication rates.

Canadian Airway Focus Group updated consensus-based recommendations for management of the difficult airway: part 1. Difficult airway management encountered in an unconscious patient

PURPOSE

Since the last Canadian Airway Focus Group (CAFG) guidelines were published in 2013, the literature on airway management has expanded substantially. The CAFG therefore re-convened to examine this literature and update practice recommendations. This first of two articles addresses difficulty encountered with airway management in an unconscious patient.

SOURCE

Canadian Airway Focus Group members, including anesthesia, emergency medicine, and critical care physicians, were assigned topics to search. Searches were run in the Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and CINAHL databases. Results were presented to the group and discussed during video conferences every two weeks from April 2018 to July 2020. These CAFG recommendations are based on the best available published evidence. Where high-quality evidence was lacking, statements are based on group consensus.

FINDINGS AND KEY RECOMMENDATIONS

Most studies comparing video laryngoscopy (VL) with direct laryngoscopy indicate a higher first attempt and overall success rate with VL, and lower complication rates. Thus, resources allowing, the CAFG now recommends use of VL with appropriately selected blade type to facilitate all tracheal intubations. If a first attempt at tracheal intubation or supraglottic airway (SGA) placement is unsuccessful, further attempts can be made as long as patient ventilation and oxygenation is maintained. Nevertheless, total attempts should be limited (to three or fewer) before declaring failure and pausing to consider "exit strategy" options. For failed intubation, exit strategy options in the still-oxygenated patient include awakening (if feasible), temporizing with an SGA, a single further attempt at tracheal intubation using a different technique, or front-of-neck airway access (FONA). Failure of tracheal intubation, face-mask ventilation, and SGA ventilation together with current or imminent hypoxemia defines a "cannot ventilate, cannot oxygenate" emergency. Neuromuscular blockade should be confirmed or established, and a single final attempt at face-mask ventilation, SGA placement, or tracheal intubation with hyper-angulated blade VL can be made, if it had not already been attempted. If ventilation remains impossible, emergency FONA should occur without delay using a scalpel-bougie-tube technique (in the adult patient). The CAFG recommends all institutions designate an individual as "airway lead" to help institute difficult airway protocols, ensure adequate training and equipment, and help with airway-related quality reviews.

Adverse Events and Unsuccessful Intubation Attempts Are Frequent During Neonatal Nasotracheal Intubations

Background: Intubation of neonates is difficult and hazardous. Factors associated with procedure-related adverse events and unsuccessful intubation attempts are insufficiently evaluated, especially during neonatal nasotracheal intubations. Objective: Aim of this study was to determine the frequency of tracheal intubation-associated events (TIAEs) during neonatal nasotracheal intubations and to identify factors associated with TIAEs and unsuccessful intubation attempts in our neonatal unit. Methods: This was a prospective, single-site, observational study from May 2017 to November 2019, performed at a tertiary care neonatal intensive care unit in a German academic teaching hospital. All endotracheal intubation encounters performed by the neonatal team were recorded. Results: Two hundred and fifty-eight consecutive intubation encounters in 197 patients were analyzed. One hundred and forty-eight (57.4%) intubation encounters were associated with at least one TIAE. Intubation inexperience (<10 intubation encounters) (OR = 2.15; 95% CI, 1.257-3.685) and equipment problems (OR = 3.43; 95% CI, 1.12-10.52) were predictive of TIAEs. Intubation at first attempt (OR = 0.10; 95% CI, 0.06-0.19) and videolaryngoscopy (OR = 0.47; 96% CI, 0.25-0.860) were predictive of intubation encounters without TIAEs. The first intubation attempt was commonly done by pediatric residents (67.8%). A median of two attempts were performed until successful intubation. Restricted laryngoscopic view (OR = 3.07; 95% CI, 2.08-4.53; Cormack-Lehane grade 2 vs. grade 1), intubation by pediatric residents when compared to neonatologists (OR = 1.74; 95% CI, 1.265-2.41) and support by less experienced neonatal nurses (OR = 1.60; 95% CI, 1.04-2.46) were associated with unsuccessful intubation attempts. Conclusions: In our unit, TIAEs and unsuccessful intubation attempts occurred frequently during neonatal nasotracheal intubations. To improve success rates, quality improvement und further research should target interprofessional education and training, equipment problems and videolaryngoscopy.