The role of liver stiffness measurement in the evaluation of liver function and esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients

Use of biochemical parameters for non-invasive screening of oesophageal varices in comparison to elastography-based approach in patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease

Introduction

Oesophageal varices are routinely diagnosed by esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), and their bleeding has high mortality. We aimed to evaluate diagnostic performance of biochemical tests in comparison to elastography-based approaches, as non-invasive alternatives to EGD, for ruling-out high risk oesophageal varices (HRV).

Material and methods

Retrospective analysis of patients (N = 861) who underwent liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by transient elastography (TE) in a single centre over 5-year period, with available results of EGD (within 3 months from LSM). Only patients with suspicion of compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) defined by LSM ≥ 10 kPa were included comprising the final cohort of 73 subjects. Original and expanded Baveno VI criteria (B6C), controlled attenuation parameter (CAP), platelet count (PLT), aspartate aminotransferase to PLT ratio index (APRI), Fibrosis-4 index (FIB4), model for end stage liver disease (MELD) score were evaluated against the results of EGD that served as the reference method.

Results

Analysed patients had median age 62 years, 59/73 (0.81) were males, 54/73 (0.74) had alcoholic/non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, and 21/73 (0.29) had HRV. In multivariate logistic regression analysis only LSM and PLT were independently associated with HRV. The best performing tests for ruling-out HRV (% of spared EGD; % of missed HRV) were respectively: LSM < 20 kPa (53.4%; 0%), B6C (38%; 0%), Expanded B6C (47.9%; 4.8%); PLT > 214x10⁹/L (21.9%; 0%); FIB4 ≤ 1.8 (21.4%; 0%), APRI ≤ 0.34 (12.3%; 0%). CAP, MELD = 6 alone or combined with PLT > 150(x10⁹/L) did not show acceptable performance.

Conclusion

The best performing biochemical tests for ruling-out HRV in our cohort of patients were PLT and FIB-4, but they were still outperformed by elastography-based approaches.

Liver fibrosis: noninvasive assessment using supersonic shear imaging and FIB4 index in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

PURPOSE

Shear wave elastography (SWE) has been validated in chronic hepatitis C and B; however, limited data are available in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of SWE and FIB4 index for the diagnosis of fibrosis in a cohort of consecutive patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD, and to evaluate the effects of other histologic parameters on SWE measurement.

METHODS

Written informed consent was obtained from all patients, and this study was approved by our internal review board and ethics committee. Seventy-one patients with histologically proven NAFLD (mean age 50.8 years ± 15.7) were examined. All patients underwent SWE (Aixplorer™; SuperSonic Imagine) and FIB4 index (based on age, aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels, and platelet counts) measurements. SWE measurements were compared with the histologic features based on the NAFLD activity score and FIB4 index.

RESULTS

The area under the ROC curve for the diagnosis of hepatic fibrosis stage 3 or higher was 0.821 (optimal cut-off value 13.1 kPa, sensitivity 62.5%, specificity 57.4%) for SWE and 0.822 (optimal cut-off value 1.41, sensitivity 71.9%, specificity 53.9%) for FIB4 index. The median liver stiffness values measured using SWE showed a stepwise increase with increasing hepatic fibrosis stage (P < 0.001), inflammation score (P = 0.018), and ballooning score (P < 0.001), and showed a stepwise decrease with increasing hepatic steatosis stage (P = 0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

SWE and FIB4 index are useful noninvasive tools for estimating the severity of fibrosis in NAFLD patients. However, the presence of severe steatosis may affect the liver stiffness measurement, resulting in underestimations of liver fibrosis.

Computed tomography for the diagnosis of varices in liver cirrhosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) for varices in liver cirrhosis.

METHODS

PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched for the literature identification. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUSROC), sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio (PLR and NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated. We performed the subgroup analyses according to the location of varices, CT technique, and study design. The study quality was assessed according to the QUADAS-2 tool.

RESULTS

Seventeen papers were eligible. The study quality was modest. The AUSROC was 0.8975 and 0.9494 for predicting any size and high-risk varices, respectively. Summary sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, and DOR of CT for predicting any size and high-risk varices were 0.87/0.80/3.67/0.18/22.70 and 0.87/0.88/7.52/0.12/65.55, respectively. According to the location of varices, the AUSROC was 0.9127 for predicting any size gastric varices alone; and the AUSROC was 0.8958 and 0.9461 for predicting any size and high-risk esophageal varices alone, respectively. According to the CT technique, the AUSROC of multi-detector CT (MDCT) was 0.9047 and 0.9490 for predicting any size and high-risk varices, respectively; and the AUSROC of MDCT esophagograms for predicting any size and high-risk varices was 0.8735 and 0.9664, respectively. In the subgroup analysis of prospective studies, the AUSROC was 0.9122 and 0.9507 for predicting any size and high-risk varices, respectively.

CONCLUSION

CT had a high accuracy for the diagnosis of varices in liver cirrhosis.

Normal liver stiffness: A study in living donors with normal liver histology

AIM: To define the normal range of liver stiffness (LS) values using transient elastography in living-related liver transplantation candidate donors with normal liver histology.

METHODS: LS was measured using Fibroscan in 50 (16 women, 34 men) healthy potential donors (mean age 28.4 ± 5.9 years) who were being evaluated for liver donation for their relatives at the National Liver Institute, Menoufeya University, Egypt. All potential donors had normal liver tests and were negative for hepatitis B or C virus infection. Abdominal ultrasounds showed normal findings. None of the subjects had diabetes, hypertension, renal impairment, heart disease, or body mass index > 30 kg/m². All subjects had normal liver histology upon liver biopsy. They all donated the right lobe of their liver with successful outcomes.

RESULTS: The mean LS was 4.3 ± 1.2 kPa (range: 1.8-7.1 kPa). The 5^th and 95^th percentiles of normal LS were 2.6 kPa and 6.8 kPa, respectively, with a median of 4 kPa; the interquartile range was 0.6 ± 0.4. LS measurements were not significantly different between men and women (4.4 ± 1.1 kPa vs 3.9 ± 1.3 kPa) and did not correlate with age. However, stiffness values were significantly lower in subjects with a body mass index < 26 kg/m² compared to those with an index ≥ 26 kg/m² (4.0 ± 1.1 kPa vs 4.6 ± 1.2 kPa; P <0.05). There were no differences in hospital stay or postoperative bilirubin, albumin,alanine and aspartate transaminases, or creatinine levels (at discharge) between donors with livers stiffness ≤ 4 kPa and those with stiffness > 4 kPa.

CONCLUSION: Healthy donors with normal liver histology have a median LS of 4 kPa. Stiffness values are elevated relative to increase in body mass index.