Rheopheresis for Adjuvant Treatment in Resistant Calciphylaxis

[Uremic calciphylaxis]

Uremic calciphylaxis is a rare disease that affects patients with chronic end-stage renal disease. It is a pathology of the microvessels of the dermis and hypodermis which are calcified and whose thrombosis leads to skin necrosis. Calciphylaxis lesions can be distal and axial. They lead to pain, infection and are associated with denutrition and in high mortality rate (40-80% at 1 year). This general review describes the clinical and para-clinical presentations of calciphylaxis. It summarizes the current knowledge on its pathogenesis and the therapeutical options that can be proposed to improve the management and attempt to reduce the mortality of patients with uremic calciphylaxis.

Rheopheresis: A narrative review

INTRODUCTION

Rheopheresis is an extracorporal selective double-filtration procedure with an initial separation of plasma from the whole blood and a further filtration of the plasma through a second filter in order to eliminate a certain number of high molecular weight proteins such LDL, Lp(a), fibrinogen, α2-macroglobulin, Factor von Willebrand, and IgM Immunoglobulin.

METHODS

In this narrative review we discuss the available data on the effects of Rheopheresis in various clinical conditions.

RESULTS

Rheopheresis is considerd to exert a rapid effect on clinical conditions associated with seriously affected microcirculation and rheologic parameters such as, the dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD), sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSHS), peripheral artery disease (PAD), calciphylaxis, systemic sclerosis and diabetic foot.

CONCLUSIONS

Rheopheresis is a promising technique for conditions associated with affected microcirculatory rheologic parameters.

[Iatrogenic non uremic calciphylaxis: A case report]

Calciphylaxis is a rare and severe condition, characterized by calcification and thrombosis of small vessels, mainly affecting the skin. It is most often described in patients with end-stage renal disease on dialysis. Rarer cases of non-uremic calciphylaxis are reported. The prognosis is grim and the treatment is not well codified. Sodium thiosulfate has been used for more than a decade in the treatment of uremic calciphylaxis and has been shown to be effective. Its use in non-uremic cases has been reported in a few rare observations. Rheopheresis is a technique very recently used as an adjuvant treatment in uremic calciphylaxis. We describe a case of non-uremic calciphylaxis in a patient with normal renal function and with calcium supplementation. Sodium thiosulfate was introduced, then discontinued due to the patient's poor tolerance for this treatment. Rheopheresis was then used and allowed the acceleration of healing process and a significant reduction in pain. These two treatments are promising, larger studies are needed to establish their effectiveness in non-uremic calciphylaxis.

Intradialytic Nutrition and Hemodialysis Prescriptions: A Personalized Stepwise Approach

Dialysis and nutrition are two sides of the same coin—dialysis depurates metabolic waste that is typically produced by food intake. Hence, dietetic restrictions are commonly imposed in order to limit potassium and phosphate and avoid fluid overload. Conversely, malnutrition is a major challenge and, albeit to differing degrees, all nutritional markers are associated with survival. Dialysis-related malnutrition has a multifactorial origin related to uremic syndrome and comorbidities but also to dialysis treatment. Both an insufficient dialysis dose and excessive removal are contributing factors. It is thus not surprising that dialysis alone, without proper nutritional management, often fails to be effective in combatting malnutrition. While composite indexes can be used to identify patients with poor prognosis, none is fully satisfactory, and the definitions of malnutrition and protein energy wasting are still controversial. Furthermore, most nutritional markers and interventions were assessed in hemodialysis patients, while hemodiafiltration and peritoneal dialysis have been less extensively studied. The significant loss of albumin in these two dialysis modalities makes it extremely difficult to interpret common markers and scores. Despite these problems, hemodialysis sessions represent a valuable opportunity to monitor nutritional status and prescribe nutritional interventions, and several approaches have been tried. In this concept paper, we review the current evidence on intradialytic nutrition and propose an algorithm for adapting nutritional interventions to individual patients.

Calciphylaxis: Approach to Diagnosis and Management

Calciphylaxis is a rare disorder of poor prognosis that can lead to intense, painful lesions involving the skin and subcutaneous tissue. Although mostly described in dialysis patients, it can affect patients with normal kidney function. The diagnosis of calciphylaxis is complicated by the absence of a gold standard marker of disease such as a clear histopathological finding. Late diagnosis and advanced lesions can significantly shorten life expectancy. Calciphylaxis wounds can have a major influence on the quality of life of patients, usually due to the immense unbearable pain these patients suffer from. The management of calciphylaxis mainly comprises aggressive wound care and symptomatic management. Therapeutic options are few and far between and are limited to off-label uses. Recent understanding of the pathogenesis of lesions has enabled development of novel therapeutic options, some of which are being studied in clinical trials (sodium thiosulfate, vitamin K). Vascular calcification and thrombosis underlie development of these lesions and research has been aimed at studying drugs that counteract such processes. Future research is required to establish clear causal pathways and improve on the treatment options currently available to patients.

Rheopheresis: A new therapeutic approach in severe calciphylaxis

AIM

Uremic calciphylaxis, also called calcific uraemic arteriolopathy (CUA), is a rare disease with a poor prognosis (mortality between 45% and 80%). Treatment is currently not standardized, and is based mainly on risk factor control, often with administration of sodium thiosulfate. We report the use of rheopheresis, a double filtration apheresis technique, specifically designed to improve blood rheology and tissue perfusion, as adjunctive therapy in eight patients with severe CUA.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed eight cases of severe CUA treated by rheopheresis after failure of conventional measures, including administration of sodium thiosulfate and discontinuation of vitamin K antagonists.

RESULTS

Of the patients, there were 5 (63%) women, the median age was 69 (63.9-73) years. Four (50%) patients had biopsy-proven CUA. At diagnosis, the median dialysis vintage was 35 (3.9-42) months; five (63%) patients were anuric. Weekly median dialysis duration and dose were 12 (12-12.75) hours and 1.19 (1.13-1.48) Kt/V per dialysis session, respectively. Median time from CUA onset to first rheopheresis therapy was 26 (3.2-68) days. Patients started with 2-3 weekly sessions, coupled with haemodialysis. Complete remission was obtained in five patients (66%) after 25 (19-39) sessions over a duration of 119 (114-196) days. Three patients died, two of which resulted from an infectious complication related to CUA.

CONCLUSION

Rheopheresis is a promising approach, with a good safety profile, for the treatment of CUA. A prospective study with a larger population, would clarify its place in the therapeutic armamentarium.

Calcific uremic arteriolopathy (calciphylaxis) calls into question the validity of guidelines of diagnosis and treatment

Background: Calciphylaxis is associated with end-stage renal failure or kidney transplant, although, cases of non-uremic calciphylaxis have been reported. It is a rare disorder, with high mortality, characterized by vascular calcification within cutaneous vessels; vascular calcification can occur in other organs, besides skin, like heart, lung, or pancreas, which is named visceral calciphylaxis.Objective: The purpose was to review current knowledge regarding diagnosis and therapeutic approach to cutaneous calciphylaxis.Methods: A literature review has been conducted associated to word "calciphylaxis".Results: The diagnosis is based mainly on clinical features and histologic findings. Therapeutic options are still controversial.Conclusions: Cutaneous calciphylaxis is a puzzling disease, with a challenging diagnosis, and a complex treatment, which requires a multidisciplinary team and expertise.